Flattr Makes It Easier Than Ever To Support Content Creators Just By Favoriting Tweets

from the give-it-a-go dept

Tue, Mar 19th 2013 8:13pm — Mike Masnick

We've written about Flattr a bunch of times over the past few years, as we find it to be a really interesting experiment in both micropayments and in supporting content creators. If you're unfamiliar with the concept (which was created, in part, by Peter Sunde from The Pirate Bay), each user of Flattr puts some amount of money (total is up to the user) into its account each month, and they can then click on "Flattr" links around the internet. At the end of each month, Flattr tallies up the total amount of content you've "flattr'd" and divides your monthly allotment by that amount. Thus, if you want to give creators $10/month, and then flattr 10 pieces of content, each creator will get $1 (actually, $0.90 after Flattr's 10% cut). If you flattr 20 pieces of content, each one gets $0.50 (er... $0.45). The thing we liked about this is that it gets you past a big part of the mental transaction costs of micropayments: that is, if you have to think about "is this piece of content worth $0.50 or $0.10?" you're already going to lose a bunch of potential customers who don't even want to bother with thinking about it. But, with Flattr, they don't have to think about it for each piece of content. Once they're convinced to take part and fund their account each month, it makes no difference to them how many piece of content they flattr.

As some of you know, we've had a Flattr widget on every one of our posts for the past couple of years. It brings in a small amount of money each month -- maybe between $50 and $100 or so. Of course, part of the issue is that there are some usage hurdles. The service has a small but dedicated user base, but it seemed to stagnate over the years. On top of that, there was a bit of a chicken and egg problem, in that the process of finding content that is Flattr-enabled is still somewhat haphazard -- and then Flattr users need to remember to flattr that content. However, that's now getting much easier as Flattr has announced integration with a number of different services, including (most importantly) Twitter, Instagram and Soundcloud (also: Vimeo, Flickr, github, 500px and app.net). So, now, if you connect your accounts, you can give money simply by favoriting tweets.

And, yes, that means if you want to toss a bit of change our way, you can now do so with a Flattr account by favoriting the tweets on our official Twitter account or my personal Twitter feed as well -- both of which are connected to the Techdirt Flattr account.

Of course, the other hope in all of this is that it will help lead to more people using Flattr in the first place. That's because Flattr users who favorite a tweet of someone who is not using Flattr are still designating those flattrs for that account. That doesn't mean that Flattr is holding money for those accounts (since that could add up!), but simply accumulating flattrs. Thus, if I "favorite" a Twitter account that doesn't use Flattr once a month, and that person finally signs up for Flattr a year later, it would count all 12 of my favorites as if they came that month (thus giving users on other services incentives to sign up sooner rather than later). Flattr is working on automatically notifying people who can "claim" money, but initially they're hoping the community will do that job for them, with an "unclaimed" page that highlights those with the most Flattrs on the various connected networks. Someone call Randall Munroe and let him know he has a whole bunch of unclaimed Flatttrs for the xkcd Twitter account. Ditto Wikipedia and the Torproject. Similarly, someone might want to alert Linus that his Github account is leading the way in unclaimed Github flattrs as well.

There are, also, some obvious social networks that are missing -- though I've been told that Facebook, YouTube and Tumblr are obviously key among them. It sounds like Google+ may be a bit further down the list. All in all, we still love the idea of Flattr, and think that this is a good step as it evolves its business. It still requires getting people to sign up to pay -- and that, of course, will always be a big hurdle -- but making it easier to do something once you have joined seems like a very good thing.

Filed Under: business models, flattr, integration, micropayments, social media
Companies: flattr

61 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

The First Word

“

Tipping Point & Now I Know...

This article was the tipping point for me to actually sign up for Flattr. Will see how it goes.TechDirt was my 1st Flattr as it only seemed fair.

Flattr is just putting you money where your like is.

I think the comments are going to give me an insight to how people have reacted to similar economic change in the past - "paper money!?! never! how does that have any value? I'll continue to barter and carry my gold around thank you..."; "Tips! Why not just pay me a decent wage!" - "Shares! Forget about it, people want to own companies, not paper..." - "Copyright!?! Royalties!?! Forget about it, I will stick to my patron thank you very much" - "Give away the razor and charge for the blades!?! You crazy?" - "Free software? In-app purchases? Ain't no money in that."

