Penis Pump Company Threatens To Report Techdirt To Interpol Because We Wrote About Its Bogus DMCA Demands
from the good-luck-with-that dept
Last summer, our writer Tim Cushing put together something of an omnibus post of stupid DMCA takedown requests, none of which probably deserved their own unique post. One of the individuals he highlighted later went on something of a wacky defamatory crusade against Tim, posting blatantly false information about him, and claiming that Techdirt is actually owned by some telecommunications company I'd never even heard of, that is also a patent troll, or something. But now another entity in that very same post has also decided it's upset about the post, and has taken a slightly different strategy.The company in question is Andromedical, makers of the creatively named "Andropenis," which is (you guessed it) a penis pump. The company appears to do two things aggressively: push a highly questionable "study" claiming its device is effective... and issue questionable takedown demands. Tim was mocking the fact that Andromedical was asking Google to take down results from the competing Bing search engine, but also the fact that it appeared to be promotional images of the product. So, why are we subject to a takedown notice?
BRING ON THE KITCHEN SINK OF LEGAL THREATS!
In what is announced via email as a "DMCA notice," (and sent to a personal email address of mine, rather than our publicly listed DMCA agent email address) is apparently a combination notice of all sorts of things we didn't actually do:
I write on behalf of the Legal Department of Andromedical, S.L. Company, as an Intellectual Property abuse report to your company. This email is part of a Counterfeit Notification to INTERPOL and must be considered as an official Cease and Desist, Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) Notification. We have detected that your website is using our trademark Andropenis® and our copyrighted images without being licensed to do so. It is illegal to use Intellectual Property (IP) without license in your website, whether or not you are selling the actual device associated to our copyrighted properties. Thus, you are infringing the law by using trademarked and copyrighted properties of Andropenis® without license and without IP rights. Please, proceed to delete immediately the following pages and the images in them from your website:Yeah, so, first of all, it's a DMCA notice, which covers copyright and not trademark. The fact that we don't have a license is meaningless either way. First of all, we can use the ridiculous Andromedical or Andropenis name as much as we want without violating the trademark, because we're using it in a manner that is clearly descriptive of the product, and not in commerce. It's also not being used in a manner to confuse consumers or dilute the brand. So, just the fact that it suggests merely mentioning the name without a license is infringing is ludicrous and wrong. You're doing trademark law badly.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150728/12010131782/all-ways-dmca-takedown-process-can-be-responsibly-used-these-are-none-them.shtml https://i.imgur.com/2SbufcE.png
On the copyright question, we did post an image of some of Andromedical's own promotional images, but in a manner that was clearly fair use. It was part of our news article, explaining Andromedical's abusive DMCA practices, and as part of showing the kinds of images it was taking down, we showed a few thumbnails of those images. This is obviously fair use, so Andromedical can take its DMCA notice and pump it.
Then we get to the whole "Counterfeit Notice to INTERPOL" -- to which I can only say... huh? There's no counterfeiting. We're not selling any products in our post -- legitimate or counterfeit. We're just posting a story about the company, which is perfectly legal to do.
Nevertheless, the company insists that if we don't take down our article, it will follow through with a list of increasingly aggressive/ridiculous tactics:
You have one week after the reception of this email to delete any and all images of Andromedical and/or Andropenis® products, any and all Andromedical and/or Andropenis® trademarks, and any and all Andromedical and/or Andropenis® information and references from your websites. Legal actions against your company will be stopped if these actions are undertaken. If you fail to do so, our Legal Department will:Wait, we're "committing an international crime by trafficking in illicit goods and counterfeiting" because we posted a story mocking your stupid DMCA takedown requests... and your response is to send an even stupider and more ridiculous takedown demand? Yeah, that's not very smart. You're also lying, which may be an issue for you given that the DMCA forbids making false statements in DMCA takedowns.
