Legit Ebook Lending Site Taken Down By An Angry Twitmob Of Writers [UPDATED]
from the pack-of-highly----got-it dept
[UPDATE: Word is filtering back that threats are being directed at some of the authors pictured or quoted in this post. I will reiterate my comment I posted below about the threats, mainly: DON'T DO IT.THIS DOESN'T MAKE ANYTHING BETTER.
Techdirt's not that kind of site. I know that because I've been reading this site for a half-decade and contributing to it for well over a year.
If you really just want to make a statement to these writers about how they've lost a customer because of their actions, there are several places to find the names involved. I'm not going to compile a list and post it here as some sort of vindictive troll bait.
IF YOU WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING, SUPPORT THE BLOGGERS AND AUTHORS WHO DEFENDED LENDINK, AND PATRONIZE LENDINK IF DALE CAN GET IT BACK UP AND RUNNING.]
A bizarre thing happened late last week. A bunch of authors, playing Twitter telephone, managed to take down LendInk, a legitimate book lending site. (This "discussion" has spilled over to LendInk's Facebook page.) LendInk, a matchmaking site for Kindle and Nook users to "borrow" each other's titles, somehow found itself on the receiving end of an irate mob, who accused it of piracy and sent (at least according to the threats) several DMCA takedown notices its way.
As of last Friday, the site is down, presumably as a response to the heavy influx of angry traffic and DMCA notices. There has been no official word from the person running LendInk (listed here on an info page [via Google Cache] as Dale Porter, a disabled Army vet who seemed to be running LendInk as a hobby), but it pretty much seems to be how it looks: LendInk is down and may not be coming back.
Here's a bit of the "outrage," which mostly seems to be people lining up for their turn at the "I spot a pirate" mic:
Update: At least one of these writers (Imran Siddiq) has since admitted to misunderstanding what LendInk does, and retracted his statement.
A variety of misconceptions appear frequently:
1. This is a pirating site
A small amount of investigation shows that LendInk is (was?) not a "pirating" site. No copies of ebooks were stored on its sites. All LendInk did was connect people wanting to lend books with borrowers.
Here's a brief explanation of the process from a review of LendInk by The Next Web:
Using LendInk is as simple as could possibly be. Just browse the new and notable section, or search for the book you want. After checking it’s being offered in the format of your choice you put in a request and the lender has 48 hours to respond.
If you’d prefer to offer a book for someone else to borrow, it’s just a case of entering the title, author, a description and the format you own the book in.2. All your books are available for free.
All your books only appear to be available. Because LendInk is an Amazon affiliate, any book title searched would be listed at the site. Clicking through would tell you whether the book was actually available (meaning someone had offered it to borrow). If the author or publisher has not authorized lending, then the Borrow button would be grayed out.
The massive wave of overly-concerned authors all searched for their own books and, unsurprisingly, were able to find them listed. What they failed to do was continue any further with the process. Fortunately, someone did and attempted to talk a few people out of their torches and pitchforks.
For people who are wondering why their book is there if it isn't lendable, or was lendable but now isn't, the answer is simple - that site lists every book for sale at Amazon or B&N. Every. Book. Did you notice that they also have links to buy the books? They make money through an affiliate program, if people buy books through their links. So they list EVERY BOOK. In fact, their website might be dynamic in that it generates a page whenever someone searches for a certain book.No mystery. Nothing illegal. It lists every possible book. Some aren't lendable. LendInk is hoping you'll buy the books using its links, if you can't borrow them. End of story.
I signed up and posted a book to share. I then searched on that book, found it, and said I wanted to borrow it. The site wasn't smart enough to know that I was the same person.... So what happens is the site sent me an email saying someone wanted to borrow my book, with "yes" and "no" links back to the site. When I clicked the "yes, I'll lend it" link, I simply got a page that said here's the name and email address of the person who wants to borrow your book.
In addition to helping more readers read more books, LendInk also (via its affiliate links) helped sell books. Sure, every sale put 6% into LendInk's pockets, but it's no different than affiliate links at any other site. LendInk wasn't taking advantage of authors. Every time it made money, the authors made money.
3. I did not give LendInk permission to lend out my book.
This is the most common complaint and, like the rest of this list, is completely wrong. The fact is that most of these authors did grant permission for lending via their royalties contract with Amazon.
If you publish through KDP (whether or not you are in Select) and are at the 70% royalty rate, then your ebooks are lendable. Period. End of discussion. If you're at the 35% royalty rate, then you can opt in to make them lendable.A publisher even weighed in on the subject and declared LendInk legitimate:
This has NOTHING to do with the Kindle Owners Lending Library for Prime customers. This is not a "borrow" under KDP Select. This is merely lending a legitimately purchased Kindle copy.
Some Kindle books are lendable. When a purchaser buys a copy, they can choose to lend it to a friend. When they do this, the ebook temporarily disappears from their Kindle and appears on their friend's Kindle. After 2 weeks, it disappears from their friend's Kindle and reappears on theirs.
It is 100% legal, and it's what you agreed to in the terms of KDP.
Here’s how it works: if you buy an ebook on your Kindle or Nook, you have the ability to lend it out to anyone else with a Kindle or Nook (Kindles lend to Kindles, Nooks to Nooks, etc.). This website connects ebook owners with others who want to borrow ebooks. So, instead of just borrowing from a friend, you can borrow even though you don’t know the person. All they do is match lenders and borrowers together. (They’re like a dating service.) The actual lending happens through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or wherever the ebook was originally purchased, and that’s completely legit.Basically, LendInk offered a legitimate service much like Lendle, but for whatever reason, a certain percentage of the writing community decided LendInk was offering pirated copies to everyone. Once a good witch hunt gets going, no one's going to stop until a witch is found... or created. Shawn Lamb of Allon Books crafts up a singular "witch" in an update to her gloaticle (Achievement Unlocked: Portmanteau'd!) "Pirate Site Sunk By United Broadside!":
IMPORTANT AMENDMENT: For those of you jumping on me and other authors from the take down of a site - know this - it was a copycat site! The subtle difference is found in the title "Lendink" with a small "i" not "Lendlnk" with an "l". They hijacked the name under the pretense of getting author's permission for pirating e-books. Collateral damage is regrettable, but we were only protecting our books, as giving permission to an unauthorized Lendink site would result in our books being removed from Amazon.Lamb's bizarre theory of small "i" vs. big "I" site-jacking is just sad. There's simply no factual basis for this statement. Searches are not case sensitive and as for the URL, it's always going to be lowercase no matter how the site owner chooses to spell it. Attempting to justify your zealous overreaction by just making shit up isn't going to make your overreaction look any better.
The most popular piece of witch hunting equipment was this response many irate authors obtained from Amazon after informing it about LendInk's "piracy:"
Hello,This was (and still is) held aloft by many authors as evidence of wrongdoing. But it really isn't. It's nothing more than boilerplate. Here's author Amanda Brice (again), breaking this letter down:
We have not authorized lendink.com to loan your book and have not provided your file to them.
If you've found your work available on an unauthorized website such as lendink.com, we suggest contacting that website to confirm your rights and request removal of your work. If you distribute your book through other sales channels, you might contact them to inquire as to whether they have authorized the inclusion of your book on lendink.com.
Our lending program allows a purchaser to lend a title once and does not allow the recipient to re-loan that book. For more information about Kindle book lending, check out this page:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200549320&#loan
I hope this helps. Thanks for using Amazon KDP.
This is a standard response from the customer service department, who is NOT the Legal deaprtment incidentally.Before the site was taken/knocked offline, any one of these authors could have drawn the same conclusions as these helpful forum contributors, but most seemed to be caught up in the excitement of the hunt. An in-depth post by April Hamilton of the Indie Author blog points out everywhere these authors went wrong and how easily it could have been prevented. Fortunately, she also saved the pertinent parts of the LendInk FAQ, which cannot be reached by Google Cache or the Internet Archive:
No, they did not authorize LendINK to lend books. HOWEVER, what LendINK is doing is the same as Lendle eBookFling or een the lending subforum right here on Kindleboards. It's no different than simply lending your book to your mom (which is 100% authorized through Amazon, btw). This is just doing it on a bigger scale.
Amazon did not provide your file to LendINK because nobody has provided any files to LendINK. LendINK doesn't actually have any files. They are simply the clearninghouse for people to meet up with others who want to borrow legitimate copies that they ahve purchased.
Amazon touts the fact that many of their Kindle books are lendable. Not able to be borrowed through the Prime library, but that customers can lend their copy ONCE to someone for up to 14 days. During the time the book has been lent, it becomes unavilable on the owner's Kindle and can only be read on the borrower's Lindle. At the end of 14 days, it disappears from the borrower's Kindle and reappears on the owner's Kindle.
This is not rocket science...
The Amazon Customer Service department is giving a stock response. It would be a different response if you actually spoke to someone in Legal, as Legal understands that this type of set-up is, in fact, tactitly authorized by the fact that they have created a system to allow for lending. (And from a policy standpoint, this type of system would discourage piracy.)
Is the loaning of eBooks really legal? Isn't this the same as file sharing?It's all said and done at this point. LendInk is dead, at least for the time being. It's bandwidth is burnt and if it ever gets back online, it's very likely going to be facing down DMCA takedown notices for content it never had. And for what? Meanwhile you've got authors patting themselves on the back for knocking the site offline, all because some authors just don't like the fact that someone enjoyed their work without paying for it. Here's a couple of lovely quotes:
Yes, loaning of certain eBooks is legal and No, it is not the same as file sharing. The key difference between the two is that the loan status of an eBook is directly dictated by the publisher and file sharing is usually done without the publishers consent. Working with Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble, the publisher's make their eBooks available for loan under very strict rules. The actual book loaning process is handled by Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble, not by LendInk.
I am a Publisher or Author of a book on LendInk, how did you get a copy of my book?
First, let us explain up front, we do not have a copy of your book. This is actually a common misunderstanding of how LendInk functions. No book has or will be stored on any LendInk server, ever. The title of the book is entered by our members and the book information is fed to us by an automated link between LendInk and Amazon or Barnes and Noble. Our servers only store our member contact information and the basic book information such as the author, ASIN and book description. We do not even store the book cover artwork.
From the Kindle Boards:
Am I proud they have been shut down? Am I proud to have stood up for my legal rights as author? You betcha! If they were a legitimate site and had written consent from each and every author to display their work for free (forfeiting their royalty income as a result) then I doubt very much that the site would have suddenly disappeared overnight. I am tired of plagiarism, book piracy and cheap-*ss scum bags who won't part with a measly $2.99 or $4.99 to support authors and show respect for their hard work, not to mention the graphic artists, editors, photographers who also contributed to the birth of an author's ebook.From the Amazon support board, an attack on the right of first sale:
Up until now I was just getting fed up with folks listing my books on ebay, amazon and third party sites selling the createspace paperback version at highly inflated prices!If you can't read your own Terms and Conditions and can't parse a website well enough to determine whether it's simply performing an affiliate search or offering up pirated goods, maybe you shouldn't be in the ebook business. And if you can't deal with a few unpaid readings, go shout at your local library or something else as equally alienating and useless. Because no matter how much you yell at people for sharing, you can't have all the money.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: authors, ebooks, lending, twitmob
Companies: amazon, lendink
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Are you proud you steered many people away from ever giving money to you? You betcha!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Sarah Palin's one of the idiot authors?
Makes sense.
She's an idiot and she's (supposedly) an author!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What a bunch of tools
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What a bunch of tools
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm, I found that part interesting because one of the main counter arguments the legacy defenders use is that it was the artists fault for signing bad contracts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He posted a comment over on my blog:
http://www.the-digital-reader.com/2012/08/06/lendink-and-the-reality-of-ebook-lending/#commen t-53308
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
*IF* a person is being rolled over in an execute-now-trial-later situation, *of course* their email is going to be important in many ways that they are now unable to access to *possibly* clear their name...
when the web korporadoes and the gummint hold the keys to the inertnet kingdom, we serfs are at their mercy...
