New North Korean Weapon Unleashed: Bad Video Editing
from the failure-to-launch dept
We've had some fun with our North Korean friends around these parts in the past, mostly revolving around the Pyongyang regime's adorable attempts to bolster its already nefarious reputation through its propaganda efforts. While the nation's Orwellian policies are both stark and serious, and it certainly does have troubling weapons in its arsenal, so many of its threats have amounted to bad propaganda devised through the liberal use of video game footage, music and bad attempts at Photoshop. Well, the arms race doesn't end, of course, which is why North Korea is pleased to display its latest weapon: bad attempts at video editing!
Who can help being inspired by the replay-launching of a submarine missile? What with all that heart-thumping music in the background? Now, I can't translate the speech, so I'm not absolutely certain of what is being said, but I'm pretty sure the narrator isn't explaining that, hey, this missile actually blew up in failure, but we cut the video together to make it look like it was super-explode-y successful! And, yet, that's exactly what the analysis done by a California think-tank suggests is the case.
Footage of a North Korean submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) test released by Pyongyang two days after it announced it had conducted the country's fourth nuclear test last week was faked, according to an analysis by a California-based think tank.All of this comes on the heels of Pyongyang's announcement that it had successfully tested a more advanced nuclear bomb in recent weeks. That announcement too was met with narrow eyes from analysts and the US government, likely because of North Korea's long-standing fake-it-til-you-make-it weapons policy. The general consensus is still that North Korea isn't capable of fitting its nuclear arsenal, which is quite limited, onto any type of serious missile delivery system.
"The rocket ejected, began to light, and then failed catastrophically," said Melissa Hanham, a senior research associate at the California-based Middlebury Institute's James Martin Centre for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS).
The CNS analysis shows two frames of video from state media where flames engulf the missile and small parts of its body break away.
"North Korea used heavy video editing to cover over this fact," Hanham said in an email. "They used different camera angles and editing to make it appear that the launch was several continuous launches, but played side by side you can see that it is the same event".
Which isn't to say that the regime isn't dangerous. It most certainly is, chiefly to its own population and to its southern neighbors, whom it continues to hold hostage in return for aid for its crumbling regime. Just keep all this in mind whenever you hear the hawks talk about how dangerous our enemies are.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: missile launch, north korea, propaganda, video editing
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
To those living inside the country, they have no real way to fact-check the propaganda the government puts out, and even if they do spot a lie, it's (quite possibly literally) suicide to point it out, which means the government doesn't exactly have to try very hard with their propaganda.
Their 'problem' comes when they try and pass off the same laughably bad propaganda elsewhere, where people can and will check it for discrepancies or other falsehoods, and the NK government can't stop them other than bluster. Suddenly their 'masterful' propaganda falls to pieces, and everyone but NK gets a hearty laugh out of their latest attempt to look like a real threat to anyone not adjacent to their hole of a country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Suicide to point out a government lie vs. whistleblowing equated with espionage (with no whistleblower defense allowed).
Doesn't try very hard with its propaganda vs. 'the most transparent administration ever'.
Are we all sure NK is just a dystopia run by an addle-brained madman, or is it the Court Jester that's allowed to get away with satirizing the 'King'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
North Korea is just...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: North Korea is just...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: North Korea is just...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing stellar voice-over can't fix
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It launched successfully, tested it's "throat clearing"
charge, shut down and splashed down safely. Claims that
it exploded fail to take the tech under test into account.
That DPRK clipped on related footage of an earlier test
flight is a particularly stupid example of propagandising
for local consumption but that doesn't take away from the
unfortunate fact that they have accomplished one of the
most difficult steps in developing a working SLBM.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inquiring minds want to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yea, right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yea, right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bwhahaha !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe the west can give them tips
[ link to this | view in chronology ]