Major Media Owning SOPA/PIPA Supporters Whine That They Had No Way To Have Their Message Heard
from the oh-come-on dept
We've been pointing out that one of the big reasons why the MPAA/RIAA and others failed in their efforts to rush through SOPA/PIPA was that they have been totally and completely tone deaf to what's happening online. And it appears that's continuing. The LA Times had a bizarre article over the weekend, where people were suggesting that the MPAA needed to "do a lot of test messaging," to see what would work in convincing the public that censoring the internet is a good thing. Test messaging? Seriously?!? They still seem to think that this is about a lobbying or PR campaign, rather than actually engaging and hearing what people have to say.Even more ridiculous is the new talking point that both the MPAA and the RIAA are apparently "test messaging" currently. And it's that they -- who own all of the major media outlets around -- are somehow at a disadvantage in communicating their views to the public. I'm not kidding. In that article above, Chris Dodd from the MPAA is quoted as saying:
"You've got an opponent who has the capacity to reach millions of people with a click of a mouse and there's no fact-checker. They can say whatever they want."Yup, that's the new MPAA talking point: "if only you moron internet kids couldn't actually say what you want!" Does anyone actually brief Dodd about how best not to make it totally transparent that he wants to censor the internet?
But the RIAA is passing along the exact same message. Dodd's counterpart at the RIAA, Cary Sherman, is quoted as saying basically the same thing in the NY Times:
“It’s very difficult to counter the misinformation when the disseminators also own the platform.”First of all, this is ridiculous on all sorts of levels. Was it true that some of those against the bill weren't completely up on the facts? Yes. But, lots of us were clear on our facts, cited specific language in the bill, and were quick to correct those who stated things that were incorrect.
But much more to the point: we're talking about all of the major media companies in the world who were in support of this thing, and they're seriously claiming that they didn't have the means to get their message out? Who the hell do they think they're fooling? They own all the major TV networks, all the cable news networks, the majority of top magazines, a bunch of top radio stations... and most of those media outlets refused to give critics of these bills the time of day. But suddenly they're claiming they couldn't get their message out? Give me a break.
Even worse, let's compare the two platforms: SOPA/PIPA supporters completely own TV. But TV is a broadcast medium. They could put on whatever propaganda they wanted, and there'd be no way to guarantee a right to a response on TV. The internet, however, is a communications medium, where anyone can take part. So unlike the reverse situation, the supporters of the bill had every opportunity to counter the claims of people online if they felt they were being misrepresented. The real problem was that, for the most part, they weren't being misrepresented. The problem was that people were saying what the bill would actually do, and Hollywood wanted people to focus on what they wanted people to believe the bill would really do. Reality, it seems, has a strong anti-Hollywood bias.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cary sherman, chris dodd, copyright, marketing, media, message, pipa, protect ip, sopa, test marketing
Companies: mpaa, riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Time after time this pesky "Reality" keeps interfering with our plans, maybe we should buy, er... lobby for a law to fix this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Old Maxim
Wish in one hand, sh*t in the other, see which one fills up first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[please don't sue me for pasting these two lines, whoever is the current copyright holder]
"...though it cannot hope to be useful or informative on all matters, it does make the reassuring claim that where it is inaccurate, it is at least definitively inaccurate. In cases of major discrepancy it was always reality that's got it wrong."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not only will this shut down the major anti-SOPA/PIPA voices, letting all us pro-SOPA/PIPA voices have an open field to get our message out, this "reform" will be supported by many of those who hate SOPA and PIPA. We'll look "progressive!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not giving up
(Emphasis added.)
Hollywood still expects to get some law out of Congress, even if it's “a much weaker law”.
Hollywood may be right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not giving up
If I say a site is a dirty haven of pirates and lawbreakers, I want them shut down Right Now, not given a chance to put together a legal defense, and most certainly NOT given a chance to try and fix the problem to the best of their ability! And no I don't have to provide any verifiable evidence of my claims, my word is good enough!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not giving up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We have an opponent who has the capacity to reach a few people with millions of dollars with the click of a pen. There is no fact-checking if the check is big enough. We can say whatever we want and they back us.
