Attention Game Developers And Console Manufacturers: 'Always On' Is NOT The Same As 'Always Connectable'
from the for-starters,-one's-an-imposition dept
Game publishers and console manufacturers have been feeling some intensified heat from customers about "always on" requirements. (SimCity, anyone?) Microsoft has been battling rumours that the new Xbox will need an internet connection to function, an issue greatly magnified by some unfortunate tweets by its (former) Creative Director.
Ubisoft has played the villain quite frequently in recent years, lacing its single player games with DRM requiring (at minimum) an initial internet connection at bootup. The CEO of Ubisoft Montreal (Yannis Mallat) seems to be perfectly fine with "always online" next gen consoles, stating simply, "I would say that a lot of people are already always online through other devices. I would suspect the audience is ready."
It almost seems like a logical statement, but Mallat is making some huge assumptions about what the public is "ready" for. A console that won't do anything without (at the very least) phoning home isn't one of them, as indie game developer Rob Fearon (a.k.a. Rob Remakes -- creator of DRM, a game with absolutely no DRM) points out in his rather devastating response post.
Look, we really need to start making the difference clear here. Lots of people are always connectible through other devices not always online. My iThing is always connectible, my computer is always connectible, my Xbox360 is always connectible. None are always online. Neither do they require me to be online to be functional.Those pushing for this sort of "innovation" continually point to the fact that many people spend a great deal of time on the internet as an indication that the public is dying to purchase a console that requires an always-on connection, even though no console has ever required that in the past. If this half-assed assumption/analogy fails to do the job, they trot out several others. Rob has answers for each and every one of these industry-tropes-in-the-making.
"Steam requires an internet connection."
Even Steam which is for the most part like a rock, that falls on its arse occasionally. Thing is, if Steam falls on its arse occasionally then that’s OK because I don’t need to be connected most of the time providing I’ve got a nice offline mode to rely on."Your phone always needs to be 'connected.'"
My phone is always on, yeah. And there’s loads of times where I can’t use my phone because the signal drops, the phone goes a bit bonkers for some reason, I’m in a lead lined shed like I think our local Asda is or something. I dunno. Thing is, my one big “always on” device has more time where I can’t use it than anything else I own. This is something to aspire to? Something that’s not always functional like my phone?"Cable/DSL? That flows right into your house like water from a tap you can't shut off, right?"
Always on, except when it isn't. No one has 100% uptime. No one. Even the services behind these consoles, like Xbox Live, experience downtime. What then? A console that needs to connect to play a game is effectively shut down because the underlying platform is undergoing routine maintenance/hacking.
There's no comparison that results in 100% uptime, or any percentage that's going to satisfy someone who's just shelled out $500 for a paperweight that contains all the hardware and software to play games but simply won't unless something on the other end gives the thumbs up.
I’m not really convinced I want a console that’s as always on as my phone is. I’m not really convinced I want a console that’s as always on as my cable is. Because I want to just be able to play my console. I don’t want to buy into something that has less uptime than what I already have, I don’t want to buy something less likely to let me play when I want.This is what people are worried about and this is why they're irate. If a console manufacturer decides to add this requirement to its hardware, it will be going against the wishes of its customers solely to satisfy its own agenda(s). That agenda may be to push its online services harder. That agenda may be to reduce piracy. That agenda may be to cut out the secondhand market. All of these agendas cater to the desires of the manufacture. They do absolutely nothing for the end users.
Ubisoft's CEO thinks the audience is ready. It's a bullshit statement. Certain game developers and console manufacturers might be, but the audience certainly isn't. But it's more than a self-serving bit of PR speak. It's a statement of intent.
