'Backdoor' Search Of FBI Records Helps Parents Learn How Local Cops Killed Their Son
from the Texas-gives-bad-cops-free-rides dept
This long Austin American-Statesman investigative report details apparent police brutality as discovered by parents who were kept in the dark by local cops about how their teenaged son actually died. It all started with their 5'4" 110-lb. 18-year-old suffering through a bad acid trip while hanging out with friends. It ended in the hospital with their son brain-dead, on life support, and the arresting agency unwilling to say anything more than their son had suffered a "head injury."
To the law enforcement agency, it's just another in-custody death. To the parents of Graham Dyer, it's long-delayed closure to a chapter kept deliberately unfinished by the law enforcement agencies who took Dyer into custody and returned him to his parents more dead than alive.
In Texas, the system is stacked against victims of police misconduct. State law, upheld by court decisions, make it almost impossible to mount a lawsuit against law enforcement officers. Courts are generally receptive to law enforcement claims and extremely hesitant to strip officers of immunity, no matter how egregious the apparent civil rights violation. This situation is made much, much worse in Texas where documents needed to propel a lawsuit past a judge's first reading often can't be obtained from the law enforcement agency holding them.
State law says a police agency isn’t required to turn over records for incidents that don’t result in a conviction. Graham, who’d been charged with assaulting a police officer after the confrontation, had died before his case could be litigated. So, the department reasoned, his records were confidential. Asked to weigh in on the dispute, then-Attorney General Greg Abbott agreed the Mesquite police could refuse the Dyers’ request.
The most important part of this paragraph is two words in the last sentence: "could refuse." The law does not forbid departments from handing over this information. It simply gives them a legal excuse not to. The Mesquite PD could have closed this tragic chapter in the Dyers' lives, but doing so would have guaranteed a lawsuit. So, it withheld the records, ensuring the officers involved in Graham Dyer's death remained free of accountability. It continued to deny release of the record, citing "ongoing investigations" that apparently involved one dead "suspect" and another arrestee, who had only been charged with public intoxication.
Faced with this hurdle, the Dyers approached the FBI, asking it to investigate Graham's death. It performed an investigation, but informed the couple it could not find enough evidence to move forward with a federal civil rights lawsuit on the couple's behalf. But it did open a door for the Dyers to obtain the evidence the Mesquite PD wouldn't release.
Using the federal Freedom of Information Act, in early 2015 Kathy asked the FBI to turn over any records it had accumulated in its investigation of Graham’s death in Mesquite. That fall, police videos of the fatal evening started arriving.
The recordings are disturbing. Graham's parents haven't watched them, on the advice of their lawyer. (All images below a screengrabs from the video posted at the Statesman.)
There was, for example, the image of a Mesquite police officer standing with his foot on Graham’s head.
There was the image of Graham in the backseat of the police cruiser, his hands and feet bound — yet also unseatbelted or otherwise restricted — in obvious distress, hurling himself about the car. And then the ghostly image of a police officer’s hand with a Taser stun gun appearing in the camera frame, shocking Graham on the leg.
And then, pushing him on his back and shocking him again — this time directly, and apparently deliberately, in his testicles. And Graham screaming silently as the electric shock to his genitals appeared to be repeated.
The Statesman has also released 24 seconds of audio from the arrest. It contains just enough to add even more horror to the images above. It contains the tortured screams from the 18-year-old as he is tased by an officer. It contains another disheartening scream from Dyer, who was suffering through a bad LSD trip at the time of his arrest: "Where the fuck am I?" And, disturbingly, it contains an officer's brutal statement as he tased the bound teenager: "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you."
That officer was correct. The Mesquite PD did kill Graham Dyer. It killed him to save him from himself, according to the PD.
“A Taser was deployed in an effort to control decedent, prevent escape and prevent him from injuring himself,” the city stated in court documents, adding the officer had been aiming for Graham’s leg and it was dark.
The PD also killed Dyer with indifference. By the time Dyer arrived at the jail, he was in terrible shape. But to the five officers on the scene, he was just a piece of inconvenient meat.
The videos of Graham as he was delivered to the jail also seemed at odds with the police department’s explanation of what occurred. According to the agency’s in-custody death report, upon arriving at the jail Graham had still needed to be placed in a special restraint chair “until the jail personnel noticed he was having labored breathing.”
Yet the video the Dyers received from the FBI depicts Graham lying limp on the sally-port floor after being lifted out of the cruiser. As he tries to raise his head, one of the officers pushes it back to the ground.
Records show it would be more than two hours before an ambulance was called.
The Dyers can finally move forward with their lawsuit. The presiding judge says the evidence obtained -- no thanks to the Mesquite PD -- shows they have a plausible civil rights claim. The PD obviously hoped its public records exemptions would keep the Dyers from successfully suing it, much less actually finding out what happened that night.
