Monster Cable Blames 'Rogue Sites' Rather Than Its Own Business Practices For 'Stealing Good Will'

from the apparently,-trademark-lawsuits-and-$1800-cables-aren't-profitable-enough-any dept

Wed, Oct 5th 2011 12:31pm — Tim Cushing

The Copyright Alliance blog has a new post up patting itself on the back for its tireless efforts in pushing PROTECT IP through the legislative system. CA writer Sandra Aistars has joined the deceptively-named U.S. Chamber of Commerce in a series of "educational meetings and briefings to urge support for legislation targeting these so-called rogue sites."

In addition to the expected "contribution" from the AFL-CIO ("online infringement costs jobs, steals wages, and cuts benefits, blahblahblah"), a name well-known to Techdirt has reared its astronomically-priced head to decry the global impact of pirated goods: Monster Cable.

Illustrating the diversity of jobs impacted by online counterfeiting and piracy, David Tognotti, General Counsel of Monster Cable, shared his company's story. Monster Cable, founded by a first-generation American in his garage, now owns 400 patents and employs 500 people. But during the last several years, the company has lost "hundreds of millions of dollars" to counterfeits.

"Our brand is respected by consumers worldwide," he said. But "rogue web sites are stealing the good will we've built, and siphoning off sales."

The implications of counterfeit versions of those created by a company like Monster Cable goes beyond lost jobs and revenues. Counterfeit electronics are made in substandard factory conditions, and can contain unlawful and harmful amounts of substances like lead and chromium, he explained. Consumers have also complained of stolen credit card information, he said.

I'm really not sure what sort of "good will" these rogue web sites are "stealing" from Monster. Could it be all the "good will" it built up by suing anybody who dared to use the word "monster" in their own ventures, including entirely unrelated businesses such as a mini-golf course, an automotive parts shop and (although it dropped this case before it went too far) the manufacturer of deer salt blocks?

Perhaps Tognotti is referring to the "good will" built up by Monster's overpriced cables that are pushed via deceptive point-of-sale displays and contain incredibly high profit margins. While there isn't anything wrong with separating fools from their money, your product should at least be able to outperform a wire coat hanger.

If anything's hurting Monster Cable these days, it's the self-inflicted beatings handed out by its pricing structures, questionable sales tactics and general disregard for its public image. With the ready availability of inexpensive cables that perform just as well as Monster's, it's highly doubtful that pirated goods are the driving force behind any "loss of sales" that Monster claims.

(Another small note: if you have a whole lot of spare time, check out Monster's extensive list of "blacklisted sites" on its corporate web site. Topping the list are ebay and Craigslist. Apparently, Monster would rather you didn't purchase second-hand cables, either.)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: good will, lobbying, politics, protect ip
Companies: monster cable

69 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

crade (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:11pm

Are these the Stella Artois Rogue sites or the D&D ones?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tichael, 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:45pm

Monster/Licensing
In the eyes of Monster, you are licensing the cable. Not buying it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:46pm

Obviously
"Rogue" here apparently means those sites which reported on what a huge dickwad Monster Cable has been, no other definition fits.

;-P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John Doe, 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:50pm

Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
With the move from analog to digital signals, there is no longer a need for "high quality" cables. Most any cable is capable of transporting 1's and 0's. That is what is hurting their sales. Of course their lawsuits against non-related companies have stopped me from every buying their cables again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:52pm

I make my own cables.
They work much better then Monster Cables.

Does that mean I'm a cable pirate?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BoredSysAdmin (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:54pm

MC Blacklist
a)Apparently they hate ebay so much they had to list it twice
b)Costco sells fake Monster cables ??? O_O
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:54pm

!!!!
Listed on the blacklist site is the well respected UK consumer organisation Which.

They claim their list is of sites that sell counterfeit goods. However Which doesn't sell anything - what it does do is:

"We campaign to get a fairer deal for all consumers and publish expert, unbiased information to help you make the right choice, whatever you're buying."

I guess they don't like honest testing of their products either!

