More Mistakes In The Megaupload Prosecution: Videotape Of The Mansion Raid Has Gone Missing
from the destroying-evidence dept
It's really rather astounding just how many things law enforcement has done wrong when it comes to the prosecution against Megaupload/Kim Dotcom. We've seen procedural errors, evidence presented totally out of context, and the desire to destroy relevant evidence. And, now, it turns out that some evidence has apparently been lost or destroyed already. Apparently the security cameras at the complex recorded the details of the raid. Furthermore, the cameras and their recordings were then seized (despite not being included in the warrant). There have been some questions about who was involved in the raid and if they used excessive force -- and there's been something of an outcry in New Zealand about how the raid went down.So, how about releasing the footage. No can do. According to Ars Technica, that seems unlikely to happen:
Since January, the Dotcom legal team has asked for the footage, but police refused, until finally the agency agreed that an IT expert for DotCom could come and collect a copy of the footage. When the IT expert arrived at the police station, he found the server completely disassembled, and authorities said they could not reassemble it or give him any footage. Now, no one outside the police agency is sure the footage still exists.Even if the case against Megaupload is really solid, it's amazing at how law enforcement involved so far appears to keep making pretty serious mistakes that make them look fairly clueless. It does not inspire confidence in the more important details of the case itself.
The New Zealand police declined to give an interview to Campbell, but sent an e-mail stating, "Police would happily release the footage in question but currently have no authority to do so. The footage is contained on a hard drive lawfully seized on a warrant obtained by police at the direction of Crown Law following a properly formulated mutual legal assistance request from the United States."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: evidence, kim dotcom, law enforcement
Companies: megaupload
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VJ3son-ha8
Also see
http://www.localnews8.com/news/30853261/detail.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ideally, they should get the low court treatment and be treated as if they did the most damage possible, like anyone else would, but that's not likely to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So what we really need to do is be more outraged that the footage is missing, assume the worst, and give enough backlash at this outrageous destruction of evidence to ensure that the courts will deliver better sanctions and will rule less favorably to them.
but, of course, a video of swat teams wrongfully destroying property is far more publicly influential than a news article of evidence being destroyed. That needs to change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I cant get this out of my head when reading this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
comment held for moderation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: comment held for moderation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: comment held for moderation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: comment held for moderation?
Trying to link infringing content on techdirt...PIRATE!!!
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rush Job
We may never know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And this is why...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
.... unfortunately the current government Wants it to be like the USA, and keeps making changes to that effect. *le sigh*
and the last election was .... dubious. i mean, when you have That many contested electorates and an actual Tie (well, until the special votes came in from people who were out of the country at the time and such) in at least one, with 1/4th of eligible voters Not Voting... and media Constantly pushing that the party who (surprise surprise) won was going to get a majority all by itself through out the entire election campaign... then there's how the electorate boundaries were redrawn...
it's all a bit suspect, really. not in a 'we're doing illegal things' sort of way so much as a 'we're gaming the system horribly' sort of way... but still.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Conspiring
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The purposes of this raid were to shut down a major cloud based storage business and to put the fear of god into those that remain.
The raid succeeded on both. Any trial, and I doubt it'll ever go to trial, is just gravy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A fair adversarial trail could risk major setbacks for those opposed to megaupload's business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
At this point, if I had to guess their strategy, I'd say they plan to cause as much 'accidental' damage to everything they can, all the while dragging things out to increase the strain, and then do their best to get Kim to settle, applying pressure in any way they think they can get away with.
