Boston Shuts Down Uber Because Massachusetts Doesn't Approve Of The GPS
from the no,-seriously dept
We've written plenty of stories about ridiculous (and ridiculously slow to adapt) government policies that simply don't keep up with the times, which then hinder new, innovative and disruptive services. One company that seems to be running into such things all the time is Uber, who is taking on local state and city regulations around the country as it tries to offer its innovative (and quite useful) transportation service in various metropolitan areas. You may remember the big fight in DC about some regulations that would have hindered Uber by forcing it to charge high prices. Up in Boston, things are even more bizarre. The company has been effectively told to cease and desist from offering its service. This has happened elsewhere, due to various silly regulations regarding cab and livery services, but in Massachusetts they seem to do everything in an especially screwed up manner and this is no exception.The reason Uber can no longer serve the Boston region: Because they were making use of this crazy newfangled technology called "GPS" to measure the distances that cars traveled for the purpose of billing users.
It seems that the Massachusetts Division of Standards, and its laws covering "weights and measures," is so out of date that it has not been updated to recognize GPS as an appropriate "weight and measure" system for distance. As if to prove just how incredibly out of touch these folks are, in the official letter ordering Uber to stop service, they repeatedly refer to the iPhone as an "I phone." They also refer to the Global Positioning System as the Global Positioning Services. These are the people in charge of killing off innovation. Incredible.
Basically, the state had someone sign up for Uber, take a ride in the car as a "sting" (one of the people in the car's job title is -- and I'm not joking -- the "Sealer of Weights & Measures") and then cite the driver after seeing that he (*gasp*!) used a GPS device on his phone to measure the distance traveled. When Uber pointed out that GPS has been around and widely used for decades, the Massachusetts Division of Standards argued that may well be... but since GPS is not for commercial purposes they can't accept it. Seriously.
Global Positioning Services (GPS ) technology is not an issue as it is and has been widely used in non-commercial applications for a number of years. However, GPS has not been used in commercial applications for assessing transportation charges until Uber Technologies, Inc. introduced its use for this purpose. The major problem at this time is the fact that there are no established measurement standards for its current application and use in determining transportation costs similar to that of approved measurement systems for taximeters and odometers. Massachusetts law does not sanction unapproved devices for use in commercial transactions.The idea that GPS isn't used in commercial applications is silly. GPS has been widely used by the military for decades and has been used in commercial applications for quite some time as well. It's beyond silly to think that because some clueless "Sealer of Weights and Measures" is still focused on last century's technology that GPS is not a viable (or even common) technology for this purpose. This seems like a clear case of a totally out of date bureaucracy actively hindering innovation for no reason other than general luddism.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: boston, cabs, gps, livery, massachusetts, rides, weights and measures
Companies: uber
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Good for the Goose
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good for the Goose
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about the freight trains?
Actually, it is. US freight trains use GPS for all kinds of useful things, such as keeping track of where cars are and measuring the distance they travel. Although shipping companies don't bill based on GPS measurements directly as far as I know, those measurements are absolutely used in the computation of shipping charges indirectly by at least some companies.
I know this because I once worked on such a system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What about the freight trains?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What about the freight trains?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: What about the freight trains?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bureaucrat Protects Cushy Sinecure
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hold on a sec, this is rational
Most of the Uber drivers use iPhones, which (especially the older models) have notoriously bad GPS. If it skips off to the wrong street for a few blocks and adds 1/4 mile to my trip, and I don't notice by staring at his screen, how would I know? Normally, I trust the cab company because that little meter is tracked, registered, sealed, and supposedly regularly audited.
Fact is you don't get to ignore laws that were put in place to protect consumers from unscrupulous vendors for years just because you're a trendy startup. I've used Uber a number of times and I'm generally pleased with their service (hell, my friend designed their driver distribution algorithm), but the fact that they rely on iPhone GPS to get an exact measure of the distance between where I was picked up and dropped off does not meet the laws in Massachusetts. They could just install meters, you know...
If Uber was selling food, should they get to ignore FDA labeling requirements? Of course not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
These laws do not just protect from inaccurate devices but keeps drivers honest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is IRrational
Get your mind out of the theory and into the practicality. Then you too can be a successful swindler.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
If you're worried, don't use Uber's service, and go with a traditional cab.
