Boise State Somehow Got A Trademark On Non-Green Athletic Fields
from the trademark-blues dept
It's football season again, which means some significant portion of America is routinely spending some significant chunk of its weekends watching some significant portion of male college students give some significant portion of each other irreparable brain damage. It's an American thing, I suppose. Also, an American thing is the acquisition of overly broad trademarks that border on the laughable. Intersecting these two bastions of American pride is Boise State, with a recent NY Times article discussing how the school managed to trademark athletic fields that include grass that is blue, with attorneys working with the school suggesting that any non-green colored field might result in trademark action.
For those not inclined towards watching college football, a quick piece of background. Several decades ago, the folks that run Boise State University didn't want to pay to resod their football field. So, instead, the school laid down blue turf in its stadium. Now real-life football players play on this:
Oy, it looks like the field has been cleansed with the blood of a hundred thousand smurfs. And, admittedly, the pure ugly of the field of play has become something of an icon for Boise State, gaining it national attention it might otherwise not receive, which translates into a recruiting tool for the school to lure players to its team. The school became so enamored with this attention that it sought to trademark simply having a field of athletic play that is blue, and was successful. To do this, the school hired an attorney that previously specialized in music licensing, because of course. That attorney's name is Rachael Bickerton, who both acquired the trademarks in question and now goes about enforcing them.
Her first priority was to register Boise State's trademarks, including the one for the blue turf. To do that, the staff had to prove to the USPTO that when consumers thought "blue field", they thought of Boise State. To make the University's case, Bickerton submitted articles, travel guides and marketing materials -- 141 pieces of evidence in all. The trademark office rejected the application in 2008, citing a "lack of distinctiveness", but approved the second attempt one year later after Bickerton argued that the previous year, Boise State had spent $2.2 million on advertising that singled out the field.
Now, we could sit around and argue whether or not having a blue football field was a thing fit to be trademarked. Personally, considering the specific color the school used, I could buy an argument that fans that see the field do indeed think of Boise State. I certainly do. But the school expanded the trademark in 2010 to fields not just blue, but fields that are "non-green." And that's crazy. Bradlee Frazer, an IP attorney working with the school, has stated that any non-green athletic field carries with it the risk of confusion pertaining to Boise State. He can say that all he wants, but such a stance likely wouldn't survive a challenge from another school.
But those challenges have never come, mostly because Boise State is quite liberal with freely licensing the ability to have non-green fields to other schools.
Boise State approves most requests "as long as it doesn't prevent Boise State from getting the best students and the best student-athletes that we're looking for," Bickerton said. Those schools that are approved receive the licenses at no cost. The only stipulation is that they cannot in any way liken themselves to Boise State.
So, to be fair, the school isn't behaving particularly badly as far as these trademark stories tend to go. Which doesn't change the fact that such an overly broad trademark on non-green athletic fields is pure crazy-pants. So if you're watching college football this weekend and see a colored football field, just know that even in your weekend escape, intellectual property law haunts you.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blue field, football, football field, non-green field, trademark
Companies: boise state
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, wait this is the "moron in a hurry" test for IP, right, good thing no morons (or trademark office employees) have access to google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure hope no forrest fires burn an athletic field.
Hope those teams up north have money to cover their field, snow will put them in violation.
Better invest in proper field drainage too, brown muddy fields will be in violation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quick question:
Cadbury is supposed to have a very specific shade of purple, or something?
Why not just trademark that very specific shade of blue?
...I get it! This is the equivalent of collecting a patent portfolio!
Boise State is trademarking 'non-green' fields and licensing them out to everybody on purpose, to prevent trademark trolling from anyone who wants to trademark a specific color!
...I think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't wait
Think about it. Or rather not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't care about the curriculum
Translation: We don't care if people choose Boise State for their quest for knowledge. We don't care about that ourselves either. We have H1B visas for when we need educated people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
used to respect boise state...
HOWEVER, i have ALWAYS thought:
A. their field is FUGLY, per-i-odd...
B. they have a tendency to wear all blue uniforms while playing there, and -to my mind- it provides a small advantage in that the all-blue players get 'lost' against the all-blue background... i think of it as crappy gamesmanship at the least, and cheating at the worst...
(i think the same thing of tennis players: saw some players at US Open wearing optic green outfits; excuse me? isn't the ball optic green ? and you allow them to wear optic-green outfits where the ball might get 'lost' such that the opponent can't follow the flight easily ? ? ? no, that is wrong, too... i doubt they would allow an outfit which had a realistic images of tennis balls all over, shouldn't allow outfits the same colors as the balls, either... realizing that tennis outfits were traditionally white, and the balls were white back then, too...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: used to respect boise state...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And yet those crazy Europeans keep getting fingers wagged in their faces because they let this kind of shit happen - go figure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See: https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/current#/current/TMEP-1200d1e12571.html
Here's the registration for blue:
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77574724&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they license for free...
This may not be a bad thing, but absurd that we need such a thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Non green
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Solved and green
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No puns for this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]