Do enough damage, and court case or no MU will be finished, and at that point the message will be loud and clear to anyone who provides competition to the people funding/running this farce: 'We don't need the courts to completely ruin you.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Only this time they might be smart about it and avoid taking it to court so that they can avoid the risk of setting a precedent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Huh... well I was going to bring up the fact that Kim does have enough money to resurrect MU or a similar service, but then it occurred to me... if they're willing to destroy evidence to make sure he stays as an object lesson to what happens to competitors, I really don't see them somehow permanently seizing all his monetary assets too as being that much of a stretch. Hell, all they'd have to do is pull a UMG and just keep suing to drain all of his money dry, they've certainly proved they're willing to do that in the past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Clearly file lockers have a flaw when put up against tryanny. Their death will surely spawn something harder to kill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A fair adversarial trial risks setting salty, unpallatable precedents for those opposed to megaupload.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
-Procedure was screwed up every step of the way
-Weird, impossible-to-prove charges were brought on
-Evidence was screwed up left and right, and now apparently, destroyed
They're going to screw this case up badly enough that he's going to get off with, at most, a slap on the wrist. And if they can't even put a real case around this guy, there's no way in hell they're ever taking down anyone who's actually big.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
Once again the inept corrupt government we have has shown its true face.
The Face of not only Stupidity but pure Corruption as everyone here with a brain knows.
They should just release this man at this point as a Public Defender could get a man off.
What case can they have now that they have screwed so much stuff up is beyond me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
Can you imagine if this was a big time murder case? "Oh it is ok to clean up those blood stains and rent out the apartment again." "Opps, we seem to have lost that bit of evidence."
WTF are these guys doing? You are going after a guy that it should not be all that hard to find criminal wrongdoing and yet every step of the way you have the authorities stumbling around like idiots and shooting their own foot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
In total, we've had 758 seizures in America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
That article makes it sound like this was the one variation of megaupload.____ that the company didn't own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Man, this is gonna be a whole carton of eggs on their collective face
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given the treatment of Dotcom during the raid is of importance, maybe a nice mutual request for the FBI copy of the raid would be in order.
I mean everyone wants to see a guy decked out in raid gear shoving a maid to the ground screaming at her to find out where the bombs are.
Anything contained in the recordings on the system pales in comparison to the completely inept attempt at a coverup of the details of the raid. I mean they spent so much time breaching the dumbwaiter they thought was his secret villain club house.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ArsTechnica
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ArsTechnica
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://arstechnica.com/&hl=en
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
we saw a mouse run in there
What possible excuse could they have for disassembling the server? Were they afraid it might have a concealed weapon?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: we saw a mouse run in there
If the HD is in US hands, it will never see the light of day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: we saw a mouse run in there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Taiwanese animation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://arstechnica.com/&hl=en
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.google.com/interstitial?url=http://arstechnica.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The state had its one permitted bite at the apple and bollixed it up. Tough patootsies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Article : http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/6720276/Dotcom-mansion-raid-footage-safe
"
However police on Tuesday rubbished the claims, saying the footage had not been destroyed or damaged and it will still be able to be viewed.
''Police would happily release the footage in question but currently has no authority to do so,'' a spokesman said.
''The footage is contained on a hard drive lawfully seized on a warrant obtained by police at the direction of Crown Law following a properly formulated mutual legal assistance request from the United States.''
The spokesman said the equipment was part of the wider evidence gathered and police would hand it over once the court gave direction on how the exhibits, in their entirety or individually, were to be managed.
Dotcom's lawyers were asking for full disclosure from the FBI. Documents are yet to be provided, and it is likely a court hearing will be held to argue what will be released.
A date for that hearing is yet to be set.
"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Officer 2 "Did you check under the couch?"
Officer 1 "Yes, I checked under the couch"
Officer 2 "Did you check in the closet?"
Officer 1 "Yes, I checked in the closet"
1 hour later
Officer 1 "Well, I give up, I looked everywhere"
Officer 2 "Don't worry, It'll show up eventually"
3 days later, Officer 2 is looking behind the couch for his television remote control "Ahh, here is the evidence!!! Musta misplaced it while watching television".
I don't understand it, how can they lose the evidence and later find it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Always, always have an offsite backup for security footage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Always, always have an offsite backup for security footage in a country hostile to the US, and keep your hosting bill paid 6 months in advance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Regarding the article in question: Seriously though, at this point can we not try and find a neutral third party to handle the evidence, or at least a copy of all evidence? By this point it's abundantly clear that both the US and NZ people involved here aren't qualified to be in charge of a lemonade stand, so they certainly aren't qualified to handle evidence this important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the only way it could be more obvious is if the badge wearing #####s clubbed the tech and dumped his body.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
- One of the largest cyberlockers, something their tracking tech and 6 strikes agreements can't touch.
