Nielsen Finally Realizes That TV Viewers Are Cord Cutting, Calls It 'Interesting Consumer Behavior'
from the we-want-to-keep-an-eye-on-it dept
For many years we've written stories about the TV industry being in complete denial over cord cutting (i.e., getting rid of pay TV). The industry has denied that anyone was doing this, claimed that it was just a minor blip during a recession, suggested that when kids "grew up" they'd go back to subscribing to cable, and used a variety of other means of perpetuating their denial. Instrumental in this has been Nielsen, the TV rankings people, who is closely aligned with the industry in propping up the facade. So it's pretty hilarious to watch Nielsen start to finally acknowledge that cord cutting is real, but to do so (1) so late into the game and (2) in such a condescending manner, that's clearly designed to blast out the message to TV execs (i.e., Nielsen's clients): "DON'T WORRY, EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE. REALLY."It's true. Most people watch TV in their living rooms using traditional cable or satellite options. In fact, more than 95 percent of Americans get their information and entertainment that way. But as we explored what the other 5 percent are doing, we found some interesting consumer behaviors that we want to keep an eye on.They treat it like they've discovered a brand new species, Contentus Withoutus, and it exhibits "interesting behaviors" which "we want to keep an eye on." Interesting behaviors like... not paying $100+ per month for pay TV just so they can watch two channels? Perhaps.
This small group of video enthusiasts is tuning out traditional TV — and the trend is growing. This "Zero-TV" group, which makes up less than 5 percent of U.S. households, has bucked tradition by opting to get the information they need and want from non-traditional TV devices and services.And there, right there, is the actual admission that those of us who have cut the cord and have no intention of going back are not a myth and are actually "growing" in numbers. Still, they describe us as having "bucked the tradition" rather than being part of a larger trend that is accelerating rapidly.
From there, the focus is on how those of us who cut the cord, still watch TV (i.e., "breathe, Mr. TV exec, they don't all just hang out on Reddit talking to each other each day").
According to Nielsen's Fourth-Quarter 2012 Cross-Platform Report, the U.S. had more than five million Zero-TV households in 2013, up from just over 2 million in 2007. These households don't fit Nielsen's traditional definition of a TV household, but they still view video content. The television itself isn't obsolete, however, as more than 75 percent of these homes still have at least one TV set, which they use to watch DVDs, play games or surf the Net. When it comes to video content, a growing amount of these households are using other devices.All in all it's a small admission, done in a condescending way in which they pretend this is some strange abnormal behavior, which needs to be observed but shouldn't worry TV execs yet. This, by the way, is classic bad advice for those facing disruptive changing markets. "Oh, don't worry about those people who have found something better and who are dropping your service in six figure chunks each quarter. We'll just observe them and be ready to act later."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cord cutting, myths
Companies: nielsen
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
There's others, like me, who watch the free over the air channels like CBS, NBC, etc, but would NEVER pay even $1 for cable or satellite channels.
I'm sure that number is far higher then the 'pitiful' 5% Nielsen acts like is no real threat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I would agree that the 5% number must be low. I think they are conflating two types of people for misdirection. 5% of households fit their definition of "Zero-TV". They never mention the percentage that still have TVs but no cable/satellite subscription, nor how those are changing. But if the number of people who have actually chucked their TV has doubled in six years...I could see cord cutters also increasing. Plus the new consumers moving out on their own into college or post graduation are used to doing things without subscriptions. There will be a vacuum.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They live on forced subscription and on the availability of tv and landline in the places the young people move to.
