MuckRock & Vice Announce Fellowship To Investigate Peter Thiel

from the will-charles-harder-be-given-a-new-target? dept

Mon, Sep 19th 2016 4:18pm — Mike Masnick

So this is interesting. MuckRock, the really useful FOIA platform (that I regularly use for filing FOIA requests), has announced what it's calling MuckRock's Thiel Fellowship, in which it's offering to give free service to between one and three "Thiel Fellows" who decide to do FOIA projects involved in investigating some Peter Thiel-connected companies:

MuckRock is offering a grant of 250 requests (a $1,000 value), plus our invaluable FOIA expertise, to between one and three inaugural Thiel Fellows who propose projects that help the public better understand organizations or areas of research and public policy connected with Thiel.

As MuckRock notes, many of Thiel's efforts touch on government activities (which would make them open to certain FOIA requests):

Peter Thiel - co-founder of both PayPal and Palantir and an early Facebook investor - has profoundly reshaped industry after industry and, ultimately, remade the world to fit his radical vision of the future. Unfortunately, despite his impact in industries ranging from digital payments and mass government surveillance to radical life extension and seasteading, the media has done relatively little reporting on the details of his companies, often leaving the public in the dark on his contributions to society.

Vice's Motherboard tech site has also stepped up and agreed to double the amount so that even more people can file Thiel-related FOIAs.

Of course, the name MuckRock chose for this is a clear play on the well-known Thiel Fellowship, in which he gives $100,000 to entrepreneurial college students to work on building companies, rather than completing school.

And while I'm not so sure how much Thiel-related info is really FOIA-able, this may put to the test Thiel's stated claim that he wasn't against journalism that made him look bad, in funding lawyer Charles Harder to sue Gawker into oblivion, but rather to "send a message" about protecting privacy. Of course, when you try to silence the press, there's always a chance that the press decides to turn an even bigger spotlight on you. I guess now we have to wait and see if Harder starts threatening MuckRock with trademark infringement claims over the name...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: foia, investigative reporting, journalism, peter thiel
Companies: facebook, muckrock, palantir, vice

29 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2016 @ 4:32pm

The Thiel Affect
Great job! You just created a new meme! Now whenever we find out deep pocket people with thin skin are fronting laws or lawsuits, we have Peter Thiel to refer too as the most famous example.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2016 @ 4:38pm

I heard fellowship and I though of that one involving a Ring. You know the one that had three movies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 2:12am
  
  Re:
  I'm not saying Peter Thiel is Sauron, but Peter Thiel might be Sauron.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mason Wheeler (profile), 20 Sep 2016 @ 7:02am
  
  Re:
  Nope. No rings here. There's a palantir involved though.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Eldakka (profile), 20 Sep 2016 @ 11:54pm
  
  Re:
  Thiel's Fellowship does involve a ring. Each member has to bow before Thiel and present their ring.
  
  If they are really lucky, Thiel will only put his finger in the ring.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
That One Guy (profile), 19 Sep 2016 @ 5:16pm

Delightful
By using his own tactic against him he can't object without calling attention to the hypocrisy. He was willing to throw money at any lawsuit aimed at Gawker, now two companies make it clear that they're willing to fund(to an extent) action that investigates his activity.

He either stays silent and lets any FOIA requests progress normally, or he objects to the 'general bounty' offered and highlights the double-standards where he sees nothing wrong with bankrolling efforts against someone else, but objects when someone does the same to him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2016 @ 5:38pm

ITT...
"Journalists" being butthurt about their cancer being exposed and excised. If you're as shit as Gawker, then yeah be afraid. Someone will gank you before long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Thad, 19 Sep 2016 @ 5:41pm
  
  Re: ITT...
  "If you're shit, someone will gank you" -- thanks for that expert First Amendment analysis.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2016 @ 8:36pm
  
  Re: ITT...
  Same thing can be said for thiel, if you're butthurt about other people and use your own wealth for public agenda based on your own opinion, then someone will gank you before long.
  
  What goes around, comes around.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 4:59am
    
    Re: Re: ITT...
    If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- BentFranklin (profile), 20 Sep 2016 @ 7:20am
  
  Re: ITT...
  Shut up Peter.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Padpaw (profile), 20 Sep 2016 @ 10:14am
  
  Re: ITT...
  you either defend everyone equally or you defend no one. You cannot pick and choose who gets rights and who does not or the system is worthless.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 1:56pm
    
    Re: Re: ITT...
    I chose that people who intentionally and maliciously violate the rights of others give up their rights. Oops.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2016 @ 5:53pm

I still find it sad that TechDirt supported Gawker and believe Peter Thiel is a "bad guy" for ending the cancer that was Gawker

Good Ridden Gawker, and Thank You Peter Thiel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- art guerrilla (profile), 19 Sep 2016 @ 6:05pm
  
  Re:
  um, something not justifying something, or something i remember from aeons ago...
  the basic conundrum: good can not use eee-vil methods to attain good ends; eee-vil can use eee-vil methods to attain eee-vil ends...
  i would also remind various pearl-clutching kampers, freedom means people are free to make stupid, or tasteless, or ill-advised words and actions, otherwise they arent really free, are they ? ? ?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - NickDenton, 19 Sep 2016 @ 6:25pm
    
    Nothing Peter Thiel did was evil, I find it odd that people seem to have a Problem with Thiel funding the lawsuit but have no issues with Public Knowledge, ACLU, IJ, Innocent Project, or the 1000's of other groups who's sole existence is to help people that can not afford proper legal assistance to get that legal assistance.
    
