Our Turn To Get Bizarre Legal Threats From Global Wildlife Foundation
from the you-are-saved-and-wait-for-me! dept
So, on Monday, we wrote about some bizarre legal threats sent to Ken White (aka Popehat) concerning a story both of us had written about years ago. That story was about how a Louisiana zoo called the Global Wildlife Center (apparently run by the Global Wildlife Foundation), got upset about an obviously satirical article about giraffes at the GWC killing people, mocking a recent spate of attacks on humans by animals in captivity. The GWC was briefly able to get an injunction that was quickly removed when someone realized that there's this amazing thing called the First Amendment... For reasons unknown, years later, Ken Matherne, suddenly started threatening White over his original post on the story, which quoted a local news source saying the following:In addition to filing this lawsuit, via email Global Wildlife Foundation president Ken Matherne threatened to file criminal charges, FCC charges, fraud charges, an IRS complaint, a governor's office complaint, and a federal lawsuit against Brilleaux. Matherne's email did not explain any basis for the additional threats.Matherne sent a series of emails to White, each more endearingly wacky that the previous one, full of interesting legal theories and creative use of the English language. You can read the details from the earlier post, but just to pass on a few of the more memorable quotes:
I did not say anything at the time. But, I think he would get dis-board by the falsified documents he presented to the judge. His father was a friend or I would have had he dis-board.And more like that. Anyway, we wrote about that and posted it Monday. Today is Wednesday. At 12:49am California time this morning (2:49am in Louisiana, where the Global Wildlife Center is based), it appears that Ken Matherne subscribed to our daily email. Three minutes later, he unsubscribed. One minute after that, the general catchall email address that is the "from" in the subscription confirmation email, received a message from Matherne with the following subject line and no message:
We are going to dp this all legal – get ready – I will have one of your partners, associates , friends , spouses, in dispositions for the at least the next 6 – 12 months. Minimum – 1 lawsuit lasted 12.7 years, the next only 6 . I have the means – so write me back or get ready.
Ken It was a BS move – and I appreciate that you do that for the best of people – but you always know our kids are first – and I don't care how many $ it takes – my daughter will not live with this – so I will ask you one more time to pull this down – as a gentleman – or I will come to you! My airplane is only 10k an hour – have more cash & Gold in the bank than you can imagine – but if you hurt my daughter through this – my executives has all authority to go until all is done – I only have 1 daughter and it breaks her heart to see this! I would not do this to you or your family!
you are saved and wait for me!Leaving aside the vague notions of religious salvation, we waited. Not for long. At 1:39am our time, we received a "reply" to the unsubscribe notice that just said:
Get ready!With anticipation building, we continued to wait (actually, we were all asleep). Eight minutes after that email, we got the following:
What state are you registered in? And if any of your two companies are affiliated - we should start to proceed. My daughter asked me not to last night. But after you new post -- I am coming!Half an hour later (about an hour and a half after he first "subscribed") we get to... well... something:
Law is the Law !
I will save this - as I will see you in court! You may think this is fun and games - I believe in the law. I believe in the court system. You have just started a conspiracy and you documented it yourself.I like how he is emailing us after 2am California time, where we are located, and giving us less than 6 hours to respond. While we are curious how reporting on facts means that we have started "a conspiracy," and find it even more interesting that he appears to directly be admitting that his intention is merely to tie us up in court, we believe that he probably should have heeded the original advice of his daughter that this was not a productive path to take.
So take my foundation down out of your harmful and malice posts or I will spend the next 20 years of my life, with every appeal, and every court to see justice. I will sue you as individuals and corporations - if they are legit.
Gentlemen, I only requested you do the right thing. Now you make the decision. And never use the word that I threaten you. I have been kind and upset, but I would never threaten anyone.
I never raised my voice to my wife. I don't care of your back ground - but through investigation and depositions, I will know each and everyone one of you.
You can print this to under one of you internet companies - but please note that I will hire enough geeks to play fair.