[W]hen someone says “we think the audience is ready” you can read that as “we’re doing it anyway” really.Keep that in mind when you hear statements from developers and console manufacturers about the public's apparently secret love for always-connected devices. Their "read" on the market is nothing more than them signalling a desire to put the customers' desires dead last.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: always connected, always on, consoles, drm, video games
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
To begin, I'm not 14. I'm 60.I'm a real hard-core dyed-in-the-wool CTO who can still out-code most of the 20-somethings in our industry. I own (personally) a Sunfire E20K... and I keep an application server and development environment running at home (In an Antique French Armoire for SteamPunk style points). Can't get any more hard-core than that. I've worked on mainframes, mini's, dedicated, embedded - and stuff you've never heard of. I have done IT from private, local, state, Federal, International and even Military points of view. Been there, done that - and have the bloody t-shirt collection to prove it. Started, Managed, and Sold businesses. I know it from both sides. That qualified enough for you to debate me or at least listen to a different point of view here?
If so, then let's have some fun.
I am no "freetard" or "pirate". I don't believe in it. I own 500+ movies, I go out to movies regularly, I go to concerts (and buy the t-shirts, apparently just to piss you off..), and I enjoy the hell out of culture.
However, the arrogance and stupidity running rampant in "IP" based industries makes me totally understand and relate to the "pirates". Not the true idiots who really do only want everything for free - I think there is no excuse for that...but back to the arrogance for a minute.
I want to buy a book. "Sorry, it is out of print.. and *I* am the only one who has authority to print it". This makes me go get it somewhere else. Maybe a used copy on ebay or the old half.com - or I have to download it somewhere because I can't buy it. So how about we make the infamous "making available" move to the other side of the argument? If you don't "Make It Available" for purchase ALL THE TIME, then you lose your "Exclusive right to make and sell copies (Copyright) for a limited time". This should no longer be a one-way street.
As for the Arrogance+Stupidity principle - "We're locking it away in the vault". NO YOU AREN'T. YOU ARE WITHDRAWING IT FROM THE MARKETPLACE. If no one can buy it from you, then I totally agree with your LOST CUSTOMERS getting it from someone else. And I will totally agree with you that it does truly represent a "LOST SALE".. but it is YOUR FAULT you lost the sale. "Well, just do without". Oh please - get real, and get a clue.
I've yet to lose a book from my shelves. Not so much with my Kindle. Explain that again? I spent money and have NOTHING to show for it but a "lesson learned" - and probably not a lesson you wanted me to learn.
As for culture and "copying"... I suggest you read up on Chuck Berry. He appeared EVERYWHERE in the world - WITHOUT A BAND. He didn't need one, because EVERY band knew his licks - they had the "abundant" (skill and knew the material) - he had the "scarce" (himself and his showmanship). He sold the hell out of the scarcity by giving away the abundant. but wait - that only works for a few modern musicians who don't count - right?
Mike may just push all your buttons because he can. Ever think that he words some things certain ways just to taunt you? Mike isn't right 100% of the time. No one is. He's a LOT closer than you however.
This is a colorful world. It is neither black nor white. It changes - as does culture, business, and having total control. All evolve (or die). Fisher buggies evolved. The others died. What is your industries choice?
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The last time i pirated a game was 15 years ago, I have just not had the need to pirate games when the second hand market provides me with everything i need.
And if they are trying to destroy the second hand market , they are destroying customers like me, who absolutely refuse to pay $60 for a game. In my mind no game is worth more than $10. Why? because it is something i play once and never again. Why would i pay crazy amounts for something like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Those who can (and will) find a way around �always-on� functionality don�t get affected by service outages and a lack of connectivity and whatever else affects an �always-on� service because those �freeloaders� don�t need the service to play games.
Those who don�t look for a way around the �always-on� functionality will have to contend with outages and lack of connections and other such issues because they bought the system and the games fair and square.
�Always-on� connectivity, like any other form of DRM, does more to inconveninence the legal consumer and punish them for the decision to stay on the straight-and-narrow than it does to curb piracy and punish �freeloaders� for the decision to crack said DRM.