Choice is a wonderful thing in a free market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
We pass regulations that say you have to fully disclose what you are selling and what you are charging. I don't expect that if I get into a livery service of any kind that I'll be charged $50 +/- 5%. No one has that expectation. You publish rates that say "$X/mile and $Y/min" and you honor those rates.
I don't personally call in and validate the medallion on my taxi, do a background check on my driver and pull the maintenance records of the vehicle I'm about to get in - I trust that the regulations that WE THE PEOPLE put in are being enforced.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
Now, this does not excuse Massachusetts from not understanding GPS. Any idiot could see that GPS was going to be popular and useful. The standards should have been in place long ago.
Now, if the iPhone is that bad, then it wouldn't meet standards and would be grounds for fines. But, since they're too stupid to have regulations at all, arguing about accuracy is a moot point. Granted, there are ways around bad GPS by properly coded software. That could easily make the iPhone accurate again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
No, but that's a case of fraud. I would see nothing wrong with a gas station using meters that only estimated the amount of gas, providing that the margin of error was disclosed before the purchase and that there was no intentional attempt to cheat people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
It's all about the representation. Despite the government's authority to govern weights & measures, it is perfectly legal to sell scales that only estimate these things. They won't be certified, but that's no problem unless you fraudulently claim or imply that they are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
This time you have your own odometer with you at all times, if you keep track or if there was a service that would log on that data and be a trusted party to any claims of wrong doing you be better served than by trusting the government.
You don't need those laws anymore to protect you, because now you can do it yourself.
The government can even profit from it making a trusted service that logs on the data from the cab and the customers, it also can be used to investigate cases of abuse.
Should the FDA ignore a better way to keep track and people honest because it is not in the books?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
This means everyone using Uber is aware of how they do business and that they don't have traditional meters.
A quarter mile added to a run in SF at over 11 MPH would sock you for an additional - $1.3125
A quarter mile added to a run outside SF at over 11 MPH would add an additional - $0.875
While being wiggly sometimes, which could be improved I am sure, most people using the service would most likely not freak out. A simple we use GPS tech to bill for your travels disclosure dohickey might cover it.
Heck Uber could help themselves by offering an app that the passenger hits go on and their phone generates its billing on their phone as well. That way one could compare the bill as presented with their own data.
The problem with meters is they are supposed to be checked, they are not always checked and they can and are gamed regularly. They will want them to only be in actual taxis, and put more barriers in the way of someone trying to create a new better system to protect the legacy players.
There has to be a way to make sure the playing field is fair for consumers, and allow new things to be tried.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
I do also agree with this article though that it is stupid for them to be throwing a fit over GPS systems. It is well past time for these morons to have added whatever regulations they need for GPS systems. To just pretend that GPS is some crazy new thing shows just how far behind these fools allow laws to get.
Instead of acting like a spoiled little kid and throwing a temper tantrum all the time our government should work with companies and update regulations to accept new technology. Instead these fools want to sit back and cry about the evil "I phones" and such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
2. you are ignoring the factoid that GPS errors will -theoretically- work both ways: you can be 'cheated' out of a few shekels when it reads longer than the actual mileage, but it appears JUST AS LIKELY that the GPS will read shorter than the actual distance...
3. all in all, a bullshit tempest in a teapot, NOT predicated on protecting consumers, but on protecting established businesses who don't want to compete...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
2) This is an unreasonable assertion. In my example, there's a direct route through the city streets. Since the GPS tracker follows "miles driven" and we have no way of knowing if/how it snaps to the street grid (as many navigation systems do), if my driver was already taking the most direct route there's no way it could charge too little.
3) Evocative imagery, but not really relevant. The law was put in place to protect consumers from shady cab companies. You can argue that you don't LIKE the law, or that now it is being used to PROTECT cab companies from an up-and-comer, but there is a law on the books and Uber appears to be violating it. Lawyers will decide that eventually. Point is - this is a law that has existed for far longer than Uber, and is nothing like some cities inventing new laws or misconstruing old ones. Also, it would be relatively easy for Uber to comply - they could just install meters. To my knowledge Mass. does not restrict the sale, certification, or installation of cab meters, so they could quite easily put them in their vehicles.
