CafePress Takes Down T-Shirt Calling Donald Trump A Cheeto-Faced Shitgibbon, Saying It Violates Frito-Lay's Trademark

from the trademark-at-work dept

Mon, Jun 27th 2016 12:46pm — Mike Masnick

As you probably heard in the news, last week, Presidential candidate/reality TV star Donald Trump took a bit of a detour from the campaign trail last week to fly to Scotland to open his new golf course. That the timing of the trip coincided with the Brexit referendum for the UK to exit the EU was just the wacky icing on the bizarre global political cake we're all now eating (bad metaphor apology). As you also probably heard, Trump talked about how wonderful the Brexit stuff was, and how much the people in Scotland must be thrilled, apparently missing the fact that Scotland, somewhat overwhelmingly, voted to stay in the EU. And because this is Scotland, and Scotland is awesome, folks there took to Twitter for a series of increasingly funny insults:

@cocteau8 @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/taaM2Pzo9b
— Kevin Osborne (@skinoverbone) June 24, 2016

@realDonaldTrump we never got our country back, we wanted to remain, bolt ya hamster heedit bampot, away and boil yer napper
— Rosco (@TheCyberwolf85) June 24, 2016

There are a bunch more at the Quartz link, but a pretty good one came from @MetalOllie, also known as Hamfisted Bun Vendor, who is English, rather than Scottish, but got into the spirit quite well:

Scotland voted to stay & plan on a second referendum, you tiny fingered, Cheeto-faced, ferret wearing shitgibbon. https://t.co/iKyEIxf8ej
— Hamfisted Bun Vendor (@MetalOllie) June 24, 2016

As I write this, it has over 6,000 retweets and over 7,000 likes. Not bad. Based on all of this, Jay Lender, a writer/director for SpongeBob SquarePants, Phineas and Ferb... and also his own movie, They're Watching, created an image in the style of Shepard Fairey's famous (and legally disputed) Obama Hope poster.

After some discussion Jay and MetalOllie teamed up to put the image on t-shirts at CafePress. I have no idea if anyone was actually buying it, but earlier today Lender announced that CafePress had shut down the page for trademark infringement. Whose trademark? Frito-Lay's, the makers of Cheetos, of course!

It's not at all clear if Frito-Lay made this request or if it's just CafePress worrying about future Frito-Lay concerns. Lender asked CafePress for clarification, and all they sent back was a link to Frito Lay's corporate contact page, telling him to contact Frito Lay to ask for authorization, implying that Cafe Press made this decision on its own. But, really, there appears to be a ton of other merchandise hosted at CafePress that mentions Cheetos in some form or another, so if the company is suddenly concerned about trademark threats from Frito-Lay, it seems to be targeting rather selectively.

Lender pushed back on CafePress's decision to take down the store, and received some rather ridiculous "suggestions" for replacement terms:

If you can't read that, it says:

The use of "Cheeto" infringes on Frito Lays trademark. If would be different if you used "cheese puff" or "cheese-snack"-faced in your design.

You may forward your notice of authorization from Frito Lay, giving you permission to use "Cheeto" or "Cheetos" in connection with the sale of commercial merchandise to us via email....

Yes. Really. Nothing like having CafePress ruining your jokes for you with its bizarre interpretation of trademark law.

As we've discussed many times in the past, CafePress is frequently targeted by bogus takedowns concerning political speech and the company doesn't exactly have the best record in dealing with such takedowns. But this seems just blatantly ridiculous on so many levels.

Either way, to argue that this is trademark infringing is crazy. No one is confusing the t-shirt or the image above as coming from Frito-Lay. I don't care how much of a moron in a hurry you might be, there's no consumer confusion here. For CafePress to declare absolutely that the use of Cheeto as an adjective here (not even as a noun!) is infringing on Frito-Lay's trademark is just... wrong. Second, this is pretty clearly protected political speech -- whether or not you agree with it or even think it's funny. Yes, CafePress has a right as a private company to refuse to host any shirts it dislikes, but at the very least it should come out and say that's why it's shutting down the shirt, rather than hiding behind a bogus "trademark" claim from Frito-Lay.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cheetos, donald trump, political speech, shitgibbon, t-shirts, trademark
Companies: cafepress, frito lay

75 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

The First Word

“

Do not take a cat to a food fight

I have been seeing what I think is reckless cat breeding for "wild look".

he Cheetoh's parent breeds are the Ocicat and the Bengal, which is actually a direct descendant of the wild Asian Leopard Cat... from one breeding site.

