Cheney Biographer, Fox News Contributor Put On DHS Terrorist Watchlist; Harry Reid's Spokesperson Says It's No Big Deal

from the oh-really? dept

Wed, Sep 24th 2014 12:25pm — Mike Masnick

Stephen Hayes, who is the official biographer of former Vice President Dick Cheney and who also authored an entire book promoting dubious claims that Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda had a close working relationship, is the sort of person who basically seems to support nearly all of our government's excesses in the supposed "war on terror." So, as some people noted, there seems to be a bit of irony in the fact that he has ended up on the DHS Terrorist Watchlist.

As we've discussed, the recently leaked guidelines about how you get on the watchlist shows that it's incredibly (and ridiculously) vague. It can be summed up as "someone at DHS thinks you did anything that might possibly be suspect, so onto the watchlist you go." That's why nearly half of the people on the list have no actual terrorist affiliation.

As for how Hayes ended up on the list, he claims it's because he recently booked a one-way flight to Istanbul for a cruise, returning to the US from Athens a few weeks later. Indeed, that seems likely. Marcy Wheeler has been pointing out for a while that one of the criteria to be put on the watchlist is merely "travel... to a locus of TERRORIST ACTIVITY" and apparently Istanbul counts.

In fact, Spencer Ackerman, at the Guardian, actually got US officials to quietly admit that those reports you've heard of 100 Americans "fighting for ISIS" is an almost entirely bogus claim based entirely on Americans who "travelled to Syria or attempted to travel to Syria over the past 18 months." In other words, if you're an American and you happened to travel to or near Syria, the US government claims you're fighting for ISIS -- even if, say, you went to provide humanitarian aid or to fight against ISIS. The US government doesn't care. Onto the "terrorist" list you go.

Speaking of not caring, when asked about Hayes being placed on the watchlist, Senator Harry Reid's long-time spokesperson (who previously worked for Senator Ted Kennedy) gave a "who cares?" response:

I have no idea and frankly don't really care why [a] Bush/Cheney apologist ended up on a TSA watch list -- Senator Kennedy was on a list as well

That is... an absolutely ridiculous response, and shows just how out of touch those in power have become. The proper response is that if people like both Stephen Hayes and Ted Kennedy are ending up on a terrorist watchlist something is seriously screwed up with that list and the process to get people on the list. Besides, isn't it a little disturbing that a person in power on one side of the traditional political spectrum shrugs off the government putting someone at the other end of that spectrum on a terrorist watchlist?

No one's legitimately worried about any harm done to Hayes for being on that list. He's going through the motions to get off the list, which I'm sure will work out just fine. Because he's white and a person of some influence with connections to famous politicians. But, as we've covered, if you happen to be Muslim, and happen to be put on the list it's nearly impossible to get off. Even if you're politically connected, being Muslim means that you can be put on a watchlist here in the US.

At some point you have to ask what is the point of all of this. It doesn't seem to be about making us any safer.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: dhs, dick cheney, harry reid, homeland security, isis, james manley, stephen hayes, terrorist watchlist, travel, tsa, tsdb

42 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ninja (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 11:56am

Hopefully the process will be more convoluted than he would like and by the time he's removed from the list he will have suffered enough inconveniences to review his apologia.

Wishful thinking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RD, 24 Sep 2014 @ 12:29pm

This is why
This why you have the old adage: Never travel to the middle east. Just don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 3:23pm
  
  Re: This is why
  Or the US. Or the UK.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:01am
  
  Re: This is why
  Because Americans might piss their pants over the idea of someone actually having been in contact with Islamic culture? I can't think of any other reason why Istanbul might be suspect enough to call you a terroist.
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East#Traditional_definition_of_the_Middle_East
  
  According to that list, 3 major tourist destinations for Europeans (Turkey, Egypt, Cyprus) are the "middle east", and I've personally been to all three. Never had a problem. In fact, the only concern I'd ever had was that after visits to those countries and Morocco, I didn't want to have to explain the Arabic stamps in my passport when I subsequently went to Las Vegas. So, I opted to get my passport renewed before going so that I didn't have to have an extended talk with an ignorant customs officer.
  
