3 California Cities Blocking Parking Ticket App For Being, Like, Way Too Useful
from the apps-apps-apps dept
There's an app for just about everything it seems, including apps for parking tickets, apparently. One of these apps, called Fixed, is specifically designed to do several things with parking and/or traffic tickets. When you get a ticket, you take a picture of it with your camera on your phone. From there, the app allows you to automate the process of paying the ticket or disputing it. Specifically, by scanning the picture of the ticket you've taken, the app will automatically scan the ticket for common mistakes that are made that might invalidate the ticket entirely, at which point you can use the app to lodge your dispute. Sounds incredibly useful, right?
Well, three California cities think it's so useful that they've done everything in their power to block people from using it to dispute or pay their tickets, because that's apparently easier than getting officers to simply write tickets correctly.
The startup has had issues with the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) for some time. The agency was never all that receptive to the service, and the way it automated the ticket contesting process for locals. Using its app, Fixed customers could snap a photo of their parking ticket using their phone’s camera, and then Fixed would check against a variety of common errors before writing a customized letter to the city on the user’s behalf. The app also cleverly tapped into Google Street View to check to see if the city had the proper signage in place in the area a ticket was received. However, even when customers didn’t beat their ticket, the app could help automate the payment without having to use a city’s often outdated website.Keep it classy, San Francisco. It turns out that Los Angeles and Oakland all behaved similarly with respect to Fixed, harrassing and blocking the app and the people using it to the point where the makers of the app simply shut down the parking ticket part of the software in those three cities. This despite the app successfully contesting something like a third of the tickets that users had chosen to dispute using it. Drink that in for a moment. A sizeable percentage of parking tickets were found to have errors on them using this app and, rather than address this by having tickets be properly filled out, the cities in question decided instead to keep people from using the app to contest these error-ridden tickets. It's hard to imagine how a city might be able to display more contempt for its own citizens than this.
Of course, the cities haven’t been welcoming to an app that was aimed at helping locals not pay their tickets by automating the process of jumping through legal loopholes. When Fixed began faxing its submissions to SFMTA last year, the agency emailed the startup to stop using their fax machine. When Fixed pointed out that it was legal to do so, the agency simply shut off their fax.
And what's really crazy about this? The app had as much to do with getting people to pay their valid tickets on time as it did contesting the incorrectly filled out tickets.
“It’s unfortunate that the SFMTA decided to block our service. Over 60,000 parking tickets had been submitted to Fixed. Not only were we helping people beat their unfair parking tickets, but the alerts on our app were helping people pay their parking fines on time and avoid late fees,” [Founder David Hegarty] continues. “Parking Ticket Fines account for 15% of the SFMTA operating budget, and it looks like they objected to us providing some accountability to their process,” Hegarty adds.Hmm, it's almost like the city knows it's collecting money it might not deserve and doesn't want to let a simple piece of technology stop that gravy train...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: apps, los angeles, oakland, parking tickets, san francisco, sfmta
Companies: fixed
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This sentence summed up the reasoning perfectly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's not a feature, that's a bug! (in the eyes of the city)
As anyone with any exposure to any kind of criminal "justice" in this country already knows, the powers that be like it when you pay late. That way they get to extort even more money from you.
No wonder these cities are so pissed off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's not a feature, that's a bug! (in the eyes of the city)
the prison-industrial system must be fed, and how better to feed it than put in place a kafkaesque system where a $20 jaywalking ticket (probably unnecessary in the first place, and almost certainly given to poor/browner people in far greater numbers than others), gets blown up into a couple hundred, a couple thousand, and then you JAIL THEM for not paying these unconscionable 'fees'...
will The They (tm) actually have to take your fillings out in payment, and make lampshades of your skin before you figure out 'our' (sic) gummint doesn't give a shit about 99% of us ? ? ?
WE ARE SHEEPLE TO BE FLEECED so the 1% can buy that second aspen condo, etc...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's not a feature, that's a bug! (in the eyes of the city)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: That's not a feature, that's a bug! (in the eyes of the city)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: That's not a feature, that's a bug! (in the eyes of the city)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Techdirt succeeds again in making me sad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Techdirt succeeds again in making me sad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their next project ought to be to write an app to implant spines and scrub the yellow stripes off their backs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The real issue is very apparent. As long as the public is dumb it is easy for the city to collect part of their operating budget. When a city uses that as part of their plan for an annual budget, it's not going to get shut down easily. It's the same sort of problem that red light cameras got into and ticket quotas.
