YouTube Jacks Live TV Streaming Prices 30%, As Streaming Sector Starts To Resemble Good Old Cable
from the meet-the-new-boss... dept
There's absolutely no doubt that the streaming TV revolution has, by and large, been a positive thing. Thanks to a ridiculous surge in streaming TV competitors, consumers now have far more options than they've ever had before, resulting not only in lower prices and more flexibility in TV options, but customer service that far surpasses the clumsy trash fire that is Comcast customer service.
But all is not well in paradise. Those laboring under the illusion that this competition would magically rid the sector of its worst impulses will likely soon be broken of this notion, as YouTube this week announced it would be raising prices for its streaming TV service some thirty percent ($15 to $65 a month). Much like traditional cable TV vendors have done for years, YouTube blames the hikes on the high cost of programming, and innovative improvements to the platform:
"We don’t take these decisions lightly, and realize how hard this is for our members. That said, this new price reflects the rising cost of content and we also believe it reflects the complete value of YouTube TV, from our breadth of content to the features that are changing how we watch live TV. YouTube TV is the only streaming service that includes a DVR with unlimited storage space, plus 6 accounts per household each with its own unique recommendations, and 3 concurrent streams. It's all included in the base cost of YouTube TV, with no contract and no hidden fees."
This of course wasn't surprising. The same broadcasters that kept jacking up prices on traditional cable TV providers (one and the same when talking about AT&T/TimeWarner/HBO or Comcast/NBC/Universal), are now doing the same thing to streaming TV providers. In short, it's a never ending quest to extract higher and higher rates for the same programming at a moment when consumers have made it abundantly clear they're sick of paying an arm and a leg to watch ad-laden, traditional TV (not to mention the whole pandemic and resulting financial toll thing).
It's a greedy downward spiral that even Wall Street analysts have been warning for years isn't sustainable. Said greed recently resulted in record losses in the traditional cable TV sector, as users, angered by relentless price hikes, headed for the exits. Granted with the same price hikes now hitting streaming TV providers (especially those offering live broadcasts), these users (especially younger ones) are more likely than ever to avoid the concept of traditional TV entirely and just go watch free YouTube, TikTok, or (gasp) read a book.
The sector has already inadvertently been driving some users to piracy thanks to its obsession with exclusives. With users now forced to hunt and peck through a rotating crop of paywalled services to find their favorite content (Star Trek on CBS All Access, Star Wars on Disney+, Friends only on Comcast!, etc.) many users had already been reverting to piracy (or OTA broadcasts) for simplicity and cost's sake. Raising prices hand over fist isn't likely to help that, and there's the potential here to undermine all of the work put into convincing content owners to make content easier to access over the last two decades.
Other ugly habits of traditional television have also been slowly meandering over to the streaming TV space. The Roku, Amazon, and AT&T standoff, for example, has resulted in Roku and Amazon hardware users being unable to access AT&T's streaming platforms as they bicker over rates, ensuring that the annoying and ugly content blackouts and retransmission feuds make their way to streaming. A lot of these standoffs will inevitably get worse (especially given the feckless FCC authority and death of net neutrality).
Again, streaming TV right now is a huge step up from traditional cable, the old cable box, bloated cable channel bundles, and sky high prices. But there's still plenty of warning signs that as the sector grows, it's going to forget many of the important lessons of its past.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable tv, piracy, pricing, streaming, youtube tv
Companies: google, youtube
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
something something same thing over and over expecting different results...
something something same thing over and over expecting different results...
something something same thing over and over expecting different results...
something something same thing over and over expecting different results...
something something same thing over and over expecting different results...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typo?
15$ to 65$ per month is more than 30%?
Supposed to be 25$?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Typo?
Never mind.
I read the source.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Typo?
I signed in just to reply to you, so I'm not going to let that effort go to waste just because you figured it out on your own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Typo?
How dare you read an article around here!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Typo?
I agree, not clear here. Given I had no idea how much YTTV was. I had to go elsewhere to verify that the increase was BY 15 not FROM 15.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Typo?
Oh so the old price was 50?
...thats still very high.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The more things change, the more they stay the same. Or in this case, repeat.
When cable first came out, it was a affordable way to get a variety of local + new stations without the hassle of having to put an an antenna + rotor(if you were between stations.
Once cable got enough folks hooked and the antennas had come down(sometime due to local laws or HOA rules), cable started jacking up prices.