Only time will tell if Flattr will work, but it is a step in the right direction - it may prove to only be the alpha, beta or 1.0 of what really takes off - or prove itself a worthy component of new economic reward systems we are yet to see.

The bottom line is that as we change the way we interact and engage the world, so does our valuation of those things around us, therefore, the way we reward or compensate needs to adjust as well. I'm sure there are thousands of economic degrees earnt on this premise alone.

Once/if the 1st individual or business earns a decent income from Flattr, it will be the tipping point for Flattr and it's potential foreseeable.

—Matthew Snell

”

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

out_of_the_blue, 19 Mar 2013 @ 8:30pm

TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
"each creator will get $1 (actually, $0.90 after Flattr's 10% cut)"

Absolutely TOO MUCH for a bit of accounting, calculation, and funds transfer -- leaving out the data mining income they no doubt get. -- Should be ONE percent, tops.

No, Mike, This is NOT the way to the future. IT'S SHAMELESS GRIFTING.

But thanks for putting it right out front this time.

Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Where Mike daily proves the value of an economics degree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2013 @ 8:42pm
  
  Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
  Exactly...people like sunde could give two shits less about the creative professionals who make our lives better and enrich the world with their work, could actually make a living doing what they do. He wouldn't have created a site that blatantly allows people to not have to pay for things otherwise. It's all about making money off of other people's work! If you guys actually want to support your favorite creators, go to their website and buy something or donate that $10 to them directly. Don't do it through a glorified tip jar like flattr where OTHER people are the ones making money off the back of someone else!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 12:49am
    
    Re: Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
    Well, that depends entirely on whether that site is label-owned or not.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:51am
    
    Re: Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
    Yes, right! Donate via PayPal. Oh wait, they do exactly the same.
    
    I'd say Sunde cares more about the artists than the MAFIAA. Last time I checked they got 110% out of every penny many artists earned and the only income those artists got was actually from outside the MAFIAA with live performances and so.
    
    Shut up will you?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2013 @ 10:46pm
  
  Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
  Chris Dodd received another big fat bonus for doing what?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zakida Paul (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 2:46am
  
  Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
  "Absolutely TOO MUCH for a bit of accounting, calculation, and funds transfer -- leaving out the data mining income they no doubt get. -- Should be ONE percent, tops."
  
  Tell that to the record labels you love so much.
  
  That was way too easy.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:30am
    
    Re: Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
    except for the fact that they do more than that. (marketing comes to mind) NOTE- I'm not saying labels don't get too much, just that it's not quite a fair comparison.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Zakida Paul (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:56am
      
      Re: Re: Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
      Everything to do with Twitter and Flattr (and social networking, in general) is marketing. Artists use these platforms as a marketing tool and fans help by sharing artists' tweets etc.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:47am
  
  Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
  Yes because you are the master of economics and you know how much they need to run the service eh? And oh no, they should never profit either, right?
  
  Moron
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 6:33am
  
  Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
  Yes Blue, your right 10% is to much. Those labels need to be giving more than 90% to the artists.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- art guerrilla (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:50am
  
  Re: TEN PERCENT! FOR DOING WHAT?
  fair is fair:
  1. don't often agree with you, li'l boy blue, but i thought the same thing...
  *NOT* that the operator of such a service doesn't deserve some payment, but -yeah- 10% seemed kind of stiff-ish for a -seemingly- no/low-cost service that would seem to be competely automated...
  
  2. frankly, i think some of the regulars piling on you for having the temerity to suggest that a 10% skim is justifiable, are wrong... it does NOT matter that the MAFIAA 'charge' their artistes far more, etc; is *THIS* charge 'fair' ? ? ?
  (not to mention, you have gotten to the point where EVERYONE is pretty much sick and tired of you, so you get piled on as much for your (deserved) bad rep, as you do for the specific point you are making...)
  