(and they have no mercy...)
hee hee hee
ho ho ho
ha ha ha
ak ak ak
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Screw that. I'd rather eat glass then read or promote books by people who would do this.
The punishment should fit the crime. They don't want me to access their work? I won't access their work. Case closed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
But for the most part I agree with you in that they will likely never get my business now thanks to their actions. This is especially true for the unapologetic ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Rather than do that and give these writers some sort of "moral" victory, instead try to support these authors, who went out of their way to inform others of LendInk's legitimacy.
SUPPORT THESE AUTHORS
Philip Catshill, who did his own investigation and defended LendInk on its Facebook page.
Michele Brenton, from the Digital Reader comment threads.
Eltanin Publishing, who made numerous appearances on the Kindle Boards quoted above.
Amanda Brice (also quoted above) who made several posts in the Kindle Boards as well.
April Hamilton, whose extensive blog post on the subject is quoted in this piece but is definitely worth reading all the way through.
That's just a few of the authors worth pointing out. There were others on Twitter, but the search function seems to be hitting a brick wall at the moment.
These writers took the time and effort to research the claims flying all over Twitter instead of simply grabbing a pitchfork and hitting "retweet." Then they went out and tried to prevent any further damage by educating those still on the fence and even converting a few of the pitchfork-bearers. If nothing else, send them an email or follow them on Twitter or just pass this list around. Add to it if you find more Lendink defenders.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
April Hamilton seems to have some books I'd be interested in reading. Not much of a romance, mystery or poetry fan, but I might have to look into the others too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://steamwords.wordpress.com/2012/08/09/support-lendink/
Thanks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey, they're self-publishing on Amazon (i.e.: they couldn't get contracts with real publishers) and are not only ignorant of their own contracts but also have less reading comprehension ability than most of us here had in grade-school. Do you REALLY think their books would be worth the effort?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The fact that none of this would had happened if she had followed the law and sent a DMCA, that she instead responded with an apparently text book example of defamation, and now wants to add her self generated e-drama to the police and FBI's workload is sickening.
What a childish, reckless, self entitled, airhead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I was just late posting my response. Sorry about that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not debating or suggesting anything about this point, I just want to point out that what you quoted directly above this is actually typed with a lowercase L.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
===
LendInk.com
Registrant:
LendInk
10822 Allen Dr
Garden Grove, California 92840
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: LENDINK.COM
Created on: 01-Jan-11
Expires on: 01-Jan-13
Last Updated on: 02-Jun-11
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mike would've probably covered it, but the alleged "lowercase l/uppercase I" bit tripped him up IRL. Happens to the best of us sometimes, I guess...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So again this raises the issue of "What the hell is she talking about" or the more likely idea that she's trying to make shit up to try to get out of the hole she dug.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
LENDINK.COM is the site we are all discussing.
LENDINK.CO is a basic domain parking page. Registered to a person in China.
So unless the LENDINK.CO was a pirate site that then changed back to a domain parking page, which I think is unlikely, then I have no clue what she is claiming about a copycat domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Thing is, the tweets all link to "lendink.com", with an easily discernable lowercase 'i', and I can't find any trace of a fake "lendlnk" anywhere. (One mention of a Lendlnk Funeral Home, but that's it.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you don't play by the rules, you lose.
If you play by the rules, you lose.
The difference is that the likelihood that I'll go to jail for pirating the latest film or song is next to nill, whereas, if I play by the rules, it is almost guaranteed that some loony will come by and pull something idiotic out of his ass that I won't have the resources or the energy to fight against.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"It's stuff like this that makes not feel any bad about piracy at all."
Should be:
It's stuff like this that makes me not feel any bad about piracy at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY you missed a few.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's as if a million irrational authors cried out in terror and were suddenly 1-star reviewed in Amazon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unfortunately, they'd likely just toss the letter out and think to themselves, "He was a pirate, so he doesn't matter anyways."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If not, perhaps Techdirt should take the lead on this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
this is what I have collected so far
if others could contribute that would be great.
note anybody who signs up and posts who lets me know they are joining from TD will get their post count pumped up above the anti spam capcha threshold(im the site admin ;) )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The beauty of the word Piracy
It can mean whatever a copyright holder wants it to mean at the moment, and mean something different tomorrow.
Sort of like the versatile 'rogue' web site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The beauty of the word Piracy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The beauty of the word Piracy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My head hurts
Presumably she will at least be able to read it.
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lendink was not a pirate site
My name is Dale Porter and I am the owner of Lendink (or what's left of it). I can say without hesitation that Lendink was not a pirate site, we did not store, transfer, lend or publish any ebooks, period! All we did was attempt to provide a means for people that enjoy their ebooks to meet other like minded people and share their "lend" enabled ebooks. The lending process was completely handled on the Amazon or Barnes and Noble websites.
Lendink was operated solely by myself and operated the last couple of years with absolutely no income.
There is a lot of misinformation on the internet claiming that we hosted ebooks illegally, that Amazon did not allow us to lend ebooks, etc. Let me try to address some of those here.
Amazon did not allow us to lend ebooks. This is a 100% true statement and the fact of the matter is, Lendink did not nor did it ever attempt to lend ebooks. All we did was put person A in touch with person B and redirected A and B back to Amazon or Barnes and Nobles where the actual lending took place.
Lendink was hosting ebooks illegally. This statement is 100% false. We never hosted any ebooks on our servers. We attempted to dispell this rumor on our FAQ page and for those that actually read the page, it usually cleared up the misunderstanding. For those that did not read the page, all I can assume is that is simply doesn't matter at this point. No amount of explaination would have satisfied the vultures looming over head.
The Lendink website is down, this is proof they were pirating ebooks. Really, this is proof that we were pirating ebooks? The fact of the matter is that our host company was so overwhelmed with hate mail and threats of lawsuits that they felt they had no choice but to suspend the site. These hatefull people did nothing but harass and threaten Lendink and our host company to the point that it just didn't make sense to keep the site online.
Amazon dropped Lendink as an Affiliate due to digital rights violations or new digital rights laws in California. This is 100% false. Lendink is a California based company and as such, was cut off from earning money from sales when Amazon and the State of California disagreed over the collection of State Sales Tax. Amazon cut off all of their California affiliates from earning money via their affiliate program. It was not just Lendink. This only prevented us from earning money via Amazon. It did not however stop use from matching people for book lending.
I am simply a hard working guy that was trying to provide a legit service. Let me ask you all this, if I truley intended to use Lendink as a pirate site would I keep my contact information clearly associated with the site? Would I form an LLC and run the site as a business? Would I actually take the time to file for and receive a Federal Trademark for the site? These are not the actions of a person bent on stealing other persons intellectual property. The site had been negelected the past year or so and this was due to health issues related to my service connected injuries. Working a fulltime job to pay the bills and helath issues just took their toll on me and unfortunately the site suffered. My plan was to ride out the Amazon vs. California Sales Tax dispute and then pick up when I was able to make some income from the sale of books. Sadly, it appears that my American Dream has been left as road kill at the hands of misguided individuals.
Dale
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
I myself am new to the ebook world and the first thing I do is break the DRM so I can loan books without this sort of hassle. Sure it limits my reach for lending books but it also allows me to lend books for more than an artificial 2 weeks. I can do it the old fashioned way over sneaker net and thus fly under the radar. This is exactly the behavior these authors are encouraging which I would guess they would prefer a lot less than a legitimate lending site like yours where there is a also a chance to make a sale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
If you have a friend outside of California that is an Amazon affiliate you could set up a subsidiary company with them and perhaps use their affiliate code to get around the California sales tax nonsense.
I wish you the best of luck and hope to see you back online soon!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
> trying to provide a legit service
I'm truly sorry this happened to you. Thank you for your service and sacrifice to the country. You are appreciated, sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
My goal, at the time, was simply to have an easy way to keep tabs on certain subject matter (such as my alma mater's football team, or new projects by my favorite Architect), but soon I was accosted by site owners who accused me of stealing their content as my own. Never mind that the links went to their site, and it was attributed very plainly all over the page, and never mind that if I found ANY "copyright" text on the page, I would include text that said "The site's content is protected by copyright, please click the link to visit the site to view this article." (Even though my understanding of Fair Use is that I could have not done that.)
There were some site owners who, once I explained all that to them, were very reasonable, and acknowledged that they were wrong in their initial assessment. But the number of those that complained to my hosting company grew, and apparently enough complained to Google, that I got blacklisted. Eventually, not wanting a fight for something that I started for fun, I bailed on it.
So I feel for you. That mob mentality takes over, and it wins too often. I wish I'd have done a better job of fighting for my rights, but I didn't. I'm sorry it's ruining (ruined?) your site the same way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
Also, and I'm putting some of this in ALL CAPS:
I agree with Dale's comment below:
This is really getting out of hand very quickly. I am deeply concerned that threats are being send to those that took part in the Lendink.com suspension.
THIS DOESN'T MAKE ANYTHING BETTER.
Techdirt's not that kind of site. I know that because I've been reading this site for a half-decade and contributing to it for well over a year.
If you really just want to make a statement to these writers about how they've lost a customer because of their actions, there are several places to find the names involved. I'm not going to compile a list and post it here as some sort of vindictive troll bait.
IF YOU WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING, SUPPORT THE BLOGGERS AND AUTHORS WHO DEFENDED LENDINK, AND PATRONIZE LENDINK IF DALE CAN GET IT BACK UP AND RUNNING.
I will compile a list for this reason and post it here as soon as possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
I want this list so I can setup a "DO NOT SUPPORT" list so that people can choose not to support authors whos reading comprehension is clearly below that of a elementary school student...
authors who just rushed in to attack....
I doubt anybody from TD sent threats, but this hit slashdot and some other sites where.....im sure there are those kind of people......
these authors made their own bead, I would like them to actually be forced to lay in it for a bit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
I hope something really good happens to you soon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
Personally, I sign up with lending on Amazon, even when my price is low enough I don't have to; though I do believe no one should be coerced into the lending by Amazon as they currently are, but that is a different subject entirely and no reflection on you or what you were doing.
Sites like yours perform the same function inter-library loan on my print books does. I don't know why this is so difficult for some authors to understand, but please do be aware that some authors and publishers actually appreciated what you were trying to do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
Other than that misconception I agree with you and I hope Lendink can come back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
And again, you can't steal a copy. (Well, you can.) But you can't take a copy as it's on the the internet or one of these sites. The "original" is still intact, what you have merely done is duplicated it. As such, nothing is stolen because nothing has been deprived, which again just shoots down your "thief" bit. Because if you haven't stolen (deprived someone of something) then you can't be a thief.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
But it's actually better said that they have not stolen any profits from your work, because put in those terms would mean that they actually went to your bank or wallet and stole actual funds from you from your work. What I believe you mean to say is that they have not provided you with potential profits for your work. Which is what actually happens if they do pirate it. Because it's purely potential money you could have made, but not money you did make beforehand.
And as you pointed out, it does not apply to the site in question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
Quite! Especially given that this moronic definition of theft applies equally to any decision not to buy something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
It's that simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
>>If you borrow from a legitimate library, you are borrowing a copy IT bought legitimately
Correct so far.
This is why you fail:
>>Lendink was properly notified by rights holders that they did not consent to having their books on the site. Therefore those books were indeed pirated.
The books weren't on LendInk's site. People were on LendInk's site, stating they had a book available to lend. The site then puts the person wanting to borrow that book in touch with the person wanting to lend that book.
From there, the lender goes to Amazon or Barnes & Noble, and uses the already-existing tools each retailer has to lend the book.
At no time does a copy of the ebook exist on LendInk's site. No copy of the book is pirated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
(Why books are even needed anymore when people can't read nowadays?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
Here, let's put it very simply for you.
