Before We Even Know The Details, Politicians Rush To Blame Encryption For Brussels Attacks
from the it's-almost-like-you-have-an-agenda... dept
So, it should hardly be a surprise that following this morning's tragic attacks in Brussels that have left dozens dead and many more injured, that encryption haters, based on absolutely nothing, have rushed in to attack encryption again. The first up was Rep. Adam Schiff, who quickly insisted that he had no actual facts on the matter, but we should be concerned about encryption:
“We do not know yet what role, if any, encrypted communications played in these attacks,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said in a statement.Schiff, of course, is the same guy who just a few months ago was loudly promoting CISA, saying we needed it to protect our privacy from hackers. Of course CISA doesn't do that. You know what does? Encryption. The very encryption Schiff now wants to blame.
“But we can be sure that terrorists will continue to use what they perceive to be the most secure means to plot their attacks,” he added.
Not one to be left out, Senator Dianne Feinstein jumped in with a thinly veiled statement in support of her supposedly soon to be released bill, mandating backdoors in encryption:
“We must use all the tools at our disposal to fight back,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat and vice chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement on Tuesday. “The way to prevent attacks like this is to develop good intelligence and always be vigilant.”"All the tools" likely means including her plans to break encryption.
And, of course, the many in the press are no help at all. There have been reports that a talking head on NPR blamed encryption this morning, while a NY Times reporter, Rukmini Callimachi -- who was the lead reporter on that ridiculous article yesterday insisting that the lack of encryption was evidence of encryption -- is tweeting up a storm claiming that ISIS is now encouraging the use of encryption, even though the questionably-sourced document she links to (which is written in English?!?) isn't actually recommending encryption, but things like Tor and VPNs, which are designed to merely mask your IP address.
26. ISIS is now advising its "brothers" in Belgium to only go online with encryption. (Thanks @MichaelSSmithII) pic.twitter.com/eWb4SD3INi
— Rukmini Callimachi (@rcallimachi) March 22, 2016
Either way, in the wake of yet another attack we're left with people who don't understand and dislike encryption, rushing to demonize it for no good reason at all.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adam schiff, attacks, blame, brussels, dianne feinstein, encryption, isis, rukmini callimachi
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
> what they perceive to be the most secure means to plot
> their attacks"
Hello, Rep. Adam Schiff
Does this mean terrists will NOT be using the government mandated, back-doored methods of encryption?
Who actually WILL be using the government mandated, back-doored methods of encryption?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Certainly not those who are promoting it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Regret to inform you this occurred a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think the expanded mandate for the FBI to head up domestic terror investigations has led to "investigation creep" where they've abandoned federal crimes in pursuit of international thoughtcrime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Doesn't matter if it is am fake terrorist plot, it's still a a terrorist act.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorance on display
Tor, if not used carefully just might not actually protect you. Even Tails has some significant warnings about its use. Anyone actually serious about their or their groups security would already have read those pages, and would not be planning on them protecting anyone.
I bet there are lots more face to face meetings happening.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The insanity continues
insane 'leaders' that they are in fact
insane. You can't make them seek help,
you can't make them listen to facts and
logic. 99% of the time you can't even
get them to listen at all as they are
locked in to running their mouth, all
the while babbling bullshit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmmm . . . lessee, should we bomb?
uh, 1) we retaliate and gain cred.
2) we scare the begeebers out of weak-kneed brussels sprouts.
3) we get almost unfettered access to u.s. communications.
wow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What TOR is
VPNs almost always use encrypted communication channels to eastablish the network as well.
I am fully on the side of strong encryption but somehow implicitly constraining the word to encryption at rest while excluding encrypted channels for encryption in transit is misleading and casts unfair doubt on the position we represent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What TOR is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What TOR is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: What TOR is
However, I maintain that it is unhelpful to say "...isn't actually recommending encryption, but things like Tor and VPNs, which are designed to merely mask your IP address." when both clearly use encryption and, depending on what protocols you use and where your connection is logged by an adversary, can well make the difference between a cleartext stream and a useless encrypted stream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What TOR is
People have been caught even using TOR. In fact using it can make one seem even more suspicious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bubble Gum
“But we can be sure that terrorists will continue to use what they perceive to be the most secure means to plot their attacks,” he added.
In other news...
We do not know yet what role, if any, bubble gum played in these attacks.
But we can be sure that terrorists will continue to chew what they perceive to be the most delicious flavors while plotting their attacks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As I would say to a child, "This is NOT OK!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The last time the government tried to mandate back doors, the plans were to exempt government employees and bankers. When asked why those people people would be exempt and not regular citizens, President Clinton answered that it was because "those people are GOOD citizens". So there you have it. Government employees and bankers = good citizens. Everyone else = bad citizens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like talking in person or in a car where they are not recorded? OMG!!! They are still one step ahead of us!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's what GM's OnStar is for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's about dodging accountability, not about encryption.
And yet, they failed to protect us. Again, after failing to act on early warnings on the Paris attacks.