"I don't wanna" is not a justification for "I don't have to".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hold on a sec, this is rational
okay, another plus for them (according to you)
*BUT* so what it shows a route (assuming it was even visible to the passenger), is it 'the law' the cabbie *must* follow that route ? they can't deviate for ANY reason (whether to 'cheat' the passenger or not) ?
i don't think so...
i'm betting there is some sort of 'law' that regular, metered cabs must/should/shall follow the most expeditious route, blah blah blah; but does *that* keep cabbies from doing otherwise ?
i seriously doubt it...
2. um, huh ? i can't parse whatever you are trying to say here, but i don't think it negates my point that GPS will be 'off' both to the 'good' and to the 'bad'...
if its 'inaccurate', that cuts both ways...
3. no, it is *not* besides the point that laws are PRIMARILY made to do the bidding of business, NOT protect consumers...
many -if not most- 'consumer protection' laws are actually 'limiting korporate liability' laws...
jiminy crickets, LOOK at how the world works: i don't care WHAT politicians/leaders *SAY*, the net result is that korporations are protected, and consumers are screwed...
THAT is the way of the world in this upside-down society...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Which century?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why can't you answer a direct question with a direct answer?
Yes or no: Is the *only* reason piracy is not OK is because it ignores the wishes of content creators?
Why are you so scared to talk about? Are you that ashamed of what you actually believe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I can't think of any way copyright, or piracy, is mentioned; unless pirates have been told they have to navigate with a sextant, instead of their iPhones, in Massachusetts maybe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://bit.ly/Pnbcji
Mike refuses to answer a yes or no question about what he believes. He has been asked this question for years. He always has an excuse about why he won't answer, but never just an answer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You also continue to egocentrically pretend that it's important that he answer your question.
It doesn't matter how Mike responds. By the very nature of your Glenn Beck style question, you're using the question to imply that Mike is an immoral person. You're a McCarthy-esque witch hunter who has already determined the guilt of the person you're persecuting and any accusation is just for show.
I feel bad for the people in your life if you exhibit these traits elsewhere. "Tell me again, yes or no...DID YOU USE THE LAST OF THE TOILET PAPER AND NOT CHANGE OUT A NEW ROLL?!?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes or no: Is the *only* reason piracy is not OK is because it ignores the wishes of content creators?
It's a simple, straightforward question. Why won't he answer it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
In jury trials, lawyers can respond to questions like yours with "Asked and answered", and the judge would stop you. Here, you are not stopped...but nobody is under any obligation to answer you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes or no: Is the *only* reason piracy is not OK is because it ignores the wishes of content creators?
Why won't he answer the question? Why does he refuse to discuss his actual beliefs about piracy? What is he hiding?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Not to diminish your argument, but Mythbusters proved that goldfish have an excellent attention span and are actually quite intelligent. Unlike this troll.
I expect an apology for Goldie (my imaginary goldfish) and her fellow members of the Carassius auratus auratus species.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Please be careful to answer all the arguments against it to be found here: http://copy.law.cam.ac.uk/cam/tools/request/showRepresentation.php?id=representation_uk_1762a&pa genumber=1_5&imagesize=small
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
That's easy! The answer is 1942.
Wait, no, the answer is "a polar bear".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What is Mike hiding? What kind of a person is he?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Because I don't think that qualifies as "all costs".
Define "all costs" thoroughly in a 300 word essay. If you don't answer me, what are you hiding?
You MUST answer the question, because somebody on the Internet asked you to. That's how it works, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Seriously, can you really tell me that your actions here are that of a mature adult? Answer that question.......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's a simple yes or no.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"I WANT MY ANSWER"
"I WANT MY ANSWER"
"I WANT MY ANSWER"
It's sad that those who oppose mike's viewpoint always seem to resort to such childish antics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You've been given your answer already. Multiple times.
Grow up punk, and get a life. If you have anything useful to add to the conversation, please go ahead. If not, get the fuck out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yes or no: Is the *only* reason piracy is not OK is because it ignores the wishes of content creators?
If yes, then he has given me his complete answer. If no, then he has not.
Why won't Mike just pop in and say yes or no? What is he hiding? Is he so ashamed of his true beliefs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes or no: Is the *only* reason piracy is not OK is because it ignores the wishes of content creators?
Why won't he discuss his true feelings about piracy? What is he hiding? (Like we all don't know.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Five apples.
The industrial revolution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Las Vegas.
I mean, pi times radius squared.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fucking unbelievable...