DRM has not, nor will it ever, stop � or even curb � piracy in any way. �Always-on� connectivity won�t get the job done, either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's like trying to leave Costco with items you purchased, and having a cop come punch you in the stomach, tazer you, haul you downtown for an interrogation and then 3 hours later drop you off at a random location (tired, hungry and still wanting what you tried to purchase from Costco) with a remark that sounds like 'all you people steal from Costco, so just because you didn't do it this time, doesn't mean you didn't get what you deserved.'
That is the analogy you are looking for, you monopolistic ignorant Anonymous Coward.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
After all, the world is ready.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
They don't inconvenience me. I just walk by without letting them check. They have no authority to stop me or force me to consent to a search, and so they don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm not asking the reason, that's a different question entirely.
I'm asking who are the guys who said "Put it in", and then coded it?
Those are the people to blame.
So tell me - why is it sensible for a company to make an online needed console when about one third of the target market won't be able to use it. I thought these companies existed to make products that people want and sell them. Where's the sense in the sensibility in making a product that many, many people have said they don't want, continue to make it anyway after hearing it and then running around afterward wondering why the hell it didn't sell?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There's truth here, although really, the entire company is to blame, not just the developers.
I know from experience that it's really, really hard to quit a good paying job because they ask you to do something that is legal, but that you find objectionable. That's more than most people are capable of. Yet, to fail to do so means your hands are dirty, too.
I have turned down quite a bit of work because I had ethical problems with the project. I have quit two jobs for the same reason. Doing so is really scary and difficult.
But, in the end, if you can set your principles aside because adhering to them is really hard, then you never had principles to begin with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Actually I think they exist to make money for their shareholders. If they can find a way to do that that they think is better in some way than making desirable products, they'll do that instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm a games programmer by profession. Over the years, I've added DRM to several games. Why? Because the publishers demanded it. The developer, my employer, didn't want to add it as it would damage their relationship with their fans. I, the programmer, didn't want to add it as it doesn't bloody work.
Yet nonetheless, DRM was added to the games. Some fans experienced problems, the developers relationship with its fans was damaged, I despaired and, surprise, surprise, it didn't bloody work: there was no significant difference in the sales with the earlier, DRM-free, versions.
And for the next game? The publishers demand DRM.
*facepalm*
So no, it's not always everyone who says, "put it in," and no, it's rarely the people who code it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Enjoy your "always-on phone that can't be used if even a tiny interruption in the signal bricks it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'd love to buy ebooks on my Kindle. But with the number of times Amazon has taken books away from people keeps me from doing that. And all the while I'm keeping my money from current authors, I'm enjoying myself by reading free public domain books (see, no piracy). Current authors and their freeloading middle men aren't getting my money, not because they're content isn't good, and not because of piracy, but because they refuse to release without DRM, and want to have control of my devices. So I don't play their game, and I read The Three Musketeers and Oliver Twise. If Amazon takes those away from my Kindle, I'll go get them on projectgutenburg.org. Less convenient, sure, which is why I've been using Amazon so far for my public domain book fix.
The same is true for any digital movie service. I won't buy digital movies, because they come with DRM. I do buy DVDs, and the first thing I do is rip them to my XBMC file server, and then put them back in the case as a backup. It's less convenient than what Google, or Amazon could do for me, but I can't trust them to always give me my content. It's not always because of those companies. Sometimes it's because of the copyright holders. I can't trust them, so I won't bother with them.
Copyright maximalists hate me. Not because I hate their content, and not because I pirate. In fact, it's because I don't pirate that they hate me. I'm fine with consuming content that is their biggest competitor; the public domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And this totally won't end up like it always does, with the freeloaders working around it and the paying customers still dealing with the problems.
Right? Right?