Seriously this totally undermines their credibility.

(As if that needed doing).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John Fenderson (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 12:59pm

Buying cable at Fryes
"Our brand is respected by consumers worldwide,"

As it happens, I was in Fryes last week to purchase some audio cable. Looking over the selection, all I could see was Monster brand cable. Even the packages that looked less flashy and more generic was, when I examined it more closely, a product of Monster Cable. I don't purchase Monster Cable.

I thought that this is Fryes, they surely have other brands, hopefully something generic and not overpriced. I asked a salesperson "do you have anything that's not Monster, because I'm not buying their stuff" As he guided me to exactly what I was looking for, he commented that he gets a lot of customers like me who don't buy Monster anything.

So, they may be "respected worldwide," but there are an awful lot of people (admittedly the kind of geek who shops at Fryes) who don't share in that respect.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fickelbra (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:00pm

Monster: Our HDMI cables are the BEST quality! You may pay tons of money, but you're getting the BEST picture out of your device!

Truth: Isn't it also true that 1080p doesn't even come close to straining a HDMI cable so the amount of "quality" has no effect whatsoever?

Monster: *Runs away*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:03pm

Re: !!!!
Another reason to pass Protect IP. How dare those rogue sites say their product is shit! How dare they not let Monster part the fools from their money! How dare!

And copywrong morons have the audacity to say Protect IP isn't gonna be followed by huge collateral damage and abusing. Right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:03pm

Re: I make my own cables.
Only if you or some one else uses them. Otherwise you can claim they are art.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DannyB (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:13pm

Re: Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
I would go further and explain why.

As long as the receiving end can distinguish a 1 from a 0, it doesn't matter if the 1 or 0 is distorted.

With analog, any distortion of the signal is distortion of the information. With digital, it doesn't matter if you have a distorted 1 or 0 -- as long as you can still recognize which digit it is, you have perfect information.

With that perfect information, you can make another perfect copy -- that has perfect undistorted 1's and 0's. That's why a copy of a copy of a copy is identical to the original. Information loss only occurs when it becomes impossible to receive and distinguish 1's and 0's.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Scote, 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:14pm

"there isn't anything wrong with separating fools from their money"

I'd say:

"there isn't necessarily anything *illegal* with separating fools from their money "

Ironically fooling people, as Monster Cable does through its marketing efforts, doesn't mean that the people they dupe are fools, nor that they deserve to be ripped off. I think there is something *wrong* with what Monster Cable does to consumers--it just doesn't happen to be **illegal**.

Right and wrong aren't always the same as legal and illegal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Avatar28 (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:26pm

Re: MC Blacklist
Also facebook and sears.com.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
HothMonster, 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:27pm

So Best Buy employees used to pay 5% over BBY's cost for products on their employee pricing program. I have heard it changed but dont know how its changed. But anyway back when I paid 5% over cost I bought a 180$ monster cable, guess how much it cost me. 7$ and change.

Now I don't know if Best Buy pockets the other 173$ or if a part of that goes back to Monster or what. But selling, or allowing it to be sold, you product at 25x what the store pays might have something to do with why people are seeking out other cords.

As far as Best Buy marking that price up, monster sells them through their site for the same price.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:37pm

Re: Re: Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
There was a lot of back and forth over the cables back in the analog age. There were blind studies done on those audiophiles that showed that they couldn't tell the difference between the Monster Cables and the cheap brand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris Hoeschen (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:40pm

If PROTECT-IP passes will Monster's list of black-listed dealers be sent in as a rogue websites to be shutdown?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AUToby, 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:41pm

Monster Sucks
I would never buy a Monster cable. Really, how do they figure their cables are worth $50-$100? I'll just stick with my $6.74 (Shipping included) Premium HDMI Cables from Monoprice. Thanks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tasmot (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:47pm

Other Pirates
I also noticed that Sears.com and Facebook.com are some Monster rogue-sites. It seems that the list is really just a "Monster don't like you" list.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2011 @ 1:50pm

There is nothing special about Monster Cable products. They have been complete jerks in regards to their mark(s). Those things certainly do not help them sell more cables.