The government, far too often, insulates the worst of its employees against the public that's entrusted it with power. In many ways, the system is deliberately designed to push citizens towards resigned acceptance of abuse by authority figures. The courts, meant to be a check against government power, have been far too compliant for far too long. The end result is the ugliness above where no one in a position of power will do anything to assist constituents until forced to. And they'll will follow this up by doing as possible to deter future acts of violence and brutality. The cops involved in this arrest -- and every government official that's assisted in erecting a wall between police and accountability -- should take a good, long look at the terrorized teen captured by the police cruiser's camera and see if they still feel comfortable with their decisions.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fbi, graham dyer, police, public records
Reader Comments
The First Word
“How do we tell our Children
that you can always trust a police officer when we see things like this? Who do we tell them to trust, where do we tell them to go for help?Isn't that what we need, isn't that what they are paid for?
Help? Where is our hope..........
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
There but for the grace of God go I.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If it kills a few drugged up teenagers, poor people, or children then so be it.
Make America Great Again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe there were things the police could have done different such as restraining him better to protect him from himself. The leos likely need better training on how to deal with someone in this mental state.
But the root cause of Dryers death is his decision to take LSD.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Your tax dollars, hard at work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Quit making excuses for thugs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Judge: "Pretty much, yeah. Even then I might dismiss the case on a technicality. Heck if you don't shut up I might put you in prison!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also...
I can only think the root cause for your disgraceful post was your decision to take LSD.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
trust your government
This incident happened in semi-rural Texas because they're weird there.
This stuff NEVER happens in regions with enlightened progressive local governments ... like Chicago, New York, Miami, San Francisco, L.A. , D.C. , New Orleans, etc etc.
Cops are chosen from the best & brightest of society -- humble, peaceful public servants who hesitate to even say an unkind word to anyone. Sleep tight America.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Body cameras soon to be illegal in TX?
IANAL, but an officer saying "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you." and then actually killing them- does that open up the possibility of charges of premeditated murder? With this video I don't see how these officers could keep their qualified immunity in any place with even a minimal pretense of being lawful.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: trust your government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: There but for the grace of God go I.
That logic is what created this problem to begin with. Go ahead, keep asking for someone ELSE to ensure your safety, you will find they don't give a shit about you and yours. They only give a shit about how well you can "obey" their commands.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If your brain was supposed to function like that, it would have been originally wired that way.
Any moron that takes acid is playing roulette with themselves.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Don't worry, he's working on it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If a bad and unjust thing happens to you while you aren't in a sober state of mind, the thing is still bad and unjust and the people who did it should not be given these lame ass excuses for what they did.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Body cameras soon to be illegal in TX?
Not in Texas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How do we tell our Children
Isn't that what we need, isn't that what they are paid for?
Help? Where is our hope..........
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Small correction:
Organized unanimous coverup would not be part of law enforcement routine and culture if we were talking only about the worst.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Oh, they're trained, all right. They're trained that it's better that 100 members of the public die than that an officer sprain something.
They know damned well how to restrain somebody without tasing them. And most of them know how to de-escalate, at least in theory. But they are also explicitly trained <em>not</em> to use those skills in many cases, because they are taught that their absolute top priority is their own safety. It's safer to tase somebody into submission than it is to try anything that involves closer engagement than that.
Not that they don't still whine all the time about how dangerous their job is, even though they don't make the top 10 most dangerous jobs in the USA.
Of course, none of that explains "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you!". For that, you have to get to the less formal officer training, which is that anybody who challenges your sacred authority is a scumbag who deserves anything you want to do to them.
That reinforces and is reinforced by the other formal training they get that says the most important thing to do is to establish control over every situation, and the most efective way to do that is to act tough.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How do we tell our Children
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The cause of his death was the brutal actions of the police...lots of people have taken LSD over the years and it wasn't a death sentence for them. People on LSD need to be in a calm comfortable setting, not locked in a car, bound and electrocuted. A simple Google search could have given police this information on how to help people through and acid trip. I guess all 5 were too busy restraining, beating and electrocuting him to consider other options.
To add insult to injury, the police involved will likely get some paid time off and remain on the force with full benefits and pension.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This reiterates the proper handling of the police:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Who is being sued is a major factor.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The presiding judge says the evidence obtained -- no thanks to the Mesquite PD -- shows they have a plausible civil rights claim.
Anyone else would be lucky if they were offered a deal for murder 2.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How do we tell our Children
It appears that the preference is for you to train your children to trust no one. That way they grow up paranoid about...well...everything. Which leads officialdom to be able to rationalize their despicable behavior by claiming 'they are only delusional paranoid fanatics who hate the government and are therefore terrorists' in any case where there is no other excuse to put the peon down.