The Bengal Cat is the result of a long research program to save ALC DNA. This abuse of 10 years of research is just stupid.

My 1st Bengal was half wild, handful. Current Bengals are tame. A proper Bengal costs $2000. This knockoff is a third of that price.

Follow the money.

—fairuse

”

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

TenSteppin, 27 Jun 2016 @ 12:58pm

Fair Use - besides, if Strumpet eats Cheetohs - free advertising
Or perhaps CafePress was worried about Strumpet suing them because, you know, the truth hurts and Strumpet has enough money to make others share hish pain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DocGerbil100 (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 12:58pm

Likelihood of consumer confusion = nil.
Trademark infringement = nil.
Trademark takedown = happening anyway.

Obvious conclusion: CafePress supports Donald Trump.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Wendy Cockcroft, 30 Jun 2016 @ 5:32am
  
  Re:
  Alternative conclusion: threats received from Trump supporters or Trump camp.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeffrey Nonken (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:05pm

As a certified Moron in a Hurry, I assure you that I looked at the poster and the first thing I did not think of was "Oh hey, Frito-Lay is behind this T-shirt!"

In order to level the playing field and mitigate confirmation bias I showed only the poster to a colleague, a more junior but very talented Moron in a Hurry, and asked him what he thought. He agreed that it never occurred to him that the food company had anything to do with it.

Anyway, sorry to snark and run, but I'm in a hurry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 2:08pm
  
  Re:
  "Oh hey, Frito-Lay is behind this T-shirt!"
  
  It's not. I looked behind my monitor.
  And now I'm hungry...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:10pm

What a decision to have to make
It would be strange if Frito-Lay were to admit a relationship with that particular phraseology. Would the world consider it agreement or disagreement, and which would be worse.

Since the tshirt designer and CafePress are not selling snack food, there IS NO HARM to any food related mark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bshock, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:16pm

Sad and pathetic
I very much wish I could get a magnetic bumper sticker that said:
"Anyone But The Cheeto-Faced, Ferret-Wearing Shitgibbon, 2016"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:17pm

A different brand?
I suppose if they called him a Coke-head, shitgibbon it would be trademark infringement as well?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I.T. Guy, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:21pm

Funny? Maybe it's a regional thing but I didn't think they were funny.

"we never got our country back, we wanted to remain, bolt ya hamster heedit bampot, away and boil yer napper"

and

"Scotland voted to stay & plan on a second referendum, you tiny fingered, Cheeto-faced, ferret wearing shitgibbon. "

Meh.

And I am sorry but exactly what attributes of a cheeto is supposed to resemble Trump's face? Kind of like calling him a poopy head.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- kallethen, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:28pm
  
  Re:
  I'm guessing the cheeto reference would be how his tan often makes his skin look very orange.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Vidiot (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:32pm
  
  Re:
  Hmmm... think, "color". Crayola could add one new orange crayon, and you could use it both to color-in any cheese puff drawings you created plus a portrait of The Donald. Same.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:37pm
  
  Re:
  Might have something to do with his gloriously oompa loompa skin tone.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - I.T. Guy, 27 Jun 2016 @ 2:02pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Thanks everyone. Since the whole idiotic "Build a wall" thing I try not to pay too much attention to him. Maybe he'll be like the Stay-puft marshmallow man and go away if nobody pays attention. Let 'em take Hillary too.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 2:07pm
  
  Re:
  At first I thought it was another creative Scottish insult that has nothing to do with Frito Lay, so I googled it. Apparently it's a reference to Glenn Beck covering his face in Cheeto dust to look more like Trump. So it seems the others are right, it's a reference to his insane tan.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nutellabear, 27 Jun 2016 @ 6:37pm
  
  Re: IT Guy
  It's the color, idiot! Drumpf is orange from a fake tan. Which is frequently misapplied making him look like an orange raccoon.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 11:32pm
  
  Re:
  "exactly what attributes of a cheeto is supposed to resemble Trump's face?"
  