However, it would appear that Monster is complaining about actual counterfeit products here not about people just deciding that they do not need to purchase a Monster brand product. They are complaining about people buying falsely branded Monster products. They are complaining about the counterfeit products taking sales away - this proves that having questionable claims and being a jerk has NOT hurt their reputation to the extent that td claims.

What exactly do counterfeit products have anything to do with the things that td points out are the real issues?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:02pm

Re:
However, it would appear that Monster is complaining about actual counterfeit products here not about people just deciding that they do not need to purchase a Monster brand product.

Read my comment above. They have listed "Which" as a rogue site. "Which" does not sell anything - it is a well established and respected consumer advocate organisation. The only possible reason why Monster could have blacklisted them is dislike of honest criticism.

It follows that you are flat out wrong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MAC, 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:03pm

Monster Cables...
This has nothing to do with whether or not Monster is a jerk company.

If this is an outright case of some one stealing Monster's branding then they should be stopped. If you own a brand then it is yours. Period. You can license it for a fee or whatever but without the legal paperwork, using someone elses brand is illegal as it should be.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
paperbag (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:17pm

Monster Cable: u mad?
lol Monster Cable hates deal websites because they always get trashed for their extremely overpriced cables. $100 vs $1 HDMI cables.. yeah I'll take my chances with the $1 DIGITAL cable that does the same thing.

So, Monster Cable, u mad?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:25pm

I've never met anyone who both knows what/who Monster Cable is and thinks their products are superior. Everyone I know who has heard of them is aware that their products are a ripoff and not any better than most other stuff on the market for 1/20 the price.

Makes me wonder who they *are* selling stuff to.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Devil's Coachman (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:26pm

Monster Cable is for stupid jerk moron losers
Anyone who pays anything more than five percent of their ludicrous list prices is a gibbering idiot, and should be sterilized. Most people, in blind testing, couldn't tell the difference between Monster's shite cables and lamp cord. What a crock of unholy shite they've foisted on stupid people all over the place. Never owned one, and never will. If you go to an acquaintance's home and see Monster Cable installed, run away and never go back!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:28pm

Re: Monster Cables...
Read their list. They list as rogue sites anyone who might suggest that Monster Cable products are poor or advise the public to go elsewhere.
This is not about trademark infringement it IS about Monster Cable being a jerk.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ron Rezendes (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:29pm

Re: Monster Cables...
How many cables do you believe Facebook, eBay, Which, Costco and Sears are making?? They are all on the list and I seriously doubt any of them make counterfeit cables, much less sell them.

However, I'm sure the mini golf place, the automotive parts place and the deer salt block maker have seriously impeded the Monster Cable branding somehow! I, just for the life of me, can't figure out exactly how!

I suppose Monster Cable should probably go after the actual manufacturers of these alleged counterfeit cables and leave the rest of us alone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Vincent Clement, 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:30pm

Re: Monster Sucks
I'm surprised that Monoprice.com isn't on Monster's rogue list.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Papa Fox, 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:33pm

Reputable retailers blacklisted as well
I notice www.jbhifi.com.au is blacklisted by Monster. JB HiFi is a large Australian electronics retailer. It's also a publicly listed company.

Maybe they annoyed Monster by pointing out that there were cheaper cables which were better than Monsters?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jackn, 5 Oct 2011 @ 2:50pm

Re: Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
Of course, if you want to hear it, your talking analog, so this is doesn't have any bearing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bengie, 5 Oct 2011 @ 4:00pm

Re: Re: Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
Your point is moot because we're talking about the cable that connects to the audio system, not from the audio system to the speakers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2011 @ 4:11pm

Re: Re:
Hmm, we can all agree that Monster is a jerk of a company. You seem to be interpreting Monster's list of 'Blacklisted Dealers' as a list of 'rogue sites'. The blacklisted dealer page says 'Many unauthorized dealers sell fake Monster products'. It does not say that every site listed there is a rogue site or that every site there sells unauthorized products.