  3. other than flattr has the 'first-mover' advantage, can't someone else come along and offer the same/similar service and charge 5% (whatever), and eat their lunch ? ? ?
  
  again, i do not disagree with many of your views -even if mis-aimed- at the general rapaciousness of so-called 'free-market' kapitalism, etc; but that does not obviate the copy-maximalist positions you generally take...
  just sayin'...
  
  art guerrilla
  aka ann archy
  eof
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Andrew Norton (profile), 19 Mar 2013 @ 9:07pm

Actually, Mike, the twitter integration's been there for a bit. I've had some tweets flattr'd over the last two months (the first one being mid-Jan)

Not had any facebook stuff flattr'd yet, but still, early days still. Was just explaining about it to a friend at CBS corporate on Sunday in fact.

And despite the nay-sayers (or nay-sayer - who can tell) above, I've embraced flattr for one reason - it's SIMPLE. Paypal, etc. are a real PITA, with flattr, it's set+forget, and it just takes a click or two.

It's a facebook 'like' or twitter 'favourite' that MEANS SOMETHING
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 1:41am
  
  Re:
  Actually, Mike, the twitter integration's been there for a bit. I've had some tweets flattr'd over the last two months (the first one being mid-Jan)
  
  Yes, we set it up months ago, but as far as I know this was the first big announcement around it...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2013 @ 9:56pm

And, yes, that means if you want to toss a bit of change our way, you can now do so with a Flattr account by favoriting the tweets on our official Twitter account or my personal Twitter feed as well -- both of which are connected to the Techdirt Flattr account.

You'd probably do better at a busy intersection with a squeegee than this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:55am
  
  Re:
  Yes, but that is considerably more work.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 8:06am
    
    Re: Re:
    Perhaps so, but would be more lucrative and afford greater dignity.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matthew Snell (profile), 19 Mar 2013 @ 10:10pm

Tipping Point & Now I Know...
This article was the tipping point for me to actually sign up for Flattr. Will see how it goes.TechDirt was my 1st Flattr as it only seemed fair.

Flattr is just putting you money where your like is.

I think the comments are going to give me an insight to how people have reacted to similar economic change in the past - "paper money!?! never! how does that have any value? I'll continue to barter and carry my gold around thank you..."; "Tips! Why not just pay me a decent wage!" - "Shares! Forget about it, people want to own companies, not paper..." - "Copyright!?! Royalties!?! Forget about it, I will stick to my patron thank you very much" - "Give away the razor and charge for the blades!?! You crazy?" - "Free software? In-app purchases? Ain't no money in that."

Only time will tell if Flattr will work, but it is a step in the right direction - it may prove to only be the alpha, beta or 1.0 of what really takes off - or prove itself a worthy component of new economic reward systems we are yet to see.

The bottom line is that as we change the way we interact and engage the world, so does our valuation of those things around us, therefore, the way we reward or compensate needs to adjust as well. I'm sure there are thousands of economic degrees earnt on this premise alone.

Once/if the 1st individual or business earns a decent income from Flattr, it will be the tipping point for Flattr and it's potential foreseeable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Cyber Killer, 19 Mar 2013 @ 10:41pm
  
  Re: Tipping Point & Now I Know...
  Already there... Tim Pritlove (Chaosradio Express podcast host) makes thousands of � each month from flattr. He was featured on the Flattr blog a couple of times.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2013 @ 10:12pm

As some of you know, we've had a Flattr widget on every one of our posts for the past couple of years. It brings in a small amount of money each month -- maybe between $50 and $100 or so.

Thus confirming my oft-stated contention that the freeloading cheapskates of Techdirt Nation simply don't feel like paying for anything. All this free speech horseshit is a facade to conceal their selfish, miserly core. Seriously, you'd think the legion of fanboys, sycophants, toadys, hangers-on and lickspittles constantly claiming to support creators and not being motivated by personal greed- would at least support leader of their cult. But no. Their true nature holds fast.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2013 @ 10:35pm
  
  Re:
  This is what you consider to be contributing to the debate?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 1:46am
  
  Re:
  Thus confirming my oft-stated contention that the freeloading cheapskates of Techdirt Nation simply don't feel like paying for anything.
  
