Ahead Of His Senate Hearing, James Comey Pushes His 'Going Dark' Theory
from the same-old-Comey,-same-bad-arguments dept
Ahead of his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, FBI Director James Comey released his planned testimony, which covers a variety of subjects Comey hoped to cover during the hearing. A lot of the talking points were touched on, but Comey spent most of his time fielding questions from pissed-off senators about how much they were disappointed in recent FBI investigations.
The testimony Comey planned to give contains another discussion of the FBI-centric "going dark" issue. According to Comey, device encryption has blocked FBI's searches nearly 50% of the time, preventing it from pulling data from more than 3,000 phones. Comey also says other approaches -- such as using metadata or cellphone forensic software -- won't work. They're too expensive and won't scale. Left unsaid is Comey's desire for legislation or a few precedential court decisions to force manufacturers to compromise their customers' security.
He makes this argument by conflating privacy and security and using this conflation to arrive at a completely wrong conclusion. From Comey's testimony [PDF]:
Some observers have conceived of this challenge as a tradeoff between privacy and security. In our view, the demanding requirements to obtain legal authority to access data—such as by applying to a court for a warrant or a wiretap — necessarily already account for both privacy and security. The FBI is actively engaged with relevant stakeholders, including companies providing technological services, to educate them on the corrosive effects of the Going Dark challenge on both public safety and the rule of law. The FBI thanks the committee members for their engagement on this crucial issue.
Warrants and court orders cover the "privacy" end of the argument, but using court orders (or legislation) to force device makers to build backdoors in users' devices throws security out the window. The balancing act in the encryption debate has never been "privacy vs. security." It's been "security vs. insecurity." Comey's false equation presents privacy and security as two sides to the same coin, yet somehow completely separable in the presence of a court order. Fourth Amendment protections cover the privacy end, but showing up at a device backdoor with a warrant in hand does nothing for anyone's security.
Comey doesn't want a balancing act, despite all his assertions about "adult conversations" and deferring to the "smart people" at tech companies. He wants device owners to sacrifice security in exchange for protections they're already guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backdoors, encryption, fbi, going dark, james comey
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Vault7 and CIA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Security vs. Privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Security vs. Privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
stupid twit comey
i ocme here to tell you this cause obviously you nitwits about don't realize its too late to stop.
We've now had 15 years to learn how to create and test our own encryptians and how to break them....
and yes aacs 2.0 is broken.
Also why use technology at all , when you can give a message in whole or part to someone not on any no fly list...that is already going somewhere it can then be taken and sent in any other ways.
YOU created this form of intelligence by all your spying....Had you not been so paranoid and scared and harmed those that tried to help you....well it might be a better less scarey world for what you really don't know.
later all and this ip will self destruct log away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cutting red tape
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cutting red tape
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm...
I'm all for the FBI being budget conscious. However, whenever I see a law enforcement agency complaining that they need to replace what they're doing with something else because the current system "won't scale" -- alarm bells go off. It's not like we suddenly have more terrorists or crimes over $10k happening than we used to with the current budget and techniques; so if they're wanting to scale out, that means they want to scale out investigations. That's usually at the expense of the citizenry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looking down the road
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Looking down the road
It's a lost war even if he gets some wind in some battles. I'd compare it to Vietnam where a very well equipped military with a heavy handed govt behind got their arses handed back to themselves by a bunch of underdeveloped apes. (I'm using the term ape as the government probably thought they were, this is not meant to degrade the Vietnamese)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Looking down the road
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
East Germany was such a society…
Maybe that's who Comey wants to emulate. ;]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Afraid of going "dark"
Comey is white after all....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First came window blinds...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First came window blinds...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To be fair...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And the subject nauseates him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The FBI is actively engaged with relevant stakeholders"
I'm not sure that the FBI will be happy with the type of "engagement" that these "stakeholders" have in mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Won't Scale" Is A *FEATURE*, Not A Bug
"Won't Scale" = "The Feds have to pick and choose actual suspects instead of snooping on everybody"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]