  The artificial orange colour.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Sigspat, 28 Jun 2016 @ 7:46am
  
  Re:
  Both are coated with an un-natural orange sheen?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- T-rex, 29 Jun 2016 @ 5:11pm
  
  Re: Drumpf's face
  Cheetos are orange. as is Trump's face. That's the comparison they're making.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
kallethen, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:27pm

Those tweets are worth a read. Scottish people have awesome creativity with their insults.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:42pm

Donald Trump is as bad as...
Actually I can't think of anything to compare him to that wouldn't insult the thing I compared him to...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 2:02pm
  
  Re: Donald Trump is as bad as...
  When I say, for example, that Microsoft Windows 10 is a steaming pile of horse excrement with a fresh topping of festering goat vomit, I am not trying to cause confusion in the market by my use of their trademarks. I am using the trademark properly in order to ensure that there can be no possible confusion of which company or product I am referring to.
  
  Now if I were to hypothetically compare Trump to the same thing, I don't think there would be any copyright, trademark or other complaints that anyone could make. Maybe defamation. But only if I were to actually make such a comparison which I am not.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - BernardoVerda (profile), 28 Jun 2016 @ 6:01pm
    
    Re: Re: Donald Trump is as bad as...
    Firstly, I'm pretty sure that neither "horse excrement" nor "goat vomit" are protected by anybody's trademark.
    
    Secondly, I'm pretty sure that neither "horse excrement" nor "goat vomit" can be defamed either by some implied association with, or by direct comparison to, that Donald Trump character. (Otherwise, we'd probably already have heard from them.)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TenSteppin, 27 Jun 2016 @ 7:16pm
  
  Re: Donald Trump is as bad as...
  Donny Strumpet is as bad as, well, Donny Strumpet.
  
  That's just 1000 steps below the "two-toned zebra-headed, slime-coated, pimple-farmin' paramecium brain, munchin' on his own mucus, suffering from Peter Pan envy!" individual named Rufio.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DannyB (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:57pm

We certainly don't want to create any market confusion
I can definitely see the resemblance between Trump and Cheeto-faced. But perhaps one could use a more generic term. Cheesy Poofs? But then the owners of South Park may complain.

I don't think the Trump face and Cheeto face comparison would cause market confusion for Cheetos customers or potential customers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 27 Jun 2016 @ 1:59pm

Actually, I kindof side with Cafepress here...
It's for commercial use and Frito-Lay probably has their trademark for use on clothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nutellabear, 27 Jun 2016 @ 6:42pm
  
  Re: Actually, I kindof side with Cafepress here...
  The Trademark and the name of the product is Cheetos, not Cheeto. Second, the use of copyright or trademark has a fair use exception for parodies. Especially political parodies.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 2:04pm

Just change it to "generic orange-colored, storebrand puffy chips ferret wearing shitgibbon"

Unless of course the MPAA owns the trademark on shitgibbon?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 2:24pm

You douchbags have it all wrong. It isn't a trademark issue, it is a Libel issue. Frity Lay would sue anyone suggesting that Trump actually eats their product. I mean, besides the Klan, who wants to be associated with Trump?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cooper's Loincloth, 27 Jun 2016 @ 3:02pm

Double Standard?
What if someone made a Hillary T-Shirt which compared her to a dishonest, power mad, feces-loving rodent and Disney complained that the ears on the picture violated trademark? Would anyone be bothered if it was pulled off of CafePress for *any* reason? Or would it be considered a "wild accusation" and sexist to boot?

Rules for thee and not for me, perhaps?

I don't much care for either candidate, but the hypocrisy on the left is just too much sometimes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 3:25pm
  
  Re: Double Standard?
  What if someone made a Hillary T-Shirt which compared her to a dishonest, power mad, feces-loving rodent and Disney complained that the ears on the picture violated trademark? Would anyone be bothered if it was pulled off of CafePress for *any* reason? Or would it be considered a "wild accusation" and sexist to boot?
  
  Yes. Yes, we would care. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140609/17534527530/hillary-clinton-pac-sends-bogus-takedowns-ove r-parodies-zazzle-cafepress.shtml
  
  So, please, before making bullshit assumptions, maybe try to use the search engine.
  
  Rules for thee and not for me, perhaps?
  
  Assume too much, perhaps?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 6:41pm
  
  Re: Double Standard?
  Damn, I hope you've got some soothing cream for that burn you just received.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 11:36pm
  
  Re: Double Standard?
  "the hypocrisy on the left is just too much sometimes."
  