“It’s very difficult to counter the misinformation when the disseminators also own the platform.”
It is very difficult to counter the bald faced lies when the people telling them hand out the checks as well. We pay them enough to even ignore their own reports showing us as liars.
Dear **AA's... your dinosaurs JUST F*CKING DIE ALREADY. You've been bitching for at least 20 years your dying, I'm starting to think your just hypochondriacs. Die off already... put up or f*ck off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I would like to point out one little thing. Isn't it the media companies that blacked any news coverage on SOPA and PIPA. Why are they complaining.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It should too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
But an "unregulated" internet means that "we the people" may rise again to blow their carefully crafted, badly worded bills and bought and paid for politicians out of the water again.
Beware that when these bills reappear there will be language in them that will prevent another Web strike from ever occuring again. Not under the guise of censorship, of course, but as something less odorous and more salable like "national security".
No one who blacked out this past week "owned the platform". The content companies could have responded using the web as well and, perhaps, even defended the their position. Maybe. But they long ago surrendered the Web and the Internet to "we the people" and "we the nerds and geeks".
And now they complain. They surrendered the medium, never did learn how to use it, make money at it or figure out that the Web isn't the printed page so what works on the printed page doesn't work here.
They ignored the reality that it doesn't take all that much poking around to figure out who was funding who. All perfectly legally.
They didn't take the technical high ground, they mocked it. They didn't take the moral and cultural high ground because they gave those up decades ago.
And now they're surprised they lost.
Now they're worried that the day of "government of, for and by hollywood" is over. Darn good thing, too.
BTW, I refuse to call them the content industry as, at least on the web, they produce only a miniscule part of the content to be found and often the worst parts of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Reality, you scary.
After the blackout and public outcry I immediately thought of the government trying to pass some law limiting the ability of people to support/oppose laws under the guise of finance reform. But the idea of preventing blackouts of sites "too big to go dark" hadn't occurred to me - and it's equally plausible, given the people we're talking about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My comment over on boingboing about MU being seized sorta sums it all up.
"Well it is so nice to see that CNN is being so very unbiased in the coverage they are providing...
""Hacktivist" collective Anonymous took credit for taking down the sites Thursday after the arrests of leaders of Megaupload.com and shut down the popular hub for illegal media downloads."
....
The news comes as lawmakers have turned their attention to anti-piracy legislation. Protests erupted both online and offline this week against two bills under consideration in Congress: the House's Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Senate's Protect IP Act (PIPA).
The bills are aimed at cracking down on copyright infringement by restricting access to sites that host or facilitate the trading of pirated content. But the legislation has created a divide between tech giants, who say the language is too broad, and large media companies, who say they are losing millions each year to rampant online piracy.
(Time Warner, the parent company of CNN, is among the industry supporters of the legislation.)"
We really should have laws against yellow journalism.
Our government is corrupt, our media is corrupt, at what point do we do things more than just wring our hands about how horrible these things are. "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
My immediate response to that is: so do you, you frigging idiots. Until you actually succeed in removing net neutrality and killing sites you don't like, you have exactly the same reach as every other company or organisation. You have the same net audience, you have websites, emails and everything else at your disposal. You don't have control over the content of the message or the discussion.
That's why this is a problem. They're used to controlling the flow of content and information, they've only just woken up to the fact that said control disappear years ago and now they're in a democracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They should try informing the public themselves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They should try informing the public themselves
What keeps them up at night is the worry that they'll become irrelevant and have to do something constructive and innovative in order to continue their extravagant lifestyles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: They should try informing the public themselves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They should try informing the public themselves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They should try informing the public themselves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: They should try informing the public themselves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did any other so call 'liberal' news organization declare a day the national occupy wall street day? Nope. Did liberal news networks rush out to cover the Occupy protests for the first few weeks? Nope.