If people are really purchasing counterfeit products then how am I flat-out wrong?

Sure, Monster, being the jerks that they are, have included every site they do not like on one list. That does not change their statement that 'the company has lost "hundreds of millions of dollars" to counterfeits' - which may very well be true given their prices.

It is you that got it wrong. Stop conflating unauthorized dealers with rogue sites.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NotMyRealName (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 4:23pm

Re: Re: Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
i'll amend it. only in the last cable run (to the speakers) after it's been changed back to an analog signal, does wire quality maybe, possibly, have some bearing on sound quality. there is -never- any reason, however, to buy anything other than the cheapest possible HDMI cables that will reach.

Think of it this way... whats the cheapest, thinnest, shittiest, unshielded, garbage, abused, often kinked all to hell, wire commonly used in very long, very prone to interference runs? cat 5. and with the right hardware in place on either end, you can push gigabit speeds through it without errors, and thats only got 4 pairs. HDMI runs 15 conductors. for reference, HD video runs at at most 35 megabits, double for 3d. So, theoretically and mathematically, through a single cat 5 wire, you could run 13 instances of hd 3d video with band left over, without error, lag, or distortion. Fuck HDMI.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
383bigblock (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 4:35pm

Re: Re: Re:
Why split hairs in Monsters defense. Its a simple fix, if a site is selling counterfeit itemsthen list the counterfeit sites. If Monster wants to list a site as rogue becuase they differ in opinion on the quality of the cable then fine...let them be dicks and do that. They only hurt themselves as apparent by the comments on this blog. But don't defend their rogue list because it may contain a site that sells counterfeits, if you know it for a fact then call them out. They're trying to fake a case to justify their "millions of dollars" claims by throwing out a large list of cohorts. When in fact the true list of counterfeiters is quite small while the list of those site that disagree with them is large.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jesse (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 4:43pm

The funny thing is...
The funny thing is, like the bottled water companies of the world, Monster Cable proves that you don't need a state-enforced monopoly to sell products in the midst of free alternatives.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jeffrey Nonken (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 5:06pm

From a linked article: Of course, a coat hanger doesn't have a Monster Cable lifetime warranty, so if your coat hanger breaks, you'll have to go out and buy another coat hanger.

*snerk*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jeffrey Nonken (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 5:37pm

Re:
Hey, wait. I just realized, you're going to have to change your nick. It has "Monster" in it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
abc gum, 5 Oct 2011 @ 5:38pm

Do Coat Hangers Sound As Good Monster Cables?

http://consumerist.com/2008/03/do-coat-hangers-sound-as-good-monster-cables.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2011 @ 7:32pm

Re:
Its still 5% over cost, but its capped at a low of no less than 50% of the original price.

50' of cat 5 at BB is was roughly $35-45 on the shelf. That costs $5 at 5% over cost. Now it will be $17-22

100' of 10 or 12awg speaker wire, $30 on the shelf, $7 at employee price. (and now $15)

I could go on, my GF works there, and we've bought quite a bit in the last few years.

There was a bit of a run on stuff before this went into effect, now all they are doing is driving people to buy stuff online. (Except for stuff that they don't make a huge markup on)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jeremy7600 (profile), 5 Oct 2011 @ 7:42pm

Blue Jeans Cable.

http://www.bluejeanscable.com/legal/mcp/index.htm

'Nuff Said.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Marcel de Jong (profile), 6 Oct 2011 @ 2:22am

Re: Re: Re: Monster cables are no longer needed, if they ever were
I heard that the blind test was done between a Monster Cable and a coat hanger.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 6 Oct 2011 @ 8:11am

Re: Re: Re:

It is you that got it wrong. Stop conflating unauthorized dealers with rogue sites.

It is Monster Cable that did that not me.

Their web page clearly list the sites as "blacklisted dealers".

Since Which is NOT a dealer their list is incorrect by their own definition.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Oct 2011 @ 10:59am

"your product should at least be able to outperform a wire coat hanger."

Burrrrrrrn!!!