Some books purchased on Amazon and Barnes & Noble have "LendMe" features incorporated.
These features mean the authors of said books have agreed that the books can be lent out. (Usually one time only, and while it is "lent out", the person who purchased the book is unable to access it.)
A person loans a book to a friend. After a duration of time (two weeks) the book is "returned" to the original person. (Who can now access it again, while the friend no longer can).
End of story.
What Lendlink did, was let people who had certain books which ALL had the LendMe ability/feature do was connect with others who wanted to borrow said books. And they'd lend each other their own purchased copies. Nothing more, nothing less.
Those rights holders who started notifying Lendlink to take down their books were people who were wasting their time. Why? Because there was nothing to take down. And, all the books being lent were being done so with the authors consent (as originally part of whatever deals they negotiated with Amazon) AND more importantly were being lent out legally.
Therefore, you're an idiot. It's that simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
There were many of us authors who KNEW it wasn't a pirate site and what the real purpose of it was. WE appreciated what you were doing!
I apologize for the idiots among us who totally lack any reading comprehension whatsoever and freaked out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendink was not a pirate site
There were some of us who were trying to stamp out the flames but once an accusation like that goes viral, stopping it seems to be impossible. I wish there were something more helpful than telling you this whole episode makes me truly ill.
All the best,
JR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DMCA notices?
I bet LendLink could find a lawyer willing to work on contingency and get back at these idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DMCA notices?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DMCA notices?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DMCA notices?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DMCA notices?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DMCA notices?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DMCA notices?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone really needs to make a list of these hack writers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'd like to see the folks responsible for the destruction of an innocent man's pasttime get thoroughly schooled. It may be the only way they'll fecking learn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After all, there's no way copyright related legislation could ever be abused to do anything other than enforce copyright!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Certainly not by those who don't use or understand the Internet, and are entirely motivated by "helping the artists".
Watch your congress; today nothing is more trustworthy than a public show of ignorance, and pride in the same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://vimeo.com/45864549
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Embrace the insanity
Did these authors stop to even think where these would be borrowers are going to go, now that they can't obtain these books legally?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Embrace the insanity
I have lost count of the posts I have made on various writer forums telling people that there was NOTHING wrong with this site or the practice of loaning. It is how we gain new readers, for heaven's sake.
The paranoia about pirating has gotten WAY out of hand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fahrenheit 451
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fahrenheit 451
Though, it looks like this conflict has gone nuclear and is destroying more then just a few books.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"After making a living for 13 years as a science journalist, writing for publications such as WIRED and NewScientist, I gave it all up to write fiction."
Is there anyway that could more perfectly summarize the actions of the firestorm she helped stir?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tania Hershman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tania Hershman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tania Hershman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Tania Hershman
Stuart appears to have attempted to set the record straight on a matter in the comments section of blog of a rather prominent indie author whom I respect. However, just because he attempted to correct erroneous information on a blog post that attempted to set the record straight on this LendInk issue, it does not mean he was against LendInk or against the blog author in general.
Those of you who contributing to this us-against-them mentality are in essence saying that you don't care about correct information; you just want your side to win. You are also saying that if someone attempts to correct erroneous information using in a position you support, they are against you.
Bad information and research are what led a group of moronic authors to form a mob against LendInk. We should be above allowing ourselves to fall into the same mindset. We should all approach a topic with the best information available. Correcting erroneous information is one way to help us not follow in the footsteps of several authors who went in guns blazing in a shoot first ask questions later strategy of poor thinking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Tania Hershman
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Tania Hershman
Oh do fuck off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Witchhunt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flame on
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Flame on
I think the crowd should write bad reviews on Amazon and take away her stars! How about that, Electa?
http://twitter.com/electagraham
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0082ZQF8Q/ref=cm_sw_r_fa_dp_ ybGWpb0APWJK9
By the way the Amazon page says, "Prime Members: $0.00 (borrow for free from your Kindle) ". In case you don't know it costs a lot of money to become a Prime Member, $79!
http://electagraham.blogspot.ca/
FWIW Shawn Lamb blog too.. these people are the pits. Trying to sneak away from the corpse too, they are so good at mealy words and revising history in their little hissy blogs.
http://allonbooks-thekingdomofallon.blogspot.jp/2012/08/enough.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Permission
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Permission
Some greedy publishers and their pet authors have been trying to wipe out lending libraries for better than a century now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Permission
Welcome to Copyright/IP/Permission Culture, these pretentious little cockwaffles are taught to act this way and are supported even encouraged by most of the world to do so.
They are the equivalent of an incredibly spoiled brat throwing a tantrum on the floor because they didn't get their toy or whatever, people are so desperate to make them shut up they will buy them the toy, hence reinforcing their kindergarten level behavior.
The solution? Stop caving into their whining, treat them exactly how you'd treat a child pitching a fit. Make sites dedicated to blacklisting them so that can be boycotted. PUNISH them for their behaviour.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Permission
& this also extends towards corporations such as the MAFIAA, Viacom & Disney .etc
Educating people about new options isn't enough, there comes a time when only pushing back will get the message across. It is way past time for the public to push back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Permission
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two additions to the list of misconceptions
So I have every right to tell customers what to do with their copies. And because of this, if I don't like any single thing being done with my work, I am intrinsically in the right in taking any means necessary to stop what I dislike. They must ask my permission.
5.Loss of potential profit is the moral equivalent of stealing
So I have every right to fight back, using any legal or illegal means (including fraud), when anyone - a customer, a competitor, a boycotter - does something I believe competes with me. If you can shoot a burglar, you can lie about a contract on the Internet if said lie eliminates a potential competitor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two additions to the list of misconceptions
5. Loss of potential profit is the moral equivalent of being stolen from
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Two additions to the list of misconceptions
Next you'll be arguing that when you're made redundant, the government has the moral right to all the taxes it would have gained if you'd kept earning.
Potential profits are just that: Potential. It's not up to the universe (or anyone else) to make them up to you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Two additions to the list of misconceptions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two additions to the list of misconceptions
Imagine when the time comes where Amazon informs all customers that they can sell there copies of your writing to someone else and provide the functionality for that, will not bother me as i am not interested in jumping through hoop after hoop to get what i want, i get my books from sites that do not rip me off. And as many sites are trying to stay under the radar in case they get falsely accused of copyright infringement i am possibly getting yours, although your name does not sound familiar in any way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Two additions to the list of misconceptions
You don't own their property. You only 'own' your own 'imaginary property'. How well you can control it, since it's imaginary, is a whole different matter.
So please, have you written anything that can be used for compost? Worst case, I can just use this (copyright) posting of yours... :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminal attacks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Criminal attacks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Porches & Bitchforks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rofl "Porches & Bitchforks".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rofl "Porches & Bitchforks".
please, anybody here who isnt a mafiaa shill is welcome to join and post, and if you let me know(via pm or in your first post) i will bump your post count so you can avoid the capcha we have setup to stop bot spam.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> extradited to the United States under
> cybersecurity laws for incitement and
> coordination of a DDOS attack.
If merely urging others to complain is ever held to be the equivalent of a criminal DDoS attack, I can't wait for Congress to latch onto that and try and jail anyone who tells the public to write/call their congress rep.
Several times in the last few years Congress has been swamped with calls and emails over issues of controversy (Obamacare, SOPA, immigration, etc.) and they hate it when the public interferes with their ability to do whatever the fuck they want. So look for them to try anything to strike back at those troublesome voters who dare to stir people up to speak their mind to their elected representatives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And I never pursued any claims or actions against the company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What this says to me, and perhaps a few others here, is that rather than start foaming at the mouth the minute you find out someone can lend a book to another person, perhaps you should calmly make sure that there is nothing illicit/illegal going on. You know, rather than going off half cocked and handing out the torches and pitchforks and getting useful services shut down.
On principle alone, I would NEVER buy anything from yourself or any of the other authors involved, in what is largely a website being shut down because of THEIR (the authors) stupidity and misunderstanding of a situation.
But I digress, alls well since you said "sorry". I'd post a link to that whole South Park episode regarding the BP oil spill apology, but at least they tried to clean up their mess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
But all I did is one hugely misinformed tweet.
I have had a few malicious comments emailed over to me and threats made against my home due to this. My wife has also received a message from 2 people.
One tweet should not equate to that.
I did apologise and I did it on twitter telling others to disregard my comment on 1st August.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As the saying goes, you can't unring the bell once the bell has been rung.
The lesson here, is make sure you know what you are saying before you proclaim it, especially over the Internet. The Internet never forgets, and will never allow you to forget either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Just pray to (insert deity or lack thereof here) and hope that 4CHAN doesn't decided to get involved...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Neither you nor your family deserve death threats, but just holding your hands up and saying all I did is tweet is a little obnoxious to say the least.
Do you think you deserve some award for not pursuing legal action? As though that makes your hands clean? I didn't tweet and I didn't threaten to sue either! Where's my medal?
No you don't deserve death threats, no-one does, but I wouldn't shed a tear if your primary method of income was suddenly, maliciously shut down by a bunch of morons.
Or maybe you should find a way to assist the website owner in getting it back up and running, perhaps a small financial contribution? That would speak louder than words and certainly speak louder than a 'misguided' tweet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I hope that things can be worked out over this misunderstanding where both sides end up winning. If the writers make up for their mistake, and as I have said before if they are any good at their craft they will have a following which can be directed to lendink site so that fans of their work and their friends can get a two week sample of their writing. Seems to me that paying customers would be born from this with lendink getting an affiliate commission for the service provided and the authors getting new paying customers. In a perfect world (one without lawyers) this would be a great outcome.
I wish the best for Flickimp and other authors that made a mistake and make efforts to fix this situation as well as for lendink who I hope will get his service back on line soon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
But it can, and anybody familiar with Twitter and other social media should know that. Perhaps you'll put more than a few seconds of thought into your future attempts to skewer people you think are doing you wrong.
Now that you've realised your mistake and apologised, what are you actively doing to undo the damage you've contributed to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sad that this has happened and destroyed what was probably a great hobby for a vet, probably even something that helped him cope with what he has gone through to fight for his country. All we can hope for is that people realize how valuable his service to the authors was and maybe , just maybe get this corrected some time in the near future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My only (bad) sin was the tweet.
That I know I got wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But I did apologise to him and on twitter for the comment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://allonbooks-thekingdomofallon.blogspot.com/2012/08/enough.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think she meant "MEIN Choice" She still doesn't get it either.
"Nasty and threatening emails or comments will be forward to the police and FBI as HATE mail to face full enforcement of the law!!!"
How about you blow out your ass and learn how to spell.
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Just search "cache:Pirate Site Sunk By United Broadside" . pops right up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As with many ...my opinion was incorrect and I did apologise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
While I certainly appreciate the fact that you apologized, this is what happens in today's copyright/patent/trademark driven permission culture. I am an author as well, but your apologized-for overreaction is a bit like the American apology for accidentally bombing the shit out of an Islamic funeral; the damage has been done and the apology accomplishes nothing for those hurt....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Secondly my wife was sent a message by someone who detailed her location of work...and I am now concerned about her safety,
I did not action, send or pursue any action with Amazon or any other site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It doesn't. Not at all. The people attacking you, since you obviously and sincerely backed down from your one bad tweet, are idiots. More importantly, anyone threatening you or your wife should perhaps face serious consequences for that. I wouldn't condone any threats or undue attacks in any way.
But the point is that this is what ignorance and an overly aggressive permission culture creates: anger and conflict....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
For what it's worth, I have chosen my side of issues carefully and with a lot of thought. I'm anti-DRM and pro access to what you have legally purchased, whether that is text to speech or using the same ebook on several types of tech you own. I'm pro lending (but ONLY the ones we sanction or incidental sharing of friend to friend...I will NEVER support illegal reselling of ebooks...burning multiple copies of the same ebook and selling them or posting them on mass sharing venues).