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120807/00073319950/join-us-thursday-conversati on-with-rob-reid-author-year-zero-plus-augusts-book-month.shtml#c865
http://www.techdirt.com/blog/i nnovation/articles/20120810/02111919983/entrepreneurs-vcs-tell-white-house-to-focus-innovation-rathe r-than-ip-enforcement.shtml#c986
You have your answer. I've linked to dozens of his comments where he answered you. He answered you personally. In case you've deliberately forgotten, the answer is: 1. It's unlawful, and 2. Going against the interests of artists is wrong.
He may, or may not, have other reasons for being against piracy. But even if those reasons are his only ones, it doesn't matter. Those reasons, right there, are enough to show that Techdirt is not "pro-piracy," and to stop calling him "Pirate Mike."
Yet, here you are, derailing the comments in a story that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with piracy.
I live in Boston, and I wanted to read the comments to see if anyone had anything to add about the situation. Instead, I see you're spreading your verbal diarrhea all over the Internet.
The only thing you've shown is that you're an idiot. An abusive, obsessed, childish idiot. You have succeeded in making a fool out of yourself to everyone who comes here.
In the interests of rational discourse on this site, I really hope you stop now. Somehow, I don't believe you will. Because your only goal is to disrupt rational discourse.
That's why you post anonymously: so you can mount a one-man smear campaign against the site, without any accountability.
You are truly pathetic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I have my reasons for remaining an AC, just as the others do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'm just saying that's why he remains anonymous - not that anonymous posters, in general, are bad.
Don't worry, I know first-hand that many AC's are actually insightful and/or funny. This particular guy is just being a douche.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GPS isn't legal for this purpose because it isn't accurate enough. You are taking about 10 meter accuracy 97% of the time or something. Would you accept a scale in the meat department that was 97% accurate?
Uber needs to push to have GPS "type accepted", until they they are subject to the same rules as everyone else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I've worked the deli department of a corner store, and I can tell you that the scales at the meat department are far less accurate than 97%.
p.s. Why the hell was this comment flagged?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unflag?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unflag?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http:// www.priceoftravel.com/555/world-taxi-prices-what-a-3-kilometer-ride-costs-in-72-big-cities/
Assum ing a $3 dollar per Km(0.62 miles), which is more than double the normal rate, you are talking about $3 cents of error dude.
I doubt anybody cares about that kind of rounding error, except for banks that make a living out of that and make millions just on those.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who were the other three passengers in the car?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who were the other three passengers in the car?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Who were the other three passengers in the car?
Wrong reference...
"Who you gonna call?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Who were the other three passengers in the car?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Who were the other three passengers in the car?
For some reason, I find this one easy to remember...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BIG DIG
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(I know pilots are trained with the ability to fly a plane without GPS, but GPS makes it much easier)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Because they don't use it as the basis on which to charge you for your flight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm pretty sure the current system in place for airline fares involves fungus, a magical hat, and folded up pieces of numbered paper
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hubbard (@4) is completely correct, thread over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hate to say it but I see their point
Still, government should only be allowed to specify the required accuracy of the measurement, not the technology used to measure. That's the problem with the scumbags writing the laws, they aren't trying to regulate what should be, they're trying to dictate what must be.
The arguments about trains/airplanes/trucks don't hold water IMO. Short distance on zig-zag routes in cities don't compare to the 100 to 3,000 mile relatively straight-line trips typically made by trains, planes and over-the-road trucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
One source of error is in the math/probability/accuracy. Draw a 30' radius circle (approximate GPS accuracy) around the middle of each turn in a switchback or 90 degree corner. How much of that circle falls outside of the path traveled and how much falls inside? That corresponds to the probability that any GPS error will add rather than subtract from the actual distance traveled. Sharp switchbacks result in an 80-90% chance that it's going to record a longer distance traveled.
Likewise the GPS doesn't account for elevation changes. Obviously if you ride a mile up or down a steep grade, the distance between the GPS position at the beginning and end is not going to equal the actual distance traveled since the vehicle traveled at an angle.
I've done short (38 mile) and long (5,000+ mile) rides and the error is consistent and predictable. The straighter the road the smaller the error.