People like that will always complain that the news media is against them whenever they lose, even when it doesn't match up with reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Changing of the Guard
Their strategy is clear to both them and us: they need to employ greater subtlety. Money still talks but it needs to speak more quietly, and when the noise from the internet deafens on a sensitive issue, no reasonable amount of money will overcome it with anything like political certainty. PIPA/SOPA is probably going to be instructive, as the entrenched powers in Hollywood and Washington test the waters every so often with smaller bills, "debated" more secretly and enacted when we're not paying so much heed, building PIPA/SOPA by layers rather than in one fell swoop.
Money will be the means to accomplish old media's ends, but we can continue to fight the good fight and make this as time-consuming and expensive for them as we can. Cost them enough on this and other issues and they will be deterred in the future. There is little deterrent now -- relatively little money and effort in Washington will get them what they want -- but when those costs go up, that's when their business model will start to change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Changing of the Guard
I expect not to hear about the next round of this battle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Changing of the Guard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Censoooo...Fact Checker
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Series of Tubes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Series of Tubes
That's the only way to stop those damn dirty pirates is by getting rid of those damn tubes you're refering to.
With out the tubes, there is NO WAY anyone could copy VHS and audio tapes...
no way at all....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Series of Tubes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What really happened was analogous to screwing down the pressure release valve on a boiler. Eventually the pressure builds to a point where the steam finds its own way out. The results are usually not pretty.
Reddit, Techdirt, and other groups became the focus of protest because traditional media was controlled. I don't know the actual readership stats, but I am guessing that SOPA did wonders for viewership and discussion at the protest sites. Unfortunately for big media, some of that new readership will stick around.
Even sites like Facebook were lit up with anti-SOPA messages. The traditional media were not getting out the message, so people found other venues.
Now that the boiler has ruptured, the MPAA, RIAA, and other SOPA supporters are going to have a much harder time controlling the message in the future. Even media outlets who are friendly or subsidiary with SOPA supporters are being forced to provide more balanced coverage.
Media industry hubris is the ultimate cause of the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strike the 'could', they DID
Saw the first t.v. commercial encouraging us to support SOPA this weekend. Made me gag a little.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strike the 'could', they DID
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Strike the 'could', they DID
What they don't get is that people see them, but they don't always BELIEVE them. That's what truly is baffling to H-wood types.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strike the 'could', they DID
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strike the 'could', they DID
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strike the 'could', they DID
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real thing they are saying is...
They completely own Television, and they're out to own the Internet the same way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The real thing they are saying is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The real thing they are saying is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"you damn kids have no work ethic. He quit saying that when I worked, and bought him a bass boat. I did that by selling my own media online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So what exactly do they have to offer the politicians?
Now they threaten to cut number 2 and are saying that they are ineffective on point 1. So what do they have left to offer the politicians?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So what exactly do they have to offer the politicians?
Actually, that's another argument AGAINST them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
And then came the Assumptions.
And the Assumptions were without form.
And the Plan was without substance.
And darkness was upon the face of the Workers.
And they spoke among themselves, saying,
"It is a crock of sh*t, and it stinks."
And the Workers went unto their Supervisors and said,
"It is a pail of dung, and we can't live with the smell.
And the Supervisors went unto their Managers, saying,
"It is the container of the excrements, and it is very strong, such that none may abide by it."
And the Mangers went unto their Directors, saying,
"It is a vessel of fertilizer, and none may abide its strength."
And the Directors spoke among themselves, saying to one another,
"It promotes growth, and it is very powerful."
And the Vice Presidents went to the President, saying unto him,
"This new plan will actively promote the growth and vigor of the nation with very powerful effects."
And the President looked upon the Plan and saw that it was good.
And the Plan became Law.
And that is how sh*t happens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
Next time, it would look better if you cited your sources :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
by adolf (21054) on Sunday January 22, @08:49PM (#38787117) Journal
Who says
"(courtesy of some random *nix fortune file, somewhere, that I remember from long, long ago.)"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The SOPA plan... (totally cribbed, still relevant)
"In the beginning was the plan, and then the specification.