I recognized Dale's site for what it was and spent time on Yahoo groups of authors and in private email, trying to put out the flames. To be honest, the only reason I didn't do a comment about it on Facebook (I don't tweet...if you check my Twitter, you'll see I get on there maybe every 6 months) was that so many other people already had. Sometimes adding more to the cacophony seems like screaming into the wind. I wish now that I had, but it seems to me that those who were going to listen to what I was trying to say had already asked before they jumped, and those that didn't...well they weren't going to, no matter how many times I said it.
But to hear some people on here tell it, I'm to be vilified because I send out LEGITIMATE DMCA notices to mass sharing sites and to eBay or iOffer (when someone is selling thousands of copies of my works illegally and claiming to sell resale rights they don't own...claiming my work is in the public domain, which it isn't). That's blatantly wrong, IMO. There is NOTHING wrong with what I'm doing. I don't even send a DMCA notice to a sale site I'm unsure about until I contact them and ask them nicely where they get their content. Often, they are affiliates of Fictionwise or LSI. In that case, I highly recommend to them that they post the information about it, so they don't have people going off half cocked and doing what was done to Dale. Again, no excuse for what was done to Dale. I don't want legitimate sales outlets or legitimate lending outlets stifled any more than most of the people on here do.
In fact, I TEACH other authors to be businesslike in sending take-downs, to make sure it's a pirate first, and not to engage in the petty back and forth some pirates shoot back. If the pirate isn't responding to the take-down, just go to the site or ISP or whoever is next up the line to make the same simple complaint. No embellishment. Just the take-down.
I'd counter the argument that this is all the fault of the "permission culture" with the solid fact that it's more than the copyright laws causing this. It's also authors overreacting, because they are stressed and worn down and leery, due to the rampant piracy they do deal with on a daily basis. No, there is no excuse for what happened to Dale, but you seem to think the copyright laws act in a bubble, unaffected by other factors, and that's not so. If you want reasonable authors, HELP them take down the real pirates. I'm not talking about downloaders here, because chasing downloaders is a ridiculous venture. I'm talking about the ones selling thousands of copies of illegal burns of the same ebooks (some of which were created by scans and some not), the ones uploading hundreds or more copies of clearly copyright protected ebooks onto mass sharing sites, the sites that ignore DMCA take-down notices or don't even provide a way to send them, forcing authors to go to the ISP to get any help at all.
All this talk about you'll (not you, Dark Helmet, but I've seen a lot of this on Techdirt) just go pirate the authors to teach them a lesson is counterproductive. It won't "teach" them crap. All it will do is make them more reactive to any perceived piracy and escalate the problem further. You push them, they push back. You throw threats and insults at them, they do the same in return. It's not the laws causing that. It's people on both sides running their mouths instead of trying to work toward a common goal they can agree on. Try meeting on common ground instead.
If you want to help matters, then join the fight of teaching readers to access what they have purchased but to limit themselves to incidental sharing and NEVER to play the games eBay pirates do. That would go a long way toward meeting on a middle ground and helping with the problem instead of escalating it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The problem with what I call Permission Culture is that authors (which I also am, though likely not nearly as accomplished as most in this story) receive only one side of the story from their agents, publishers, and most other authors. They are told that copyright is the most important thing in their industry, all piracy is bad, and that's how all this starts. Authors wouldn't HAVE to freak out and overreact because they are so "worn out from piracy" as you say, if only they would understand how they can combat infringement socially rather than legally.
But, in any case, disagree though we might, thanks for being one of the good ones....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
baen is drm free, they also give away a large number of titles from a wide range of authors.
on top of that, they have given away cd's full of ebooks some from their free library some not, with physical books, what they found is, that even with piracy(copyright infringement) the "harm" done was minimal, the good that came from what amounts to cheap publicity was great, many authors whos works where given free on those cd's gained a large readership.
I understand your point on piracy and how stressful it can be, but alot of that stress is due to publishers/agents/exct imparting a false sense of panic in authors because, they themselves really dont understand how these things wor in "the real world"
I have worked with people who didnt understand, infact I even talked one fellow into putting one of his older apps on a few torrent sites with the common "if you like this please buy it" (or donate) blerb, he was quite shocked, within 3 months he had sold more copies and gotten more donations then he had inthe previous 4 years, all because he took a risk(his app was good, just not well known)
I know people who would rather buy an ebook and be insured of quality then download one thats likely to have errors, I also know many who will download an ebook, give it a look and if it looks good, buy the dead tree version if they can find a place to get it.
let me be clear, im no pro-piracy, but, I do feel that the hysteria over it is misplaced,for the most part if you offer a good quality product at what your market considered a reasonable price, you will sell.
one of my favorite authors bought his own books on nook store, stripped the drm and had shared them on demonoid with links to where people could buy them....in part because his publisher forced drm on his books and he didnt like it, and in part because he wanted to see if it would help or harm sales.....from what I gather....it didnt seem to effect sales at all in his case....and may have boosted hard cover sales....(his 2 books after that sold better then his previous hard covers by a decent % from what he said.
well either way, dale wasnt breaking the law or rules, he was actually helping authors....im of the mind that the people who caused this maybe should get the same dont to their own careers..... karma is a bitch after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No one should send threatening messages to you or anyone else. But it is fine for us to campaign and advocate on the internet when we have our facts straight. If only you'd held yourself to the same standard...
It's not just our right, it's our obligation in capitalist societys to remove bad actors from the marketplace through our buying decisions, and hence there is a duty to share information about bad play in the marketplace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
the information they found, honestly isnt that hard to get if you know where to look, and they did it just to cause you to react as you have.
the worst thats likely to happen is you may get some nasty phone calls and emails, maybe a few dozen pizza's if your really unlucky.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sad as hell
I would argue it's mainly idiots and unworthy "content providers" falling. Saying "artists" just doesn't feel right in this instance. Being able to live off of ones work is a favor, always has been for a happy few and never was a right.
It's time to restore balance between commerce and art.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
I wish no ill will towards any of these people, no matter how misguided they are. They stood up and fought for their rights as the copyright owner and I respect that. I don't agree with what they did to me but I respect the fact that they thought they were protecting their property, just as I must now fight for my property. This should not however result in threats to persons.
Please, stop the threats of harm.
Thank you,
Dale Porter
lendink.com Owner
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
Those people making the threats should stop and think twice.
What happened to you is aking to a digital lynching on baseless hearsay, and I'm really glad you weren't physically caught up by a mob screaming "pirate!" beating you up and burning your shop down.
I hope the strenght of caracter you're showing will be rewarded in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
Not your fight though, I admit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
It's disgusting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
I was confused
But I never sent or pursued any action other than one tweet.
I am sorry for what happened to your business, and appreciate your comment. People are now targeting me..and in some places my address has been posted up.
I am not looking for sympathy but my wife suffered a miscarriage last week for our first child. She does not need emails threatening her at her location of work.
We made a mistake. I apologised.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
ProTip - IT NEVER FORGETS.
You can delete your ignorant tweet, but it will live on far beyond your desire to have it do so.
I would pillory you like everyone else has, throwing your hands up trying to minimize your participation in the witch hunt but your not worth it.
Your "single" action lead to
- screwing a hard working guy over
- getting a mob attacking him as a pirate (see protip above)
- showing how flipping stupid some authors are
- and fed the entire ZOMG I'M LOSING IMAGINARY DOLLARS! fever.
So now, you will have to deal with people who are going to say they do not support you, do not want the product you offer, and will tell others your a moron.
But you said your sorry... you have not YET begun to feel sorry. As your sales crash and burn around you, you might begin to understand what 1 ignorant tweet can do to someones life.
While you helped destroy his site and his good name, you managed to screw yours twice as badly.
Did you hear the one about a group of entitled assholes who can't read, yeah they call themselves authors...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
you could look up the story of "the biting beaver" or "jessie slaugher" to find out what happens when people piss off the internet......
no physical harm came to them, but, their lives where turned upside down for a time due to their own stupid actions....
you did something horrible, you need to pay, karma and the internet demand it.
if you really feel bad, you should consider donating to this fellow to help him get hosting from something better then godaddy...coolhandle is a better host for example......
sorry, i have zero sympathy for you or what you brought down on yourself.....also, if your wife wants to blame anybody, she should blame you.....
its not right that your getting threats of violance....they are just threats tho nothing more.....
what you really need to prepare for is if 4chan latches onto this and turns anons collective head in your direction....your online life will become....quite entertaining for the rest of us.....(thanks in advance for the show)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
Yes you did, good on you.
It's not enough.
All of you were able to band together in a very short time to collapse a LEGAL site. In order to fix this ( in my eyes, at any rate ) you need to band together, ALL of you, just as quickly to fix it, get his site back online. Not you, individually, I know you can't do it yourself, but it's very clear that as an organized group your were able to cause an amount of damage that on single person could not. Use that same principle to repair the damage. THAT would be the right thing to do.
Apology not accepted. Fix what you broke.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Please, stop the unnecessary threats and attacks
"Lastly, apologies on the internet mean about as much as farts do in outer space. So I went ahead and donated $1,000 to the Women Against Abuse foundation."
It's past time to repair the damage done. Moreover, here's the self-proclaimed main culprit:
"This offending site claimed to be linked to Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Not! Armed with Twitter, FB, and any online social media site available to me, I shot the word out and it went viral."
This liar subsequently deleted her post (but the shame is still present in Google Cache, just do your search) but has posted more nonsense while denying her role in this failure. Lie, delete, deny, lie again. What a nice human being.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
www.facebook.com/susan.buchanan.au thor
http://www.facebook.com/authorelectagraham
http://www.facebook.com/pages/My-Mother-Was-An-Upr ight-Piano-Fictions-by-Tania-Hershman/469511086393306
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for those threatening you, it happens. Sorry to say. But think of it like this, how would you prefer it if it was a bunch of lawyers and authors and a plethora of others insulting you, calling you a thief and a pirate and threatening to sue you and basically doing everything they can to ruin your life? I guess as long as no one threatens you with physical harm then that's okay, right?
You can report those making actual threats against you to the proper authorities. That's what you're supposed to do. As for your wife and miscarriage and whatnot, my condolences, but still save the story for someone else. I for one don't care. I got problems I'm dealing with, as I'm sure others on here do as well, you don't see us bringing them to the forefront when we screw up and cause harm of one sort or another to others. "Guys, I'm sorry. It's just that..." Doesn't work. I will say this, you manned up and admitted your mistake. Great. That's a great first step. Now how are you going to help fix something you are responsible for? And saying, well only he and this person could have the site shut down, so I've got no blood on my hands is a real cop out. What are you going to do to rectify this?
You want to earn some respect, do something to answer that question. And tweeting, "My bad. We cool?" is most definitely not a proper response/answer to that question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You wouldn't be worried?
I didn't bring the issue to the table as an excuse... It's a point I'm making that turning this into a malicious attempt to threaten is beyond reasonable. As you can't be certain that the person making the threats are not from here. This site lists my id...
I'm not asking you to care, what I'm trying to get across is that I only made a single tweet. There may be others out there the pursused greater action that caused the effect.
I apologised to lendlink
I apologised on twitter
And I corrected others that made the same mistake last week.
What else do you want me to do?
Because it feels like no matter what I do, it won't be good enough.
Some out there makes tweets about something where they may be incorrect or voicing an opinion. I am on the receiving end of a witch hunt now, and all I want is for people to leave me alone for something I apologised for within 24 hours of my tweet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I would also suggest you post a tweet/blog post about the threats. Leave out of it your personal issues, so it can't be seen as an excuse.
You made a mistake, you apologized, you said "this isn't true" regarding LendInk, you've done all you can.
Now consult with authorities, threats are against the law. Forward all emails/phone messages/SMS/letters/whatever they sent, and inform security at your wife's place of business to be on the look out for her safety.
Likely it is people babbling bullshit, like they do with presidents and corporate executives and lawyers, but better safe than sorry.