A GPS isn't accurate enough by itself to be trusted for important distance measurements. It's more noticeable/obvious/critical to off-road motorcycle riders with small gas tanks, limited amount of reserve fuel and the potential for being stranded in the middle of nowhere if distance measurements aren't reasonably accurate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
Also, why do you think they wouldn't track elevation change? You can't solve the math problem without solving for elevation.
if you're using distance to measure fuel usage in an off road situation, you deserve to get stuck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
Un-amusing troll plonked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
Assuming you're correct, how much longer?
"Likewise the GPS doesn't account for elevation changes."
It can, but for the sake of argument, let's assume you're correct. ...Which in this case would be in favor of the customer. I may have only gotten a C in 9th grade geometry, but I'm pretttttty sure I remember that the hypotenuse is longer than either of the legs of a right triangle.
"A GPS isn't accurate enough by itself to be trusted for important distance measurements."
Define "accurate enough" and "important" in this context.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The main reason the iPhone doesn't give as good if not better accuracy is that the military has gotten approval that civilian uses don't require the accuracy they do and have gotten laws passed that will only allow civilian uses to have large errors of measurement in comparison.
As a side note Mike this particular troll is not longer amusing. Rather it's tedious in it's continual attack without any genuine addition to the topics. Until the 'troll' leaves I think this is the last time I will answer in comments as I've had enough of him. Instead I'm going to drop out of reading the valuable comments as it has become irritating in the extreme.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I would suggest that this is that particular individual's goal: to disrupt the comments with completely off-topic, trollish behavior in order to drive reasonable people from the comments. I would hope that you don't go away, but rather focus on providing valuable commentary. The more good commentary should helpfully outweigh such childish behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Nope. My goal is to get you to answer a question that you have been avoiding answering at all costs for years. Why won't you just answer the simple question, Mike?
Yes or no: Is the *only* reason piracy is not OK is because it ignores the wishes of content creators?
Just answer the question, Mike. What are you scared of?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
And the answer to that is not "Nope."
Its: "Yup."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Why the hell are you focused on this? Why won't you answer a simple question, what does it matter? What do you stand to gain from an answer? What are you scared of? When you wake up someday and realize you are douche will you do something about it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The common cold.
A dinosaur.
Ninety-nine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You've been given your answer. Why do you believe that you deserve more than you've been given? You don't get to harass someone just because you want to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I doubt he's smart enough to find a way around that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Seconded.
Also, I really don't like hitting the "report" button for this sort of thing, but in this case it's become mandatory. If you see one of his comments, report it, don't read the replies, move on.
p.s. Mike - does your web software allow something like auto-hiding the replies to reported posts? That way, the entire thread could be hidden, and we'd feed the trolls a lot less. (Not that I don't feed the trolls myself...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 14th, 2012 @ 4:47pm
But roads aren't perfect things that are easy to measure distance traveled on. You can't just plug in start point and end point and get 100% accurate distance traveled.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Often describing how these laws and regulations only make things more expensive and often do nothing to protect people.
His name was John something, all I remember about him was a great head of hair and a mustache.
I recall that what he said seemed to make sense, what ever happened to him?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GPS CAN be accurate enough for this application
I find it ironic that Massachusetts approves of using GPS to determine property boundaries, but not to determine how far you traveled along those boundaries. Surveyors don't use links and chains any more. They use satellite receivers.
Now to the real question: What kind of GPS is the cab company using to measure their fares?
I wouldn't trust a phone GPS as far as I could throw it.
I wouldn't even always trust a retail handheld GPS, but I would trust it a lot more than a phone.
But I would trust (mostly) a commercial GPS that had a paid subscription to a DGPS service (Differential GPS). While GPS CAN get you down to within feet - accurate enough in theory for cab fares) DGPS can get you down to inches. It's what the surveyors use and subscribe to. DGPS uses multiple GPS satellites to get a better fix on where you are. Less chance of losing signal.
My recent experience with phone GPS on a trip from Iowa to Boston showed me that phone GPS is unreliable, not there when you need it, takes you over routes that just don't make sense, and makes some incredible jumps in reality once in a while (You think I'm WHERE??!?). On many occasions, I couldn't get a fix on a GPS satellite on top of a mountain under clear skies for a half hour. On city streets, I could rarely get a fix because of buildings and trees.