  Perhaps if you looked at what "the left" actually believed instead of attacking the fantasies you just made up about what you assume they might believe, you'd be able to take it a little more?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 6:47am
    
    Re: Re: Double Standard?
    Dream on
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Wendy Cockcroft, 30 Jun 2016 @ 5:40am
    
    Re: Re: Double Standard?
    You may find they're getting confused by Fascism since it includes crony capitalism while cutting off support for those people considered to be weak.
    
    http://www.ellensplace.net/fascism.html
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Cooper's Loincloth, 28 Jun 2016 @ 8:58am
  
  Re: Double Standard?
  Wow, touched a nerve there did I?
  
  Maybe you might consider the fact that I was responding to the comments and NOT your article. You were pretty clear (reading comprehension FTW) that your opinion on bogus takedowns was that they were, well, bogus. One either side, even. Why would I look up something that was pretty obvious?
  
  Now, you obviously found mocking trump more personally amusing than someone mocking Hillary, but that's pretty reasonable - oligarchy vs. shitweasel has a clear humor gap. Your butt hurt response to a message not directed at you is a bit troubling tho, but hey, still understandable - it was posted to your article.
  
  I'm going to stand by my assertion that folks on the left are MUCH less tolerant than almost everyone else of people who don't agree with them, and the hipocracy of their stance is annoying. That's MY opinion, based on what I've personally seen and read and experienced. Notice: all the best riots occur when the left tries to silence blowhards like Trump. When's the last time a bunch of people started a riot at a Hillary event?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 9:02am
    
    Re: Re: Double Standard?
    Oops! Shitgibbon not shitweasel.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Frankie D, 11 Jun 2020 @ 10:29am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Double Standard?
      I was trying to figure out if Trump is a shitweasel or a shit Gibbon but now I need to put a size to the question like a piece of shit Gibbon or a massive shit weasel since his actions are now affecting the world maybe the right answer would be a global shitgibbon
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Wendy Cockcroft, 30 Jun 2016 @ 5:41am
    
    Re: Re: Double Standard?
    Read and heed: http://www.ellensplace.net/fascism.html
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Wendy Cockcroft, 30 Jun 2016 @ 5:38am
  
  Re: Double Standard?
  Hillary is emphatically NOT left wing. She's actually a right wing neocon war hawk owned by the banks. She should be made to wear logo patches like a racing driver. We're not keen on her here on TD: don't get us started on her IT and IPR policies. She hasn't got a clue and I'm not sure anyone has ever explained the concept of demmocracy to her.
  
  That she's not frothing at the mouth building walls to keep the Mexicans out merely means she's not as far to the right as you are.
  
  Bernie Sanders is a leftie.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
That One Guy (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 4:24pm

Frito-Lays wasn't who they were worried about
Given how enthusiastic Trump is when it comes to legal action against people saying mean things about him, I imagine they dropped it to avoid even the possibility of get a legal threat from his pack of lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- David, 27 Jun 2016 @ 4:27pm
  
  Re: Frito-Lays wasn't who they were worried about
  I don't think so, since they suggested alternative words for Cheetos, but didn't suggest changing the picture or other words.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That One Guy (profile), 27 Jun 2016 @ 5:02pm
    
    Re: Re: Frito-Lays wasn't who they were worried about
    Hmm, true enough, suppose I just assumed that they were more worried about someone who has a history of filing lawsuits against people and companies rather than a company that makes chips, but I guess chips it is.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 5:05pm

Easy bet that it was probably Trump that was butthurt people were making fun of him(and making some money from it) and had his people send a bogus takedown.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TenSteppin, 27 Jun 2016 @ 7:13pm

Where did it say "Frito-Lays Cheetos" in the design?
That's what KaKa Press claimed in their response didn't they?

Since all 3 words weren't used, and only a partial read of the 3rd was used, they got it all wrong.

Everyone - immediately stop buying any Frito-Lay product until they approve that t-shirt design.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fifty2Tees, 27 Jun 2016 @ 8:03pm

Do Not Underestimate The Power of Stupidity
I just launched this project on Kickstarter. It doesn't infringe in any "trademarks" ...

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/stupidity/the-power-of-stupidity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mark Wing, 27 Jun 2016 @ 8:18pm

The Donald's face definitely leans towards the red end of the spectrum.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Blowhard, 27 Jun 2016 @ 8:48pm

In fairness
I don't balme the Frito company for wanting to dissociate from that Cheeto face, ferret wearing, shit gibbon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 9:10pm

"a bogus "trademark" claim from Frito-Lay."

No.