Your actions do NOT in any way deserve the reaction you've been given and that is truly unfair.
Encouragement of boycott is one thing, violence is not how things are done.
Again, contact the authorities and inform security at your wife's place of business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That said, personal attacks and threats against these writers, no matter that they were in the wrong, are way out of bounds. I'm glad the owner of LendInk said as much as well. As Dark Helmet notes, people making these threats are idiots. But it is a reality of social media today that if you step in it you're going to be the focus of a bunch of idiots until they find the next thing to attract their attention. Doesn't make it right, but people need to realize it happens and be smart.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't deserve to be followed, have books purchased or receive any good comments from anyone.
I get that.
But I also don't want my name to be passed on as a means for revenge or conflict.
I hope lendlink find a way to rise again.
And I'm not just saying that.
I didn't have to come on here... But I did, to make clear my regret, and to seek resolve from you all.
I'm just me.
I fucked up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hang in there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I have posted over and over again that if writers do all in their power to make up for this misunderstanding things can actually be made to become a win win situation for them and for lendink.
The problem with mob mentality is that the stupidity can flow in both directions. This will pass. The posters in the forum are sick of Big Media and of insane copyright attacks on people who have no criminal intent (Kim Dotcom), and I as well are very ANGRY about the astonishing stupidity of it all.
Unfortunately for you this mistake has many well meaning but misguided individuals angry at you, and they are mistakenly taking their anger out on you and your family.
So you DipShits out there that are threatening this man and his wife you are not making things better. You're making them much worse! Cease and desist in the name of sanity!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You wouldn't be worried?"
Conventional wisdom would dictate that you should be but, in reality, meh, not really...
Anyone dumb enough to do that completely misses the point of our vitriol in the first place and its likely some zit faced kid in mom's basement thinking he is part of something important.
As for what you should do it about, well, you were party to jacking up someone's business.
Perhaps collectively, with the others, come up with a way to compensate the guy and help to get his site back up.
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flickimp is an opportunity
It's understandable. This sort of thing is a long-standing sore spot and it's easing to get the pot to boil over. Although I think it's obvious that the response to a lynch mob should not be another lynch mob, it feels important to point that out at this time.
But there's a larger point: we have an opportunity here. Flickimp has discovered that the "obvious" truth is not always the truth, and that things aren't always so black and white as our emotions may lead us to believe.
He could become one of us. By "one of us" I mean a content producer who recognizes that many content producers are irrational on this subject and believe things that just aren't true. For instance, it's not true that we want to steal content. It's not true that all unpaid use is unfair. It's not true that we somehow hate artists. It's not true that copyright enforcement trumps all other considerations. It's not true that only pirates have something to lose in this battle.
Just thinking out loud here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Flickimp is an opportunity
I don't want to be one of the bad guys
I'm always looking to help the underdog
Again ... This is not an excuse, but last week due to personal matters re: my wife, I was in a bad place and I made a mistake in understanding Lendink's FAQ.
I have no issue with Content Producers... I just got it totally wrong.
I am an indie writer, who creates indie art for free (no charge) to some sites. I'm all about good sharing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Flickimp is an opportunity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I didn't contact another site or take up action.
Lendink can hopefully find out exactly who actioned notices against them. It was not me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
it sucks, you made a mistake, a horrible mistake, take it as a life lesson.....pissing off the internet is bad.....
thankfully for myself, I have been around since the net was very young and I know better then to do things this stupid that will draw the ire of a wide swath of the net......
fear not the threats, they are just being dont to "fuck with the noob" as it where.....
what you could look at doing, and im not joking here, is start a donation drive to help Lendink get some better hosting.....that would show your remorse and would help this fellow out.....it may also cool some of the ire directed at you and direct it at those who did directly attack and threaten him.
the ONLY way your going to come out of this in better shape then your in now is to do something impressive to turn things around.....sorry but thats a fact.....you made a huge horrible mistake and screwed up somebodies life...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
it sucks, you made a mistake, a horrible mistake, take it as a life lesson.....pissing off the internet is bad.....
thankfully for myself, I have been around since the net was very young and I know better then to do things this stupid that will draw the ire of a wide swath of the net......
fear not the threats, they are just being dont to "fuck with the noob" as it where.....
what you could look at doing, and im not joking here, is start a donation drive to help Lendink get some better hosting.....that would show your remorse and would help this fellow out.....it may also cool some of the ire directed at you and direct it at those who did directly attack and threaten him.
the ONLY way your going to come out of this in better shape then your in now is to do something impressive to turn things around.....sorry but thats a fact.....you made a huge horrible mistake and screwed up somebodies life...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Authors who go on witchhunts like this are not worth my time or shelfspace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not loaded...I struggle to make ends meet myself.
If he's happy to accept something from me, then I will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Nasty and threatening emails or comments will be forward to the police and FBI as HATE mail to face full enforcement of the law!!!
If the site shut down, that was NOT MINE CHOICE - I don't have that authority. Only the owner and host have such authority."
First the bitch takes credit, now she denies it and runs and hides like the cur she is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
List of authors?
so I can promptly go out and spreads their books to as many places as I can...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: List of authors?
Though we have a few problems trying to burn cyber books. Somehow loading a bunch of files onto a hard drive and formatting them doesn't seem as fun. Also, you can't roast marshmallows over it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: List of authors?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: List of authors?
thats what I Have so far, if anybody has more info to add, please join and post, (its my site) if you let me know your from techdirt, i will bump your post count to get rid of the capcha per post(bot blocker)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
other sites
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: other sites
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Baseless legal threats are frowned upon and if they managed to get a lawyer to do it for them its gonna be funny.
This highlights why people mock the entire DMCA system, you can use it to destroy a site for no good reason. And even though there are supposed to be punishments for its misuse, when is the last time anyone anywhere managed to get that to happen? This could be the first time, and it should be Epic.
I'd love to see copies of each and every notice, just to compile the names of people to never purchase from again. I wouldn't want them to see me reading one of their books on my tablet and decide I stole it and attack me in public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not An Angry Mob/Concerned Authors
Also, my ebooks are in the KDP Select Program, which you mentioned. Why is there an Amazon Prime Members designation at all, if those members could just borrow an ebook from a site like LendInk rather than pay to join the Prime program? Authors in the Select program get money from borrows by Prime members, but if someone else tries to borrow one of their books from any other site, I am not sure it would be allowed by Amazon, as supposedly only Prime members are able to get them through Amazon's Lending Library.
I doubt if anyone set out to take LendInk down--at least, I did not. I definitely had concerns, though, and still do, at the very least because I think that what is in print at Amazon in their legalese about loaning Kindle books is not really the same where KDP Select books are concerned, for the reasons I mentioned. Why have the Prime program at all, or the KDP Select one, if ebooks can be "borrowed," elsewhere other than through the Lending Library by Amazon Prime members?
Also, though I am not accusing anyone at LendInk of this, but one post at an Amazon forum mentioned that there's a possibility the people who operated the site were engaged in phishing. This may/may not turn out to be the truth, but either way, raiing the possibility or other concerns authors have, legitimate or not, does not mean that they're some angry mob with pitchforks, as you suggest.
Anyone who tries to illegally shut down a site, as it appears some people did, should be dealt with like any hackers might be--but, as far as authors shutting down the site, the ones with legitimate concerns, whatever you or April has written--I know you both have written quite a bit about this, as I've emailed April as well--I feel you are both writing in very hyperbolic terms in your characterizations of authors and their intents, and should have perhaps just said, if anything, "a handful of authors may have carried their concerns too far."
LendInk's site seems to be up today, or at least partially. I havne't checked yet to see if they have removed my ebooks from their site, as I requested that they do. And, Amazon also suggested, if a different email, to ask Lendink to have your ebooks withdrawn from their site, if you don't want them to be there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not An Angry Mob/Concerned Authors
What you and every single person that has sent me emails and called my phone making threats fails to understand is that Lendink DOES NOT lend your property to anyone. We are not taking business away from you or any other person or entity.
All of the lending took place on Amazon or Barnes and Nobles. All Lendink did was provide the two parties interested IN YOUR BOOK a link back to Amazon or Barnes and Noble. NO TRANSACTIONS OCCURED ON LENDINK.
If you receive money from book lends from the Amazon Prime Service then you get the money from books shown on Lendink. If we are guilty of anything, it is the promotion of your book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not An Angry Mob/Concerned Authors
Wow...you STILL haven't figured out that LendInk did not lend ANYTHING? Everything took place on Amazon... Incredible.
I can't speak to you, but your "anyone" doesnt really pass the sniff test. Follow the links in the article to the various thread were people were encouraging others to report this site and spread the news. Clearly they wanted this pirate scourge gone.
Now that it's clear it was legal and people were ignorant of the facts people seem to be backtracking and saying I didnt take it down. Puh-lease....
Again you miss the point of what happened here. They tried to LEGALLY take down the site. As they believed it was a pirate. The fact that they could accomplish this goal when it was obvious to most dis-interested parties that it was a BS situation is a big deal. You can't have the angry mob be judge jury and executioner.
Wow..just wow. Your books aren't on the site. No one's books are on the site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not An Angry Mob/Concerned Authors
Then why mention it, other than to try and add another justification to the rabid attacks on his site.
ZOMG TECHNOLOGIES WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND AND REFUSE TO LOOK AT, IT MUST BE WITCHCRAFT BURN IT!
The site is up because after the merry band of moronic writers were done, people actually looked at that the site did and saw, oh hey these entitled asses didn't look or understand the system they called out as stealing from them.
YOUR BOOKS ARE NOT "ON" HIS SITE THEY NEVER WERE, even after the explanations your still an idiot.
IF YOU WANT HIM TO STOP PROMOTING YOUR WORK TELL AMAZON AND YOUR PUBLISHER TO BLOCK LENDING OF YOUR TITLES. LOCK YOUR WORKS DOWN, AND DECLARE WAR ON POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS.
Sit back and relax in the smugness of maintaining complete control over your works and sink into obscurity.
You spend much time minimizing your involvement, and downplaying the torches and pitchfork attack on a perfectly legal site, and still go out of your way to make it look like it had to be nefarious in some way so you can justify what was done.
All the site did was allow people stupid enough to purchase your work, loan their copy of it via the established lending program to people who were dumb enough to think you were worth reading. Lending works better when you can connect the people who have, with the people who want. The site filled that role. The horrible "crime" of lending out a book.
Everyone else - forgive my use of caps, but I'm pretty sure I had to yell so this moron could hear me over how "awesome" he is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not An Angry Mob/Concerned Authors
It really really amazes me that, in this day and age, so many authors still think they have the right to dictate whatever they wish, based on some wrongly perceived "intellectual property". You want to have absolute control over your "creation"? Fine: don't ever release it, EVER! Keep it locked in the attic! But if you instead want to make business with it, then at least LEARN the rules (which are horrendously tilted in author's favor, but well...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You really should take the time to understand the difference between Kindle Lending and the Kindle Owners' Lending Library.
Kindle Lending: A customer who has purchased an ebook with Lending enabled can loan the book to one other person for 14 days. During this time, the book is no longer available on the original customer's Kindle or Kindle apps. After 14 days, the book is returned to its owner's library and the person it was loaned to no longer has access to it. All KDP books on the 70% royalty plan are available for lending. Authors at the 35% rate can opt out if they choose. All of this stuff is presented clearly in the Terms authors agree to when signing up to publish through KDP. Authors do not receive any money from these book loans. Any Amazon customer can loan a loanable ebook they've bought, regardless of whether they are a Prime subscriber. Anyone else can also receive a loan, again regardless of Prime subsription. Websites like LendInk never needed to be authorized by Amazon for loaning privileges, because they never were doing the loaning. They were simply acting as a social network for people wanting to do legitimate loans to find one another.