I looked into GPS long ago for use on my farm, but found that it didn't work especially well under any sort of cover. I have 50 acres of timber, and many wooded ravines. The solution came up a bit short. City streets have their own form of cover.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GPS CAN be accurate enough for this application
EVERY GPS receiver uses multiple GPS satellites, you need at least three (if you have precise time, four if you do not) to triangulate a fix.
DGPS does things like correcting for the ionosphere and other sources of measurement error (by comparing to a separate fixed GPS receiver).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How many miles to your glass house?
Yes, GPS has been used for years, including in many commercial applications. However, this is the first I've heard of using GPS to directly bill consumers based on distance traveled as calculated by GPS.
If GPS is going to be used to charge someone money, the state has an interest in ensuring its citizens that they are billed accurately when using this GPS-based service. Just like they take steps to ensure the accuracy of gas pumps, butcher shop scales, taxi meters, etc., etc., etc. These things are all inspected on a regular basis, and "sealed", by putting an inspection tag on them in a manner that would make evident any attempt to open the unit to tamper with its inner workings. As you may surmise, someone in charge of this process might very well be called (and, in Massachusetts, apparently IS called) a "sealer". Perhaps a bit of an archaic term, but then even the bleeding edge iPhone uses icons evoking telephone instruments that have little to no relevance to modern wireless telephony - where is your mockery and righteous indignation about that?
Perhaps if you took the time to look a little deeper, you might find it's not really a case of hopeless Luddites doing everything they can to ruin your hip, high-tech, app-using lifestyle. Sometimes it takes a bit of patient work on everybody's part to deploy a good idea.
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How many miles to your glass house?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How many miles to your glass house?
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How many miles to your glass house?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: How many miles to your glass house?
I'm quite willing to bet they know what GPS is and how it is used today. I would not be surprised at all to learn that their reps use GPS to get directions to their next inspection site.
To call them "clueless" about the "existence" of GPS is pretty silly.
I'm not aware that laser rangefinding has ever been used to calculate fees based on travel distance, either.
HM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Massachussets is right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sealer of Weights & Measures aka "where's my dough"
1. is upset as he can't benevolently visit Apple every couple of months to make sure their produce meets his irrefutable standards whilst they humbly provide refreshments and entertainment
2. gets even more upset as he can't put his mighty seal on the "i phone", cause it's a heretic consumer device, not a blessed measuring/billing apparatus
3. and last he must unleash his anger as he can't bill hefty charges for all of the above to justify his existence
I get where they come from, and yes, their job is to make sure customers don't get ripped off (by billing meters that is, drivers they don't care much for) BUT: they're overreaching which is AGAINST customer interests. That of course can be remedied once Mr. Sealer's deity (his grace the Mayor) comes up for re-election...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ahem, it's the archery issue again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A great example of circular (non) logic
oh.. I know..." You didn't pay us enough for the privilege of modernizing us".. yeah, that must be it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hate to say it but I see their point
However, it has just struck me that what might be happening is that the GPS records the route taken, then something like google maps is used to plot the route and therefore the exact distances and elevations should be known over the route (because this is known by the mapping application). This effectively eliminates the major inaccuracies right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the matter, GPS can't live up to test?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My iphone verses their iphone
I have used my iphone to find a route in the city I live in and it was way off on more that one occasion.
If Uber wants to show that GPS works well for this application they should install meters as well.
The customer will have a way of verifying the iphone as being accurate (or not) and the local authorities will be happy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uber's fault, definitely
See, I have no sympathy here. That driver really should have noticed something suspicious was up and acted accordingly the minute two people wearing powdered wigs entered his vehicle and asked for a ride.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Passing clouds and building reflections can "place" you on a different street. Remember, accuracy of 30ft means there is 95% chance that you are within 30ft of the indicated position - and 5% chance that you are not... Few missed turns and you have a different distance than the real one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You make out everything as a "barrier to entry" or "protection for incumbents" yet you seem unwilling to see the greater good at every turn. Is it ignorance or willful blindness?
Makes me wonder what other areas where you are baffling us with bullshit rather than a true understanding of things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's about the money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or is the real reason..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just had to comment
But really, do the same people pass judgement on survey equipment?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have used Uber 100 times and...
With Uber, THEY assume the role of a quasi-regulatory authority. They also engage it practices such as "surge" pricing that could be an issue, because they don't tell you the amount you are paying until the end of the ride.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I have used Uber 100 times and...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]