I mean, my copy of Dragon Age would keep booting me because it couldn't verify my DLC, because someone's server was run by hamster power. But I'm sure there wasn't a full working version on the pirate bay or anything; there's no way someone would have figured out a way to bypass it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Except, of course, that it's not sensible at all, let alone "perfectly".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yes, it's the freeloaders fault. They were wearing those really short skirts, they were just asking for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dumb arrogant sons of a b
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It is really quite stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
Repeated articles here on the dire problems faced by game players pretty much confirm the audience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
I wonder why you're calling us 14 year olds. Is it because of that one article where someone else called everyone who was complaining 14 year olds, and was rightfully corrected? Why deliberately repeat that? The only outcome that can possibly serve is to highlight how stupid you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
Techdirt demographics:
69% over age 25
51% earn 50k per year or more
67% with college education
Source: Quantcast
So yeah, Blue is now blatantly making shit up to support his wacky notions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
You mean he didn't used to make things up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
Lol. I'm pretty sure Blue has been making shit up to suit his arguments from the get-go, this one just happened to be easy to prove wrong.
I'll cut him a little slack on that today though - he's probably still a little butt-hurt from the ass whooping he received on the YouTube story yesterday.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention OOTB: quit being an idiot, leave the basement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
Just don't post. Your mind and morals will improve without trolling and posting endlessly.
Repeated postings by trolls like you here on the dire problems faced by people who care about technology and copyright pretty much confirm you don't have any real reason to be here except to shit stir and flame the site and everyone on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
I'm a real hard-core dyed-in-the-wool CTO who can still out-code most of the 20-somethings in our industry. I own (personally) a Sunfire E20K... and I keep an application server and development environment running at home (In an Antique French Armoire for SteamPunk style points). Can't get any more hard-core than that. I've worked on mainframes, mini's, dedicated, embedded - and stuff you've never heard of. I have done IT from private, local, state, Federal, International and even Military points of view. Been there, done that - and have the bloody t-shirt collection to prove it. Started, Managed, and Sold businesses. I know it from both sides. That qualified enough for you to debate me or at least listen to a different point of view here?
If so, then let's have some fun.
I am no "freetard" or "pirate". I don't believe in it. I own 500+ movies, I go out to movies regularly, I go to concerts (and buy the t-shirts, apparently just to piss you off..), and I enjoy the hell out of culture.
However, the arrogance and stupidity running rampant in "IP" based industries makes me totally understand and relate to the "pirates". Not the true idiots who really do only want everything for free - I think there is no excuse for that...but back to the arrogance for a minute.
I want to buy a book. "Sorry, it is out of print.. and *I* am the only one who has authority to print it". This makes me go get it somewhere else. Maybe a used copy on ebay or the old half.com - or I have to download it somewhere because I can't buy it. So how about we make the infamous "making available" move to the other side of the argument? If you don't "Make It Available" for purchase ALL THE TIME, then you lose your "Exclusive right to make and sell copies (Copyright) for a limited time". This should no longer be a one-way street.
As for the Arrogance+Stupidity principle - "We're locking it away in the vault". NO YOU AREN'T. YOU ARE WITHDRAWING IT FROM THE MARKETPLACE. If no one can buy it from you, then I totally agree with your LOST CUSTOMERS getting it from someone else. And I will totally agree with you that it does truly represent a "LOST SALE".. but it is YOUR FAULT you lost the sale. "Well, just do without". Oh please - get real, and get a clue.
I've yet to lose a book from my shelves. Not so much with my Kindle. Explain that again? I spent money and have NOTHING to show for it but a "lesson learned" - and probably not a lesson you wanted me to learn.
As for culture and "copying"... I suggest you read up on Chuck Berry. He appeared EVERYWHERE in the world - WITHOUT A BAND. He didn't need one, because EVERY band knew his licks - they had the "abundant" (skill and knew the material) - he had the "scarce" (himself and his showmanship). He sold the hell out of the scarcity by giving away the abundant. but wait - that only works for a few modern musicians who don't count - right?
Mike may just push all your buttons because he can. Ever think that he words some things certain ways just to taunt you? Mike isn't right 100% of the time. No one is. He's a LOT closer than you however.
This is a colorful world. It is neither black nor white. It changes - as does culture, business, and having total control. All evolve (or die). Fisher buggies evolved. The others died. What is your industries choice?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
You really have NO idea, do you?
