Showtime Spoils Dexter Finale During Unskippable Pre-Menu Promo
from the ***SPOILER-AL---never-mind dept
The best way to get people hooked on a TV series is to add a bit of suspense and a well-done storyline leading up to either a cliffhanger or a shocking resolution. Like movies and games, it's not much fun to plunge yourself into something whose ending has already been detailed by careless forum members, siblings or those jackasses/heroes (P.O.V.-dependent) doing a spoiler-heavy driveby.Of all the entities you'd expect might possibly prematurely inform you of Goose's death/The Crying Game's penis/Snape kicking the oxygen habit, the last one on that list has got to be the unskippable ad playing on your newly purchased DVD:
I bought Dexter season 6 on Blu-ray because I'm the sort of dork who feels bad about piracy and still buys all my media.***SPOILER ALERT***
Every time I put in a disk (not first watch, mind you, every... time... ) there is a 3 minute ad for Showtime that I can't skip and can't fast forward.
THEY SPOIL THE LAST 30 SECONDS OF THE FINAL EPISODE OF THE FREAKING SHOW IN THAT AD.
Guess that's what I get for giving them my stupid money instead of stealing... 0_o
Keep this up, Showtime (and assorted movie/game trailers), and you're going to find a whole lot more people shopping with these little things. Why?
BECAUSE PIRATES FIX* THAT BROKEN SHIT THAT YOU LITTER EVERY DVD WITH.
*Other services provided: removal of DRM, removal of region-specific coding, removal of price tag(s).
Do I really need to be reminded multiple times that every frickin' g-man in the US of A will be hounding my piratey footsteps the moment I burn off a copy of this disc? Do I really need to be reminded that, yes, this studio/channel produces a great number of other entertainments and would I mind terribly just taking a look at the extended, unskippable ad?
Nobody wants "unskippable" anything on media they've purchased. Gamers don't want unskippable cut scenes. Movie/TV fans don't want unskippable FBI/ICE/MPAA warnings and studio promos. Music fans don't have to deal with this. You don't fire up a CD and have to listen to Small Print Guy telling you that reproducing this track without the express consent, etc. etc. etc. Why does everyone else have to put up with it?
Try looking at it from your customers' point of view. They just want to watch the thing they actually paid for. In a day when infringement is blamed for shutting down the entire global economy, do you really think it's a good idea to a.) make paying customers sit through enough scary legal logos to fill an entire T-shirt, and b.) make paying customers regret their purchase even before the MANDATORY pre-menu promo is over?
If you answered "yes" to either of these questions, expect to find fewer and fewer people willing to give you their "stupid money" in exchange for your even stupider product.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dexter, showtime, spoilers, unskippable dvd ads
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Also, ** Motherfucking Eagle **
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But if I am going to spend my time and equipment viewing there advertisements I want the dvd for free, I am not going to pay to watch advertisements and make the studios even more money than they are already making on me buying the dvd.
So yes let there be advertisements but don't charge me for the content I was going to purchase, then I will accept it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I do *NOT* want advertisment in my DVDs I already paid for.
Last time I watched a DVD I didn't see any ads though maybe that's because I'm not from the USA...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You might've had the execs paying attention up until this line. Now you've gone and confused them with meaningless gibberish by referring to their customers' point of view.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We wanted to let you know that we take your opinions seriously. We've recently received your feedback concerning [POINT OF VIEW] and wanted to let you know that we've researched this issue.
I'm happy to report that there's no issue. We've found that the [POINT OF VIEW] of the customer is generally [FACING THE TV] and it thus in a perfect position to view our un-skippable content.
Thank you for not realizing you could've just pirated this for free, I'm happy to have resolved your issue.
Sincerely,
Highly Paid Executive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I used to rage like that with the unskippable trailers that remain unskippable even if you are watching the damned DVD for the 300th time. But then I found the light (piracy) and Jesus (TPB) introduced me to great content with no annoyances.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For example, one season of Survivor I was watching, season 12, had a promo asking if Terry, who had won the last 5 immunity challenges in a row and would have gone home without doing so, would win yet another immunity challenge next episode. The problem? They SHOWED someone else wearing the immunity necklace at tribal council in the promo!
Also, Deal or No Deal would frequently show clips from the next episode of a really good looking board, which almost always met the person would start knocking out all their high value #'s at that point. That's one reason I stopped watching the show.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well played, sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
we arent pirates and were not badgers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.theaveragegamer.com/wp-content/Misc%20Images/Anti-piracy.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And it's amusing how out of touch they are. I mean, if a damn third of the people are consuming illegal content then there's something wrong with a law that criminalizes that many ppl, with your damn business model or as it seems to be the case, BOTH.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pink Floyd...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pink Floyd...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pink Floyd...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pink Floyd...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*Other services provided: removal of DRM, removal of region-specfic coding, removal of price tag(s)."
