Paulo Coelho Ebook Sales Jump Way Up Thanks To $0.99 Sale
from the boom dept
We recently wrote about Paulo Coelho convincing his publisher, Harper Collins, to run an experiment, in which they offered up nearly all of his ebooks for just $0.99 (the one exception being his most famous book, The Alchemist). In the comments, we had an interesting discussion, in which someone suggested that even dropping the price by 90% would mean it was unlikely that he got 10x more sales to make up the difference. Others pointed to similar experiments -- such as those by Valve, in which dropping prices by large amounts increased sales by much, much larger percentages.Paulo himself contacted us to share some of the initial results -- pointing out that, according to Amazon, the sales of a bunch of his books increased between about 4,000% and 6,500%. Yes, that's multi-thousands of percent increases. I would think that more than made up for the difference in price...
One hopes that this will send book publishers running to their nearest economics text or professor, so that they can be taught about price elasticity, and why lowering prices can often make you more money.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 99 cents, ebooks, paulo coelho, the alchemist
Companies: harper collins, valve
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
.....and that chick
.....and all those other guys
.....and all those other chicks
.....and the intersexed individuals
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
/sarc off
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But does he eat cannibals?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But does he eat cannibals?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks to? How do you know that for sure? Correlation vs. causation and such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
-Did the retailers put big banners up on their home pages and such advertising the price drop? Related, could most authors do the same thing (no....)?
-Would the sales blitz have been the same in terms of total sales across the total time period if the price had always been $.99 and never the higher cost that was then lowered for the sale?
I tend to agree with low prices on eBooks, as regulars here probably know, but let's not immediately pretend that there CANNOT be other factors at work here than just the $.99 price....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
My first thought also. Followed by the thought that having a Techdirt article or two about the price drop certainly didn't hurt things either. If this price range becomes commonplace then that kind of hype won't be sustainable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh I agree. I was just thinking that these numbers should be taken with a tiny grain of salt and may not reflect what will happen over a longer time span and a wider scope.
Personally, I think the $0.99 range for a electronic copy of a book is right on target. I can't explain why, but that is how much I value it. Any higher and I would rather spend my money on a dead tree version or not at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you want to write, you write, if you make it you can quit your day job. if not, you can still write.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gwiz
With ebooks, you save money on gas ($4 per gallon today) because you get to download from home. Ebooks also have adjustable font, and can carry thousands of books on them wating to be read. No more awful traveling fees to carry those books on board an airplane? The ebook features also include a text-to-speech, allowing people to listen to the book instead of reading it. But for you, something is not right. You don't feel right paying more than a cup of coffee for "these" features (These features can only be used on ebooks).
Personally, as an author, I will be moving my books back to print, and leave ebooks alone. Too much drama. Not enough money to be made. Honestly, I don't see ebooks lasting very long. I really don't. Not without authors anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm just waiting for people to claim that one of the largest selling authors on the planet is somehow an exception.. Exception to what? Your idea of how things work?
Though with people starting on the cause/correlation line I think I can see the reality denying crowd having many months of whining about how sales may have gone up, whatever, but none of that matters, because you cant prove that it's because of X or Y or Z..
Their choice to deny reality of course, just as it is reality's choice to bite them on the ass when it feels like it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ~_~
(I also have this on my nameplate by my office door. Nobody has yet asked what it means, nor has anybody smirked/laughed when reading it...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ~_~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ~_~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ~_~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ~_~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ~_~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm not saying I represent that 15000% (especially since I bought from B&N, not Amazon), but still.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I thought I had a handle on this percent business.
There was the 1% boo
and the 99% that was everyone else - yah
but now your the 15000%
so are you the booyahyah?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Heck, personally I don't think sales went up at all, seems more plausible to me that I'm a brain in a vat who's being made think sales went up.
(Philosophical scepticism: When reality proves you wrong, just deny reality exists. Boom. Who's wrong now?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
/sarc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just a reminder...
That's damn impressive. Given that the marginal cost is 30%, this translates to a 41x sales increase at 1/10 the price. That's a 4x increase in revenue. Not a bad experiment... real test is to see if it holds form for a few weeks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just a reminder...
http://www.geekwire.com/2011/experiments-video-game-economics-valves-gabe-newell/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Just a reminder...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just a reminder...
100% is a 1x gain over the existing value.
100% of 2 is 4 so you gained 2(1x) not 4(2x).
A 1000% increase means a 9x gain (10-1).
So the formula for gain could be put like this.
(percentage/100)-1
Or did I miss something?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Just a reminder...
100% gain is 2x the sales, 1000% gain is 11x the sales, and so on.
so... if those are 'increased by x%' you're using, you don't need the -1, just leave off the plus... but if they're 'percentage of original figure' and you're trying to find the gain as a multiple from it, then you'd be right.
i think?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two Books Weren't Offered at $0.99
I wonder how sales of THOSE books (consider them experimental controls) have fared during this time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two Books Weren't Offered at $0.99
Aleph is his most recent book (came out last year) and is from a different publisher, so unrelated to Harper Collins...