The only way enforcement isn't necessary is if it's not illegal in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
You see a "need for enforcement" in this, I see a serious marketplace need going unfulfilled (aka "a business opportunity.")
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
If there were valid reasons for that being the case, maybe your argument would have a leg to stand on. But there aren't, so it doesn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
The obscure stuff gets pirated too. There is an entire subculture dedicated to preserving old Jazz works that are sitting and rotting in vaults because labels don't think that the "property" is worth the bother of printing again.
You are making assumptions based on total ignorance and pulling things straight out of your posterior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
If techdirt were a pretty woman, you're the old man with a comb-over and brown teeth crouched in the dark with a telescope waiting for your obsession to take out her trash so you can dig through it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
*Scene - Daycare center, full of crying 6 year olds*
6 YO 1: Wahh, I don't like Barnie, I wanna watch Teletubbies!
6 YO 2: The big scary purple dinosaur scares me! Waaa!
*Enter OOTB stage right, furious*
Hey, babies, if you don't like the show, LEAVE! I don't understand why you are sticking around in this childish environment!
*Looking satisfied with himself, OOTB strides pridefully out of the room. The babies look at eachother, realize he is right, instantly grow out of it, and demand the TV be changed over to Game of Thrones*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Attention 14-year-olds: quit playing games, leave the basement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about all those people stuck at home during hurricane Katrina but still had power but no Internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thin Client Networks did SO well..
I worked for a Fortune 500 company that took everyone's My Document folder and stored it on a network shared space. It was a great plan up until a thunderstorm knocked out the A/C unit in the server room and suddenly 1,500 employees lost access to all of their files and e-mail. Engineers couldn't access their CAD drawings, technical writers couldn't access their documents, scientists couldn't access their data, warehouse personnel couldn't access customer orders to pick items, etc.
There are still people who collect and play Atari 2600 systems and original Nintendo Entertainment Systems - new systems that rely on a remote server that may or may not be there next year will have limited potential collector's value.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
So, it's hard to say it's "failed", although I think that it won't end up being the raving success people think. People will eventually remember why the industry worked so hard to get away from that model in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
A lot of the work will be done by the local device, but things like storage and communication will still be handled by a cloud server.
The thing is, desktop PC's aren't going away. Not ever. Things like tablets are already more powerful than a 2000-era Desktop PC, so there will always be some sort of fairly powerful device at the user's fingertips.
So it makes very little sense to turn a machine like that in to nothing but a dumb terminal. It makes a lot of sense, however, to use local processing power for rendering and heavy data processing, then use remote processing power for data storage and possibly even application delivery.
So my guess is that by 2020, we'll have a global computing infrastructure that really resembles Google's Chrome OS model, where applications may live in the web, but the heavy lifting is still done at the local level.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
It can, yes, but remote storage and application delivery come with a steep price: loss of control, decreased reliability, and decreased privacy.
I see the future as a variant, though. Third party cloud providers will be used for certain things, but as more people encounter the problems inherent in handing control over to third parties, more and more will operate their own private clouds. You can already buy consumer cloud appliances. Someday, most homes will have such an appliance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
Everything I've found so far works just like DropBox: you have to have cloud storage to do cloud sync. What I want is something that automatically synchronizes files between my own PC's, just like DropBox, but without actually storing files on any computers I don't own.
Drobo looks like a nice tool for that, but it sure is expensive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
Then your existing smartphones and whatnot will work with them just the same as they work with the Usual Suspects.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Thin Client Networks did SO well..
But if your data is on someone else's computer, you can't be sure they won't give it up for a post it note and a promise of immunity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also I tend to take my consoles with me on my trips to the middle of nowhere. You usually have electricity in the middle of nowheres I go to but not internet connections. And that's why I'm not buy any new console or game that requires any internet connection. Oh well, I"ll have to make do with the indie devs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet down, can't log in to work, can't check email, heck, I think I kick back an play a little sim...
DOH!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I really think all the kerfuffle is about hearing "always on" and jumping to the conclusion that it's a requirement.