Perhaps it is easier for them to bury that topic and talk about encryption instead ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's about dodging accountability, not about encryption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Maybe not, but you can bet they've probably got a pretty good profile of your political beliefs and transgressions. Those "random" tax audits and traffic stops aren't always as random as parallel construction would make them seem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They won't be able to stop them if encryption suddenly vanishes either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sad Reality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lets look at the timelines...
Last night, additional attacks were carried out. In Brussels.
They had a terrorist suspect- in-hand, being interrogated, and by several accounts cooperating with the authorities that had him in custody - and the attacks still caught authorities unaware.
And the go-to evil technology is encryption?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lets look at the timelines...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Narrative expansion
The new model: these guys are organized and positively chatty with fellow travelers over encrypted communications. They're all around you and can be anyone (especially ethnic and religious minorities). Be afraid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
or how about exposing 10's of millions of medical records, or how about our power infrastructure, that will show those dirty terrorists not to attack us, amirite guys?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's kill all the people!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
because OF COURSE THEY DO
Much like Big Media fighting for piracy and IP maximalism is not about fighting pirates, it about controlling the mediums. It's about keeping people paying per-head-per-viewing.
Crypto allows people to do things out of the perview of the government. That means they lose control. People might think. They might determine that the government is not their friend and does not preserve the best interests of the people.
And this terrifies every official and every rich cigar-smoking bastard down to the last Havana.
So, it doesn't matter if the terrorists just shouted and used semaphores, the politicos are going to scream encryption.
Of course they will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: because OF COURSE THEY DO
The UK have had equally nasty censure for years now. UK news outlets (including the Guardian) were not allowed to report vital facts about Trafigura
Some of these facts are surprisingly accessible from other jurisdictions like this NRK article about Trafigura
A quote from the documentary:
The British newspaper, The Guardian, has also obtained a copy of the Minton-report, but according to a High Court ruling have until today not been allowed to mention it, report on it or in any way disclose that they have the document.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't understand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't understand
Aah, another innocent. Let me help you. There is no "outside". It is a myth. A fairy story you might have heard when you were young. It just does not compute. Remember this, for your own good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
actually, tangent time...
The obvious million dollar question is *WHY* is she trying to kill off a major sector of her business base, and a significant portion of ALL of her other business bases, aside from money of course. I am talking about finances (CC companies, banks, etc.) Aerospace Industry, etc.
of ALL of the top 30 publicly traded companies in Cali for 2011, I can guarantee that ALL of them uses encryption in some form or another, if not outright producing it.
So the question is... Why doesn't the entire Tech industry, Banking industry, and pretty much all the top companies that uses encryption start running anti-Feinstein ads to get her out of a position of power?
(Note: this is from someone who does not live in Cali and assumes that there are no ads running as such, I could be mistaken though)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
California
We weren't very fond of Feinstein when she was mayor here.
Boxer and Feinstein have secure positions. The GOP can't find a moderate among their ranks that can dethrone them without wanting to clear-cut the forests for factories and close down all the abortion clinics, and we Californians like our forests and our abortion clinics.
And they know this so they send token, weak candidates to run against our Senators, and no-one gets elected.
Since they're already secure and DNC, the DNC doesn't bother to attack them from the left.
Because frankly, they way, way too conservative (or more exactly, too corporatist) for my tastes, both being IP maximalists and tech idiots.
They're also pro surveillance, pro-torture*, pro-drone-strike and pro-police-state.
I'd really like someone who was actually against these things.
At least not anti-torture enough to end the CIA Extrajudicial Detention and Interrogation program.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: California
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: California
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: actually, tangent time...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One of whom will soon be the next leader of the free world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facts
Shame on you! How dare you? To question those poor brave and honorable citizens? Because the public knows what is real! They are the people who suffer from those things and because of it they are the ones who we should put our trust in. They did know the truth a while back when we tortured and burned those darn witches and they do know the reality today as it is.
Praise those who believe what is happening and curse them who say killing 40 civilians to burn some money is the same. Because those 40 civilians died by the hand of God trough a missile launched via a drone which got is commands by a warrior of God in a USAF container.
Don't you hate those religious fundamentalists? 30 dead mimimi, 40 dead and it was the right thing to do. I am so glad we are the good guys!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, wait, no, that other thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
“We must use all the tools at our disposal to fight back"
Seriously?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, about that...
I'm not even sure the Islamic State is really worse, at least they're pretty straightforward about the atrocities they commit.
We like to hide ours from our own people, so for all we know we're piling bodies in the prisons.
In fact we are piling bodies in the prisons, the question is whether it's dozens or thousands.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: “We must use all the tools at our disposal to fight back"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NON RELATED
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why they want us to believe that you can`t have them both?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There will be no freedom, by virtue of the security mandate.
But there will also be no security by virtue of the fact that in such a system nobody can protect you from the state's ill intentions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
war is peace
lobotomy is peace of mind
etc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
These people live in neighbourhoods, completely isolated from authorities. They communicate face to face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Document is clearly recommending encryption
Seems like it's pretty clearly recommending encryption.
This doesn't undermine the argument in my opinion, but let's be straight about the facts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Old saying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Encryption is not all its cracked up to be
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One day people will ask why we let this happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple v Justice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]