Government for the government, by the government, and let the taxpayers bow down and accept our largess (bow a little lower over there).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: trust your government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: There but for the grace of God go I.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You're conveniently ignoring that they tased him in the genitalia. That's not a standard practice. That's not a approved usage of the device. And that's not an effective method of controlling someone, only torturing them.
And the cop saying, "Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you," really doesn't support any idea that they were concerned for his well-being.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
However root cause or not, this is police brutality and they should be held to a higher standard - no matter how hard their job may be.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: trust your government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If you are the only freely moving human on the scene, that will be impossible, as you will be the threat..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
But the root cause of Dryers death is his decision to take LSD.
The root cause of his death was someone stupid enough to think that the police that showed up would actually help him.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Something to keep in mind
These are sadistic serial murderers, they're on a police force, and nobody is going to do a thing about it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: There but for the grace of God go I.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Comey.
'Nuff said.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unforeseeable outcomes...
You weren't there you can't understand...
Can we really stop pretending this is acceptable?
Can we stop unions from getting contracts that allow them to force terminated officers back onto the force?
Can we stop the thin blue line of silence?
Some cops won't come forward because they know other cops will be slow to back up them going forward, how are they still employed?
They run like fucking gangs, who are protected at every fucking turn. Its time to shatter the pack mentality and remind them they are to protect & serve, not abuse & coverup.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Something to keep in mind
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Oh, they know. Protect and serve the rich and powerful.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Looks like brutal treatment of an individual leading to their death, but since the individual in question wasn't a cop, and the ones doing it to them were, nothing to see here, that's perfectly acceptable behavior."
/poe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Something to keep in mind
Given the only reason it even might go to court this time is because the parents involved the FBI, and then when they failed to be any better they routed around them to get the evidence they needed... yeah, I'd say they're likely quite used to getting away with stuff like this.
Furthermore, I'd put good odds on any judge looking at the evidence and seeing nothing wrong with what occurred, with a slap on the wrist, 'Don't get caught next time' as the worst any of those responsible will likely face, because police are never wrong. With factors like that in play why wouldn't they feel confident they could get away with murder?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If there is a single officer killing people arbitrarily, it's a job for the FBI. If the whole department has turned into a crime ring killing people without individuals standing out, it's a job for Internal Affairs. Because, you know, qualified immunity is only gone when you behave extraordinarily in the execution of your duty. When the whole department is on a kill-and-coverup spree, you need to deal with them as a department and that's not the FBI's job.
Something like that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Now you know
We have a drug den across from where I live, we have called the Cops, then found out some cops stop by the drug den, for personal use. We will take care of it ourselves, then the Cops can investigate the aftermath.
Disclaimer: I was not born here, I just moved here for the sunshine.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: There but for the grace of God go I.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
BTW, ever tried to restrain someone on a bad acid trip? I have. "Motherfucker I'm going to kill you" is the kind of thing you utter when they headbutt you in the nose or a flailing limb hits you in the testes.
Yeah, the cops screwed up - a LOT. However, basing "guilt" on a few seconds of a longer video is crazy. You'd need to see the entire vid of them getting him down and into the car.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And the winner is...
See it soon in U.S. Congress.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Surely they would have called for medical assistance immediately they felt the need to tase the victim to protect them from themselves, before they'd begun transportation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What I do think is that the risk calculation tends to lead to the conclusion that you're safer assuming that any given officer is a "bad apple" than not doing so.
If you assume that a good officer is a "bad apple", the best outcome is that the officer proves you wrong, and you go away with your situation (whatever it was) resolved satisfactorily. The worst outcome is that you offend the officer, make him a little more cynical and less likely to trust the public, and push him a little farther towards being a "bad apple".
If you assume that a "bad apple" is a good officer, the best outcome is that he doesn't happen to bother doing anything particularly bad that time. The worst outcome is that you end up dead, and the officer gets away with no meaningful punishment.
Even if we presume for the sake of argument that there are far fewer genuine "bad apple" officers than good ones (or at least ones who won't do bad things unless they're backing up a "bad apple"), the risk/reward calculation here is just so heavily unbalanced that the best decision is almost a foregone conclusion.
Assuming that an officer is good could get you killed; assuming that an officer is bad could offend somebody; and the flip-side positive results don't remotely outweigh the negative possibility of getting killed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: There but for the grace of God go I.
Nope. Negligence requires a lack of intent. Murder requires intent to kill, which may be formed in advance and expressed as ``Motherfucker, I'm going to kill you.'' but need not be.
Normally intentional police killings are not prosecuted because it would make the officers feel bad.
(No, I do not know who thought of this silly ``markdown'' stuff. Sorry about that. Just pretend the HTML is working.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How do we tell our Children
Far more people are killed every year by the police than police officers. They're all in the Thin Blue Line Gang.
It's sickening the things they get away with. All the LIES they always tell. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for YOU, only for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]