Of course, I've been hopelessly optimistic before. When the facts come out (i.e., when Microsoft officially announces that, yes, they do have a new console), we'll know for sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I could be wrong. I hope I'm not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Or, you are away from home and hear about the latest game or demo. You go to xbox.com and queue it up for download (which you can do today), but because your console is off, it won't actually download until you get home and turn it on. But now, it could do this as you queue it up from the web and be ready to go as soon as you get home.
Those are the best-case scenarios I can think of.
Of course, there's also the dark side -- it will download the latest and greatest ads to display on the dashboard. (Although that could be a relative benefit as well -- it will have done the downloading already by the time you turn the machine on, so it'll be more ready to go.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Well, no, because I don't use software that forces me to update stuff. But I understand your point nonetheless.
Your second use case makes a great deal of sense.
This is absolutely a feature I would disable or, if I couldn't, would cause me to firewall the box off from the net. But I can see how some people might like it now. Thanks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
But, we know that's not how it's used.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The proposals on the table are to block you from using the console if you can't get online. That's where the complaint lies. Show me ads and force me to have the latest updates to play online - this is fine. Just don't tell me I can't use my legally purchased software because my ISP decided to have an outage, or because I simply want to play my single player game without having to download 1Gb of updates first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Always on is the same as buying stock
It's the same reason I hate Steam. I have to buy a game, then download a crack (or cracked copy) just to restore functionality to the stupid thing in the event I lose my connection (for a myriad of reasons) or continuously run the risk going over my monthly cap and incurring huge fines (because America).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Always on is the same as buying stock
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad enough already
And that *already* leads to problems. Beside the extra time when I "sign in" and it takes forever to go talk to some Microsoft server somewhere, the extra "online" parts of various games mess things up, too.
Mass Effect 3 is the worst. It usually fails to load *at all* if my XBox is online. There's a bug that means that it doesn't even time out properly when trying to connect to some server. To actually play the game (offline), I have to disconnect that cable and then start it. To play online, I have to do that and then reconnect the cable.
And I have a pretty reliable, reasonably fast connection. I know that plenty of people here in Canada can't even get broadband. Not because they can't afford it or don't want it, but because there isn't a company that offers it.
If a new console requires an Internet connection, I just won't be buying one. I'll stick with the old console, or maybe I'll go back to PC gaming.
I honestly don't understand the attitude of some of these "businessmen". Rather than "hey, if you have X, you get all these extra additional features", which is a selling point, they choose "requires X", which can only turn people away who either don't have X or don't want a device that requires it. That's true regardless of how common X is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That sure lasted long, didn't it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great, someone else telling me what I'm ready for
How about you let me damn well choose what I'm ready for.
I can see what is next... "Hey, he looks like he's ready to die, so into the mix he goes and green shakes for everyone!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great, someone else telling me what I'm ready for
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Great, someone else telling me what I'm ready for
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comparison
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think this says it all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But then, as if someone flipped off a switch, all video games made past that point just stopped being playable. It's probably just as well, the industry is headed toward a much-needed crash and the insolence of publishers to think that the customer will always be around to eat up their filth will only make their impending bankruptcy feel that much better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ad Wizards!
Buy the new GamerThing today!
- See your games networked with that required high speed internet connection you must upgrade to with your local provider!
- Enjoy undetermined hours, maybe even minutes of gameplay as long as your connection and our servers allow it!
- Meet new friends, especially MegaConsumer Electronics, with whom you contractually allow the video and audio recording of all activities that can be captured through our integral WackyCam controller whenever GamerThing is on, or even just plugged in!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Has anyone ASKED the USERS
It seems that before offering a product to the public, manufacturers should actually ask users if they want some sort of always-on DRM or if they want to be able to re-sell and buy used games.
