Samsung Issues Takedown On Video Of Grand Theft Auto 5 Mod Turning Galaxy Note 7 Into A Weapon
from the that's-not-a-copyright-issue dept
Another day, another weird copyright takedown for censorship rather than legit copyright reasons. Adrian Lopez alerts us to a YouTube video that no longer exists at that link. If you go there (as of right now), you get this:
What that video used to be, according to the original description was:
GTA 5 Mod Showcasing the explosive Samsung Galaxy Note 7. You can blow people up with a Samsung Galaxy Note 7 in GTA V.And there's the little thumbnail that was shown in the Twitter card for the video before it disappeared:
GTA 5, of course, is the video game Grand Theft Auto 5. And, like many video games, it's possible to mod (modify) those video games to add in other elements. And so it appears that someone took the "ripped from the headlines" stories of exploding Note 7s and created a GTA 5 mod that made such things into weapons you could use in the game.
It's kind of funny, actually.
What it is not, however, is copyright infringement. I don't care how you slice or dice it. It's not copyright infringement. Samsung may be embarrassed by its exploding devices, and it may not like people making fun of them or turning them into weapons in video games, but that doesn't matter. There's no copyright infringement against Samsung's copyrights in doing that. And it's flat out ridiculous that Samsung appears to have made a copyright claim over such a video. Hopefully whoever put up the video challenges this and YouTube comes to its senses...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, copyright, galaxy note 7, grand theft auto, mods, takedown
Companies: samsung, youtube
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Copyright = Don't Say That!
Well, with Lenz still not ruled on by the supreme court, why not DMCA anything I don't like?? No penalties (except, of course, the Streisand effect, in operation here)!Hey! Techdirt! Take down this whole article! GTA5 and your whole article infringe upon my right not to giggle at a game whose whole point is to let people play at behaving badly!
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Copyright = Don't Say That!
Hey! Techdirt! Take down this whole article! GTA5 and your whole article infringe upon my right not to giggle at a game whose whole point is to let people play at behaving badly!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Copyright = Don't Say That!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Note7
http://i.imgur.com/WwOD7Io.jpg
S.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next GTA mod...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Next GTA mod...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Next GTA mod...
Burying your opponent under a blizzard of bogus paperwork is not something you can do in GTA! Now, how to do that visually??? Hmmm....maybe in the module with the courtroom scenes, where the judge chews you out....for not behaving badly enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Next GTA mod...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Next GTA mod...
Or 560ish million in 2015 total
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Next GTA mod...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Next GTA mod...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
some prefer exploding, but it seems that they're mostly just setting themselves on fire
So a proper mod would depict the Galaxy Note 7 as a flamethrower. Please let someone do it.
Meanwhile we can have a mix of fun and despair while we watch law enforcement freaking out and banning phones (all of them) from flights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hot phones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Got that right...
Truer words have not been spoken. I'm not sure what we call the people that make decisions at Samsung, but leaders and managers aren't quite ringing true here.
Exploding phones, well, that never should have happened. Like, R&D and QA should have nipped this in the bud in testing. But everything that has happened since is pertinent evidence that this company is seriously mismanaged on many levels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Got that right...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I want to see another mod
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another source
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YouTube says "ye shall not embarrass large corporations".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GTA5 Modder, May I Make A Suggestion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by [add name here]."
is a standard Youtube take down notice used for any type of take down. I guess the writer expects Youtube to be more explicit in their wording so the writer is not so easily fooled.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TMI (Trademark Infringement)
It doesn't protect the GTA franchise from your boycott of it and your public complaints about it's "low blow" "hit job" humor which you find beyond the pale of decencty.
The purpose of a trademark is to allow someone to identify "their" product when it is for sale without confusion in the marketplace for "their" product.
Here, there's no sale, no distinctive marks, no confusion (except about what Trademark protects), and yet we have all JUMPED to the conclusion that these "explosively weaponized" phones are Samsung Galaxy 7s...so no Trademark infringement at all.