Most importantly is the price. Honestly if the pirates removed all that sh*t you refer to and still charged the same price, nobody would bother.
It's all about the price Tim, wake up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's all about the price Tim, wake up!"
No, because if the price is the same but people can avoid dealing with all that nonsense (DRM, unskippable ads, etc.) then people would have no problem with paying it. It's a superior product. Superior products can often, and better said often do, have higher price tags. However, you said if they charged the same, meaning the price would be the same for a superior product. I believe in that case most people would prefer the pirate version.
Same end product, without all the crap, at the same price = WIN!
People DO NOT just want free stuff. Contrary to misinformed and not popular opinion. Yes, people will take free stuff if presented with the opportunity to do so. But they don't just want that, they want better stuff (even if it has a price attached to it).
And a great example of that is the smartphone market. Yeah, you can get that smartphone that has this OS on it for free when you sign up for a contract. Or you can PAY anywhere between $100-300 for a MUCH BETTER smartphone on the same 2 year contract. Guess what the majority of people do? Pony up for the better phone. Why is that? Oh, because they realize that the "free" offering more often is not the better offering, as such they pay for the superior product.
But I'm sure that entire bit is lost on you. PEOPLE PAYING FOR STUFF WILLINGLY?! NONSENSE NOT WHEN THERE'S FREE AVAILABLE! RAWR! Am I right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:Netflix Auto-Queue Roll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:Netflix Auto-Queue Roll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Citation needed.
Meanwhile, people like me who buy content avoid buying content with such restrictions. Luckily I'm not a whore to the corporations you worship, so I manage to get a lot of stuff without that crap forced on me. It might mean that this new season of Dexter loses my purchase or the new crappy blockbuster you blew a small country's GDP on making suck ass, but that's not my problem.
"It's all about the price Tim, wake up!"
/Yoda
And that is why you fail
/end Yoda
Sadly, you probably believe this lie, despite the huge levels of evidence to the contrary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Honestly, if I was in the store and had 2 options:
1: Pay $5 and get movie on dvd, but DVD is region coded, locked with DRM, covered in threats of jail time, and has ads for things that I will be forced to watch with no option to skip.
OR
2: Pay $20 and get DVD is a nice looking dvd case. It is DRM free and I can just hit play and enjoy my movie.
Guess what? I would pick up the $20 DVD and happily to check out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: not about the price
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
-Gabe Newel of Valve Software
So aside from my quote I have a question.
Would you rather pay $5 to $40 US to have a bunch of in skiable advertisements that you cannot even fast forward through, and a 15 minute anti piracy ad where the spineless star of the movie is explains to you piracy is bad in the same scenario of skipping through ads?
Or would you rather just watch the movie you paid for to watch?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110729/03513915312/why-people-pay-more-access-to-inf ringing-content.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Then we have the annoying trend toward giving away *everything* in trailers. I can honestly say that I've gone from seeking out and anticipating trailers a decade ago to actively avoiding them. Far too many of them give away major plot twists or reveal things that you'd be better off not knowing before the movie starts, so I'd rather not see them even for anticipated movies. That's right, the studios have driven me to *actively avoid their marketing*.
So, here we have the perfect storm of idiocy. The last 30 seconds of any TV program has no business being in any trailer. That this is a series that depends on surprise moments for much of its impact should make it a no brainer not to be included. But, to have the footage not only there, but in a way that forces people to look at it before the series starts? Pure stupidity.
We don't have to go into the usual half-assed piracy argument that the trolls will probably start soon, you just have to ask a simple logic question - given that spoilers and unskippable content both devalue the product to the consumer, why on Earth would it make sense to combine the two? Even if buying the set was the only way people could possibly watch the season and piracy didn't exist, why would this ever be a good idea?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But wait, there's more! Add DRM (region locks and others), huge release windows, prohibitive pricing and lack of portability (ie: you have to brak both the law and the DRM to have it on your computer) and you have the perfect anti-consumer product!
I am truly astonished the MAFIAA can stay afloat with that business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It was these that got me to start ripping DVDs I purchased specifically so that I could skip (and later, after I learned how, omit) all that crap.
Trailers must be a really tricky thing. Those sorts of trailer are annoying, but I'm not sure they're worse than the equally prevalent trailers that give you no real idea of what the movie is actually about. Both types make it less likely I'll go see the movie.
Really, what I want in a trailer is the "elevator pitch" for the movie, and that's something most trailers don't give.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Their customers are themselves, so it's a pretty short list.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's true, piracy isn't victimless. Neither, apparently, is paying for the damn thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.lauexplorer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/legal-dvd-vs-pirate-dvd.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pop up Ads
I've set my remote so channels that do that don't show up anymore.