I wonder how sales of THOSE books (consider them experimental controls) have fared during this time.
That's a good question...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
5 * $4.99 < 50 * $0.99
For those too lazy to figure this out:
$24.95 < $49.50
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The math speaks for itself, if you bother to use the right numbers.
(The math equation in this post is in base 3.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There are 2 types of people in the world
those who understand binary
and those who don't
No wait, I did that wrong
Let's see there are 10 types of people in the world
those who....
Just hold on, I know this one. Just a sec, kay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
LoL
You see at $4 I don't think that many people will come back again to rebuy that product, now if the price is ultra low how much that encourages people to rebuy that thing over and over again? Reasons could be to give it as a gift, to replace and existing problematic copy, to buy for another platform, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That would be good to plug into the formula too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
point is that the per item cost of digital goods (as opposed to the 'i made a thing at all' cost*) is near, if not actually, nil.
* which is a different thing and is covered by your initial per-item profits and, once payed off, no longer matters at ALL. if you sell enough items that your per-item profit covers this expenditure, your product is a success. if not, it's a failure. that means increasing Items Moved is more important than increasing sale price per item for overcoming this Provided the market for the item in question is large enough. (you put the per item price higher if there are insufficient customers to buy enough of the item at the lower cost to cover this, And said customers would still pay the higher cost. if they Wouldn't, then the product would seem non-viable and you just lost out. oh well, such is life, move on.)
that's my understanding of it anyway. I'll admit to not having any relevant qualifications beyond actually reading, paying attention, and using my brain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its possible that lower prices would in general increase sales, but it seems unlikely that the increase would be as dramatic as in this case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
if anything that statement means you should make the price change as soon as possible to make sure your one of the lucky few who will cash in.
BTW it totally false, people are simple going to buy more books, rather then buying 1 book, and pirating 12 they will buy 13.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The general principles are the same so why can't book publishers do this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I know you want to bring up Twilight & probably Harry Potter as examples of huge successes, but please don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Granted, in my case that situation will be changing soon, but still, the lower the general price point the larger the market becomes. In most cases, this is an exponential relationship. This means you need to come fairly close to the extreme before the multiplicative decrease catches up.
The marginal cost of ebooks is tied to running the download servers. Until the price reflects that cost, the publishers can easily keep pushing the cost lower to capture a much larger market and more revenue. Win-win.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
i do agree about drm sucking, but at least stripping nook book drm is fast and simple :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
All he said was stop drinking so much beer. You are so dramatic about everything. And you're on here...giving your opinion. People aren't interested.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People buy a lot of media, the accrued value of all that expending is why they will not buy something at higher prices more than once and that is why you don't get to set new restrictive rules that aren't possible on physical media.
Paulo Coelho is going to get less costs dealing with complaints and more repeat sales over the lifespan of the work.
Even if he had a DRM on the books, which it has in some distribution channels, by being low priced people don't care anymore they just buy a new copy to a friend or family.
39x to 64x increase in sales just show what that means.
In fact $0.99 is a premium, it should be in the range of $0.05~$0.25. That is the price range charged for services that see a lot of monthly spending, that is what people will pay every moth and don't complain about it, just look at your gas bill, your water, your cable, they all are priced under that scheme and there is a reason for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anon Coward May 4th
WRONG. At sub-dollar pricing ALL we get are complaints. We get nothing but complaints because one rule of business holds true and that is, the lower your price point, the worst the customers are. 99 cent customers are the hardest to please. They whine and complain about everything imaginable. they blame everything on authors and publishers. I've seen them give one stars to authors on Amazon and proceed to say that they ordered the book and it came late in the mail. The author takes the blow for poor mail circulation. It's just tiring, and like I said, despite amazon's efforts, I doubt ebooks will last. If all authors can hope to earn is under a buck then forget it. That coupled with the ongoing whinning and complaining is just not worth it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If so, many of the purchases might be by people who planned to buy (and in many cases would have bought) the books eventually anyway (at a much higher price) and are just taking advantage of the sale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
At lower prices your market share expands, also it increases the casual expending and decreases maintenance costs.
How much people wait to reach the resources necessary to acquire something at price X and how long people reach the necessary resources to acquire a lower Y?
To visualize the situation think about coffee, if in one place it costs $4 and in the other place it costs $0.40, how many people will walk in on the $4 over a period of time and what the interval will be compared to the other place?
At $4 a pop you go there in special occasions at $0.40 you probably go there every day, that is $2.8 every week against once a month in the other, at the end of the year who got more?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
and from what i have read, I really think the author would keep the price at .99 perpetually if he could. but his publishers likely will want it back up at "full price"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cause and effect... who knows?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well I'm glad you think we have that much power here..
