Oh, And One More Thing: NSA Directly Accessing Information From Google, Facebook, Skype, Apple And More
from the not-a-good-week-for-the-nsa dept
Obviously, the Verizon/NSA situation was merely a small view into just how much spying the NSA is doing on everyone. And it seems to be spurring further leaks and disclosures. The latest, from the Washington Post, is that the NSA has direct data mining capabilities into the data held by nine of the biggest internet/tech companies:The technology companies, which participate knowingly in PRISM operations, include most of the dominant global players of Silicon Valley. They are listed on a roster that bears their logos in order of entry into the program: “Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple.” PalTalk, although much smaller, has hosted significant traffic during the Arab Spring and in the ongoing Syrian civil war.This program, like the constant surveillance of phone records, began in 2007, though other programs predated it. They claim that they're not collecting all data, but it's not clear that makes a real difference:
Dropbox , the cloud storage and synchronization service, is described as “coming soon.”
The PRISM program is not a dragnet, exactly. From inside a company’s data stream the NSA is capable of pulling out anything it likes, but under current rules the agency does not try to collect it all.I expect we'll be seeing more such revelations before long.
Analysts who use the system from a Web portal at Fort Meade key in “selectors,” or search terms, that are designed to produce at least 51 percent confidence in a target’s “foreignness.” That is not a very stringent test. Training materials obtained by the Post instruct new analysts to submit accidentally collected U.S. content for a quarterly report, “but it’s nothing to worry about.”
Even when the system works just as advertised, with no American singled out for targeting, the NSA routinely collects a great deal of American content.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: data, data mining, nsa, privacy, spying
Companies: aol, apple, dropbox, facebook, google, microsoft, paltalk, skype, yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Because America.
Because the children.
Because drugs.
Because gun violence.
Take your pick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
MOTHERFUCKIN' EAGLES, bitchez...
its motherfuckin' eagles all the way down...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
All the other stuff you mentioned though, they created or are creating themselves at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
All for the greater good, of course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DNI Clapper misstated facts to Congress
That appears to be a mis-statement. NBC News reported tonight that DNI Clapper now clarifies that he was talking about email and not phone calls. But whether it's emails or phone calls, it now appears to be a mis-statement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DNI Clapper misstated facts to Congress
“Clapper Clarifies Remarks Over NSA Snooping”, by Michael Hirsh, National Journal (via Yahoo!), June 6, 2013
Wyden: Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?
DNI Clapper: No, sir.
Wyden It does not?
DNI Clapper: Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect — but not wittingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DNI Clapper misstated facts to Congress
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Shit
in
3
2
1
.
.
.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh Shit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hi Speed Internet means
And get off my cyber-lawn!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So let me get this straight... the NSA use billions of dollars, break practically all rules about privacy in existence and lie about the whole thing; and the best they can come up with is a system that can do 1% better than tossing a coin... impressive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If I was flipping a coin, I would get 50% of positives would test false and vice versa. The negative does not equal the positive, (That is, the number of people under survey are not equally split between 'american' and 'not american'), so a coin flip would perform either much worse or much better. I suspect Americans are probably over-represented on American databases, but OTOH, there's 5.7 billion non-americans in total vs. 0.3 billion Americans.
And then if the statement can be taken literally, then we're dealing with confidence, not probability, so that's another step removed and 51% is an odd number to use. Your confidence in a measurement is how sure you are that the true value falls within a certain range of the measurement. So I might say I have 99% confidence that there is a 19-20% probability of the next batch of mead also coming out sour. (Presumably my measurement would've been 19.5% of my batches are sour and my confidence interval would be +/- .5%)
The wider the interval, the higher the confidence, so if it DOES mean confidence, and in the way I took it, 51% implies a very tiny interval. In this case, the interval is probably centred around 100%.
"But then why would they say confidence instead of percent?"
Because the confidence interval grows and shrinks with data variability. The less it varies, the more certain that the prediction of the prediction is true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I knew when I wrote it that it was not meant to be interpreted like that. Just thought it was a bit wonky wording used.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dropbox
Not that I have anything to hide from the NSA, no, no, not me. My life is an open book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dropbox
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm pretty damn sure I'm foreign by any US standard, but I'm not allowed the protection of law from neither my own country or from the US? Gee. Guess I'm all fucked then huh?
I should start sending fake emails between made up google accounts containing the phrase "don't forget to set the timer on the device" just to see how long it takes before the cops come banging on my door.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
Seriously, do you regard this as NEWS? I see that at least "BearGriz72" reads my posts (and thanks for the advance publicity, you embiggen my effect here, ankle-biter), so I can only conclude that Mike has consciously dodged associating NSA and Google (and the rest), but that's now become untenable. -- And on that line, this is just another routine roll-out to accustom the public to the new level of tyranny.
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Where Mike's "no evidence of real harm" means he wants to let secretive mega-corporations continue to grow.
12:29:44[n-842-8]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
I like this part: “We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully."
So, Google, are you telling me that someone has reviewed all the data that you give to the government? What was your basis for determining whether it was in accordance with the law and what law are you referring to?
Furthermore, are you willing to testify under oath that there is no back door for the government?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
Remember that Congress passed a law in about 2008 which grants all these companies immunity from prosecution by their users for "breaking the law" with the US Administration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
I'm curious to see what newsletter you are subscribing to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
Second, being paid by someone does not mean you have to be a mouthpiece for them and it's entirlely possible to only accept payment for speaking if it does not contradict your own beliefs.