I am too old to be a true cord-cutter and to live cheap I have to pay for tv to get as cheap an internet-connection as I get (yes it is cheaper than internet alone because it is a package deal for the area!). However, I don't use my tv very often (it is 5 months since I last turned it on!) and I do not have a landline so an "interesting consumer behaviour" I express.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I was having the same problem. I only turned it on for background noise while working on the computer or doing the dishes or other things, and I quickly realized my $92 I was spending on cable was really being a waste. After all, I could play a DVD which cost $15 once instead of $92 compounded over time. I cut the cable out and only had internet (which caused my internet cost to increase by $10, unbundled,) but I'd move to another ISP (come on Google Fiber,) in a heartbeat given the number of times in the last two weeks my internet has gone down due to unscheduled maintenance or problems (they always seem to want to upsell you to business class internet when you call about their crappy uptime, don't they?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Which usually ends the conversation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Broadcast stations
And another segment that I rarely see mentioned - senior citizens that just simply can't afford it any longer. There are many in my own neighborhhod.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 13th, 2013 @ 8:13am
No more cable!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More than doubled in 4 years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More than doubled in 4 years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More than doubled in 4 years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: More than doubled in 4 years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
This article was totally worth it if only for this line of this comment. Thanks for the heads up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I just checked it last week, and it wasn't available yet.
This is awesome!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The more I think about it the more Cable/Satellite providers seem like lazy assholes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Oh, you want us to say we have a 50Mbps connection constantly downloading TB of data from Mega, don't you?
You also make the assumption that people must watch TV shows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm going to go on the assumption (hah) that there was no point since the question wouldn't make any sense, since there is no point being assumed.
You mean: "it raises the question".
And most of us have antennas and a subscription to Netflix. At least I do. I watch about 60hours a month on Netflix. I also own a collection of DVDs. Maybe you don't know what's out there besides cable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
How does he watch TV, movies, sports, cartoons, etc.?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Seeing as he wrote it, and it's his anti-IP blog, it matters quite a bit if we're to determine how honest he is.
Perhaps he just goes to the library.
lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hmm.
Again, irony not lost.
Shouldn't you, the accuser, prove first that he watches tv, sport, movies, or cartoons?
And then that he doesn't watch youtube, or hulu, or any other video service online that isn't netflix.
And its not like there aren't things like DVD players, OTA channels, and day-after streams from network websites.
What are you trying (and failing, I might add) to prove, again?
Did Mike turn you down for a date?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm far from the only person that considers this the safest assumption one could make.
But nice for you to come to Mike's defense. How does it smell up in there?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm far from the only person that considers this the safest assumption one could make.
Funny that I already answered you above and you're still doubling down on this lie.
I do not pirate anything. I've said this before and I'll say it again: I do not engage in piracy. I do not have any "file sharing" programs on my computer. I don't even have a BitTorrent client, though I have in the past (which was used for authorized content).
You keep making assumptions for whatever reason, but those assumptions are incorrect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Assumptions. Wow.. Again, I have to say it, the irony is not lost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And judging the content on TechDirt, I'm pretty sure Mike spends most of his time online reading news and legal papers. I doubt he has much time left to pirate crappy television shows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I have a wife and kid too. Cable is an utter waste of money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
They don't. Actually, I'm more interested in TV and movies than they are. My wife wanted us to cut the cord long before I did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
YOU FILTHY PIRATE LIAR RAPORIST!!! BLAAAARRRRGHH!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Aside from the college football my wife loves so much and the occasional DVD rental, neither she nor any of our three kids watch TV.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
This is not an anti-IP blog. I know that you'll never understand the difference, but I couldn't let that slide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
hahaha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
neener neener, right back at you.
Grow up, get over the rejection, and move on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh wait, no, what I meant was, "what's your point?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Over the air free TV.
Streamed to a computer near you with all the perks of a "smart TV" which is basically a TV with a WiFi attached to it.
For $25 bucks you can build your own buying a Raspberry Pi and pluging it into a TV set.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I tried standing, but it gets uncomfortable after a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Just in case: not a single one of my XBMC plugins connect to an unauthorized service. Every single one gets the videos directly off the authorized websites. For example, the PBS Kids plugin gets the videos directly from http://pbskids.org/video/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There is also Walmart launching their online video streaming service.
https://www.internetretailer.com/2011/07/26/walmartcom-launches-streaming-video-service
WTF!
Walmart!? really?
