:-( Samsung, Research In Motion Sued For Making It Easy To Use Emoticons
from the thus,-infringing-a-patent dept
All the way back in 2001, we wrote about how the brilliant satirists at Despair Inc. successfully trademarked :-( and announced that they planned to sue 7 million internet users for violating the trademark. The actual announcement was pretty funny -- even though not everyone got the joke. In 2006, we also had a story that mentioned a whole bunch of patents and patent applications related to emoticons.It appears that one of those is now being used in a lawsuit against Samsung and RIM for having the gall to create a button that makes it easy to pick an emoticon without typing it in. The patent in question (US Patent 7,167,731) really is for having a button that lets you pick emoticons. How this is possibly patentable is beyond me. But, for some reason, examiner Lee Nguyen thought it was somehow non-obvious. The patent was originally assigned to Wildseed, a mobile accessories firm that AOL bought in 2005. The patent itself then went to Varia Mobil, who moved it to Varia Holdings to Varia and back to Varia Holdings. It's Varia Holdings bringing the lawsuit. Varia appears to just be a trolling operation (of course).
It's fairly stunning that anyone considered this a valid patent at any point. That it's now being used as the basis for a lawsuit should (once again) raise significant questions about the USPTO's approval process for patents.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: emoticons, patents, software patents
Companies: rim, samsung, varia
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Part of it will be seizing the computer you used and all the area around it. Shame on you for stealing my original idea that no one would have ever thought of had it not been for me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
............................................________
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?......................................................,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:"........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.`~,......"~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...................................../
.............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__
,,_..........}.>-._...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,__......`,.................................
...................`=~-,,.,...............................
................................`:,,...........................`..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_..........._,-%.......`
...................................,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If using a laser pointer to tease a cat is non-obvious, then why should we be surprised when anything else is found non-obvious?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also, I did not type this on a Windows machine that uses both carriage return and line feed to represent new lines and are both entered when pressing the "Enter" key. That is a violation of this patent, obviously, and my use of that vile, patent infringing OS would be aiding and abetting the enemy.
Also, EVER!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
patent examiner Lee Nguyen
Especially since this was filed after examiners were allowed to use Google and a cursory search should have led patent examiner Lee Nguyen to realize that sending many more characters than keypresses happened every time patent examiner Lee Nguyen used the "paste" function on patent examiner Lee Nguyen's computer.
Attn: patent examiner Lee Nguyen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: patent examiner Lee Nguyen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And that is how you get a patent for an obvious device. In this case a piece of double sided velcro wrapped in a circle.
Oddly the cat loves this more then any of the other toys. Go figure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: one click
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
These patent wars are like a Mexican standoff where somebody was actually stupid enough to fire first. Now everybody is suing everybody else, and the only ones innovating are the lawyers with their "I'm gettin' richer by da moment" dance routines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can I patent patent trolling?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can I patent patent trolling?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Can I patent patent trolling?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Can I patent patent trolling?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can I patent patent trolling?
And why is that? Because the guys at the USPTO are morons or greedy bastards who wave anything through just to make a dime?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I met a patent examiner once
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I met a patent examiner once
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Opera Mail calls that button insert>Smiley, not Emoticon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You have GOT to be kidding!
This got a patent?????????
Does any sentient creature not understand now why software patents are a horrible, bad, terrible thing?
(Sentient creature automatically rules out the majority of IP maximalist trolls here, by the way.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You have GOT to be kidding!
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You have GOT to be kidding!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What a joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For goodness sake...
And while you're at it, patent the idea of patenting stupid ideas by adding "on a mobile device" and "on the internet".
Don't worry about prior art... the patent office doesn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Software patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The one word I haven't seen mentioned....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
every IM client and forum I used from mid to late 90's through early 2000's had this [useless] feature
Lee Nguyen... c'mon man
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*Frowns
*Quickly looks around to make sure no lawyers saw
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My only comment on this is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
admit it
But why stop at Samsung and RIM? Just saying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: admit it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: admit it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Junk Patent Problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent/Copyright status: Expired.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For the benefit of those inclined to criticize the patent examiner, while I suspect that subjectively he probably felt the same way of most persons commenting here, he is bound by law to use objective evidence in considering the allowability of patent claims.
I have no doubt there is objective evidence residing somewhere. The difficulty, however, is finding it, a task that is not as easy as many seem inclined to believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ridiculous patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I remember quite clearly Netscape's e-mail client also had a button for inserting smilies.
This "invention" or "innovation" wasn't just obvious. Everybody was already doing it. The USPTO seriously needs to be sued for incompetence on the job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]