I remember that, Monster, Pear Audio, and James Randi, the One Million dollar challenge.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bergman (profile), 7 Oct 2011 @ 3:52am

I wonder...
...if perhaps Monster Cable is claiming sites like Ebay and Craigslist are "rogue sites" because Monster merely licenses their cables, not sells them. Hey, if getting rid of First Sale works for the software industry...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
business branding, 21 Nov 2011 @ 12:42pm

Important to include in your marketing plans are your target audience. Defining and segmenting your target audience in the early stages can help in formulating and deciding on the most effective branding strategy, whether it is through ads, PR campaigns or online marketing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Peter Piper, 15 Jan 2012 @ 4:55pm

Monster Cable is basically a legal 'scam' selling $1 cables to the uninformed for $50
Now if you had a legal scam selling cheap cables for big bucks, you'd probably want to protect it and shut out the competition, wouldn't you? Even if it means wrecking the internet to do it.

Btw. has anybody noticed how hard it is to find cables that are NOT Monsters? Somebody must be paying somebody off to not sell anything but Monster. Now THAT would be illegal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hose A, 16 Jan 2012 @ 9:01am

If Monster Cable is involved...
...in this SOPA legislation, it must be crap. When I think Monster Cable, the *last* thing that comes to mind is "good will" - lol. Buncha corporate speak from a bunch of corporate sleazeoids.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mostercable are morons, 16 Jan 2012 @ 10:41am

they contradict themselves
They list buy.com as blacklisted. They list buy.com as an authorized dealer. Which is it?

Howcome no matter what you search, ebay and craigslist come up at the beginning of the list? Seems like they have something against them?

I think they should make a more competitive product and maybe they would gain more market share...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
sandy, 16 Jan 2012 @ 1:17pm

missing the subject...
I think everyone missed the point. Monster as well as many other brand names are and do have a ton of counterfeit copies out there. Monster cables are a very small portion of what they create. They have headphones, power strips, and many other products. The monster beats are so popular that they have been flooded on the market with china counterfeits. I should know I bought a pair. Here is the thing though those websites, craigslist, ebay are just the vehicles to sell counterfeit items and not the root cause of the issue. I bought the counterfeit pair on purpose and if your smart enough its easy to tell what you are buying. The issue is that they see this as tarnishing their name, which in a sense is their right to feel that way. The problem is that they want to take action against the wrong people. What needs to change is the root cause of the issues and not a band aid that hurts everyone. Protect ip is dangerous and hopefully will never pass.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shawn, 16 Jan 2012 @ 6:57pm

STUPID
I think Monster Cable site is stupid to blaim craigslist its not craigslist people dont have money like they used to buy brand new stuff people like to buy used things off ebay,craigslist used store etc... Its not craigslist PEOPLE WANT TO SAVE MONEY PERIOD. So if someone could buy something used over something new and works the same they will buy it and find it anywhere anyway they can. pawn shops etc. anywhere.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shawn, 16 Jan 2012 @ 6:59pm

Re: STUPID
thats in responce to trying to shut down craigslist...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nick, 16 Jan 2012 @ 7:16pm

Wow! thats an awesome point. they listed Buy.com as a blacklisted dealer, amd an authorized dealer. Thats too funny!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Voice of Reason, 17 Jan 2012 @ 3:09am

Honestly -
I think both the writer of this article and companies like Monster Cable are taking it too far.

There is a legit concern about counterfit merchendise being sold on third party sites. In the vein of "parting fools from their money," petty con-artists will buy off cheap, off brand merchendise and market them on sites like CL and eBay at "discounted" prices - which will still bring the con-artists 300%+ return on their money - as well as cheapen the reputation of the supposed company. Both CL and eBay do a good job of warning their users about this.

I would hope they'd go farther than just warning to something along the lines of logging ip addys and reporting them to the authorities for fraud.