  Other than that, visits to places like Istanbul shouldn't be much of a concern. You certainly shouldn't be afraid of being treated like a terrorist for visiting a country where British travel agents routinely offer package holidays.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 4:44am
    
    Re: Re: This is why
    I think he also included Usrael into his response (which is crimson red of NSA spying if you look at the Boundless Informant map).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just Another Anonymous Troll, 24 Sep 2014 @ 12:32pm

"In other words, if you're an American and you happened to travel to or near Syria, the US government claims you're fighting for ISIS -- even if, say, you went to provide humanitarian aid or to fight against ISIS. The US government doesn't care. Onto the "terrorist" list you go."
...
...
...
I'd say that I hate this government now, but I don't want to be put on The List.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- orbitalinsertion (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 12:40pm
  
  Re:
  Or elected to Congress. You know, whichever.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - David, 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:25am
    
    Re: Re:
    You are confused. To be eligible for Congress, you have to hate the country, not the government.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 4:46am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Good news then, Bill Maher probably destroyed the winner of Flip A District with some congressman from Minessota winning as the worst congress critter, apply for the mid-terms now!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 6:13pm
  
  Re:
  Not a problem, you're commenting on a site that dares to criticize the government, so you're probably already on it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That One Guy (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 6:15pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Related to the above comment, is there a name for 'This is meant to be a joke/sarcastic, but I worry that it is, or will be soon, more accurate than humorous'?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - beltorak (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 10:11pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Poe's Prophecy?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jo (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 8:37pm
  
  Re:
  To late;)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Fenderson (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 12:40pm

Not a little
isn't it a little disturbing that a person in power on one side of the traditional political spectrum shrugs off the government putting someone at the other end of that spectrum on a terrorist watchlist?

Yes, it's a lot disturbing. Unfortunately, that sort of thinking (viewing everything through the lens of partisan warfare) is so common as to be considered the norm. Not just in Washington D.C., either: the effort to divide us along party lines has been so successful that it's a part of daily life now. I remember when extreme partisans were considered kooks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AnonymouseCoward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 12:50pm

So ... anyone travelling to that antipodean hot bed of terrorism called Australia will be on the list too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bshock, 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:08pm

disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
While I think that Dick Cheney and many of his associates in the Bush administration should face indictment on numerous counts, that in no way invalidates their civil liberties.

If the Constitution doesn't protect the lowest of the low, it doesn't protect anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 6:03pm
  
  Re: disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
  Lowest of the low, so you are taking about the current administration? They have far surpassed anything Bush and Cheney did.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - David, 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:29am
    
    Re: Re: disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
    If we've managed to sink low it is because we've been browning our noses on dwarves.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Niall (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 5:26am
    
    Re: Re: disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
    I rather think an illegal, false war costing trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives far outweighs any of the Obama government's many sins.
    
    Oh yes, an illegal, false war that directly led to the current crisis in the Middle East.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 4:51am
  
  Re: disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
  Yeah the guy just visited a NATO Ally...one that is aiding ISIS instead of having 70 000 soldiers ready to invade Northeast Syria, the hotbed of terrorists that ASSAD told us were terrorists and he was right all along.
  
  I'd go with a secular tyrant who only imprisons the extremely religious (insane), even moderately religious should be kept an eye on over the mess that is going on there right now.
  
  Don't you guys also miss Saddam ? B'aath Party is about Arab Socialism, something treasonous according to Saudia Arabia and that's why this party got started. The US being the bitches of Monarchs for delicious cheap oil.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 5:54am
    
    Re: Re: disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
    I'd go with a secular tyrant who only imprisons the extremely religious (insane), even moderately religious should be kept an eye on over the mess that is going on there right now.
    