- Remove your company’s visibility in GOOGLE, Yahoo and/or other search engines, such as Yahoo! or Bing, via DMCA notices. Please find attached to this email the DMCA notice in question. (https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-notice?rd=1&pli=1&authuser=1 )
- Block your payment gateways via intellectual property abuse reports to your payment processors, VISA, PAYPAL. (http://usa.visa.com/about-visa/our-business/intellectual-property-rights.jsp?ep=v_sym_ReportBrandAbuse, https://www.paypalobjects.com/webstatic/ua/pdf/US/en_US/infringementreport.pdf)
- Contact your web hosting service to have your website removed, as you are infringing their Terms of Service by using their server space for unlawful purposes.
- Contact INTERPOL, as your company is committing an international crime by trafficking in illicit goods and counterfeiting. (http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Trafficking-in-illicit-goods-and-counterfeiting/Trafficking-in-illicit-goods-and-counterfeiting).
And, just to be clear: we're not selling any stupid penis pumps, counterfeit or not. Did you miss that simple fact? I imagine Interpol might wonder why you're wasting their time making false reports.
Also, note that it tells us we have a week to respond before it will do all of this stuff, but according to the Lumen Database, it has already sent a DMCA to Google falsely claiming that we're infringing on its copyright.
Next up, the email lists out the various trademarks in different jurisdictions that the company has -- all of which is totally meaningless and unimportant because writing about your company is not violating your trademark in any way, shape or form. That's not how trademark works.
And then the closing:
Andromedical S.L has not signed a valid license contract in this seller’s favor to use the trademarks of Andropenis® or its copyright. The names referred and its images pertain, only and exclusively, to Andromedical S.L.Yeah, that's great. Except, again, we're not selling anything, and we're not violating your trademark or your copyright. Your "good faith belief" is either not in good faith at all, or just wrong. Our use is clearly authorized by the law.
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the allegedly infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
Sincerely,
Eduardo Gomez de Diego
Finally, note that the opening of the email threat said that it was coming from "the Legal Department of Andromedical." So, that would imply that our friend Eduardo Gomez de Diego is a lawyer, no? So, then, why does he show up as a doctor stumping for an Andropenis penis pump? And the author of the "study" that claims that Andromedical's penis pump actually "works"?
In summary, I'd argue that Eduardo's legal claims are about as strong as his scientific and medical claims.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: andropenis, censorship, copyright, counterfeit, criticism, dmca, eduardo gomez de diego, fair use, interpol, penis pumps, trademark
Companies: andromedical
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I'm Shocked! Shocked I say!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm Shocked! Shocked I say!
However that doesn't excuse Andromedical's behaviour here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lawyers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Low hanging fruit but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Low hanging fruit but...
it's almost as if Eduardo is compensating for something...
Isn't this statement an oxymoron?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Low hanging fruit but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Low hanging fruit but...
I think that SolkeshNaranek wanted to say that if Eduardo's fruit was low hanging he wouldn't need to compensate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Low hanging fruit but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
From a Company that most likely SUCKS!
From a Guy who REALLY SUCKS!at his Job..
Suckers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Exactly, this thing literally SUCKS!
From a Company that most likely SUCKS!
From a Guy who REALLY SUCKS!at his Job..
No this thing literally PUMPS
From a Company that most likely PUMPS
From a Guy who REALLY PUMPS!at his Job..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Full of hot air.
No not hot air KY Jelly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moL4MkJ-aLk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://www.amazon.com/s/url=&field-keywords=popcorn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would like to nominate Andromedical for funniest comment of the week.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More proof...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More proof...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: More proof...
They could name it "Copyright Maximalist".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: More proof...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More proof...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unfair competition
No fair trying to get funniest comment of the weak like that, everyone knows that the DMCA is more toothless than a gummy bear, so the idea that blatantly lying in a DMCA notice could 'be an issue' is beyond a joke.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He should have probably called a real lawyer and "pumped" him for information before sending a Technology web site that specializes in this very thing, a stupid ass email like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ewwwwwww.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remove your company’s visibility in GOOGLE
Good luck with that, geniuses!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hey, it could work...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSGkBWYDmrM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wondering how boilerplate that email is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please expand on what would be the consequences for these fraudsters, (that operate their businesses and abuse the legal system the same way the Italian Mafia does), if this moves forward.
