New Evidence: Homeland Security Spied On Peaceful Protestors; Worried About Protests Getting News Coverage
from the homeland-security? dept
We just recently had a post on the head of one of Homeland Security's "Fusion Centers" (the same Fusion Centers found by a Congressional investigation to be a near total waste of time and money, finding no terrorists, but violating the public's civil liberties) who claimed that the DHS centers did not spy on Americans, and then immediately admitted that they spied on "anti-government" Americans.The definition of "anti-government" was mostly left as an exercise to the reader. However, in a bout of good timing, the Partnership for Civil Justice has released some new DHS documents it received via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, showing that DHS regularly spied on peaceful demonstrators and activists. Because exercising your First Amendment rights must make you one of them there "anti-government" Americans, which means the DHS is free to spy on you.
Functioning as a secret political police force against people participating in lawful, peaceful free speech activity, the heavily redacted documents show that the DHS “Threat Management Division” directed Regional Intelligence Analysts to provide a “Daily Intelligence Briefing” that includes a category of reporting on “Peaceful Activist Demonstrations” along with “Domestic Terrorist Activity.” (p. 68)And it's not just the big cities. The new documents show that DHS is involved in spying on peaceful protesters and activists around the country. It also shows that DHS helped local law enforcement "crack down" on the various Occupy gatherings. But the key thing is that DHS seems to have no qualms at all about spying on anyone who disagrees with the prevailing positions of today's federal government. And it's clearly not because they're trying to protect others from any threat of actual harm. They seem to be focused on spying to further the goal of preventing the administration from looking bad:
The PCJF has obtained thousands of pages of documents pursuant to its Freedom of Information Act demands and made them available for public viewing. The newly obtained documents show coordination and intelligence monitoring by the DHS, the FBI, the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies of “Occupy-type” protests.
The documents show the routine use of Fusion Centers for intelligence gathering on peaceful demonstrations as well as the use of DHS’ “Mega Centers” for collection of surveillance information on demonstrations.
The documents show a Department of Homeland Security that appears obsessed with the question of whether any and all protests that are being surveilled receive media attention and coverage. Reporting within the DHS on media coverage of First Amendment protected activities, even in the smallest places, appears to be a routine part of DHS intelligence reports. None of the documents explain why media coverage of peaceful demonstrations is of interest to law enforcement or concerns “homeland security” in any way.That's because it doesn't concern "homeland security" at all. It concerns the job security of those employed by Homeland Security.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: americans, dhs, fusion centers, homeland security, protesters, reputation, surveillance
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
We were warned."... We know what no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me."
George Orwell
1984
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Strange how short little comments are held for moderation ... or maybe it is key words, lets find out then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
What happens, then, when the government is the enemy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
It's actually something that people don't think about. What happens when someone thinks outside the box?
No institution is a better fit for the bureaucratic structure than the military. It is a model for Weber’s “firmly ordered system of superiority and subordination in which there is a supervision of the lower offices by the higher offices.”
Work goes on within a compartmentalized environment structured by rank and myriad rules and regulations. Action is focused on fulfilling specific orders normally without reference to outside consequences.
As a result, within the military bureaucracy thinking must always be within the box, which means it is done within the institution’s set thought-collective. Indeed, given the military’s particular environment, one that strives to shape the thought as well as the action of its participants, thinking can take on near totalitarian constraints.
Bradley went against the "military code" by going to outside sources. It's why he's being persecuted so greatly and with the full extent of the US government.
The government is supporting the wishes of the richest people and Bradley is a threat to their security by thinking outside of the box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
98% of the material classified, is so not because it's "national security", but because it's embarrasing to a higher up either military or political.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
"... We know what no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me."
George Orwell
1984
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Define "Anti-government" and "Patriot"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They have immense pressure to go after a specific subset of Americans and they have immense power to go after them. But this puts them on the wrong side of history. While everyone goes about keeping their head down, they ignore all of the unrest their actions cause.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
This isn't even as noble(?) as protecting the goverment. This is corruption, pure and simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Both movements are fighting a common enemy: The merger of big-government and big-business (pretty much the definition of corruption).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
― Isaac Asimov, Foundation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: insightful
Democracy is a form of reaching apparent consensus, it is a way for a perceived "majority" to overpower a perceived "minority". It is not a way to secure freedom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If They're So Worried About Making the Administration Look Bad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
...that was easy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Americans
Oh I understand that one. Any Government agent to me who violates the US Constitution and Bill of Rights is "anti-American". These after all are the founding documents which define the very nature of what it is to be an American.