Aero is another player that is still alive and kicking.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/02/21/172532486/amid-lawsuits-aereo-brings -broadcast-tv-to-the-internet
Quote:
TV networks executives shake uncontrolabbly when they hear the sounds of OTB(over the box) word, network streaming, webseries and new companies that have nothing to do with TV actually investing millions of dollars to produce content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Mostly Netflix, because it works so well.
We subscribe to Hulu Plus, but I find the implementation appalling. That's not a remark about the content, but about how badly the application and the service work. The lack of an Android application for my phone, tablet and Google TV just add to my frustration. That's what the legacy dinosaurs call "adding value" because to them frustration == value.
We are considering adding Amazon Prime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Amazon Prime and Netflix are ALMOST redundant. I use Amazon instead of Netflix because I also order a lot of crap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Mostly, I don't. We cut the cord a few months after my son was born because we realized we just don't have time to watch TV. And since then I haven't missed it. The few shows that I have occasionally watched I've found were available on either Hulu or directly on the shows own websites (things like Daily Show and Colbert, for example). But, for the most part, I just don't have time for TV any more. For a while we were renting DVDs from the local video store, but again, no time lately. Every so often I consider signing up for Netflix, but that whole "no time for TV" thing makes it less appealing.
Not sure why you make the assumption that everyone must spend allotted time watching TV.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The 5%
I use it for gaming, but mostly to watch video I've downloaded, or DVDs. I can't tolerate the commercials.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm. I was a very early adopter.
It's nice when the world starts catching up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm. I was a very early adopter.
All I wanted was the Scifi Channel and some Fiction Stations like Discovery,History, Science.
Told them I would even be willing to pay them for the privilege of Blocking the other channels.All I wanted was a reduction of sorts in my Monthly Bill.They would not work with me so I Cut That Cable and I will never go back.
Nielsen has ruined so many good intelligent shows ! Screw You Nielsen..........Guess it takes you MAFIAA Stooges a Decade to catch up to Reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Allow me to finish that for you
...it is getting much smarter. Newer model TV's come complete with wifi and multiple HDMI ports so that users can choose to watch all of their video content over the web.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Allow me to finish that for you
I wonder when TV stations will get smart and start streaming their programming as it is broadcast, the way radio stations do? Or have I been missing something?
BTW, I suspect partial cord cutters Today will be complete cord cutters at some point not so far down the road, so not counting them is a dishonest study of the issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Allow me to finish that for you
Up to now, stations were stealing views from themselves when they put something up online right away, which is a big deal to them because they wouldn't have the Nielson numbers to show advertisers. That's why Hulu normally has a week waiting period before they get the episode online.
With this new decision, they are now have the freedom to put stuff online day of and not lose a view.
ABC has already announced that they are planning on putting stuff up right away. It'll happen more and more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Allow me to finish that for you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well, look at this way
that would sound about right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Disrupters will come along, such as Google fiber in KS, Muni broadband, etc, and at some point there will be a subtle shift, like is happening with traditional land lines to cell phones/voip.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I cut the cord, so now without cable/satellite I follow the shows I have a specific interest in, at my leisure and choice of time AND place. I am finding it troublesome to find new shows to watch, or keep up with anything that isn’t easily predictable. I don’t want to waste my time searching for when a season starts back up, or what day do I have to wait to see the next episode.
I got my time back from a bad habit and I like it. I’m watching TV as a whole less and less and I think it’s great, but how are they going to respond to that? How are they going to get me back or even keep my attention in the long run?
I no longer flip through channels finding something to watch, I don’t have a myriad of commercials telling me about new shows either, I don’t research TV shows, hell they don’t even make it simple (it’s so bad it has to be on purpose) to find out basics outside their TV centered ecosystem.
They’re becoming completely irrelevant faster than they know, and they may think they’ll have a second chance someday when I have kids, but the reality is that’s not going to happen without me still having the bad habit. I can’t say I care at all if these companies fail to keep up, because the only certain thing is someone else will be there to take the opportunity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
nextepisode.net for finding when the next episode will be available.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TV Viewers Are Cord Cutting
Today, we call that "reality" TV, and, as has been said, it sucks balls.