I have an absolute right to factually discuss my Apple iPhone (with TM). That includes satire -- especially as my swipe to unlock has disappeared in the latest iOS update, thank you USPTO, dammit!) TM only prevents me from trying to make you think my Droid phone which I am selling is somehow actually authorized by Apple.
Someone else may point out how the anti-circumvention properties of the DMCA infringe upon that right of speech, but it's not germane here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: TMI (Trademark Infringement)
I use a Mickey Mouse test for infringement. I imagine the misused trademark to be 'Mickey Mouse' and think of all the violent games that include him. I always come up with zero times. Disney is a very aggressive defender of their trademarks. Samsung is not wrong in being just as aggressive. Exploding Note 7 phones is very funny though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Needless to say, the Streisand Effect has taken over. This story has even started to appear in places that would normally be bashing GTA. E.g. Link
More amusingly, it even includes a link to the mod!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
_____
If GTA 5 was some non-profit enterprise, or the reporting of the Samsung exploding phone was merely for some non-commercial purpose, then battling an "NP-GTA 5", or some other NGO's/ NPO's use of Samsung's failed product line (and, on copyright!) could-- and should!-- be deemed excessive!
_____
Mike!... you're censorship concerns are valid!... and, I can't keep from believing that the cited "take-down" was motivated-- in part!-- by Samsung's defence against any further erosion of public confidence (although!... I think that ship has sailed!)! Nevertheless!... business, is business!... and if a GTA 5 wants to use Samsung's Note 7 as a "theme" in their "for-profit" "venture"... (and regardless of the failure of Samsung's product!)... then GTA 5 should allow Samsung to receive a "return" on the use of Samsung's failed effort! And... honestly!... the pennies from a GTA 5 "Galaxy Note 7 theme" may be the "rare return" that Samsung may receive, from its MANUFACTURING DISASTER!
_____
Please!... no emails!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
.
Please!... no emails!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
"GTA 5 is making money on the addition of this Galaxy Note 7 "storyline" into their product!"
How? Are you honestly stating that people are buying copies of GTA5 purely to access this mod? Or, do you believe that the mod itself is a revenue stream for them? If so, show your work.
"if a GTA 5 wants to use Samsung's Note 7"
"a GTA5" is doing nothing. A user of that game has, independently of developer Rockstar, used the tools available to him to create a modification to the game that includes the phone as a joke.
"the pennies from a GTA 5 "Galaxy Note 7 theme""
Pennies form where? This is a free mod, not a product for sale.
"Please!... no emails!"
You put this at the end of every comment, but it's nonsense. If it's to avoid spam, nobody reading the message knows your email address, and no automated script on the server side will ever read this request.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
.
Please!... no emails!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
Sounds like it might be better to ramp up your original policy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
I think it translates to "I'm a troll".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Troll, Troll, Troll your boat...gently down the stream!
Life is but a dream.
You might want to anchor your boat in the actual law...the Streisand rapids are ahead.
Copyright: Exclusive control over *ORIGINAL* work, modulo fair use. Fair use is more likely for a non-profit.
Tradmark: No marketplace deception.
We aren't deceived, and this GTA mod isn't original to Samsung.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just Waiting
One or two of these will probably not stem the tide of invalid notices, but it could start a trend.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just Waiting
Lenz is at the supreme court now...because the lower courts didn't agree that any fees should have been awarded.
It has also been going on for, literally, YEARS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BS Shiz
best gift for your mother in law... would be a note 7 mwhahaha XD
"S" caused this upon themselves, they should actually be put in prison for sending out bombs, there are no terrorist attacks, it was only "S". besides gta cant be held liable for royalties to "S" for what a user made, otherwise "S" must pay royalties to Sony, cause I had Sony's backround on my S3 , the shouldve allowed these mods to happen, because lets face it it will be fun for a while then it gets lame, now its going to carry on longer than it would've, and if the people buy GTA V just for that mod, well thats the end users money being used, Rockstar cant be held liable for what the end users do with their product
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
great
Looking at the phone in the GTA 5 hacks game, it could be a number of different phones. it doesn't say Samsung 7 of it. It's a exploding phone and THEY are actually taking credit for that with take down notices. That's pretty funny.
⋮
[ link to this | view in chronology ]