I want an answer by 10 CST that you will stop the damage you and your associates have done. I will have no choice but to proceed to expose you and associates, everything! And I love court and depositions!
He might also want to look up the definition of what a "threat" is, because saying that he will spend the next 20 years taking us to court is pretty much the definition of a threat.
Anyway, if there is anything he feels we wrote about him that is inaccurate, we (of course) are open to hearing about it, reviewing the evidence and determining if any correction needs to be issued. Though, as we saw with White, Matherne never seemed to provide any such evidence. Either way, we aren't easily bullied by random threats based on bluster and a weak understanding of the law.
Oh, and we should note that while Matherne was referred to as the President of the Global Wildlife Foundation in that original press report that White quoted, one of our commenters pointed out that Matherne does not appear to be listed as an officer, director, trustee or key employee of the Global Wildlife Foundation, according to its publicly available IRS filings, the latest of which you can see here or embedded below. Other reports have said that Matherne is merely the President of the Foundation's "advisory board."
Either way, I would suggest that his emailed threats to both us and Ken White are not doing the Global Wildlife Foundation or Global Wildlife Center any favors. Also, since I imagine he'll be reading this soon enough, Ken Matherne: I believe in the law, too. And the law doesn't let you just make up reasons to bring people to court because you're upset that those people are reporting on factual information that involves an organization that you are connected to. Again, if you believe there are factual inaccuracies in our reporting, we are happy to review the evidence. Otherwise, continually sending these kinds of emails isn't helping anyone.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ken matherne, legal threats
Companies: global wildlife center, global wildlife foundation
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I don't know; I find the whole episode rather amusing. I do feel a bit guilty though as it seems like he might be suffering from some sort of disability.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They should really put an adult to take care of the pen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What request?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What request?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What request?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What request?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: What request?
He already said this is a conspiracy between the two websites, so OBVIOUSLY he doesn't have to request it of both.
You just aren't fluent enough in crazy-rage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh boy. That sounds familiar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
♪ NO SPILL BLOOD!
(with apologies to Oingo Boingo)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Your home is where you make it!"
"You like to see homeboy's naked?"
- Joe Dirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In Mr. Matherne's defense, he could just be feeling the effects of toxic gasses released by fracking in the 11,000-feet-deep Haynesville Shale deposits. Maybe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You've won.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That was epic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lksjqqRa5N1qihssro1_250.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What. The. Fuck?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What. The. Fuck?
According to its content and syntax he doesn't believe in grammar, spelling, or English teachers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If he really has all that money...
Also, he needs to learn the English language...for his daughter's sake.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If he really has all that money...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Supply list
This definitely falls in the 'popcorn' category.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Supply list
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Supply list
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Supply list
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Supply list
BRB inventing that shit and becoming a millionare
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Supply list
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Supply list
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He would make a terrible villain in a movie; revealing his plot in the beginning and all.
If the daughter is reading this, then I feel sorry for you because your father is either gonna have to back down or get terribly humiliated later.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrible ORM tactic
It is, in almost all likelihood, an attempt to get search results for Ken Matherene cleansed of the old entry that comes up when searching for his name. It really has nothing to do with the foundation if that's the case. Pure personal brand damage "control". Bizarrely addressed in the extreme.
He has no comprehension that he's now done like everyone else who chooses the path of outrage, and just added even more such entries under his search results.
Dear Ken - congratulations. By threatening PopeHat (love how you interpret that moniker as "pot-hate"...) You've now thrown massive volumes of gasoline on your online reputation fire. And by going after TechDirt, you just brought in an entire tree's worth of additional wood for the fire.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Please proceed, governor, I mean, Matherne."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fluent Rodman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fluent Rodman
It works like this. Take the first half of a correctly formed or almost correctly formed sentence. Then add the second half of a different fully or almost correctly formed sentence.
You never get one completed sentence, because halfway through, the focus shifts. I heard some old ones recently on The Daily Show with John Stewart and realized that this is how the Palin dialect seemed to work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Deja Vu
Mecham's frequent inability to construct coherent sentences was so fascinating, that I set my VCR to record when he was on the stand while I was at work.