Cheeto is a registered trademark, so I have no idea what you're talking about.

Why you're surprised that Frito-Lay would not want to be associated with this (or Donald Trump in general), is strange.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 28 Jun 2016 @ 7:19am
  
  Re:
  "a bogus "trademark" claim from Frito-Lay."
  
  No.
  
  Cheeto is a registered trademark, so I have no idea what you're talking about.
  
  Why you're surprised that Frito-Lay would not want to be associated with this (or Donald Trump in general), is strange.
  
  That's not how trademark law works. But thanks for playing (and revealing your ignorance of the law). Trademark does not allow you to block any use of the word just because you dislike it. It only applies in cases where there is likely to be consumer confusion as to the origin of the products (i.e., if people think that Frito Lay actually made those shirts). That's not the case here, and thus the trademark claim does not apply.
  
  Separately, as the article notes (did you even read it?), it looks like Cafe Press made this decision, rather than Frito Lay.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 9:17pm

"there appears to be a ton of other merchandise hosted at CafePress that mentions Cheetos "

And by a ton, Masnick means 5. But hey, that sounds honest, right?

Cheetoh is a bengal tiger, Masnick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2016 @ 9:36pm
  
  Re:
  Bawk!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 28 Jun 2016 @ 12:16am
  
  Re:
  And by a ton, Masnick means 5. But hey, that sounds honest, right?
  
  The image is just part of the page. By my count, there are 44 products in the Cafe Press store with a variation on the word "Cheeto"
  
  But, you know, I'm sure it's more fun to slam me based on your own failure to read than to actually read.
  
  That sounds honest, right?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 6:32am
    
    Re: Re:
    Oh really?
    
    OK, here's your chance to prove you're not intellectually dishonest: Post a list of the 44 items.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Mike Masnick (profile), 28 Jun 2016 @ 6:48am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      OK, here's your chance to prove you're not intellectually dishonest: Post a list of the 44 items.
      
      I posted a link IN THE STORY that you appear to have totally missed. http://www.cafepress.com/+cheetos+gifts
      
      That says there are 62 products, but not all of them actually say Cheeto/Cheetos/Cheetoh or whatever. So I simply went through and counted the ones that did, and it's 44. I can't believe you're challenging this rather than just admitting you were wrong. Got the link and count.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 6:56am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Admitting anything is difficult for some.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 8:40am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Oh I looked at the link, and I saw 5 items that said 'cheeto' on them.
        
        Now post your list of the 44 or admit you're an intellectually dishonest bullshitter.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Mike Masnick (profile), 28 Jun 2016 @ 11:19am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Now post your list of the 44 or admit you're an intellectually dishonest bullshitter.
        
        Ah. I get it. You're being a pedantic asshole. Because you're not counting those that say cheetoh instead of cheeto.
        
        Just because I don't have a stick up my ass about exactly how one spells cheetoh doesn't make me dishonest. The examples used clearly refer to the cheese puff, not the tiger. Either way, it's clear that CafePress allows it in other contexts. So the only one being dishonest here is you in pretending there's some massive distinction. That's not how it works.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2016 @ 4:24pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yes, you intellectually dishonest buffoon, because a cheetoh is a tiger and those shirts were about cats, not cheese puffs.
        
        But you don't care, because all you wanted was to say that there were "a ton" of references to Frito-Lay's Cheeto puff on Cafe Press when, in reality, there aren't.
        
        Playing loose with the facts is something you do all the time and everyone knows it.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jun 2016 @ 5:08pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "a cheetoh is a tiger"
        
        Holy shit, are you serious??
        
        Just in case you missed it, there is no animal named a "cheetoh". This might be the time to take the old saying to heart:
        
        "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than than to speak and prove it."
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jun 2016 @ 5:11pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Hey! And I proved the saying with my own words!
        
        A Cheetoh is indeed a kind of cat. In my defense, though, it has only existed since 2014.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        PaulT (profile), 29 Jun 2016 @ 11:20pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I wonder where the name originated. It would be amusing for the purposes of this argument if the person who named them called them "cheetos" but then changed the spelling to avoid conflict with the brand name.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 7:29am
  
  Re:
  "Cheetoh is a bengal tiger, Masnick."
  
  I know you are but what am I? Wipe the tiger spooge off you knee pants AC.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 10:43am
    
    Re: Re:
    Dropped out of school before you got to biology class I see.
    
