DHS Interrogates NY Times Reporters At Border, Then Denies Having Any Records About Them
from the right,-sure dept
Thought it was just officials at UK airports detaining and interrogating journalists? According to a new lawsuit from two NY Times reporters, they were also pulled aside and interrogated by Homeland Security officials multiple times concerning their own reporting efforts. The two reporters, Mac William Bishop and Christopher Chivers were apparently pulled out for special interrogation at JFK.Among other things, Plaintiffs seek records used or created by DHS employees in respect to the questioning of Plaintiffs at JFK Airport earlier this year. Plaintiffs were subject to segregated questioning by DHS employees at JFK on May 24, 2013, as they prepared to board an international flight for a work assignment as journalists. Subsequently, on June 6, 2013, Mr. Bishop was subjected to further segregated questioning by DHS employees at JFK as he returned to the United States.Given this, the two journalists filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests on records pertaining to themselves... and got back absolutely nothing. After playing hot potato with the FOIA requests between different DHS agencies, the reporters basically got back messages saying that there were no records on either.
On September 27, 2013, ICE denied the Bishop Request. ICE reported in a "final response" that the unite had conducted a search and found no responsive documents.Remember how Eric Holder insisted that the feds weren't going to keep intimidating journalists? Yeah, right.
On October 28, 2013, Mr. Bishop appealed ICE's denial. In his appeal letter, Mr. Bishop said it was "inconceivable that DHS has no records pertaining to [him]" as someone who is "a frequent international traveler." He pointed out that on June 6, 2013 he had answered questions for DHS employees in a private room at JFK, and those answers were recorded on a computer.
On November 18, 2013, ICE denied Mr. Bishop's administrative appeal, finding that the agency had done an adequate search.
As for the TSA, that unit of DHS informed Mr. Bishop by letter on July 31, 2013 that his "request was too broad in scope." TSA required more information before processing the request.
On August 9, 2013, Mr. Bishop, through counsel, responded by letter. He restated the initial request and asserted that no legal authority supports the proposition that TSA could simply refuse to do the search.
More than two months later, on October 23, 2013, TSA told Mr. Bishop's counsel that it could not find the August 9, 2013 letter. Counsel subsequently provided a new copy of the letter and additional information about the June 6, 2013 questioning at JFK. There has been no further response from TSA.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cbp, christopher chivers, customs and border patrol, detention, dhs, foia, ice, intimidation, journalism, mac william bishop, reporters
Companies: ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No see, you just have to look at it differently
They're just going by the government's latest 'logic', where not knowing about something means it didn't happen, so it follows that not having any records of an event means it also 'didn't happen'. /s
Sarcasm aside, I'm guessing that while the detaining and harassing weren't 'official', and thereby recorded, it's likely the DHS and TSA have been given 'suggestions' from up top to make any travel by big reporters from the papers that are covering government abuses as unpleasant as possible, just to show them what happens to those that don't toe the line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No see, you just have to look at it differently
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And NSA apologists wonder why...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do we trust in a Government that allows blatant liars to remain in their jobs? (ie: Clapper, Alexander etc). No surprises here.
Yet more steps into fascism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
(one alternative of it that i can think of is "media relations specialist" = bullshit master)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But you are understating the case
-- these are actually "blatant perjurers"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe they were looking in the wrong haystack of haystacks .. or maybe the US doesn't respond (via FOIA) to terrorist (Journalists) demands..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's make something clear: these reporters allowed themselves to be interrogated. And people wonder why this abuse continues...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Yeah, right. I know some people that I bet could make you talk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Better response....
Now if they take away all tools capable of recording said "interview", I would start asking for a lawyer or formal charges or I walk....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
The They (tm) WILL take your shit without ANY explanation, receipt, or other legal justification, PERIOD...
are you dense ? ? ?
JUST LIKE the story here the other day, about donut-eaters essentially saying "Give up your right to unreasonable search/seizure, or we will kill your dogs and FUCK YOU UP ROYALLY!"...
WHAT REAL "CHOICE" does a powerless citizen have ?
what are they going to do, call the police ? ? ?
bwa ha HA HA HAAAAAAA
we are so screwed...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception
No lawyers needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better response....
Combine that with one of those low-rez cameras disguised as a pen, and you have a perfect honey trap for TSA and other DHS types.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Of course! You didn't know that?
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What would you do in their situation, roll over and let the DHS have their way?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"they don't have to let you go you know, there is not even due process anymore if they don't want to allow it" ... just saying it's not all that easy to resist, lots of downsides.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you do that, you wont' succeed in your later challenge because you agreed to do what they wanted, therefore it was voluntary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yeah, they could have fought back. As journalists, I'm sure they were traveling through the airport well armed.
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ministry of Truth error
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BTW, even if a record exists and is eventually located, it does not follow that the record must be disclosed as there are several exemptions from disclosure enumerated in the FOIA statute.
Exemption from disclosure can be raised, to my knowledge, at virtually any time during this proceeding.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"There are too many leaders who claim solidarity with Madiba’s struggle for freedom, but do not tolerate dissent from their own people."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So let me get this straight, the NSA can obtain millions of call records on people who not are suspects in any crime, local law enforcement can request "tower dumps" of cell towers getting all the data available from that tower, both without a warrant, yet asking for records from the government one specific person is "too broad in scope"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remember how Eric Holder insisted that the feds weren't going to keep intimidating journalists? Yeah, right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All records
They're asking him to be more specific because he's unlikely to specifically ask for whatever it is they're worried about.
Hey, I could be wrong. But when they act like this, we are left to assume the worst.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I see why
The poor DHS employees looked him up on the computer system and found.... nothing. How strange. Then upon a few questions Mr. Bishop claimed to be a frequent international traveler. A frequent international traveler should have some sort of files. Of course any logical person would have to follow up on this strange case. After all everyone on earth has a file with DHS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I see why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
truthsayer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy to say, hard to do.
And you think they're going to let you whip out a recording device and start recording? Or that you're going anywhere anytime soon if you don't answer questions?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Down with the Establishment ! Power To The People !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why can this idea, that they have gone to fucking far, not penetrate the bubble in DC?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]