Kindle Owners' Lending Library: Once a month, any Prime customer who also owns a Kindle device may borrow one eligible title. They cannot loan this book to anyone else, and they can keep it until they borrow another book, or forever if they never borrow again. Authors receive some small portion of a shared fund in exchange for being Amazon-exclusive for 90 days and letting Amazon loan their book out.
With the first program, true customers of yours who have actually spent money on your book (unless your book was free to begin with), are loaning your book out. With the second, Amazon is loaning your book out whether anyone has ever actually bought it or not.
I'd rather have those paying customers myself, people who liked my cover and blurb and sample and reviews enough to put their own money up for it. And if they all loan it out? I'm totally fine with that. That they still even have the book to loan means they didn't avail themselves of Amazon's generous return policy, so they probably found my book worth owning... or at least not so horrible that they'd demand their money back.
Another thing to keep in mind with KDP Select: Since Select authors can (and many do) make their books free for up to 5 out of 90 days, many readers are content to simply add these books to a watch list and wait for the free days. Authors participating in KDP Select are basically telling everyone, Prime and non-Prime customers alike, that their books aren't worth paying for. As well as telling Nook and other ereader owners, "I don't care about you enough to make my book available to you right now." It's a horrible, horrible program. Most authors I've known who've done it have sworn off ever doing it again. If it works for you, more power to you, but good luck succeeding long-term with a program that does everything it can to reduce your chance of selling any books.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is My Bitchfork, there are many like it but this one is mine.
Meanwhiles... your self serving "Authors Guild" pissants are on my DO NOT BUY FROM EVER list.
You just suicided your sales. Major FU!
My books, I own them.
No Bookstore/vendor nor the author can take them away from me.
I can loan them to whomever I wish for however long I wish and the author can go pound sand.!..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is My Bitchfork, there are many like it but this one is mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some authors understand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Some authors understand
word of mouth, as anybody in business can tell you, is the best advertising.
just an idea, also the guy who started all this may want to consider the same idea......if he reads this, he could at least try and earn some good will to counter the bad.
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Some authors understand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Some authors understand
Your comment lead me to check out what you write. It sounds good (in a genre I like), so I've bought one. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You missed everything important, you missed the end of the debate and you posted 3x at once.
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
you dont want to join or help out, thats fine.
yeah i noticed it multi posted....meh, shit happens.....if it was forum software i would just edit the posts to remove the duplicates.....buts not so i cant.
and i read the whole page and responded as i went down.....again dont like it.....not my problem.....hell your even more then welcome to not like me.....its not like the opinion of one asshole on the internets going to destroy my self worth...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirate?
Personally I look to the day a 'lock' can be put on them where they can only be lent one or two times and the copy can no longer be transfered.
Lending may not be piracy but its a fine line and either way the author, editors and publishers are the losers.
It isn't right. Nor is it right to lend songs or music. Same principle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
It's exactly this attitude that constantly gets in the way when creators try to attract the audience. Don't put me into that category, I do buy what I like even if I already have it for free. Yet the creators don't differentiate between people. Like it's been pointed out repeatedly on this blog - if the creators automatically consider everyone a pirate anyway, why bother proving them wrong?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
You do realize that anyone with a decent scanner can make a personal copy of a borrowed physical book, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
This is acceptable use in accordance with your contract.
You are just a self righteous idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
I'm an author as well, but I also work in the technology field and write for Techdirt, so trust me when I tell you how ridiculously wrong you are about how lending eBooks works. eBooks CAN be returned through Amazon's lending DRM, and in fact that is exactly what occurs after 14 days. Libraries are also beginning to lend out eBooks under a similar platform.
Your comment smacks of someone who would think that libraries are a detriment to your income. They are NOT. They facilitate purchases through borrowing and expanding reach, culture, and interest.
You're wrong. Really wrong, on this one, in fact, and thinking like yours got a legitimate business shut down. Please stop doubling down on incorrectness and learn about the things you're choosing to speak of before you help harm anyone else...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
Let me just say this: YOU CAN'T READ !!!
Proof:
You say:
> IF you lend an e-book you can't give it back
> when you are finished reading it. However you
> can give it to someone else and they can then
> give it to others. This 'lending' can go on forever
If you actually could read, even at a very basic level of reading skill, you would know this is not true about Amazon's ebooks.
So either (1) YOU CAN'T READ, or (2) you don't tell the truth.
Sorry to be so blunt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
It explains how lending works and how the lender does NOT have the book when they lend it (just like a physical book being lent).
As for why would you lend them? So others read them and maybe like them and maybe buy your next book or other books. That's how a lot of sales of books happen, word of mouth and lending (libraries included).
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120807/21080519958/legit-ebook-lending-site-taken-d own-angry-twitmob-writers.shtml#c2399
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
It isn't right. Nor is it right to lend songs or music.
Wow, really? Are you going to chop off the ears of people who crowd around the same radio?
You deserve every little bit of backlash that you get.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
Those of use who are readers know that if we don't support authors, they won't keep writing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
Amazon and B&N had you sign a contract, in that contract it allows for lending for a limited period of time.
During that time the person who purchased the book is unable to read it, as it is loaned out to someone else. When the time of the loan expires it goes back to the original person.
Your failure to comprehend this simple idea time and time again seems to be the problem. You are so terrified you might miss out on a couple of dollars your blind to the benefits of having your book seen by more people.
In your overzealous pursuit of these "lost dollars" that are in fact imaginary, your creating a name for yourself. And it isn't very good, I see you as an author who feels entitled to call me a thief if I use the perfectly legal and AUTHORIZED BY YOU lending feature.
This makes me care less about anything you have to write or offer for sale in the market. You have decided that I have to be a pirate trying to steal from you, because I want to see the book to make sure it is something I would enjoy first. This means you are actually going to lose money, because I am not alone in feeling this way. Because of your you must be a pirate for using something I authorized, I will never see anything you have written. I will never decide I like what you write and purchase the book to show how much I liked it. I will never buy the next book you put out, or the next, or the next. You will be one of those sad authors who never develops a fanbase.
Enjoy getting your stories locked down, it means fewer people will hear of you, know about you, or even care you wrote something new. Your going to be one of those authors who thinks they don't need consumers, it is really very hard to make ANY money when no one buys what you offer because your reputation proceeds you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pirate?
Seriously?? You mean, if I have a bicycle, and my buddy or neighbor or co-worker or a complete stranger wants to borrow it, and I let them, that should be a crime??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
I heard all the same hand-wringing pompous arguments by shut-in zealots over Napster ten years ago, and although that is now gone, cheap assholes the world over have any number of sites enabling them to "borrow" music, and indeed anything else, without paying for it, so stop freaking out and wait a few days for all the replacement book theft sites to spring up. Jesus O' Toole will still have his "poor little me" T-shirt and whining business to keep him busy. You ARE all proudly wearing your martyrdom support T-shirts as you feverishly beat at your keyboards with your flippers aren't you? Careful you don't bite that tongue now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
I'm not sure what you're trying to say exactly through all that hatred and bitterness you're spewing...
As for lending and borrowing things... You're wrong.
It's true that you can't do everything you wish with things you buy these days. But the thing is, yes, I can lend you that DVD I bought the other day. And I don't need your permission. As for that awesome book I read and want you to read? Yeah, guess what? I can grab the paperback and let you borrow it. Even Ebooks can be loaned out to a friend or family member. Maybe, later, they'll buy a copy too. Or I'll just give them my copy. OH WAIT. To you that would be a lost sale, huh?
Why can't you see it as a possible new fan that will buy all your books?
And if you feel that there is no way to stop piracy, why not just let it stop making you so angry and find a better way to deal with it? You CAN'T stop piracy. But guess what, if people love what you write, you will have fans to support you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
*Huge sigh of relief* -- was about to burn my copy of A Spaniard in the Works....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
People really ought to have do the moron test before they are allowed on scintillating forum threads such as this. Now, I'm just off to finish my latest novel, which, I expect, many people will buy, or borrow from the Amazon lending library, or take the opportunity of getting for free should I chose to do a free promotion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
The analogy does work. Why? Because the people that were choosing to loan their books out had bought the books fair and square, and with them, the right to loan the book out once to anyone they chose to.
Not as many times as they wanted, they could only loan the book ONCE.
In other words:
You sold your bike to a person.
That person then allows someone else to borrow it for a couple of days.
You jump up and down in anger because of it.
But they have the RIGHT to let someone borrow it.
I don't understand this attitude I've seen in authors lately. "I wrote the book. It's mine. MINE, DAMMIT."
So let me get this straight, none of these authors ever borrowed a book from the library? They never borrowed a single book from a friend? They never gave a book to a friend? They never borrowed concepts from other places? Never? Seriously? Every book they ever had in their possession was bought? I thought the purpose of writing was for creating other worlds and sharing it with as many people as possible.
It makes me sad. I love to read. But if the people that are creating these worlds are turning into this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate?
Do you really live your life this way? Do you never borrow books from friends or libraries? Do you never read magazines in a doctor's waiting room?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pirate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The new Righthaven?
Could he get them to host the site?
Just a thought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please don't judge us all by a vocal set!
Brenna
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Please don't judge us all by a vocal set!
Those of us trying to talk sense were ignored. The damage is done, but I can only imagine how I would feel if what was done to Dale had been done to me. It truly makes me ill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ebook sites spreading the word
http://www.romancenovelcenter.com/forum/po.php?forumID=17&ID=484&page=1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think there's a joke about this. "I am not a reader, I'm a writer!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Took my post-it and went out and bought hard copies of every book, those not stocked I bought where available online.
Every book for every author on my torch list got the lowest review score possible where it was an option.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
didn't the site link back to amazon so people can buy the ebook?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Author Confusion / LendInk
We started getting angry emails from confused authors a few days ago and I eventually tracked it to the pile-on on the LendInk Facebook page and some of Amazon's forum pages.
Out of the 5 authors who sent DMCA notices, we only heard back from two or three when we responded to set the record straight. One wouldn't back down while the other two engaged in a nice dialogue about lending, lending rights, Amazon and our role in all of this as a lending site.
What I've learned is that there is a ton of confusion. I think this is partly Amazon's fault, partly the fault of authors who don't understand the contracts they're signing and, of course, partly the fault of sites like ours.
My take is that authors didn't understand something, they over-reacted, and that was compounded by the fact that the site that was the at the center of the storm was largely unresponsive to DMCA notices and concerns. I appreciate that the owner of LendInk hadn't been actively working on the site for some time prior to the controversy, but it can't be comforting (as an author) to have concerns go unanswered.
Calming the situation down (for us) really was as easy as a detailed response laying out what our site offers and explaining to authors that they need to look closely at the agreement that they signed with Amazon.
It's worth noting that blaming LendInk's host for caving is a bit unfair: If the site owner wasn't able to respond to complaints and legal takedown notices, the host has little choice but to act.
Of course, there will always be authors who feel that the lending license is limited to "one lend, to a personal friend" but we don't think that's a reasonable restriction on a license that a customer paid for. Authors who don't like the idea that their fans can lend a book to anyone, if it comes with a lending license, should turn lending off. It's as simple as that. Leaving the option on but having unrealistic expectations about how it'll be used (legally) seems an awful lot like an author wanting to sell a book with an added perk with the expectation that their customers will never get any actual use out of that perk.
With that said, we at Lendle have always been eager to talk with authors about lending, about the future of the industry, and about how lending sites (like ours, and like LendInk) can actually be a great help to indie authors. We've never really found a great forum for opening that dialogue despite our best efforts, but anyone who wants to get in touch should feel free to do so.
Still, I sure hope that the authors involved in this dust-up have learned something, will use a little more common sense and restraint, and avoid letting others do their thinking for them in the future. I'm glad to see that a few are here expressing regret about the way things went down and hopefully we can avoid any further efforts at intimidation which isn't any better than the original reaction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Author Confusion / LendInk
You see cause they LIED in a legal document.
Misguided or not, they violated the law.
How would one respond to a DMCA notice demanding you remove content that is not actually there to be removed? How does one prove a negative?