Now, in the wake of Newtown, we have a sudden glut of turgid slime about psychopathic serial killers.
If it weren't for Netflix, I'd put my TV out of its misery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TV Viewers Are Cord Cutting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i'm hatin' on the bastards...
have actually made *some* progress: want to downgrade our dish package, but there is ONE channel in the upper tier she *really* wants, but think i can get that either online or through hulu...
otherwise, it is ONLY sports that keeps us in the thrall of our Big Media monopolists...
for myself, i'm so pissed at Big Media, i would give up the sports on teevee and listen to it on radio... *THAT* is how much i hate on the bastards...
(in fact, since we just got screwed by our ISP when they got dropped from espn3/espngo/espnwatch/WHATEVER the fuck they are calling it this week, we can't even get the online stuff anymore... fuckers: we HATE ALL OF YOU, but we have no choice for alternatives... the NANOSECOND we do, you greed monsters are his story...)
Big Media can go piss up a rope...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More Nuanced Analysis, Please.
And the only reason I'm not in the "cord cutter" group is that Comcast charges more for Internet alone than it does to bundle it with "Limited Basic" cable in my area. Do they have a metric for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More Nuanced Analysis, Please.
This is me, too.
I'm willing to bet they do have a metric for that. My cable TV box isn't even plugged in. I'm quite sure that their system tracks box usage at least to the point of knowing if they're connected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's really the *only* programming I'm unwilling to give up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
NOW. What can we see from this about Nielsen and the whole field of advertising? -- FIRST, IT'S ALL LIES! Nielsen and ad agencies have direct interest in promoting the myths and numbers, and so they lie. It's hardly surprising, as Mike so often says. -- 2nd, as I've been trying to get Mike to notice for, oh, at least 2 years I guess, is that advertising is DESPISED, and will be avoided whenever possible. The implications are immense.
But instead of speculating on the collapse of advertising, in effect Mike goes on as if "teh internets" are pretty much just another form of non-interactive entertainment and so advertising support will continue to work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that maybe, just maybe, Mike realized something like that a loooong time ago. If I remember correctly, he's written articles about it
"If the advertisements are too annoying and/or intrusive, people will go away and the value of that advertising drops. Any smart media property knows this, and actually works quite hard on keeping the user experience as good as possible, which quite frequently means pushing back against the desires of advertisers. "
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120813/00081620002/fee-based-twitter-is-no-more-ideologically -pure-than-ad-supported-twitter.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
"2nd, as I've been trying to get Mike to notice for, oh, at least 2 years I guess, is that advertising is DESPISED, "
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that maybe, just maybe, Mike realized something like that a loooong time ago. If I remember correctly, he's written articles about it"
--------
You ARE out on a limb there, fanboy, a short one that you sawed off between you and the tree: August of 2012, a mere 7 months ago, is well within the two years that I stated. So you prove that I tipped Mike to it.
In any case, it's such a fundamental concern to his precious Google and the web in general that he should be focused on it frequently, rather than, say, on Prenda Law...
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Prenda Law! A staple in the "At The Bench" series. Mike sez (short version): "Wow. Wow. Wow. ... The story is gripping."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation .shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
lol!