However, tearing down sites like CL and eBay goes too far. There has to be some sort of accountability with the consumer. Namely, don't be a fool.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger, 17 Jan 2012 @ 7:51am

NAZI AMERICA
Hey you stupid fools.....You have just made sure I will NEVER support your shitty un American company EVER again. Besides you probably manufacture in China raping and abusing both child labor and the environment. IF not then you're just traitors who should be hung out to dry. Suck my D&*K.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jr, 17 Jan 2012 @ 11:10am

Your fucking gay
The only reason your your retarded company supports this bill is because no one needs these damn cables anymore.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mark, 17 Jan 2012 @ 1:03pm

Monster Cable about craigslist
Monster Cable is was over priced anyway, dont blame craigslist for your overpriced crap that I will never buy after this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John Doe, 17 Jan 2012 @ 9:48pm

MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC.
Who you jivin with that cosmik debris?

-Frank Zappa
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jery, 17 Jan 2012 @ 11:29pm

stupid
this is stupid
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Drew, 18 Jan 2012 @ 1:46am

Stupid
Waste of time
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Jan 2012 @ 6:00am

Rt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
T, 18 Jan 2012 @ 6:02am

T
T
[ link to this | view in thread ]
crawler, 18 Jan 2012 @ 8:24am

craigslist is awsome
get over it
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Jan 2012 @ 8:29am

fuck off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Durbin Haas, 18 Jan 2012 @ 8:46am

$$$
Wonder if it's because people don't have 100 dollars to throw around on brand new "higher quality" cables when they can go get them for 20 bucks in nearly new condition. IMO, someone purchased they originally from a retailer.. IE Best Buy, Amazon..etc. Monster shouldn't give 2 Sh*ts about where they go after that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Jan 2012 @ 9:28am

do not take away crsigslist
[ link to this | view in thread ]
EE, 18 Jan 2012 @ 12:57pm

Years ago, the late Bob Pease from National Semiconductor challenged any and all of the 'golden ear' audio cables, including Monster, to a double blind challenge of their wonder speaker cables vs.18 ga lamp cord.

None accepted the challenge.

Why? Because what they sell is snake oil, pure & simple.

Monster is just po'ed cause others are cutting into their scam.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
David, 18 Jan 2012 @ 3:06pm

Monster Cable
Immediate boycott of all Monster Products. Over priced anyway!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike, 19 Jan 2012 @ 3:09pm

HDMI
I just got my first HD TV. It.is.disappointing.

I don't see any difference between regular and HD TV...

So, do I need to pay $100+ for Monster Cables? I doubt it would make HD TV impress me any more.

Monster's list is an example of how this whole thing won't work.

First, you take down these sites and they will be back up in a week with another domain name and IP address.

Second, most likely every one of those sites sells something other than TV cables. Shutting down those sites will affect the products of all the other vendors. If I make flowered USB drives and sell them on one of the sites Monster doesn't like and has taken down, do I get to sue Monster for infringing on my business relationship and, effectively, putting me out of business because they dislike what someone said about their trash cables?

Basically, it comes down to this. This country cannot function without the Internet. When the RIAA/MPAA, etc goes out and kills sites, these sites can't sell products. The dead sites don't make any money. They close. People lose their jobs. They don't pay any taxes. They increase the burden on social services. And on and on

When the government looks at Monster's desire to throw a tantrum in the interest of 'anti-piracy' and they look at the potential for lost tax revenue, Monster's, and everybody else's, interests are going to take a back seat to collecting taxes.

This is one company wanting to take down hundreds of sites - sites like Craigslist and eBay. (Do they think eBay is going to be shut down because Monster doesn't like what its users are selling? Hell no.)

When you consider, once this gets going, there will be hundreds of thousands of sites businesses want taken down, you realize how impossible this would be to enforce.

Remember the RIAA once claimed the amount of money they lost to piracy in one year was greater than the whole GNP...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Audiocrazed, 20 Feb 2014 @ 12:50pm

Lol, Blacklisting Craigslist
Just randomly stumbled on this article, black listing craigslist, you gotta be kidding me.

Love that fancy branding Monster, sorry I'm not buying it though.
[ link to this | view in thread ]