  Um, that would be a really dumb assumption to make, now wouldn't it? Flattr is simply one service and one of many ways to support us. The fact that not everyone on the site uses it says little to nothing about how much anyone feels like paying for something.
  
  What kind of person would jump to such a ridiculous conclusion from that data point? Clearly someone who is predisposed towards an answer (proven by the ad hom above ads well).
  
  All this free speech horseshit is a facade to conceal their selfish, miserly core. Seriously, you'd think the legion of fanboys, sycophants, toadys, hangers-on and lickspittles constantly claiming to support creators and not being motivated by personal greed- would at least support leader of their cult. But no. Their true nature holds fast.
  
  Er... we do get a ton of support from our fans via many other methods -- such as advertising, research deals, consulting, the insider shop and much more.
  
  That people don't specifically use *flattr* says little about how much people are willing to pay.
  
  Are you really so focused on dissing us that you'd so misrepresent something? Honestly, this just makes you look kinda dense.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:37am
    
    Re: Re:
    to be fair, this is the first time any of the revenue Techdirt generates has been discussed. He might have assumed that the $50-100 represented a large amount of the total.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:55am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      I remember other numbers being discussed in other articles but they are all specific to single sources.
      
      @Mike: I think most people would agree with me when we say we are very interested in revenue you get from your readers as a whole. Would you mind doing some post about it? You can throw an approx value and work with percentages, it would be enlightening. I'm just curious and I'll understand if you don't want those numbers out but that's an idea!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 6:50am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        That will never happen. It would be more embarrassing than discussing Step 2.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:30am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Step 2 is a nice platform. Underused I'd say. In any case shut up troll =D
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:52am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Step 2 is a nice platform. Underused I'd say. In any case shut up troll =D
        
        Are you kidding? It's a ghost town. There has been two comments and zero new threads in 2013.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 11:22am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        As I said it's underused. The idea is nice.
        
        I'd say he should integrate it to the articles, there was a big surge of activity during the times we were dealing with SOPA and ideas for some "internet constitution".
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:01am
    
    Re: Re:
    Er... we do get a ton of support from our fans via many other methods -- such as advertising, research deals, consulting, the insider shop and much more.
    
    I'd guess that advertisers are interested in eyeballs and aren't exactly "fans". Same with consulting and research clients. They are getting a specific work product in exchange for a fee. Insider Shop... maybe t shirts and coffee mugs put some money in your pocket. Insider Chat seems like the same 5-10 people. But the pure content generated on the TD site seems, as you said, to generate $50-100 per month. Ad revenue is clearly tied to the content, but you have said in the past that it is minimal. All of this leads me to believe that TD is a loss leader for Floor 64 and is kept alive by other, tangible activities and could not survive on its own. That said, I do see how TD itself could serve as advertising for the research and consulting business of Floor 64.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The Groove Tiger (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:35am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "I'd guess that advertisers are interested in eyeballs and aren't exactly "fans"."
      
      Most idiotic comment of the month. The fans are the eyeballs, not the advertisers, you nincompoop.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:45am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        What??? I said the advertisers weren't necessarily fans- you know, the guys paying Masnick money to run their ads. Masnick was trying to claim advertising revenue as evidence of fan support. The fans aren't paying for the ads (or much of anything else it appears).
        
        Is English not your first language?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        The Groove Tiger (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 11:08am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Right.
        
        Hey, if fans pay Mike via PayPal, then it's also not fan support because PayPal is not a fan!
        
        Gotcha!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 2:16pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        God are you thick. I'M STILL TALKING ABOUT HIS CLAIM THAT ADVERTISERS SOMEHOW CONSTITUTED FAN SUPPORT. Got that?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 22 Mar 2013 @ 1:42am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        God are you thick. I'M STILL TALKING ABOUT HIS CLAIM THAT ADVERTISERS SOMEHOW CONSTITUTED FAN SUPPORT. Got that?
        
        You'd be amazed at how it helps to have people *like your site* as a way of convincing them to *buy advertising* on it.
        
        i.e., a significant portion of advertising on the site is purchased by organizations who employ fans.
        