If you were an honest person(or paid attention) you'd note mike's views are the same as before there even was a google to speak of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
Yes. And his blind devotion to his paymasters continued on and on as Google increasingly spied, violated privacy and abused its monopoly position. I guess that its acknowledged role as information gatherer-in-chief for the NSA finally ended his public adoration (and payments).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
Of course by that same logic blue, AJ, bob, and any of the other trolls would count as shills for 'Big Mike', as they regularly comment on his actions and beliefs(both real and imaginary) on this site themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So, turnz owt I wuz rite about dat, as I habs been abowt ebbryfing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This just in: Out_of_His_A$$ Proves he is a moron!
1) Of course this is news
1a: a report of recent events
{...snip...}
2a: material reported in a newspaper or news periodical or on a newscast
2b: matter that is newsworthy
2) Enclosing my handle in quotes? Implying that it not linked to an actual identity, really?
My name is Rick, the handle I have been consistently using on the internet since the mid 1990's (Damn near 20 years) is BearGriz72. If you had even bothered to look at my profile, you would see that it links to my Google profile (I know you think Google is evil, I don't, get over it), my twitter account, and even my LinkedIn profile (with my full name and a ton of information about me). Unlike you, who can't even be bothered to register a profile name (there is no requirement to link it to a real identity, I just choose to), and then you complain when people impersonate you (and even register the name you have been using).
3) RE: "ankle-biter" -- FUCK YOU BLUE.
I did not & do not post ANYTHING for your benefit, you are a troll, plain and simple, and we will all be better off if/when you give up and go away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the Bright Side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Immunity for privacy violations
This is why CISPA is so dangerous. It aims to accomplish the same thing for domestic surveillance as the above laws did for surveillance of foreign citizens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is why our economy sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is why our economy sucks
Hopefully this will be a wake-up call where people abandon silicon valley companies in droves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is why our economy sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not trying, doing?
How about the companies that participate unknowingly?
Collecting it all would be easier than trying to exclude the cat gifs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA gagged
Avoiding effective oversight would be a whole lot simpler if the NSA just issued the committee with a National Security Letter, thereby limiting their questions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'THEY QUITE LITERALLY CAN WATCH YOUR IDEAS AS YOU TYPE'...
Top secret PRISM program...
MICROSOFTYAHOOGOOGLEYOUTUBEFACEBOOKSKYPEAPPLE...
Obama administration collecting phone records of millions daily...
Secret court order requires VERIZON to hand over ALL CALL DATA...
White House: Critical tool against 'terrorist threats'...
Specifically targeted Americans, not foreigners...
'Homeland Security': Laptops, phones can be searched based on hunches...
NSA SEES ALL: Phone Sex, Banks, Emails...
CIA: We'll Spy on You Through Your Dishwasher...
'1984' Published 64 Years Ago Today...
Now you know why we who support the second amendment do so so adamantly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They warned us along with other whistleblowers and they were punished harshly for telling the truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did Intelligence Officials Lie to Congress?
(Emphasis is from cited story; not in original letter.)
Did that response intentionally misstate the facts?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To be secure we have tacitly approved them stripping away our rights and leaving only the illusion of them behind.
We are all to busy screaming about abortion, guns rights, terrorism, etc. to bother to notice. It is time to call your congress critter and ask them why this is acceptable. Then inform them they will be replaced unless they act to stop it.
We have gone through the looking glass, this is wholesale spying on Americans and they must be doing a piss poor job as they were unable to catch those banks helping terrorists hide their money.
This is not freedom, this is not democracy, this is insanity.
We have so many freedoms here...
The freedom to not hear about the government breaking the law, because they go after the whistle blowers.
The freedom to not share a private thought with another, without it being checked to see if it looks 51% like your a terrorist.
The freedom to have our personal document searched and seized at the border in constitution free zones that are pushing in on the country.
The freedom to protest, but only in designated zones where you will be photographed and placed under surveillance.
The freedom to fund a program that wastes money and exposed people to unknown amounts of radiation so some people hired form the tops of pizza boxes could see us naked.
9/11 was a horrible thing... but it fucking pales in comparison to the horrific dismantling of our rights and freedoms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Makes you wonder if those 911 was a inside job conspiracy theories are true, shit now the NSA will be looking at my communications in more detail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now?
Every single one of you that took the oath to the Constitution - your oath demands your allegiance. There is no other precedent and there is no other law that supersedes the core text of that document. It is your superior.
If the Declaration of Independence is your king then your queen is surely the Constitution. Only their subjects can defend their reign. There is no heir. There are brigands and mercenaries embedded. Secrecy and deceit abrogate your rights.
If you find yourself on the floor of the Senate and hold your tongues in the face of treachery then you are treasonous, indeed. You hold your tongues to protect yourselves from jail? You have risked the freedoms and rights of all that you represent yet you are beholden to a cabal of secrecy that can not be reigned in, challenged nor tried?
There is no safety among traitors as there is no honor among thieves.
Do you truly believe that WE are so weak and that WE are in peril? Make your case! The King's subjects will not be idled. Terror will never reign and The Freedoms are not for sale.
It is not a fine line that we walk. It is not a delicate balance. The babe that you deign to cradle does not cry.
Arm yourselves. Mind your tongues. Your government deceives you. Your country requires you.
Soon, all of you, must, inevitably, represent yourselves. Long live the king.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now?
Come the next election, don't vote for the Big Two unless the candidate is proven to have stood against this crap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the naming of things
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-But they do right?? I mean since when did the government care about rules? Rules are only for common folks like us, are they releasing this supposedly 7-year-old news to divert us from their IRS fiasco?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welcome to the biggest police state ever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
contacted by two generals in one day on skype
[ link to this | view in chronology ]