So here in the DHS, DoJ, FBI, CIA and more are these "anti-Americans" who are like Nazi Communist Triad Mafia Terrorists and who are a serious threat to the American way of life.
I will expect Congress to pass the anti-American Cannon act with due haste so these people with lying passports can be violently exiled, using a 3 mile long power shot, into the closest large body of water!
So the great United States was saved all thanks to the Google sponsored maglev cannon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Americans
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Americans
Look on the bright side when it only takes one or two firings to make all Government department to much improve. Send them all the videos to see.
Google sponsoring the cannon is good for them. As the camera follows the pipe on the firing it can go like Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle. BANG ZOOM.
I expect if we got enough pubic backing we can have the first and worst ever Government employee fired in under 5 years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More power to the people, damn straight.......first step, awareness.........oh shit..........so........THATS why homeland.........
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Secret Police...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Secret Police...
Can the government prove that no peaceful protesters were ever sent to Gitmo? Is there any record of who has been sent to Gitmo?
Wait, there's a knock at my door, why it's just the friendly the Gitmo Educational Specialization Transportation Agency for Political Opposition (GESTAPO)... I'm sure they just want to talk, be right back
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Secret Police...
Gotta love our government for providing these free educational opportunities, they tell me I'll learn a lot while enjoying the local hospitality and climate.
I can hardly wait to go so I can get back and tell everyone about the great education camp and activities. They said my free trip was for an 'indefinite' period of time, so I'm not sure when I'll be able to share what I've learned with the rest of you, just imagine me sunning on a tropical beach while learning the best our government has to offer (or so the travel brochure says).
So why do I feel like the winners of the The Running Man before Arnold???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
# reference Frankie Goes To Hollywood, who if they issued their videos today would probably attract a few dozen of the little grey human drones...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"But the key thing is that DHS seems to have no qualms at all about spying on anyone who disagrees with the prevailing positions of today's federal government. And it's clearly not because they're trying to protect others from any threat of actual harm."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bais in political motivation reporting
Most police are republicans and Obama does not have direct mind control of everyone working in every level of government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't really know why they have gotten such high status from just having the job, when all it really should be about, is respect. But respect comes with honesty and by actually seeming to have a good reason for the actions they take. Any reasonable person can respect a guy by these standards, even if they don't agree with him. I just wish that more of the difficult questions would be asked, without carefully formulating it to not offend, because that guy is "big". To often they get away with no real answer to questions and no follow-ups. I wish that we could get through to a lot of these politicians and leaders, that they actually suck and seem to be piss poor at their job. I say "seem to be" because their reasons for decisions are so often buried or hidden that it can be hard to tell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: those in the bottom are the same as those in the top
Is it right to kidnap your neighbor because you disagree with his speech?
No, but the State can send costumed men to his house and "detain" him indefinitely.
Is it okay for you to claim your neighbor owes you part of his food whenever he goes shopping? Would it be okay if you wrote it down? Would it be okay if 50 friends agreed?
No, but the State can "tax" him and all of us and you would be okay with it as long as it appeared to have the "majority" of the vote.
Is it correct for you to walk into his yard and punch your neighbor because he looked at you funny?
No, but the State bombs&invades other countries for less.
So, who works for who now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pay Attention To History
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pay Attention To History
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wrong!. It concerns the messaging of the regime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you disagree with the status quo, you're a terrorist
The key isn't to argue against the status quo, this only validates and highlights it in the mind of the public. Contention is a tool widely used by governments to polarize the public into inaction.
Meet up with a friend, grab a dove and get onto a tour of the whitehouse. If you can't find a dove, grab a pigeon. It's the thought that counts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If you disagree with the status quo, you're a terrorist
They'll use this to pass more laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And for the record the ones who did not stay peaceful are the ones who showed up in riot gear and assaulted peaceful protestors making situations worse.
Creating the illusion it MIGHT spiral out of control, calling them terrorists for protesting highlight what has gone wrong in this country.
Protest - get assaulted and your rights violated.
Destroy the economy - get handed more cash, special protection details, and no punishment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Provocateur
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, it is that bad. And probably older than that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thank you
anyone deemed a threat to the united states , can be held without access to the court system.
INDEFINITELY!
bush may have started it but its President Obama who is signing your rights away!
hold on i hear JACK Boots Goose Stepping my way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Truthout/Jason Leopold had these documents two weeks ago
[ link to this | view in chronology ]