    This is a disturbing trend. After the first world war the territory of the former Ottoman Empire (and other previous Islamic Empires) was taken over by "strongmen". Kemal Ataturk was the prototype and Nasser, Assad (Mk 1), Saddam, Gadafy etc followed in their footsteps.
    
    They tended to emphasise Nationalism and de-scope religion and tribalism as far as possible. (although they often relied on cronies from a particular tribe for their core support. In general the non-islamic communities in their countries did rather well - often getting government jobs (eg Tariq Aziz).
    
    These people had to work hard to keep the religious genie in the bottle and this often required oppressive methods - but it seems (from what we see now) that this was better than the alternative.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 1 Oct 2014 @ 4:15am
    
    Re: Re: disturbing indeed, for so many reasons
    The B'aath ideals are not too terrible, but both Assad and Hussein betrayed those ideals for the sake of personal power and cronyism.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:12pm

Well, I'm pretty sure the Alphabetti Spaghetti have valid reasons for not inflicting anyone associated with Dick Cheney on any other nation intentionally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:21pm

Supporting the war on terror is in large part about keeping people believing that terrorists are a serious threat to the nation. Most people react to that kind of news with concern or outright alarm: they're terrified it might be true. Therefore, people who try to convince you that the war on terror is necessary are using the threat of a independently owned and operated terrorist attack to affect politics, which sounds like the textbook definition of terrorism. Thus, people who try to convince you that the war on terror is necessary are, in fact, terrorists and it makes perfect sense to put them on a terrorist watchlist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:28pm

Accidentally Right
"...the sort of person who basically seems to support nearly all of our government's excesses in the supposed 'war on terror.'"

Sounds to me like they accidentally got a real terrorist on the list.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
art guerrilla (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:32pm

and now for something completely different...
...although it could be argued that a cheney-esque disregard for poorer, darker people he engendered along his entire career, is semi-responsible for this:
the young black man MURDERED in the walmart because some lying fat slob of a cracker called 911 on him GROSSLY EXAGGERATING what was going on ('i'm gonna be a hero, i'm gonna be a big fat stupid, ignorant shithead hero ! !!'), and was subsequently MURDERED on sight by PIGS, said PIGS have NOT been indicted by the grand jury...

unfortunately for the lying pigs, they had to release the surveillance videos which -surprise- SHOWS THEY ARE LYING MURDEROUS PIGS...

i tell you what, i would COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND and sympathize if EVERY BLACK MAN in amerika rose up and slit the throats of every white person...

there is NO JUSTICE, only might makes right...
where does that leave *us*, kampers ? ? ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- New Mexico Mark, 24 Sep 2014 @ 4:19pm
  
  Re: and now for something completely different...
  Whew. Get a grip!
  
  As for your question, "Where does that leave us?" Basically, it leaves us in a nation much like any other where "justice" is carried out clumsily and with partiality to power brokers. In general, it is just a matter of degree. While I mourn at how far our nation has traveled down that slippery slope, I am also occasionally encouraged when I see things done right. I often wonder if it is even possible to turn this Titanic of a nation around, but in my opinion that will only happen when enough people repent of moral compromise, political complacency, and personal (as opposed to ideological) intolerance.
  
  As for the attempted racial genocide you propose, even a brief perusal of history and the horrors of flip-flopping revolutions where your scenario takes place repeatedly should teach us that 'more injustice' is never the solution to injustice.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - art guerrilla (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 5:00pm
    
    Re: Re: and now for something completely different...
    realizing that in Empire, 99 times out of a hundred, that was a white boy, wouldn't have been NOTHING made of it...
    
    and that FAR TOO MANY TIMES out of a MILLION times as many 'incidents' (driving while black, walking while black, living while black, etc) happen where a black person is killed on sight...
    
    i can ONLY despise such an Empire...
    i can ONLY imagine the justified rage of those at the hind end of Empire...
    i can ONLY beg forgiveness for being part of such an Empire...
    i can ONLY despair when bread, circuses AND a shiny ifucking phone keep the rabble in line...
    
    i *understand* IF a black person would want to slit the throats of every white person on the planet; didn't say i condone it, or would put my whitebread/cracker neck on the block voluntarily... said i *understand* it...
    