They want special rights not actually in their contracts, and the right to demand people who are acting legally but in a manner they dislike be silenced.
If they wanted the right to control who can lend to whom they need better contracts, barring that they need to politely STFU.
If you scroll back in this thread you can find authors still claiming special rights and piracy even after it has been explained over and over to them. One went so far as to repeat accusations of bad behavior and ill intent on the part of the website, he tries to couch it in I'm not saying this but I heard. I'm not sure if its slander or liable, but he is repeating an untruth designed to damage the reputation of a business that he dislikes, all the while clinging to the the idea that the site is still somehow illegal.
I think you should take the list of the authors who went torches and pitchforks and remove them from your site, instead leave a message telling people who might have been interested that this author thinks that customers who want to borrow or lend books are thieves and you refuse to support them.
They got really angry over the "loss" of imaginary dollars, maybe they will get really humble over being publicly shamed and hey they get their way, no one will lend or borrow their books which means their sales will slump because people will be unable to see if its writing they would enjoy reading. They can be content fading into obscurity with a tight grip on their masterpiece.
They can't read their own contracts, they can't read the terms clearly spelled out on a website, and ruined someones good name all on the basis of them being to stupid to read... if they fail at basic reading and comprehension why would you suspect they can write anything you'd want to read?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stolen from slashdot
To save all of you the trouble, here's the moblist so far on the facebook link:
Robin Helm, OG Tomes, Buck Stienke, Ken Farmer, Dawn Sinclair, Joyce Godwin Grubbs, Tony Riches, Rebecca Treadway, Lisa Kz, Mari Passananti, Melody Peugh, Stephen Dafoe, Karen Kennedy Samoranos, Gerry Huntman, Rhea Rhodan, Kai Starr (Kaichi Satake), Anne Barnhill, Vicki Batman, James F. Ross, Scarlet Hunter, Alisha Paige, Merris Hawk, Cathie Dunn, Roscoe James, Trish Marie Dawson, Mark Patton, Sandra Peddle, Bill Wilbur, Rachel Lyndhurst, Melinda Hammond, Chrystalla Thoma, David Naughton-Shires, Electa Scott Graham, Kate McCormick, Seumas Gallacher, Juliet Cardin, Benita Brown, Julie Parker, Jenny Woodall, Pam Mangol Bitner, Liz Ringrose, Anne Polhill Walton, Lesley Cookman, M.m. Bennetts, Gerry Huntman, Prue Batten, Chrystalla Thoma, Karl Jones, Anna Jacobs, Deborah Gafford, Nely Cab, Tessa Berkley, Nan O'Berry, Sharon Cathcart, Lauren Gilbert, Naty Matos, Tory Michaels, Cerian Williams Hebert, Karen Cino, LaVerne Clark, Erin Dameron-Hill, Kissa Starling, Emily Harvale, Rosalind Smith-Nazilli, Seumas Gallacher, Paula Martin, Melanie Pearce, Jeanette Baird Vaughan, Trace Rybarczyk Broyles, Trevor Belshaw, Pam Howes, Deb Harris, Gayl Taylor, Nanette Del Valle Bradford, Ella James, Raven McAllan, Linda Gillard, Jenny Woodall, Virginia McKevitt, Morticia Knight, Judith Arnopp Novelist, Heather Nelson, Ruth Watson-Morris, Rebecca Rynecki, Victoria Pearson Writer, Maxi Shelton, David J Howe .... and a whole lot more I'm sure but Facebook refused to load the messages any further.
Special mentions go to :
Aimée Reinhart Avery (belittling posters), Renaissance Romance Publishing (yes, a publishing house that cannot be bothered to investigate), Shawn Lamb (unremorseful), Danielle Yockman (abusing/belittling posters esp. with comments like "Doubt you would've bought a copy anyway. *shrugs*")
Authors who apologised:
Jennifer Hanning
Authors who actually took the time to investigate and found no wrongdoing:
Michele Poet, Philip Catshill, Shanon Nowell
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The irony
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The apology is great.
But a good idea Flickimp for you to try out is perhaps going and actively contacting other authors who took part in the hate against the site and explaining to those who still think incorrectly about what the site actually does what it actually does. Then, getting together with those who like you realized their mistake and each of you issuing a very public apology. Not just saying, "Sorry." But saying something like, "I overreacted and misinterpreted based on false assumptions on my part what the site actually does. In doing so, I actively aided in the shutting down of a legitimate and useful website. I would like to hereby apologize to users of the site, and most especially to Dave for any and all harm caused by this. And I actively would like to encourage those who do purchase my books to try out the LendMe feature and share my book with other users on this site using said feature." Something like that. Then perhaps going a step further and, again, with other remorseful authors, seeing what Dave needs to get the site up and running again. If he needs a few bucks, send them his way. If he says I'd like you and all the other authors to write a post for my site endorsing it, and also stating quite clearly what this site does (so that other authors with misconceptions can see that we DO NOT host "pirated" copies of any of their books), as well as pointing out that any "sharing"/"lending" is being done WITH YOUR EXPRESS CONSENT, per your agreement with Amazon. Then you go ahead and do that too.
That would go a long way towards making amends.
Also, again, I'm sorry about any threats you received. That is most unfortunate. Report them to the proper authorities, but I'd just blow them off for the most part. I'm almost certain it's just people talking out of their a$$ for the most part.
If I was a bit rude yesterday or seemed like I was trying to make your apology seem like nothing at all I apologize. But I mean it's common sense that our words do have very real consequences. A simple tweet can get around the world in minutes and can cause very real harm and damage. Sometimes, it helps to take a step back and think before you hit submit or enter or whatever. You don't seem like a bad guy though.
As for the other authors posting, Brenna I like. She approached the situation correctly. The one idiot still thinking the site host copies of his work... sigh. There's no hope for that guy and it's quite sad to see that an author, who is someone who should be able to read (as you know, their occupation requires it), still cannot get it through their head, despite all the information on this, that there are no copies at all on the site. You sir are an idiot, just wanted to put that out there. As for the other author, Sheila, thinking lending is wrong and costing her money. Sigh again. Lending is inherently a good thing. In this case, people are lending with your permission. No copies are being made at all. So like the other author, I say to you that you're an idiot.
Just my two cents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As a mindless mob, they broke it.
As a unified group, they need to fix it, kind of like they way the Amish build a barn in about 10 hours through organization and teamwork.
That would be acceptable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rabble are easily roused.
The sort of people who go so far as to make physical threats whether over a demonstrably untrue allegation (that LendInk was engaging in piracy) or over a demonstrably true allegation (that people were falsely alleging that LendInk was engaging in piracy) tend to be pretty much the same rabble. Whether the grievance is justifiable or not isn't really important, they just get off on making the threats.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If I have one complaint about the article
The article quotes a post on Kindle Boards. (The in-story link doesn't work, and here is the correct one: http://www.kindleboards.com/index.php/topic,122064.0.html ) I agree that the quote was an ugly and unprofessional one. What the article seems to imply is that the post was what ALL of the posts on Kindle Boards was like. Since I post there and posted on the thread in question, I can tell you that is not the case.
Yes, this is self-serving because I don't like being tarred with the same brush as those who went after the site. But there were authors out there trying to talk sense. Author Amanda Brice almost immediately after the thread was posted there commented: "It is NOT piracy. They are simply acting as a go-between..." I made the brief comment (before later getting pretty snarky on the topic): "I permit lending of my books. The site also links to Amazon to buy it. Most people find new authors by borrowing their books either from a friend or from a library. I consider this nothing more than an extension of that."
Please understand that not all authors believe in lynch mobs or took part in the twitter assault. I still see some authors defending their actions in this. I have withdrawn from one authors forum where I was a longstanding member over it. But... seriously, not all of us were guilty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If I have one complaint about the article
The article does nothing of the sort. Many of the other quotes used in this article are taken from the Kindle Boards, where writers and publishers were stepping in as a voice of reason. Scan the post a little closer and you'll see I even called out Amanda Brice by name.
I've also posted a list of writers who were actively trying to stop the witch hunt: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120807/21080519958/legit-ebook-lending-site-taken-down-angry-twit mob-writers.shtml#c1880
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If I have one complaint about the article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If I have one complaint about the article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: If I have one complaint about the article
I actually found the Kindle Boards discussion to be one of the most level-headed. Shame about a couple of writers in there, but I really felt I needed to highlight that particular negative comment as indicative of how self-righteous some of the writers were in their "triumph."
Twitter's where everything was pretty much one-sided, but what works better at 140 characters? Broad accusations or nuanced dialog? So it was what it was.
Once again, I'm sorry if I came off as hostile. At the point I wrote that, I probably was, but it certainly wasn't your fault.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: If I have one complaint about the article
Because they are good sweet innocent people, and it is unfair to point out they were in a lynch mob based on rumor and innuendo rather than actually spending the time to look into the issue themselves.
They were just protecting their property from legal uses, and how dare anyone challenge their absolute right and control of their product, I mean people who bought it thinking that they have the right to loan it out like was advertised.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If I have one complaint about the article
On top of being upset about what happened, I also feel defensive because I don't want to be judged to have people think all indie authors are like that. Then throw in that I don't feel that I did enough, because I didn't realize until it was too late how hostile things had gotten on Twitter. That doesn't make for cool judgement when reading and posting about this nasty affair.
I do think the KB discussion was one of the better ones because a number of authors were explaining the true nature of the situation and some of the others were listening. I resigned from one forum in quite a bit of heat where authors who were part of the mob action continue defending what they did. Like you, that angers me perhaps even more than what they did in the first place.
It has been a horrible week. What can I say, but thanks for posting about it so clearly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Author says no
Everything went as it should.
It listed my book, then told me the book I wanted wasn't available. At no time did it ask me to upload anything. I was satisfied that the site was on the up and up, but people wouldn't listen when I said so.
I posted all over the place on author loops, but it was like trying to push back the tide. Publishers posted "Leave the site alone" messages, but they weren't heeded either.
Ignorance isn't an excuse, it never was. I didn't know either, but I went and found out. It wasn't hard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-BitchForks!-
Sticking to dead trees seems to make the most sense; since those are MINE and I can loan them lend them, rip them up reorganize them or whatever I choose to do with them, as I so wish and all your publishing houses and authors guilds and whaterver can go pound sand. Nyah Nyah..!.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But Can't You See How it Happened
When I first became aware of lending sites listing my books, they immediately raised my Spidey antennae. But then I took time and educated myself. I even tried to get the word out on my own blog as to how lending sites are not pirate sites. (http://ninapierce.com/blog/lending-your-way-to-sales/) But the fact is, author's books are stolen every day. Right or wrong, authors are leary of any site (that's not an etailer) where their books are available. Frustration at losing income can make even the most diligent author react before reading the fine print.
I'm not defending actions, I'm just saying, I completely understand how all of this has come about. I understand the frustrations of readers who were legitimately lending/borrowing books and authors who are discouraged at the loss of royalties from sites that are pirating their work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But Can't You See How it Happened
To spend anytime on TechDirt one can learn that free isn't a dirty word, that people sharing can be amazing your your bottom line, and how you respond is reflected by your fans.
The torch and pitchfork set are going to have a wave of very bad reviews hitting them, and people might actually post the books to be pirated just to screw with them.
Authors are now hitting what hit the music industry in the 80-90s, where they were told they were losing huge chunks of cash to pirates and there were "studies" to back this up. The studies have been debunked time and time again, and while someone might download a track and not pay for that one track, if they like the artist they will acquire more over time legally.
I give you the case of Dan Bull, HipHop artist. He released a series of tracks on various sites and asked people to buy them. He also posted those tracks and more in a torrent on The Pirate Bay at the same time. A young independent artist with no label backing him charted quite highly... all while people could go to The Pirate Bay and download it all for free.