However you really need to think about updating your medication..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Paulo+Coelho+99+cents
Try that on and wake up to the smell of fresh brewed spamvertising.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not likely to be the latter. Shills like you always insist that sites like Techdirt are insignificant in the long run.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the old business model is dead and buried
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
missing the point
http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2012/05/01/a-book-for-the-price-of-a-song/
An e-book is not a book. A Kindle is not a book (try loaning or lending a Kindle). Only a book is a book.
http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/nothing-is-as-good-at-being-a-book-as-a-book-is/
The e-books could have been given away.
Has it led to an increase in the sales of books?
This will not happen immediately, give people time to read a downloaded e-book. Do they like it? Do they go out and buy a book? Do they recommend the author to a friend?
A book only gets read if it is leant or given.
We are seeing the same with music. You cannot like a piece of music until someone has shared it with you.
That is why bandcamp is so good, it lets you listen to an album on-line, it enables sharing, and it makes buying easy. But even if you do not buy, or download for free, if you like, you are likely to share with your friends.
http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/sharing/
http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2012/02 /08/bandcamp/
http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/why-give-music-away-free/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: missing the point
not really true, many of my friends have read books based purely on my suggestion and word of mouth, sames true for me, many of the books I have where grabbed due to somebody telling me "hey you gotta read this"
I dont really think your implication that ebooks/ereaders arent good is true, I will say, I wouldnt lend out a high end ereader, tho, some of the cheaper ones wouldnt be bad as lender units...cheaper then some hard cover books I have bought inthe past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: missing the point
I guess that also means an FLAC album is not a cd, only a cd is a cd..(true but misses the point)
I tried to point out that you can lend and share DRM free ebooks, and infact you can do this much easier then with dead tree books but he just responded with the same "an ebook is not a book" and "why would anybody want an ereader even if its cheap" (paraphrasing actually)
to me, ebooks at 99cents or less are a great deal if you have a decent ebook reader, and you can get a decent reader for 20-30bucks, you can get a great one for 45-60...sure thats more then buying a paperback, but most hardcovers I have run across in recent years are 20bucks or more....so an ereader and reasonably priced ebook would be a better option for me, specially seeing as its much easier to carry a small ereader then a big heavy hardcover book(or even a paperback.)
meh, just wanted to save any new readers some time.
all you can take from his blog is "ebooks suck and have no value, buy real books"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bummer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
false premise
Maybe, but this is to argue from a false premise. I do not choose one author over another on the basis of price. Books are not a commodity, though publishers do their best to treat as a commodity.
In Aldershot charity shops on one side of the street books are priced at 99p, the other side of the street British Heart Foundation sells at an overpriced £2-50.
If I am looking for a book, I look in the 99p shops first, only with reluctance do I go in the BHF shop. But what I do not do is go into the BHF charity shop see what I want, but then buy something I do not want at 99p because that author was cheaper.
The volunteers in the British Heart Foundation charity shop know their books are overpriced (books they get for free), but if they try to sell at a realistic price, an overpaid manager descends on them from head office. The old discredited business model once again rearing its ugly head.
http://keithpp.wordpress.com/2012/05/06/to-know-the-price-of-everything-and-the-value-of-no thing/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
About right
Think any of these useful idiots ever took economics and actually KNOW about supply and demand??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
? I'm a reader, not a mathematician!
I bought ONE of his books as I'm not familiar with him and even at $.99, I want to make sure I'll like him before I buy more than that.
0 sales at 9.99 compared to 1 at $.99. A dollar more in sales than would have been if I hadn't purchased on sale, because I would NOT have purchased at the regular price.
That might not mean a lot by itself, but a few thousand sales add up, even at $.99. The % math aside, I'm assuming there would have to be at least one sale for each gain in sales rank points which would put the number in the thousands.
I will share my opinion with others, who might read it and share with more people, possibly more of his books sold through all that word of mouth and THAT is where the real results of this "experiment" will show up.
Special Sales are not usually about how much you make or lose now..it's about finding new buyers and generating interest that will increase future sales. Will all these people who haven't read him before this decide he's worth the extra money? Or will they decide they've read a few authors just as good who sell regularly under $5? Will they decide to enjoy what they got on sale, but stick with the lower priced authors who they enjoyed as much? My own experience has led me to believe that the higher price does not necessarily guarantee a BETTER read than what I've been getting cheaper. Or even less typos. :)
My WISH list has about 100 $9.99 ebooks on it. My actual PURCHASED ebook list contains over 500 .99 to 2.99 ebooks, plus 1000 or so snagged during temporarily "free" promotions, which often resulted in actual purchases of more books from those authors that I liked. (I read a LOT) Several hundred dollars spent, less than $50 spent on "published" authors.
I am not the only person out there finding lots of new favorite authors amongst the indie authors and relegating my old favorites to the rear of the line. I happen to be one of the masses that made paperbacks profitable and libraries popular. I'm assuming that publishers aren't stupid. (well maybe they are, I'm not going to assume anything at this point) HOPEFULLY, they will figure out that the agency model has opened up the market share to the indie authors and smaller publishing houses and those authors are finding an audience. That buy ebooks and are willing to give them a chance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Distribution fees are 65%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]