I keep thinking I wouldn't get this if I pirated content instead of paying for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pop up Ads
Why put up with it? Just hook a laptop up to your TV and you can watch whatever you want, whenever you want, uncut and commercial-free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And at this point there is practically nothing they do that I really need to watch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Except that it doesn't matter because there's a very good chance that they've slipped in things that they didn't tell you about. Unskippable ads, FBI warnings, auto-install programs, etc.
Why is it that, when I have JUST GIVEN YOU MONEY, do you see it as a great marketing opportunity?
I can tolerate ads, but unskippable ones? That's just lazy programming. If seeing it once didn't do the trick, the 50th time won't do it either.
The FBI warnings always crack me up. If I bought it, I'M THE WRONG PERSON TO BE WARNING.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Then again, an unskippable cut scene in a game is worse than any FBI warning. How many games did I quit playing because it kept making me watch a movie? A really bad movie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Or how about cutscenes in the middle of a boss battle? Star Trek Elite Force II stops THREE times during the borg boss battle to show you a useless cutscene, disorienting you and ensuring that you'll get hit when it ends and the game resumes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They don't care -- they've already got your money.
Now if it were a broadcast show, they would care. Having been spoiled, you might not watch the episode.
I can imagine them laughing uncontrollably and saying . . . .
Suckers.
This spoiler is part of their continuing efforts towards consumer dissatisfaction and revolt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They don't care -- they've already got your money.
Honestly a grade-schooler would probably get it faster than them. 1 customer that feels like he got scammed = a whole lot of other people who might have been customers going elsewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They don't care -- they've already got your money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reason to NOT Buy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I know. Stupid of me.
Sometimes I'm interested enough to watch the ads, but the 35th time I insert the DVD, I just want to watch the fricken movie.
I don't care if the ads are skippable. I don't want to spend 20 minutes playing with the remote control before getting to the movie.
Something I find equally annoying is being forced to sit through 30 seconds of menu animation before I can hit Play. Yeah, your animated menu is so damned clever that I need it shoved in my face EVERY. FREAKIN. TIME.
That's when I run DVD Shrink and create my own copy. I bought the movie to watch the movie, and I'm sorry if the studio can't monetize every single viewing, but that's just rough darts. Contrariwise, not a single one of those views costs them anything. If I want to go through the menu, I can hit the menu button on the remote; that's what it's there for. Otherwise I want to WATCH THE MOVIE I PAID FOR.
I'm always grateful (and usually surprised) when I find a commercial DVD that just plays the movie when I insert it.
Think I'm a captive audience? Wrong. I'm a pissed-off audience.
And that's just part 1. Part 2 is where I hate it when the advertising department insists on telling you stuff you don't want to know. T2 is my favorite example of that: the guys making it went out of their way and did all that work to bring the tension to a peak in the back halls of the Galleria when the Terminator and the good guy intersect with John between them... and suddenly Arnold says "Get down!" and shoots the T1000. Only, we already knew that Arnold was the good guy, because every single trailer basically said "OH LOOK, THE TERMINATOR IS THE GOOD GUY IN THIS MOVIE, ain't that great?" Thanks, guys. I should have been on the edge of my seat for that. Instead I was sitting back, gnawing on my popcorn and thinking, "It's about damn time they gave us some real action."
So, yeah, add my voice to the complaints about spoiling trailers. Putting an unskippable spoiling trailer on the very DVD it's advertising is... I don't know. It's like it's a new KIND of stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shut up, shutupshutup! Shhhh. Jeez. They can probably hear you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm grieving
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Little kids
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next time try this sequence...
hit stop, hit stop, hit stop (make sure it actually stopped)
hit menu
wait for it - boom - menu, without adverts.
oh wait - that's regular dvds that do that - maybe blu-ray doesn't?
Why the fuck did you sell out and buy blu-ray? Blu-ray fucking sucks donkey dick.
HD-DVD is way better than Blu-ray.
I will never buy Blu-ray.
I'd rather stick with old DVDs than pay a penny to Sony for a lesser quality high def format that they had to bribe onto the market cuz they couldn't stand to lose yet another format war. Fucking wankers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Next time try this sequence...
DVD's are just fine, but I feel you should know that HD-DVD's were rife with DRM that allowed the option for studios to put an encryption key on disc and if it didn't match up to any of the keys on the HD-DVD player, it turned said player into a $400US paperweight and would no longer play any discs afterwards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1) Opened new Dexter trailer on YouTube
2) Read a comment saying the video was spoiler
3 Hit ctrl+w
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have almost stopped buying any media
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spoiled whole season for me!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wish I read this prior to renting it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WHY WHY WHY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]