    The legal system is completely out of balance, Gawker likely could have used it vast finical resources to force a premature settlement simply by exhausting the monetary supply that the victim had access to for the lawsuit, That is not a good thing.
    
    Gawker violated a persons privacy, not for the first time. Previously gawker was the 800 pound gorilla and used their expensive lawyers to crush their victims, I did not see anyone calling for a "Gawker Fellow" to use FIOA or other tools to get gawker.
    
    So if what Peter Thiel did is to be called "evil" or "abuse" do you believe Gawker doing the same thing was evil or abuse? Or can only "journalists" use the legal system to crush people? (and BTW Gawker was not Journalism, it was trash)
    
    There has to be a line drawn where privacy trumps a miserable click bait site's "right" to post something. I am personally fine with that line being drawn and unauthorized and stolen sex tapes
    
    Pretty sure TechDirt has been on the side of prohibiting and prosecuting persons for Revenge Porn, so why is what Gawker did acceptable?
    
    If you find what Gawker did either in this case or 100's of other despicable "stories" then you should have no problem with a 3rd party assisting a gawker victim obtain justice.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 2:21am
      
      Re:
      What Thiel did was abuse because he wasn't helping people who cannot afford legal representation. He helped Hulk Hogan shop around for a friendly venue for his lawsuit after it was thrown out of federal court (twice, I think). That's legal harassment and not at all the same thing as what the ACLU is doing. He then helped maneuver the suit as to avoid insurance payout, and what would have probably been a decent settlement for Hogan.
      
      Sure, that gawker post was trashy as hell, probably shouldn't have happened in the first place, but the damages awarded and bankruptcy were far from necessary.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 5:02am
      
      Re:
      I see that you are ethically challenged, is there any cognitive dissonance or is that just a myth?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - rk57957, 20 Sep 2016 @ 6:31am
      
      Re:
      
      "The legal system is completely out of balance, Gawker likely could have used it vast finical resources to force a premature settlement simply by exhausting the monetary supply that the victim had access to for the lawsuit, That is not a good thing."
      
      So if Gawker abuses the court system, bad.
      
      "Nothing Peter Thiel did was evil"
      
      But if Peter Theil does it, not bad?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- amoshias (profile), 19 Sep 2016 @ 6:14pm
  
  Re:
  That's interesting. Why do you find it sad?
  
  I'm a big fan of speech, even speech I don't like. I'm not a fan of vindictive billionaires being able to use the US court system to reshape the media landscape to their liking. And I'm especially not a fan of the precedent this sets for OTHER billionaires who get butt-hurt by something a mean, nasty tabloid says about them. Or the mean, nasty New York Times.
  
  If Thiel had just done the honorable thing and BOUGHT GAWKER - which would not be a major outlay based on his estimated net worth - that would have been one thing and easy to laugh off, although still disturbing. But doing it on the cheap - using OUR court system - is sickening.
  
  Okay, so there - those are my reasons. What are yours?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 4:51am
    
    Re: Re:
    gawker chose to print stuff, and there were consequences. Isn't that how freedom works? You can do whatever, but not with impunity.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 11:07am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Er, no?
      
      That's the dumbest definition of "freedom" I've ever heard. If your definition of freedom is "people can do a thing but then they have to accept punishment for it," then literally everyone is free to do literally everything. If that's your definition of "freedom" then the word is completely meaningless.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 20 Sep 2016 @ 12:28am
  
  Re:
  While normally I wouldn't wish such a fate on anyone(well, not many people anyway...), I can't help but think that it would be both fitting and funny if you were on the receiving end of something similar to what brought Gawker down, namely a vindictive rich person making it clear that he/she will bankroll anyone who cares to bring a lawsuit against you until you have no other choice but to fold. Maybe then you'll figure out why TD has a problem with what happened to Gawker.
  
  If the only thing you care about is how 'bad' Gawker was and how happy you are that someone drove them into the dirt then you're focusing on entirely the wrong part of the story.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
chilling farts, 19 Sep 2016 @ 6:38pm

Because he supported Trump?
Because he supported Trump? I hope someone ask the same for the TONS of lobby crap made by music labels with democrats.

P.S: Paypal sucks anyway. Remember they supported TPP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 11:09am
  
  Re: Because he supported Trump?
  Huh? What does partisanship have to do with anything? I think Techdirt's generally pretty good about acknowledging that there's shady backscratching going on on both sides of the aisle; why are you bringing Trump up at all, let alone following it with a "Look over there!"?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2016 @ 6:42pm

to catch a thiel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stan (profile), 19 Sep 2016 @ 7:35pm

The Thiel Effect
>...when you try to silence the press, there's always a chance that the press decides to turn an even bigger spotlight on you.

Does it follow that the Thiel Effect is a corollary of the Striesand Effect?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 20 Sep 2016 @ 12:47pm

So, considering it's a Thiel Fellowship, what will we do with his ring when it's properly FOIA'd?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2016 @ 1:47pm

poor gawker
poor gawker. now how will i get fix of such riveting journalism as *what horse would hulk hogan ****?

about time somone took that trash out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]