    SAME as i *understand* if ANY OF MILLIONS of moose limbs despise US, and want to slit our throats... if i'm joe achmed, and you drone *MY* family/tribe/town, fuck you to death, is what i ululate...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- RD, 24 Sep 2014 @ 6:31pm
  
  Re: and now for something completely different...
  Yeah so much for those orange tips making fuck-all difference. What a fiasco. And the cops are going to walk, the grand jury declined indicting him. Another Ferguson all over.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:42pm

funny how this reduces the number of western folks traveling to the eastern countries, witnessing the western worlds liberating these sovereign countriess, would of thought the good guys would have "nothing to hide"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mason Wheeler (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 1:43pm

Besides, isn't it a little disturbing that a person in power on one side of the traditional political spectrum shrugs off the government putting someone at the other end of that spectrum on a terrorist watchlist?

20 years ago, it would have been. Today, it's just business as usual. Sometimes I wonder if Tom Clancy didn't have the right idea about the US political system...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 2:21pm
  
  Re:
  ... Sometimes I wonder if Tom Clancy didn't have the right idea about the US political system...
  
  If he were still alive I'd vote for him over any other candidate. He'd sure be better than what we got now.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - David, 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:32am
    
    Re: Re:
    A rabid chimpanzee would be better than what we got now.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Uriel-238 (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 1:15pm
      
      Tom Clancy or a Rabid Chimpanzee
      I have fantasies of voting for Sideshow Bob. He, at very least, still had a conscience and a sense of service.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zero, 24 Sep 2014 @ 2:32pm

Location location location
So I assume now that any US citizen who travels to the ME region (or to those "suspect" nations) is presumably put on this list?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2014 @ 5:39pm

I'm curious if Senator McCain is on the watchlist for meeting "moderate" Syrian rebels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 4:59am
  
  Re:
  Or visiting Ukraine while it was still technically governed by an ally of Russia. Another chip on my shoulder, the Ukraine/Russia thing is a family feud. They're both the same people, lots of Ukrainians and viceverca care about each other, what I saw on Maiden was racist Ukrainians and nationalis, engineered by Georges Soros that sack of shit.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
That One Guy (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 6:11pm

Of course they don't see why it's a big deal, a single phone call and they're off the list, all they have to do is name-drop who they are and/or who they work for and the 'unfortunate mistake' will be cleared up within a day.

So for them, being placed on the list isn't going to affect them to any real extent. For those less 'fortunate' though, those that have to fight tooth and nail to be even told that they are on one of those lists, it's a much, much bigger deal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 7:34pm

Congress has fostered the terrorizing of citizens, lets put them all on the list and see how quick it gets fixed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 9:04pm
  
  Re:
  It wouldn't, they can almost certainly get off the list with a simple phone call, so it would be nothing more than a minor annoyance at best for them, and hence, they wouldn't care.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - nasch (profile), 25 Sep 2014 @ 5:56am
    
    Re: Re:
    Congress members don't fly commercial; I'm not sure they would even realize they're on the list.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Sep 2014 @ 3:36am

people are put on these lists because they can be, simple as that! and as for those that say it is 'no big deal', it isn't for them, because they are not on the list! try it and see how it makes you feel. when you are an ordinary, basically honest, upright citizen, who has no police record and hopefully wont have one, why would your own government think so little of you that you are basically classed as an undesirable alien, someone who shouldn't be in that country or even exist, someone who intends to do massive harm to others, someone who is classed as a terrorist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]