Sure, "if you don't like it, don't buy it," but Capitalism really is a two-way street: you have to give the customers what they want, or they won't buy it. Isn't it far better to come out of the gate with something customers DO want, rather than stumble out with something they don't?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Has anyone ASKED the USERS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legacy
I have a four year old son, and one thing I really look forward to as he gets older is sharing with him some of the games I played as a child. I know I'm not alone here. I fear he will never get the same chance. All the new games he'll play will have their servers go dark and cease to function entirely.
I expect that studios are looking forward to meeting this "need" as a chance to re-sell the same games to a new generation, similar to how Nintendo does via the Wii Virtual Console, but this misses in a few ways. First, I don't want to have to trust the publishers to know that the specific games I enjoyed are the ones they will choose to resurrect. I especially don't want to re-buy content I've already purchased and may still have stored. Most of all, part of sharing these games with my children is sharing the experience... things like blowing into a Nintendo cartridge to clear the dust. Re-release to new platforms doesn't cover that.
My real fear here isn't the DRM by itself... it's that it guts the cultural legacy we leave for our children.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Legacy
I recently completed The Curse of Monkey Island on my Galaxy S3.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright or DRM: pick one
Here's the deal. DRM breaks that bargain. Content that is only released encumbered by DRM will be lost forever when that DRM service ceases to operate. While there are already exceptions for certain classes of content and archivers, games are a case that are completely left out in cold. But that's beside the point.
It's my opinion that choosing to use DRM breaks the spirit of the copyright arrangement. Shipping a product with DRM should immediately void any copyright held on said product. Creators still have the option to try to make a profit. They have just chosen to use DRM *instead of Copyright* to secure their exclusivity. Pick one. You don't get both.
I'm a reasonable guy, and to be fair I'll admit that the public broke the agreement first, in the earlier days of file sharing. It's understandable that publishers started to turn to alternatives to secure rights that should have been theirs regardless. But this is no longer the reality. Much of today's piracy is the *result* of restrictive DRM, prices that reflect old distribution models, and failure to take advantage of new distribution channels... not to mention extension after extension after extension to copyright terms.
So I'll say it again: the right solution is not to grant exceptions to archivers to break DRM for preservation. The right solution is to present publishers with a choice: DRM or copyright. Pick one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Copyright or DRM: pick one
Here's my solution: It's not unreasonable for companies to have to post a key of sorts with some sort of digital escrow company. This would be a master code or software patch that will unlock the DRM on a product. If, after so many years, the company dies or stops renewing the bond, the key becomes available to everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Copyright or DRM: pick one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, I miss the good old times when you could play a game as soon as it arrived, running as stable as any other pogram. Just last weekend I got Assassin's Creed 1 -put it in, 20min installation, ready to go. Compared to the first and only time I tried to play something via Steam; 20min Steam download/sign-up, 10h unasked download of game data (though the discs where RIGHT THERE), 5h unasked download of updates. Now, 3 years later, I cannot access the game anymore because Steam doesn't recognize the machine (upgraded to Win7, oh no), my e-mail acc is longe gone and I'd have to provide god-knows-what kind of information to prove that I really am the owner of that fucking account.
Thanks but no thanks, as long as it's still possible, I'll continue to play modern games (namely everything released after 2009 it seems) on tpb cracks while the brought copies look pretty on the bookshelf.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's not Valve's fault.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's called a Web Browser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even a phone does not have "always-on" requirement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BS
Ok so let's say I need to drop internet because times are rough for the time being. Of course I'm stuck with a video game console paper weight. I can understand if a certain game is online only like World of Warcraft but even so I don't buy many of them either. But to play a single player game needing to be online? Please. I don't need to be online to watch a movie dvd or to listen to a song. I shouldn't need to be able to online to play a single player game. My table doesn't need internet to be able to use it. Of course I won't get online or do updates but I can still use it.
I'm paying for my ISP and I will use it how I like. Just like how I do with my water and electricity. You game companies want always on? Tell you what. You pay for my ISP then I won't care.
Bottom line I am tired of companies trying to tell me what or when I can use or do things on their own time. I bought it and should have a right to do whatever I please to do with it. If I want to burn something I bought, then it is my right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Always on internet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]