    A Cheetoh *is* a bengal tiger.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2016 @ 9:01pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You know, instead of having to resort to word crimes for character assassination, wouldn't your IP-driven efforts be better aimed at other causes? Like resolving the Malibu Media anti-piracy crusade machine? Though I suppose you would have a problem deciding between Colette Field and Keith Lipscomb. Which bottom-feeder to felch?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 28 Jun 2016 @ 4:53am

Now, I know what they mean, I accidentally confused the t-shirt with a cheetos and ate it. Needless to say my hospital bill was... high. Good thing Fritos or whatever you call the company is out there to protect us morons-in-a-hurry from ourselves!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 6:55am
  
  Re:
  Damn - I just voted for Frito Lay.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Kansas Coward, 28 Jun 2016 @ 7:04am

If you don't have anything nice to say...
"Cheeto (R) faced, ferret wearing shitgibbon" has just surpassed "Epic douche canoe" as my favorite Trump insult!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mark Wing, 28 Jun 2016 @ 4:09pm

It's strange you mentioned the number 44, because that's the exact number of Cheetos per square inch that it takes to make the orange dye for the Donald's spray tan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ertdfg, 29 Jun 2016 @ 11:25pm

Should have known better
Frito Lay is defensive of their trademarks.

And I can see why.
Their Flaming Hot Shitgibbons are a guilty pleasure of mine.
The Cool Ranch Baked Shitgibbons, now with extra shittiness aren't bad either.

Oh, that wasn't the word that caused issues?
Whoops. My bad. I may have been confused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tanner Andrews (profile), 4 Jul 2016 @ 12:27pm

Cheeto-Faced Ferret-Wearing Shitgibbon
I think you have a correct use of the trade mark.

A trade mark is intended to assist consumers in distinguishing particular products and their origins. If I were to sell a snack under the Cheeto name, it would be infringement; the same is true if I were to sell malted battery acid under the Pepsi name. But if I were to say that I want a lunch consisting of Cheeto snacks and Pepsi malted battery acid, I should be correctly using the marks.

Here, the writer is correctly using the trade mark to identify a particular product from a particular vendor. That is the intent of trade marks.

Sure, Pepsi could say that it does not want to be associated with a Cheeto-faced ferret-wearing shitgibbon, but that is a political issue largely unrelated to the question of whether the use of the Cheeto name is correct to identify a particular product from a particular vendor.

Assume also that I insult Cafe Press at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No2GOP (profile), 17 Aug 2016 @ 1:33pm

Cafe Press Seems Right Leaning
It has been my experience with designs on Cafe Press that they allow much more if the content is right leaning as opposed to left leaning.

I had an anti-Trump sticker that violated no copyrights nor any of their rules, turned down… even after I sent copies of my graphics proving no copyrights were violated. And I see similar items on there that are anti liberal, all the time!

~Frustrated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Phil K, 21 Apr 2017 @ 12:14pm

Laughable for all the wrong reasons
I'd call all this juvenile pathetic and lots of far more insulting and more personal terms.
Fortunately the vast majority of the population is now seeing you all for what you've ALWAYS been
I particularly like the cowardly masked thugs who attempt to bully (as long as they outnumber 10 to 1) spitting in peoples face, attacking them, then screaming and running to the same police they mock and celebrate when they're murdered by their racist BLM pals
You all need two ot three promotions to get to "arrogant turd" level
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Frankie D, 11 Jun 2020 @ 10:42am
  
  Re: Laughable for all the wrong reasons
  Did you ever consider the fact but a lot of people feel helpless when shit weasels like Trump have the power to ruin lives the environment and futures of so many people. So an off-handed remark helps us get through the day while we watch Rome burn
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alan, 18 May 2017 @ 8:50am

Cheetoh Faced Ferret Wearing Shitgibbon
I have the shirt AND the coffee mug. Proudly. JOYfully.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fairuse (profile), 17 Jul 2021 @ 8:40am

Do not take a cat to a food fight
I have been seeing what I think is reckless cat breeding for "wild look".

he Cheetoh's parent breeds are the Ocicat and the Bengal, which is actually a direct descendant of the wild Asian Leopard Cat... from one breeding site.

The Bengal Cat is the result of a long research program to save ALC DNA. This abuse of 10 years of research is just stupid.

My 1st Bengal was half wild, handful. Current Bengals are tame. A proper Bengal costs $2000. This knockoff is a third of that price.

Follow the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]