How about this one? I mean he doesn't exactly say "advertising is hated" but it's about ad blindness, and why else would we ignore ads?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091012/0331366489.shtml
Anyway I don't feel like trolling through the TD archives anymore just to prove you're an idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
UPDATE Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
AdBlock Plus BLOCKED from Google Play
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/14/adblocker_blocked_by_google_play/
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Mike will soon announce T-shirts that he personally silk-screens! Just $1000 each! -- He's selling REAL scarcity as only one in 20 come out legible!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: UPDATE Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
What are you getting at?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
UPDATE 2 Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
eBay: Our paid Google advertising was a total waste of money
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/13/ebay_study_google_paid_search_not_worth_it/
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
All the news you saw last week on other sites, re-written to cherry pick points that fit Mike's agenda.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: UPDATE 2 Re: Well, falling, but it's NOT going away entirely!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Live sports is the only reason to pay for television, Nielsen's own ratings should show this, but they fail to make the proper conclusion again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But that's heavy selection bias right there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I guess my question is how do they pick the Nielsen families? I'd lay money on them picking families in a way that eliminates most of the people who cut the cord.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
the girlfriend pays for the broadcast part of the bill and we split the internet part because i dont watch cable tv. we have one converter which is in her office and i only make use is online/OTA.
because of her insistence on having the broadcast service, i cant be counted as a cord-cutter.... now think for a moment how many people are in my situation? how many kids are in households that only touch the TV for their game console and/or media center and never watch the broadcast side from their provider? there is actually a lot of them out there and none of them get counted as cord-cutters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seven years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Over two years now...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too funny. Almost spit coffee on my keyboard laughing at that one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cancelled cable ~ 15 years ago
thanks to torrents we can get everything we want as soon as it is released, sometimes before
watching tv seasons one episode a night for two weeks is so much better than waiting months for it
and I've never seen a tv show that wasn't available online within minutes of a broadcast finishing
if netflix would make a linux client I might get that but they don't and i'm not bothering with windows just for one service
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Fortunately AT&T doesn't control the use of the circuit between my house and sonic.net's backbone, so I have no caps or filtering bullshit going on here :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's a trend. And it'll grow exponentially.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this cord cutter also a Nielsen family ....
PS3
PS2
XBOX 360
NetFlix
DVD
BlueRay
Not too long ago I got a call from a polite Nielsen rep. asking if we would be willing to 'be a Nielsen family'. I tried to explain to the nice lady that we don't subscribe to cable TV, satellite, or even watch over the air channels.
That was a difficult conversation to say the least. Finally she settled on the line that all types of television watching people were important and if we could maintain some diaries for them anyway. In the end I said, sure why not.
The diaries arrived in the mail and the appointed week rolled around. I diligently filled them in.
[tv on - time], [tv off - time] channel watched - [none]
again and again it went.
In the notes at the end I reiterated that we have no, cable, satellite, over the air capability (even our internet isn't through the cable company). There were no channels, because we don't use our televisions in that way.
I sometimes wonder what they made of that info......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: this cord cutter also a Nielsen family ....
Wonder no more! Now you know - you're an oddity in their minds, one of the 5% "strange consumer behavior" statistics.
Keep it up :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now I don't have to listen to DISH tell me how it is someone else's fault they have removed my favorite program from their lineup of a zillion channels I mostly didn't want to watch. Even more annoying, they would remove popular without alerting customers about it; you had to find out about it by googling.
I have A LOT more freedom now. I watch exactly what I want when I want. My phone goes where I go.
I'm surprised that more people don't do this. There are a lot of stupid things about the 21st---why not at least enjoy the good stuff?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting tidbit...
That's what we've been saying all along: the copyright industry also controls the flow of information, but here you have Nielsen confirming it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Interesting tidbit...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
content
I realized just how much I had been missing out on by restricting my watching to cable. It's interesting that the quality and entertainment value of what I'm watching has increased but thanks to no commercials or wasted time channel surfing the amount of time I spend in front of the TV has decreased.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zero-TV definition
From the sounds of it, it's not just a home that doesn't have cable/sat, but also doesn't have over the air, which makes a lot more sense given that 5% number.
The number that use both internet and over the air instead of cable is quite a bit higher if I remember correctly.
Nielson announced a good month or more ago that they were going to start counting internet tv services in their numbers such as Netflix, YouTube and Hulu, and some of the bigger networks like ABC are responding to the announcement that they are going to be putting their shows online day of instead of after a week wait because of it.