        I recognize that you don't understand how advertising works, but displaying your own total ignorance on the matter takes special talents.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:44am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Insider Chat seems like the same 5-10 people.
      
      It intrigues me, I've seen much, much more people with the insider badge in the comments but I think not all insiders have access to the insider chat so that would explain it. Some of the insiders in the chat barely ever talk. What you see are the most talkative ones (ahem).
      
      But the pure content generated on the TD site seems, as you said, to generate $50-100 per month.
      
      That's from Flattr alone... And the insider shop is exactly pumped up by Techdirt content much like Harry Potter merchandise wouldn't sell if it wasn't for the popularity of the books. They are getting at about $4.17 per month from me alone so considering the others have the standard package (there are tiers above and below mine) the 5-10 people from the insider chat alone bring in $20-$40 per month on top of Flattr (which is a pretty limited platform so far). Can you see how many variables you are leaving out of the equation?
      
      I do see how TD itself could serve as advertising for the research and consulting business of Floor 64.
      
      That's the only thing you said that makes any sense.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:50am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It appears you can get an insider badge for free or $1. Access to Insider Chat and other services costs more.
        
        And surely TD probably drums up business for Floor 64, but don't know how much. My point still remains that TD could never stand on its own two feet financially.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 11:25am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Not for free. You can get those reports and books for free though.
        
        Your point is still weak. One could say he can do his consulting and research jobs because he gained credibility with Techdirt. How about that? That means most of the money Floor 64 generates come from the credibility he earned and maintains via Techdirt and the insider shop and features are just an extra (although I suspect I'd love to earn that monthly extra).
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 22 Mar 2013 @ 1:33am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        My point still remains that TD could never stand on its own two feet financially.
        
        Ha! Techdirt has been entirely profitable for many years on its own, unrelated to the other lines of our business. Thanks, though, for your concern.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 8:16am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Funny how Masnick champions the give-it-away-and-pray model but can't even make a go of it himself with a fairly high-traffic site like TD. Imagine what it is like for creators whose cost to create content exceeds Masnick's by millions.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Ninja (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 11:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        If people are not willing to pay for the million dollars content then these creators are doing it wrong ;)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:41pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        They're being stolen from by people like you and your fellow Techdirtbags. Isn't this blaming the victim.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:23pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Ah yes, the usual tactic of "if I pound the table loudly enough everyone will think you're a pirate". That worked wonders for the RIAA.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 22 Mar 2013 @ 1:37am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Funny how Masnick champions the give-it-away-and-pray model but can't even make a go of it himself with a fairly high-traffic site like TD. Imagine what it is like for creators whose cost to create content exceeds Masnick's by millions.
        
        It must be *exhausting* being so consistently wrong. Tell me, do you work hard at it? Does it take practice?
        
        We do not champion "give it away and pray." In fact we've said the opposite. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080522/1545021204.shtml
        
        So, no, we don't rely on "give it away and pray," we rely on an overall business strategy that is working quite nicely for us, contrary to your general assertions.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 6:29am
  
  Re:
  Did you donate via the Flattr widget? You...are...here...viewing content...for FREE! Did YOU do it? If not, you are a freeloading cheapskate of the Techdirt Nation, too. Better cough up some funds or continue on ranting and thrashing as the hypocrite you are.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 6:48am
    
    Re: Re:
    I am financially supportive of a large number of creators and causes I believe in or whose work I enjoy. And I am not a member of, but a detractor of Techdirt Nation.
    
    I have no expectation that everyone support every venue offering free content the read, watch or listen to. But I find it interesting that the zealots here collectively kick in as little as $50/month to support their spiritual leader. You're one of the more odious yes-men. How much are you in for?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gwiz (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:14am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      And I am not a member of, but a detractor of Techdirt Nation.
      
      While you claim to be a detractor, you are still contributing to the community. You add comments and start discussions with your dissenting views. That creates interest and value in and of itself.
      