And the plan was without form, and the specification was void.
And darkness was upon the faces of the programmers.
And they spake unto their project leader, saying:
"IT IS A CROCK OF SHIT, AND IT STINKETH."
And the project leader went to the manager, and he spake unto him saying:
"IT IS A CONTAINER OF EXCREMENT AND IT IS VERY STRONG,
SUCH THAT NONE MAY ABIDE BEFORE IT."
And the manager went unto the Director, and he spake unto him saying:
"IT IS A VESSEL OF FERTILIZER, AND NONE MAY ABIDE ITS STRENGTH."
And the director went unto the vice president, and he spake unto him saying:
"IT CONTAINS THAT WHICH AIDS PLANT GROWTH AND IT IS VERY STRONG."
And the vice president went unto the president, and he spake unto him saying:
"IT PROMOTETH GROWTH, AND IT IS VERY POWERFUL."
And the president went unto the board of directors,
and he spake unto them saying:
"THIS POWERFUL NEW PRODUCT WILL PROMOTE THE GROWTH OF THE COMPANY."
And the corporate board of directors looked upon the product,
and saw that it was good!
(courtesy of some random *nix fortune file, somewhere, that I remember from long, long ago.)"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freudian slip in title?
Hmm, was that a double entendre implying that Major Media own the (Congressional) supporters of SOPA/PIPA?
Sad that that slip isn't even notable, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sore Losers
Dodd's remarks in particular seem just juvinile. It would be like the coach of a football team making a press release at half time bitching about how bad the other team is cheating because his team is down a few points. Then another press release after the game whining about how bad the other guys cheat. Then a week after the game issuing another press release saying, "Hey guys, just so you know, that game last week was gay. The other team was cheating."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
History and messages
When my dad was a kid, 1940s there was radio and newspapers. One way communications only. When a small group wanted to get it's message out they had to print it somehow. Buy a small press, mimeograph or something like that.Telephone was around but it was one to one and not everyone had one.
When I was a kid it was pretty much the same with the addition of TV but it was still one to many. If I wanted to communicate it was still pass out newsletters that I printed somehow.
As I reached early adulthood there were copy machines. Still paper based but easier than printing.
What the *AAs don't understand is that now one person can get on Facebook and post a message that can, literally in hours, go all across the world if enough others are interested in it.
Some of them are my age and just haven't caught up yet. They have secretaries that check their email and hire techies to "Do that web stuff."
They don't ever get on web sites, can barely get on the internet.They don't get many to many communications.
This is why they don't understand what's going on. Their whole lives have been spent in a one to many world of mass communication and they can't get used to the fact that in this world there is a many to many form of communication. They aren't interested in learning and THEY ARE IN POWER RIGHT NOW.
We can wait till they die off but in the mean time they will cause extreme harm to our nation, world and it's progress and maybe to the internet itself.
Part of our job now is to get through this transitional period without these dinosaurs doing too much damage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: History and messages
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: History and messages
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: History and messages
Because not understanding things your "debating" and voting on should be a criminal offense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
REALLY!!
What is the need for SOPA & PIPA anyway? Megaupload bit the dust. What more is it they want to ask for? I thought the purpose of SOPA & PIPA was to enable the government to do exactly what the DOJ did with Mega? Apparently what little of message they got out was just ruse to win public support. The government just demonstrated they are fully capable of seizing the over seas pirates anyway.
So what is it that they are really after.. Makes you think doesn't it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: REALLY!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I did see the SOPA commercials :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I want my, I want my, I want my free mp3's
And nothing else matters."
I am the web. I am your boss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Get over yourself.
Most everyone here has practically begged you to come up with a better business model. Nearly everyone has stated repeatedly that they do not endorse IP Infringement.
Frankly, I love movies and music and books and well, you get the idea. I pay for my media.