For lots of great cord cutting news check out Frame Rate on the TWIT network: http://twit.tv/show/frame-rate
It's one of my favorite weekly video netcasts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Zero-TV definition
http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/5/4066982/abc-unified-disney-nielsen-tv-anywhere-advertisin g-platform
This is better than a la cart channels. This trend will grow, and it will eat the cable companies from within, because all the sudden they will have to face a level of competition that they haven't had to deal with since they got their regional monopolies.
It will be interesting to see what their response is to this threat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I stopped watching TV over a decade ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We Were a Nielsen Family
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've been TV-less for many years now. I don't missed the stupid in those shows. I certainly don't miss the commercials that both broadcasting and ad companies want to shove down our throats and find that my life has a much calmer tone with them missing.
I have no interest in televised sports, I get news and weather from the net. I have no intentions of putting another tv in my home.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not missing anything. No TV needed.
Any 'shows' or 'movies' I want to watch are available online, at any time I happen to be in the mood to see them. I pay for a few websites to improve my streaming access but my total internet and streaming bill comes to $51 a month and is a hell of a lot more versatile than any cable system ever has been.
Really, there it is a rather obvious decision.
100$+/month for arbitrarily scheduled oft repeated programming fraught with pre-empting for events I don't care about. To say nothing of the 9-20 minutes worth of advertising per hour.
vs.
51$ a month for access to whatever I want, whenever I want to see it. Minimal ads, some of which are even targeted to me specifically rather then at demographics I have no ties to. Unlimited ability to pause, skip, rewind, replay. Plus everything ELSE the internet has to offer. I can even watch things on my mp3 player, laptop and phone, wherever I am. Visiting friends/family? I can access my accounts from any computer and keep up with or share what I'm interested in.
And I'm supposedly 'missing out'. Yeah, Sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's like when digital downloads were not counted in video game sales, so 'sales' went down but magically more money was made than what was being 'sold'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Best answer I can give
"Commercials??? I haven't seen commercials in forever!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another thought occurred to me
The video quality sucks, you can't watch things on your own schedule, and oh, lord, the commercials are just painful.
Almost any other option is a higher-quality experience. And, I think, more and more people are realizing this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Soo.
WHAT is the USE' of cable/sat?
its distribution. to get a signal around the country, without installing 10,000 Towers and power locations to send a signal.
THIS SAVE THEM MONEY..TONS OF MONEY.
Promise of CABLE, were LESS commercials, MORE SHOWS.. NEVER HAPPENED.
PROBLEM of CABLE/SAT..NATIONAL commercials, its hard to send Location specific Commercials. Your local bike shop cant send you a commercial. So you end up with Adverts for locations and shops that MAY(probably arnt) near you. Considering that over 3/4 of the nations is considered RURAL/Farming.
So, if you are going to watch 10-15 minutes of commercials EVERY HOUR, why are you paying for it?
When cable started, you got BASIC CABLE $20, then added packages $10 each...NOW, you pay for ESPN even if you dont watch it.. you pay for religious channels you may not want..You pay for SALES channels(even tho they SEEM to be free..You pay for music, Alt-language(Spanish/other)channels..And TONS of stuff that you Dont/wont watch..
WHY pay for something you DONT WANT to watch?
If you look at the Full listings, MOST(almost all) people watch LESS then 20 channels. And that is a HIGH selection. Many only watch about 10.
But, for all the infrastructure NEEDED to send a signal to EVERYONE in the USA.. wouldnt you think CABLE/SAT would be cheap?
LET them setup Antenna's AROUND the country to get your advertising dollar. It will make TONS of jobs. Forget CABLE/SAt until they drop the prices.