When it reaches this point it is no longer about the law, it's about getting more money for the city as an additional sneak tax.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Punishment for laws imagined by law enforcement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cities using infraction fees for revenue enhancement is not new news.
The alleged purpose of city ordinances is to sustain the safety, peace and order of the municipal area. But actively impeding people from behaving according to code (either by obfuscating the code, or obstructing obedience or process) is contrary to these purposes.
The city should not be in the business of tripping people up so that they have to pay fees. And there is no other reason that they would obstruct use of an app.
Maybe some officials should be publicly confronted as to why this is happening.
It creates an actively hostile relationship between motorists and the municipalities. Might be a good time to divert tourists from San Francisco by warning them that the town is out to force them to pay arbitrary fines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Toddlers.
And grossly inconveniencing anyone else regularly using the fax number. "Hi, I'm trying to send you the faxes you requested, but don't seem to be able to get through, can you let me know if there is a problem with your fax machine?" "Yes there is, we are passive aggressive shits so we turned it off" "Oh, I see, then we should mail the paperwork?" "Yes, fsck off, we're not here to do our jobs"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And the issue is ...
The app is costing the system money both ways ... late payment + fees is always preferred.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wtf
This about a movement away from finger printed, non-druck drivers, assault free car services to anyone with a car and gas being moved into the new criminal transportation arena.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wtf
*talks very loud* start transportation non-druck drivers gas free services, go tail pipe mouth piece inhale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wtf
Can you please translate your nonsense into English?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Postal Mail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A third of the tickets were disputed?
If most of these were disputed on legal grounds, then the city has a larger problem than just the app. In fact, why isn't the media picking up on this issue?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A third of the tickets were disputed?
The point is that we (all citizens) have a reasonable expectation for the government to handle things according to the proper rules. ( or at least rules written down somewhere)
If a proper parking ticket requires certain information filled out and you receive nothing but a scrap of paper with "F U pay mony" scribbled on it then you should have it dismissed instantly. If it's supposed to have a reason filled out and the traffic enforcer left it blank then you should have it dismissed instantly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How could you possibly know without having read it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder how a judge would respond to a plaintiff who got a bogus ticket and then traveled all the way to court because they city shut off everyones access to due process without wasting the courts time. Well I tried to alert them to the ticket being improper your honor but they cut off all of the easy access because they didn't like this app that showed them how many defective tickets they were writing, and hated that someone held them to the letter of the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While traffic firms aren't exactly Big Law like Cravath, there is a very solid industry of them, many with franchise-like branding, such as the Ticket Clinic (and California does have Ticket Clinic offices).
With the recent debate on the value of the bar exam for entering lawyers in light of the worst scores ever, defenses against criticisms that state bars should relax rules on the unauthorized practice of law (and some bars even fighting non-legal tech alternatives to lawyers), and the recent debates of reciprocity admissions in NY and FL, it's becoming more apparent that bar leadership has been creating barriers in order to maintain business and opportunities for established attorneys in their respective jurisdictions, rather than actually concerning the competency of new attorneys or providing novel solutions outside of legal representation.
I can easily see the opposition to this app as a movement by local traffic firms and practitioners (and even national entities, as noted above) to ensure a steady flow of clientele. As mentioned in other comments, the dismissal rate for tickets with this app is something like one third, which is respectable. A traffic attorney might feel threatened at the loss of some easy dismissals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The ultimate decision for a ticket should still be with a human since nobody (humane) would want robocops. But technology is here to make our live easier not to become a new enemy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is when you know "We the people" is no longer "We"
Our government was supposed to be made up of normal citizens who would serve a short term or two and then return to work. We need to get back to that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Important part left out of the techdirt writeup of the story
But in August, Xerox began using a third-party organization to block Fixed from accessing the parking ticket site. While Fixed engineers could still work around the block, it now required an increased amount of engineering time and resources, and this also impacted Fixed’s customer service operations.
For that reason, Fixed decided to end support for parking ticket assistance in these locations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SFMTA has a long history of not caring about the public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This app does exactly that. Eventually the State Bar or California and similar regulatory agencies in every state is going to block this from getting large.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]