      Keep up the good work and thanks!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:41am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I'm pleased to illuminate the fetid world of freeloaders, professional malcontents and embittered, failed creators.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 7:58am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Couldn't you do something more interesting and worthwhile with your life than hangout with a bunch of people you hate? Or does it make you feel superior?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 8:10am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I do plenty of interesting and worthwhile things. And I don't hate anyone. For me it's like teaching a class of unruly special ed students. Admittedly, it is hard not to feel superior with the bar set as low as it is.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 12:23pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Whatever you THINK you're doing here is not working. You really are wasting your time.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 3:48pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I realize that even among the other "special" kids, you stand out as a particularly challenging case. I haven't figured out yet whether you are simply unreasonable, or just slow. Right now, my money is on "slow". Never fear, my developmentally disabled friend- I'll continue to edify you in the hope of evoking some lucid thought some time in the future.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 9:48pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        If only you were funny. Just smug.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Urban Sundstr�m, 20 Mar 2013 @ 6:32am

Flattr - ID on comments
Hello !

On some blogs i can put my Flattr ID together with my comment. Why can I not do that here on Techdirt ?

Regards, Urban
(with over 50k Flattr clicks -:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Urban Sundstr�m, 20 Mar 2013 @ 6:32am

Flattr - ID on comments
Hello !

On some blogs i can put my Flattr ID together with my comment. Why can I not do that here on Techdirt ?

Regards, Urban
(with over 50k Flattr clicks -:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 8:00am

Adoption!
I considered using flattr when it was first announced, but realized all the money would go to TechDirt. I just don't see it anywhere else. I was hoping websites would adopt it quickly but that hasn't happened. If I start seeing it in more places, I'll sign up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Cerberus (profile), 22 Mar 2013 @ 1:00am
  
  Re: Adoption!
  I have happily sent most of my � 2/month Flattr money to Techdirt over the past six months or so. Why not? And once in a long while I come across another site with a Flattr button, but Techdirt still gets most. I know, it's still a puny amount, but it's more than other free websites get from me, precisely because of the reasons Mike laid out. I will pay more once I make more money. For similar reasons, I have spent more on Android applications than on any other platform so far.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Evan Schoepke, 20 Mar 2013 @ 8:35am

Misconceptions about Flattr
Hi I'm Evan, global biz dev with Flattr. I wanted to address some misconceptions about our service. First off, the criticisms around our 10% fee. The reason Flattr is already a success (albeit one not so well known in the US) is because we can pay our devs well enough to build awesome stuff, and because we help support creators of all types. In the near future as our userbase continues to rapidly expand in new countries we would like to lower our fee. We are also at this moment considering other options to lower fees such as accepting and paying out in Bitcoin. Other misconceptions that arise often have to do with pending payments. Trust me when I say Flattr will never force you to make money you don't want. Finally, I would like to address that some folks think Peter Sunde is a jerk, this is not true, that is all for now thanks everybody for the lively discussions. If you have any questions for me or anything partner related I'm also happy to correspond. evan (at) Flattr.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 9:41am
  
  Re: Misconceptions about Flattr
  Finally, I would like to address that some folks think Peter Sunde is a jerk, this is not true,
  
  That is incorrect. Many people, including me- think Peter Sunde is a jerk. Others think he's a douchebag. And still more hold a variety of opinions of him.
  
  Thanks for letting us watch you lick the hand that feeds you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 9:55am
    
    Re: Re: Misconceptions about Flattr
    To be fair there are probably people that all other people have difficulty talking, working or dealing with. So why single out the people who work well together?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 12:41pm
    
    Re: Re: Misconceptions about Flattr
    Pot...meet Kettle.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jupiterkansas (profile), 20 Mar 2013 @ 12:21pm
  
  Re: Misconceptions about Flattr
  Mr. Schoepke, you can ignore the trolls here. They hate everything about this site, yet somehow spend each and every day commenting on it. They have sad, miserable lives and you can't convince them of anything.
  
  Flattr is an awesome idea - but it needs to permeate the web before it's truly useful. Keep at it!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Mar 2013 @ 2:18pm
    
    Re: Re: Misconceptions about Flattr
    Way to break in the new kneepads and lobster bib.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]