I'd guess that your first legal recourse is to file criminal charges against these people that clearly and beyond any reasonable doubt engage in criminal practices.
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: as per Ken White's advice, and considering the kind of people we're dealing with here, the following statement is in order:
This comment was written metaphorically speaking, in the hopes there is a special place in hell reserved for he who engages in the malicious practices described and on whom I am entitled to comment, purely as hyperbole, on a matter of public concern under my First Amendment rights to free speech and I petition the Government for redress of grievances.
:D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's easy: None whatsoever.
There's absolutely no penalty whatsoever for filing fraudulent DMCA claims, so anyone can claim whatever they want without fear of being punished for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The law requires:
"A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed."
This allows people to weasel out, because the only thing under penalty of perjury is that the own the right. So if they merely own the copyright but the claim is bogus, they can still get in some trouble like paying attorney fees, but not perjury trouble.
But this person uses a different word order:
"I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed."
They are declaring the accuracy of the *entire notification* under penalty of perjury, not just that they are the owner. I wonder if this could lead anywhere?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Why aren't you taking us seriously?"
Yours truly,
Biggus Dickus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pure Streisand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LoL, I actually know this company from adult fairs in USA and EU
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Serving Suggestion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's clear that he's making deceptive statements to sell a product, which I believe the FTC takes a very dim view of.
And yes I know he's in Madrid, but thats why you let the ftc deal with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Faulty Claims
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Faulty Claims
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Virgin territory...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Virgin territory... FTFY
A story 'on' whose 'breadth' and girth can only increase..
Unless you actually meant 'breath' (not mine definitely)
then nevermind..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It makes sense now
No wonder I never saw one of these on a Tech Dirt Daily Deal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If generated by a bot, said bot could be getting Eduardo into some real legal trouble really really fast...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They Must Be Serious…
Emphasis mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pinocchio
Apparently, his father wasn't a puppet maker, but rather worked in the forestry industry and was seeking a source of cheap wood. When he's particularly knotty, then he gets a big spotted dick.
Jimminy Crickets! It's a whale of a tale.
I can keep this up all day, but imma cease and desist for now. I'm worried I'm gonna get a patent infringement call from Disney. Or trademark...or whatever, yada yada DMCA>
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No matter how much you wish it did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Had to google that because I thought of the music act and wondered how they played in this story. TIL.
http://interpolnyc.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Legal Department"
CEO: "Alright. Someones written something on the internet we don't like. Have the Legal Department send them a threatening letter!"
SECRETARY: "Who's our Legal Department?"
(all voice but one) : "1-2-3-NOT IT!"
Eduardo Gomez de Diego: "Huh? .... DAMMIT!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There needs to be financial penalties for doing these sorts of things.
The amount of bluster involved also shows that this is a bluff, someone hoping that the fear of the law will make people do what they want.
Holding ones self out to be a lawyer should be more of a crime with more penalties.
We have reached a point where the mere mention of copyright is a magic key to get you what you want. You don't even have to be serious, just invoke the power word and watch the world bow down before you. Even the courts will clear your path and if your target tries to fight back will allow you to run away facing none of the penalties so richly deserved.
(what you expected me to go for the easy penis puns?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Huh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Android Penis Movment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eduardo needs to quit using the company product so much
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't you know? Eduardo is the general, the president, the king of the scene!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hitler.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this person fucking stupid or something?
Yes I'm being a bit rhetorical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For those of you that are unaware: Interpol has no law enforcement powers. The only thing they do is facilitate communication between police in different countries.
Interpol cannot arrest you. Interpol cannot even investigate you. They're not some transnational FBI. They can't actually do anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well.... Goodbye Techdirt. You suck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Design Limit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But
But, lets discus the bigger issue here.. The Streisand Effect is not costing Andropenis a cent making itself out to be (of course) larger than life. Well, not costing anything yet!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He DMCA'd himself now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TSaId-PBj4
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's also worth noting...
It's not the police.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fucking Geigner, always trying to be funny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hajar Jahanam Mesir for Men
This herb very popular for Indonesian men. Make them more long lasting in bed.
https://www.papatahanlama.com/hajar-jahanam-mesir-super/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]