Do you really have to look like a whinny child? Come up with a plan! Make yourself even more stinking rich!
Or, continue as you have been and become regarded as part of the most evil empire in the world.
I really cannot believe you cant afford some smart guys to figure this out for you.... It's gotta be better than throwing money at those dishonest politicians...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But MPAA/RIAA is THE Mob ... get the difference.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We are the web. We are your boss.
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
...then toot them out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's either we can tell the truth better than you, or we can lie better than you. Either way, you're fucked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most effective measure to bring the MPAA in line
Stop buying their recordings or purchasing any of their media for a few months and watch how the power of the masses will make them change their minds. Shouldn't be so difficult, meanwhile watch some good movies or read those good old books on your bookshelf ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Most effective measure to bring the MPAA in line
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Most effective measure to bring the MPAA in line
http://prorevnews.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-to-boycott-movies-and-record-labels.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Most effective measure to bring the MPAA in line
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Most effective measure to bring the MPAA in line
Transnational Piracy Research in Practice
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1950482
Game Changing Study Puts Piracy in Perspective
http://torrentfreak.com/game-changing-study-puts-piracy-in-perspective-110311/
The Media Piracy Report
http://piracy.ssrc.org/the-report/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most effective measure to bring the MPAA in line
Agreed, but if people really would boycott the MPAA and RIAA on a massive scale, they probably would have a hard time "forcing" their deals onto anybody.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
These people complained about the VCR, they complained about CD's, they complained about audio tapes, they complained about nearly everything, and they did no fact checking at all. Everything they said was totally wrong and it all went unchallenged. This needs to change. Government established media monopolies need to end.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/02265017137/new-anti-sopa-song-crowdsourced-video- dan-bull.shtml#c863
These people used to be more easily able to spew their pro - patent, pro-copy protection, pro-IP position with no fact checking or criticisms whatsoever. Just an entirely one sided message.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100727/10432810380.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/a rticles/20101005/12204511290/why-won-t-universal-music-let-you-see-the-20-20-report-from-1980-about- how-the-music-industry-is-dying.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091101/1818186751.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120108/00533117331/study-confirms-news-networks-owned-sopa-sup porters-are-ignoring-sopapipa.shtml
They're happy to put their pro-IP position over mainstream media but they would never allow someone like Mike Masnick the opportunity to criticize intellectual property laws because they know that, in the face of scrutiny, their position is indefensible.
http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/against.htm
Which is why many of them don't even allow comments on their blog.
They one sidedly steal from the public domain through retroactive copy protection extensions and the media doesn't cover it.
These people want to be able to do anything they want, unchallenged whatsoever by any media outlets.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090811/0152565837.shtml
We need to abolish their government established monopolies. The government has no business giving self interested private entities a government established monopoly on information distribution. This has gone on far too long.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100714/15432610219.shtml
Underlying the media cartel's fear mongering is the fact that the media cartel sees this as a potential alternative form of entertainment and hence a threat to their entertainment monopoly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scooby Doo Much?
Nice to see that Chris Dodd really wanted to make the most out of the run down fun house by scaring all potential business off. Now if only he'd have used that ingenuity to craft a better business model...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorists?
The SOPA/PIPA debate clearly falls in the terms of politically motivated terrorism by holing the world population and businesses to ransom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorists?
The SOPA/PIPA debate clearly falls in the terms of politically motivated terrorism by holing the world population and businesses to ransom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freedom
http://www.dethronehatch.com/orrin-hatch-is-no-friend-of-the-internet/
This is what happens to Politicians who've been in Washington for 36 years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Censorship is your right, we serve the people, as we have always done so, since the first day you gave us this power.
Your right to share information on a global scale near instantaneously, will never be jeopardized.
We will never pass bills or pay more attention to certain bills with real problems, based on the amount of money my good friend Mr Corporate might or might not give me, Hi Bill.
