Blowhard UK MP Says Ban Twitter Because Grandstanding Is Fun
from the not-gonna-happen dept
The UK seems to have a rather interesting relationship with Twitter for some reason. For the purposes of this discussion, recall that UK police have demanded the deletion of photos from the microblogging site before, in some attempt to have the internet forget certain things happened. Also, keep handy the knowledge that, in the UK, you can apparently be jailed for acting like a jackass on Twitter.
With that in mind, it's ironic that acting like a jackass in government gets you a job as an MP. Such is the case, at least, with George Galloway, who is calling for a ban on Twitter nation-wide until the site agrees to fully cooperate with UK police in all of their many deluded demands.
Filing the motion named "Twitter and the detection of crime", the MP believes the social-networking site should defer to UK authorities or be sanctioned by the Government – those sanctions involving a ban on the service.
"Twitter is now a very widely used mode of social networking; is a US-based enterprise whose primary motivation is to maximise its profits; Twitter is now used for a variety of criminal activities including sending malicious communications," reads the filing.Non-Brits like myself will recognize this tactic of wanting to ban services that don't bend over a barrel for local police, having seen it so many times with services like Craig's List. In the case of Twitter, the company already complies with police requests that are matters of life or death and does so voluntarily. What they don't allow is law enforcement to go on fishing expeditions in non-serious matters. Now, should you think that such petty action by UK LEOs is unlikely, please keep in your mind all the links provided above. Were I Twitter, I wouldn't want to open up that can of worms either.
Luckily, that prevailing opinion is that Mr. Galloway is simply trying to draw media attention to himself. The Parliament's own website concurs.
"Although there is very little prospect of EDMs being debated, many attract a great deal of public interest and frequently receive media coverage," claims the website, whilst summarising, "The majority will attract only one or two signatures."Given Mr. Galloway's rather, ahem, colorful history, I suppose we shouldn't be surprised by such a move on his part. That said, fear not, my dear Brits, Twitter will remain for now.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, free speech, george galloway
Companies: twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Details of the EDM
So just the usual grandstanding. I'm not even sure if that is Twitter's policy, and whether or not they do co-operate when required to by law - there are, of course, criminal offences with not aiding the police where required and impeding their progress etc., but I don't know how broad they are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1NIuCt72bU is what we appear to call and MP in this country!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BTW the debate motion was "Israel should withdraw immediately from the West Bank" Who the hell did he think he would be debating when he agreed to turn-up?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1NIuCt72bU
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=IAAi9CG7WW0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do you have a comments policy on this site? Or do you ban people who post lies and random, baseless accusations against the individuals who run the site?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The paperwork he filed includes the possibility of a ban. What are you talking about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Does this site have a fucking comment policy or not? Can a cunt like me come along and post whatever the fuck I want? If so, that'll be great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Galloway
The second and more likely possibility is that good old George was just joking. He after all knows that many of his fellow MPs are huge Twitter users, to keep their followers updated, and to suggest "communications masochism" would give them all a good laugh.
So here are all the UK public looking on and thinking "Is this really what we elected you for?" along with "You have had your 5 minutes of fun so now back to work"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any bets on how long such a thing will happen with legit sites?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]