I wouldnt mind $20 per month, for ALL the channels..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No TV needed. No internet needed. Got nature and a book
No. not missing anything. No need to worry on what's going on in the world. Got my bible and the great outdoors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No TV needed. No internet needed. Got nature and a book
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cable is living on sports, and will die by sports
For the less-sports-watching majority, I think this will be a tipping point, causing large numbers of these viewers to look at Netflix & other entertainment-only content options. A $150 cable bill is going to be a bridge too far, especially given the fact that the bump was due to a "sports tax". The funny thing is that Deadspin commenters know they're being subsidized by everyone else, but they always say that everyone else will just pay extra so they can watch all the sports they want to watch, cheaply. (Also, given the economy & programming quality, that 5% number is seriously understated, by a factor of 5 or 6, especially when you factor in household consolidation.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nielsen survey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cowabunga!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Commercials
Goodbye cable / satellite, hello commercial free Internet!
Figure out how to stream Duke bb games and I'll use my TV for target practice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nielsen
Full disclosure - I work in at the Network level.
More full disclosure - I probably hate Nielsen more than you.
Mostly die to sampling.
But -
Depending on where you live, Nielsen hasn't used a paper diary in years. The major markets have been LPM (Local People Meter) for maybe 5 years. The way they work doesn't allow a viewer to turn on a channel, leave the TV for hours and the channel to get credit for it.
Last year when Nielsen acquired Arbitron (Radio ratings), they did it primarily to get their meter technology which provides for measurement via encoded signal. Nielsen ois testing in select markets and plans to roll it out in the top 100 DMAs. It will also measure OTA and mobile tv viewing as well (mobile will be done through app technology)
The real reason Nielsen exists has little to do with programming of TV shows -it's got everything to do with companies being able to make effective and efficient media buying decisions. As much as the some people may want to deny it, TV is still the leading media for creating brand awareness and purchase intent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nielsen
ITS FOR AVERTS...the higher the show rates, the MORe they can CHARGE for advert slots..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another thing I like is that streaming services have the capability of fully tracking viewing habits. I actually make money from advertising revenue on youtube so I can see what videos are seen when and how often and in what countries so that I know what content is popular in what isn't. I don't have to rely on a silly little sample size. I see it all!
As a viewer, I like to know that my viewing habits matter. When I watched a new show on Netflix they immediately renewed it because they knew at a glance what the viewing habits were,
For cable television to survive a few things need to change.
1.) Stop forcing people to pay for channels they don't watch. Seriously. You can sell them in packages of channels that people get to choose, and you can offer better deals on the bulk packages you select, but but you can't otherwise compete. Since everything is digital cable this is an easy thing to implement. You aren't making more money by charging double. You are making LESS money by pushing customers away. If you do this you have a better chance to get them to expand their channels in the future.
2.) Outfit all new televisions with built in feedback. Allow the televisions themselves to act like Nielson hardware sending back viewing habits on EVERYTHING, not just a few, so that the stations know the REAL ratings are. If you bundle these televisions with a DVD that can be monitored by the same feedback system it would be able to monitor what shows are watched later, what ads are watched or skipped, and provide information that even a Nielson home just records as "The DVR Channel". More importantly, this would help sell new television standards by campaigning on the promise to give every home a vote in what shows survive. Once you do this people will make a point to watch their favorite shows on cable TV even if the alternative is cheaper just because it makes them feel like if they don't the show might be cancelled.
Or you can just go on like usual in which case it's been nice knowing you, but cable TV will be extinct within a generation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cut the cord
1. commercials blaring volume.
2. why too much commercial content.
3. Price, if I'm paying I shouldn't have to see all the advertisement or be rated as to content. Cable should have free rain on adult content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Who is claiming they exist?
You can't stop it, all online streaming will have ads and commercials.
I see no indication that Netflix wants to introduce ads. One of their main selling points is there are no ads, they would be extremely foolish to throw that away, and they've demonstrated they are anything but foolish.
People who say they cut the cord but are still watching TV on their computers, dvd players, online aren't fooling anybody.
"Cutting the cord" means canceling cable or satellite TV service. It doesn't mean not watching any TV shows. You can cut the cord and continue watching TV via an antenna or online services.
Cable companies are are already heading towards online paid subscription, don't think they won't buy out everyone else and then you will have no option but to go through them.
You're saying cable companies are going to buy Netflix, Amazon, HBO, and Google?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]