- They have gone above and beyond the legal requirements to try and appease the **AA's, but like in all things it is never enough.
- He filed a lawsuit over the MegaSong and the bogus takedown/private agreement with YouTube that UMG claims it has. This would very seriously undermine their efforts to get more control.
- The new music platform the MegaSong was promoting would have crushed any offering by the RIAA membership, and taking only 10% would have put him at the top of the list for the place new artists get found.
- He has a checkered past, and isn't contrite about it. He's done his time, but they can count on people to assume that he HAD to be a criminal in this case.
- Despite the overuse of orange and his past he was running a hugely successful website, so successful their own people were trying to get more of their content onto it for exposure.
- The dual (triple/quad whatever) citizenship he holds, and Mega being based in Hong Kong just adds to mystique of him being some sort of Bond-esque villain out to destroy the world.
- He complied completely within the boundaries of the law, but refused to cave and go extra far to appease them.
He represents a business model that works in the internet age, and they are still stuck believing all money made on the internet is just stolen from them. They still think Youtube is a fad and will go away. Its cute watching their death-throws. All they had left is money, so they paid the right people the right "contributions" and they are sure this is going to go down with Dotcom losing... and that really should show everyone how delusional they truly are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This smells
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It doesn't matter that they have no case.
It doesn't matter that they destroyed/lost evidence.
It doesn't matter that they (insert all other failures here)
They shut down the Mega Constipancy. They killed the company without a chance of coming back in a timely fashion. Now they can gloat to their friends about it, and tell the public how evil file sharing is and how successful their efforts were.
We all know mainstream media hates a followup on a story months/years later, especially when it involves how bad the government failed at its most basic duties: protecting the people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1) There is no video tape,
2) the system recorded to hard drive,
3) the data is probably still on the hard drive
WTG Mike! Another non-story from the world of Mega. Does Kim forward you these directly, or does he have people?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
1. Can you point out where in the article it mentioned a video tape? It doesn't, for the simple fact that it was recorded digitally.
2. Given (1), then of course it is on a hard drive.
3. And with regards to (3), you seem to have missed a rather important quote from the original article, lemme post it to save you the two seconds it would take to scroll back up:
until finally the agency agreed that an IT expert for DotCom could come and collect a copy of the footage.
Emphasis mine. In case you missed it, the IT guy from Kim wasn't going over to take the HD the footage was stored on, he was going over to get a copy of the footage.
This was of course made just a tad difficult due to the police apparently having decided they wanted to disassemble the server the HD was stored in, refusing to reassemble the server so the IT guy could get the copy himself, and also refusing to get the footage themselves and give it to him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They haven't screwed up
If they lose the case then they win by still showing that the common man has no chance of defending himself and only the super rich are above the law.
If they win then they prove to the next group of super rich that they are capable of taking down any target, for any reason and regardless of ethical, moral or legal considerations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They seriously need to fire the every single one of the retards that were involved. I know a good deal about computers but let's just say Google hired me to setup a whole server database for them. It would be the equivalent to me knowing absolutely nothing and doing what the moronic police did.
I know my limitations and sure my man ego of pfft that looks easy kicks in time to time but I know better. If you don't know what the hell you're doing DON'T FUCKING DO IT!
Using their logic I guess it would be alright to send a preschooler to do brain surgery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
did you ever think?
They want the evidence destroyed so badly so that no-one can say "HEY!!! I created that video clip / song"....
Side effect BTW of "losing" the video evidence, is that Dotcom can now pretty much claim anything he wants happened during the raid...people getting beaten with rifle butts, sexual abuse of others in the property, hell he could even claim they shot his dog because it wouldn't stop yapping.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]