Streaming is following the same playbook. Low intro price, no or simple controller box, better channel options. Now that enough folks are hooked and have turned in those cable boxes, Streamers are raising prices and in many cases adding in those same high cost channels that folks used to hate in the cable bundles.
If the Streamers keep this up, physical media may make a come back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When I canceled cable TV I had to schedule a service call to remove the box. Canceling a streaming service only takes a few clicks. The pain may come sooner, as will discounts. My cable company sends me an offer every few months to bundle TV with my Internet for the same price. Either they are desperate to raise subscriber numbers or my Internet price is a rip off. Either way I have held the line and neither restored cable nor added more streaming services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
For many years Comcast has been sending me mailings advertising combo packages with TV at a much lower (advertised) price than I'm paying for Internet alone. But I know that the billed amount will be higher and rapidly increase.
The mailed advertising is especially irksome because I get them at least as frequently as the previous mailed bills. Comcast encouraged customers to replace that with paperless billing for environmental reasons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Youtube what? Never heard of that until that news came out. lolYoutube. Back to torrenting shit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait, when did cable TV providers use "innovation" to justify price-hikes? The only innovation that comes to my mind is pay-per-view and cable-based internet, which would have been paid by subscribers to those services (rather than TV subscribers). And I guess the TV-guide channels they added in the '90s. DVRs were another big change, but Tivo did the innovation there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Innovation doesnt need to exist for companies to use it as an excuse to raise prices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Right. Did they? If so, did they say what they viewed as "innovative", apart from creative billing practices and bad customer service?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We subscribe to Amazon Prime, Netflix and Hulu+ as we have done for years now. The rates for those have increased once each during that time but only slightly. We have zero plans to subscribe to any more services because we dumped cable for a reason, or multiple reasons. We're not going to repeat that mistake with streaming.
Google jacking up their rates by 30% will only ensure their service fails to grow or possibly even shrinks. Others will learn the same lesson. Sooner or later all those varied services will finally decide that they don't have enough customers to remain viable (except maybe Disney) and will go back to Netflix et. al. with hat in hand to restart contracts. I look forward to that day when there will be something to watch other than Netflix's low-grade in-house content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lol @ "complete value"
I only watch TV for free and most of the time I believe it's still not worth the price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lol @ "complete value"
Exactly, YouTube doesn't get to decide what the value of their product is, customers do. And if they decide it's not 15% better value than it was when they decided to sign up, they might decide to take that money elsewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The walls of the various walled gardens are only going to get more costly to enter as time goes on and people will argue it's necessary. 'Gwynneth Paltrow isn't going to make infomercials shilling her batpoop insane lifestyle brand for free you know!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We signed up for youtubeTV when the pandemic forced my young kids to be at home with me working but we typically watch it for a few networks and the kids never watch it. I have tried all the major streaming tv services and YouTube TV is the best but still not worth the same amount I pay for internet each month.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's Live TV?
Haaaaardpass; paused till December.
They've had the option to add premium channels for more money for a while, which I've politely declined. To now roll a substantial price increase into mandatory more channels is just more than I'm willing to weather. Part of me wonders whether they've needed to raise prices for a while now and securing some extra stations was an excuse for finally doing it.
I'd like if they did some user surveys or stream tracking for a survival of the fittest channel trimming every quarter. Continually adding stations isn't what anyone actually wants. Either drop the least popular ones, or separate them into sub-packages I can not buy. You'd have user metrics to show the content owners. "Look, no one watches this. Either we'll drop you or you'll lower the price"
Luckily, since I've decoupled my content from my utility, it's a simple click to suspend service and run through my Netflix queue for a few months. Or finally try out Sling... or Hulu... or playon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no reason for this to be expensive.
Why are people paying so much? I have: Netflix streaming and DVD, $17/month. Amazon Prime, if you count that since I'd get it anyway, about $10/month.
That's $27/month for pretty much anything I can think of to want to watch, and far more content than I can ever watch. Occasionally I think about sampling Hulu, Disney+ or CBS All Access but I never do. Their stuff comes out on DVD too eventually.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have Sling and it is basically becoming more like cable. More channels of content I'm not interested in. I'm losing hope that someone will be able to offer truly Ala Carte programming.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, I don't think that's going to fly in the Internet era. They will either charge way less or be gone within a couple of years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An answer to a common problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk3J0l8sbiQ
How in hell do they loose money?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even pirate streaming sites are starting to resemble cable
Some sites are like cable now. You have to pay extra now for more channels just like with cable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]