We will not use buzzwords, such as "PIRACY", to justify our actions
We will not use buzzwords, such as "PIRACY", to call people pirates, when they dont support SOPA/PIPA
We dont expect
Husband: Another useless bill *sigh*
Wife : But what will the neighbours think
Husband: Go, SOPA
We will not release information, on fact and figures and not have verbal or documented proof, as to how this information was gathered
We will not release information, or bar access to information that would, incriminate us
We will not release information, or destroy information that would, incriminate us
We will not release information!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Suck it up, princesses
Looks like your spin department is working overtime for you to cover your asses after SOPA/PIPA more-or-less fell flat on their faces.
Lets not forget that you've got the capacity to reach any member of Congress and offer them a huge paychecks and cushy jobs after tey retire form the house. Give a politician a large enough paycheck or a good enough cushy job after their term is up, logic, reason, facts and public interest go out of the window, and the constitution is ignored completely. Wish we had that, then SOPA would never have been on the agenda to begin with.
Cry me a fucking river.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Pot calls the Kettle Black- ..AND Justice, SOPA and Pipa for All
Our intellectual Property rights are just as important to us as theirs are to them! Before the Internet and Occupy, we had a difficult time getting our message heard...The playing field is now level...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clearly they're just upset about Citizens United...
Citizens United was about a bunch of people getting together to put out their own documentary to people who were willing to pay for it. People who oppose the ruling apparently believe that only these major media corporations, these SOPA/PIPA supporters, should be able to broadcast political views. Non-media groups, whether grassroots or whether Reddit, Google, or the Wikimedia Foundation, should shut up, because they're not the right sort of corporations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It was very clear during this SOPA/PIPA revolt that mainstream services were ignoring this as best they could. Then the likes of CNN and Fox News were saying in not so many words "We cannot accurately report this news when our owners are SOPA supporters"
The mainstream news services that the majority of the population listen to did ignore the 6000 websites and 8 to 15 million people who revolted.
To now turned around to say these same "censors" were not heard is remarkable. I can only say "Thank God for the Internet" the one place where you can actually read news not corrupted by corporate media whim.
Oh how they fear us... but ignore us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
KEEP WHINNING FREEDOM STEALERS
Please understand, as long as my rights as an American are under attack, then expect no support from me. If you idiots really didnt want to lose money, then America would get 2 weeks earlier releases. Do your homework morons, most of them movies are pirated from other countries. SO STOP TRYING TO STEAL MY RIGHTS... USE YOUR BRAINS AND LEAVE ME ALONE. I could run both your pathetic industries as 1 person than any of you can as a team. Losers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great Historical Irony in MPAA Actions
A couple of wiki articles offer an interesting perspective. Edison parlayed his patents into a consortium of corporations that controlled all the materials needed to produce films, e.g. film, projectors, cameras, etc. This group MPPC (Motion Picture Patents Company) suppressed independent film makers on the east coast via court injunctions, sending private investigators to collect evidence. Sometimes they even used mafia enforcers to harass independent film makers and destroy unlicensed film equipment.
LA area provided not only good weather (often mentioned in newspaper pieces), but also geographical distance from MPPC east coast enforcement. Out west, companies sprung up faster than injunctions could be issued. Additionally, crews could also put further distance between themselves and patent/licensing enforcers by filming in nearby Mexico. MPPC's patents from the mid-1890's expired in 1913 sabotaging the legal suppression strategy. Additionally, MPPC's monopolistic practices were found to be in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in 1918.
Amazing how this pattern plays itself out over and over again: Original creative patent or copyright holders make an innovative or creative breakthrough, then use the laws and courts to stifle competition and innovation. Eventually, these companies collapse under their own lethargy and the wave of new innovation. And the process starts again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What They Mean Is ...
What they need to figure out is how to do is force the subversives into watching mainstream media, while filling the Internet full of pliant sheep.
Pass a law, maybe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Murdoch full court offesive
Today's WSJ had a bunch of invective...
Then there is the US Chamber of Commerce with full page ads....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]