I still have all of that audio somehwere...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Deja Vu
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
restate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: restate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PR at it's worst - What a Maroon... LOL
Personally I would publicize this till the end of days and encourage others to do the same. If you ask me this is pretty much an "Internet Bully", that has no real means to do anything other than run his/her/it's mouth. Which makes it even more funny.
LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
State Records
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As the real owner of Popehat, Techdirt and KMart, I assure you I have more than enough cash to dp you legally. My lawyer's address is at http://boards.4chan.org/b/ - just type in all your demands and you will receive an answer very quickly.
Yours,
Popehat Techdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: P. Techdirt on Mar 6th, 2013 @ 1:08pm
dp means two things
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
+10
still laughing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Glass Full
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dis-board?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeap they call em cajuns.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He appears to have made many political donations, tracked by various services, such as the Christian Science Monitor reporting that he contributed $2,500 to the Romney campaign for US President (http://donors.csmonitor.com/l/1982552/Matherne-Ken). There, he is listed as "Self-Employed" at "Global Resources Inc.".
That "Global Resources, Inc." is a curious firm. The LinkedIn page pointed to from Mr. Matherne's entry (http://www.linkedin.com/company/global-resources?trk=ppro_cprof) says that it provides "Information Technology professionals". Other sites (http://www.salespider.com/b-56196022/global-resources-inc) claim that it provides "Amusement And Recreation Services". They also seem to lack a home page (at least one that scores sensibly in Google searches), which would seem to be a prerequisite for filling "Information Technology" positions in this day and age.
A Christina Matherne also appears on election contribution lists, and is cited as being a "manager" at Global Resources (http://www.city-data.com/elec2/elec-FOLSOM-LA.html). One presumes that she is his wife, as they appear in "The Ken and Christina Matherne Endowed Scholarship for Athletics" (http://www.lionsports.net/sports/2012/5/14/laa_0514125257.aspx?path=laa).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have no doubt as to whether or not this is absolutely true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The difference may be subtle, but I just want to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Call Discovery Networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Call Discovery Networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Call Discovery Networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Call Discovery Networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Call Discovery Networks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Clearly, his keyboard is the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Clearly, his keyboard is the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I warned you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another Fine Mess I've Gotten You Into, Stanley
I will conduct myself accordingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another Fine Mess I've Gotten You Into, Stanley
Well, yeah! And YOU SHOULD BE SHAME!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another Fine Mess I've Gotten You Into, Stanley
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Using a speech recognition program to write emails
As your country allows various things under your constitution it may well be some joker prenda to be the source sending you these messages.
The above is a very poor attempt at humour - I haven't had brekkie yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Using a speech recognition program to write emails
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Using a speech recognition program to write emails
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, it certainly appears to be. I'm enjoying the show a great deal.
[Gentlemen, I only requested you do the right thing.]
Which of course is what he says is the right thing and not necessarily what the laws say?
[And never use the word that I threaten you. I have been kind and upset, but I would never threaten anyone. ]
So, this email was just a friendly thank you?
[I want an answer by 10 CST that you will stop the damage you and your associates have done.]
And as I can see by this post, TechDirt has indeed answered.
[And I love court and depositions!]
But they do not love you back.
Waiting for the next batch of wonderfully ludicrous and non-English emails to hit the web.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brilliant.
Also. His is part Nigerian Scammer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hollywood can't even come close to providing this kind of quality entertainment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great story, topped only by comments
Bravo, TD commenters!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hope....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You are sofa king we todd did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One of the early commentors raised the question. Could this be a case of hackers having got into their systems and simply trolling the internet?
Or, if a nutcase falls from a tree in the Global Wildlife Center and no-one is there to hear it, does it go insane?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I mean you can actually TASTE the crazy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh but there is a reason!
They are comic gold, that's what they are! :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]