This is not to say that model will work for you, or another author. But the part that will work, is having a connection with your fans and treating them as people and not just parasites waiting to pounce and steal from you.
If your mindset is that if someone reads your book without having paid you in full is a horrible crime to humanity and they needs to be beaten... your not helping how you appear.
If your mindset is that well I'm not thrilled I didn't get paid, but hopefully they will buy my next book if they found my work good... the fans will respond. Did you know that some people who "pirate" ebooks often go back and legally purchase the books they enjoyed so they can keep the author writing? That some people who pirate ebooks sometimes find that content so annoying they just delete it, can you still think of them as a lost sale? Should you?
There is a sense of entitlement for people who "create" intellectual property, and they go on and on about the "entitlement" of the consumers... they seem to miss we are entitled, we pay them. If you treat us poorly we'll find someone else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But Can't You See How it Happened
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But Can't You See How it Happened
What income was lost?
I assume you live in a dwelling and not a cave?
Should I be paid every time you use it for shelter?
Should you need my permission to add a wall? Knock down a wall? Build an addition? Replace windows? Hammer a nail in MY wall?
Or do you think that if you bought a house, you may do what you will with it?
If you think no creativity is needed to build a house, build your own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But Can't You See How it Happened
Spiders don't have antennae.
I hope to God you don't write science fiction or fantasy if you can't get that basic fact right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But Can't You See How it Happened
Or you could submit it to a publisher who will do the marketing and protecting for you.
You can't take all of the benefits of self-publishing (quick payment, quick publishing, the ability to have micro-level control over every part of the process, etc), and then complain about all of the hard parts (marketing and protecting your books).
That is quite ignorant if you ask me. You want to have all of the best parts of self-publishing and traditional publishing and none of the worst parts of either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are being returned to publishers and distributors with a statement that he will no longer be carrying any of their works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lendlink
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lendlink
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lendlink
Considering how many of us on KB were defending LendInk, blaming KB seems a little self-defeating. A lot of the people there are very knowledgeable and try to get out correct information. You won't find people on KB defending this, unlike on some forums.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dictonary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You cannot register 'LendInk.com' and 'lendink.com' as different domain names.
It's going to be 'lendink.com'. A copycat site would be something like 'lend-ink.com'. Something so close to the original domain name that it could be easily confused for it.
Look above at the URL of this page: www.techdirt.com
That is how all domain names are shown in URLs. Lowercase letters.
S/he's trying to cover their butt by making such a claim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shawn Lamb
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:lSGXaLr6ZBEJ:allonbooks-thekingdomofallon.b logspot.com/2012/08/pirate-site-sunk-by-united-broadside.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&lr =lang_en%7Clang_fr
By the way for those who don't know URL name are case insensitive so writting LendInk.com or Lendink.com or lendink.com is the same...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comment taken out of context
"Up until now I was just getting fed up with folks listing my books on ebay, amazon and third party sites selling the createspace paperback version at highly inflated prices!"
It’s a shame that you didn’t quote the following line in the forum post –
“Which I find both clever and annoying.”
There was indeed some confusion over the lending of books – and some authors did indeed get worried. I love how all you guys say that misguided authors should have read the small print – the terms and conditions. Really? Did any of you really know all of the details of publishing on Amazon. Be honest did you really? I personally knew Amazon could lend my books – but had no idea third parties could.
Mob mentality has seemingly shut down Lending site – and now mob mentality is hitting any author who expressed an opinion about the whole thing.
Ask yourselves what is wrong with an author NOT wanting to participate in a third party lending site – whatever the Amazon T & C’s. If the owner of the site had added a simple ‘opt out option’ his site might still be trading.
I don’t agree with the authors who sent cease and desist notices – it was jumping the gun – and I really don’t agree with some of the book vigilantes on here who wish to destroy those said authors.
So far I have received one awful and personal review on Amazon by a ‘Greg Alexander’ and numerous attempts to hack my website. Why? Because I wasn’t sure third party lending of ebooks was a good thing. Please re-read my post and see that I actually thanked a fellow forum member for clearing the whole matter up.
So the mob is eating the mob and no one is winning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Comment taken out of context
The fact that I paid for your book means its mine and your wishes don't mean anything anymore.
It is this sense of control entitlement that is born out of the content cartels pretending it is morally wrong to share.
It is now my property, and if you've not prevented it I can lend the book out to my neighbor or random person on a website.
You can be against it all you want, but its legal and actively attempting to maintain control over something people have purchased makes you look like an entitled ass.
Consumers will reach the point where what you write is no longer worth having to deal with you popping in telling them the "rules" for how they are allowed to read your book.
This hysteria is over adding "on the internet" to something we've had in society for a very long time. Libraries.
Ebook lending is different from library lending how?
Other than it happens on the internet, it isn't really different.
Library Card vs Amazon Account.
Due Date w/ fines vs Amazon autoself destruct.
When a copy is loaned out, no one else can use it except the person who checked it out.
The hysteria is from authors feeling they have a right to be paid over and over when its loaned out.
Stephen King isn't on my doorstep when I loan out my copy of Carrie to a freind demanding his payment for me sharing the book I own.
What makes ebooks so special?
Oh it happens on the internet, so you gotta get paid and keep control.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Comment taken out of context
The site just allowed Person A, who bought your book, to make an offer to lend it to a person. Or for Person B to leave a request for someone to lend them a book. When a match was found, both Person A and Person B would have to go back to Amazon for the lending to actually take place, and Person A would lose access to the book for 2 weeks. Each book could only be lent once.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Comment taken out of context
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your quote: "I personally knew Amazon could lend my books – but had no idea third parties could."
You still don't have a clue about this, do you? Third parties CANNOT lend your ebooks. Neither LendInk nor any other company can lend your books. ALL lending took place on Amazon. These "lending" sites simply connected a legal purchaser, who had the right to lend a book, to a borrower. The actual lend then took place through Amazon, using the same process you would use to lend an ebook to your mother or friend.
There was no fine print that said something sneaky or contrary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cheapskates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cheapskates
Nice. I have a feeling people will remember that opinion even though it makes you a sad, pathetic person more than anything else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: cheapskates
(By the way, the cocksuckers I referred to are the ones involved in harassing authors and giving them dishonest bad reviews just because of some petty personal gripe. It's hardly an honourable way to conduct oneself now is it? And yes, they should all kill themselves. There'll be plenty more housebound intellectual midgets to take their place and keep these imaginary places alive with amusing and poorly punctuated piffle)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Extra chromosomes all round
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guilt by association?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Guilt by association?
Get over yourself. The photo was posted because:
1. Show, don't tell. I suppose I could have transcribed the entire twitsplosion into exciting words, but this conveyed what was happening much more quickly.
2. It preserves the moment. Often when something horrendous like this happens, the people involved attempt to give the internet selective amnesia by deleting posts and taking their twitter feed private. This helps us remember things exactly as they happened.
Her only comment appears to be perfectly affable to me and in no way hysterical or reactionary. I've just been looking through some other forums discussing this subject and found no mention of her, let alone any further contribution to this particular storm in a teacup.
OK...?? That's your particular witch hunt, not mine. I didn't post a list of names anywhere. I simply used a screenshot as an illustration. Read the lead-in to the photo again. And perhaps a third time.
By the way, your "mob" reference seems to be targeting the wrong side of the situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Would it possible for you to re read my original post that you quote in your article. You make out that I am trying to stop ebooks being lent (legal or not). If you read the post you will see that I am talking about being annoyed (and admiring) of the folks selling my Createspace paperback for inflated prices on ebay, Amazon etc. My book is £6.99 on Amazon - yet folks try and do sell it for £12 on ebay. It's not a second hand copy - it is the exact same copy a customer could buy on amazon direct. This is capitalism - it annoys me - but there’s little I can do about it.
Because of you quoting me out of context I have had numerous hack attempts on my website and a 1 star review on amazon calling me a ‘bad person’.
This is my original post:
Thanks for the explanation xxxxxxx - so as I understand it anyone could in theory open up a website re-lending kindle books? (and take a cut in the process)..
I still find it worrying that Amazon is happy to go along with this.
I for one am going to email the site owner - xxxxxx
and see if I can see if he will take my book down. (Doubtfull)
I tried to join the LendInk site to see what happens but firefox threw up lots of warnings! So I didn’t finish the registration process.
Up until now I was just getting fed up with folks listing my books on ebay, amazon and third party sites selling the createspace paperback version at highly inflated prices! – which I find both clever and annoying. Now it seems someone has found a way to make money from re lending the kindle eBooks.
The quote you use is about createspace paperbacks not eBooks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nick, he did not " take a cut in the process". There was no cut to take. The book had already been purchased when the owner would offer it for a one-time lending.
Yes, the site owner made a little money just the way a lot of people do. He was an AMAZON ASSOCIATE. Thousands and thousands of people are, including a lot of book reviewers. If you BUY a book from a link on their website, they get a small cut from Amazon (and NOT from the author). It costs the author nothing but gives them another conduit for sales so it is a good thing.
If you have a problem with Amazon Associates, TALK TO AMAZON ABOUT IT. Don't attack the small business people who make money through Amazon.
There is a very easy way to "stop books from being lent". Do not accept the 70% royalties that Amazon offers and opt out of lending. You'll lose money but... you won't have our books lent. Or go whining to Amazon and see how far that gets you since they know that lending works to our benefit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And the leader I used into your quote dealt with right of first sale, which is what I thought you were complaining about. Your mention of "folks listing my books on ebay, amazon" I took to mean people reselling used copies of your physical books, which is their right. I included the other part -- "and third party sites selling the createspace paperback version at highly inflated prices!" simply because ending a quote with an ellipsis is usually indicative of some heavy trimming. Keeping the "clever and annoying" really wouldn't have changed anything.
My apologies if this misunderstanding led to a one-star review (which you've had removed already) and as for the hack attempts, I've already stated how I feel about retaliatory action in an update attached to the top of post.
If your entire sentence was all about Createspace, then I'll alter to post to reflect that. I can't find you listed on any of the "hitlists" that I'm aware of, so at least there's that small consolation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now I don't think the owner was doing this purely out of the goodness of his heart. There had to be a reason for this site to make money. I don't know how as I missed the chance to join before it was taken down.
I am actually not against making an honest living - but some of the posts on here seem to think an author or creative shouldn't make a dime. A particular nameless commenter on Amazon seems to totally condone piracy on his blog - I'm pretty sure the same guy is on here. But as he chooses to remain anon I cant show the link.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It wasn't through the eBook lending program.
He had originally set up the website to be an Amazon affiliate. This is why all Amazon books were up there. There was a "Buy this book" link to the Amazon store, and if anyone followed that link and bought the book, Dale would get a (very small) payment. That's how Amazon affiliates work; there are hundreds of thousands of Amazon affiliate sites.
Unfortunately, right after he set up the site, Amazon dumped all their California affiliates due to California tax laws. So, he never ended up making any money from the site, other than banner ads (which pay almost nothing).
If you looked at a page for a book that couldn't be loaned, the option was grayed out. In any case, Dale did not make any money whatsoever from lending; all the site did was send both parties emails, so they could get in touch with each other, and loan books through Amazon or B&N directly.
some of the posts on here seem to think an author or creative shouldn't make a dime. A particular nameless commenter on Amazon seems to totally condone piracy on his blog
There is a huge difference between "condoning piracy," and thinking that authors or "creatives" shouldn't make a dime. If by "piracy" you mean "non-commercial file sharing," then it's not even remotely settled that piracy is responsible for a drop in sales (or an increase in sales, for that matter). It's certainly possible to condone piracy and hope for authors and "creatives" to earn more money.
There's also a big difference between advocating for file sharing and condoning piracy. For example: if I said "you should share your books on the Pirate Bay, you'd make more money," I would not be condoning piracy, nor wishing for you to earn less money.
On a separate note: If you're looking for reasons why nobody takes an "anti-piracy" stance seriously, the LendInk fiasco is a perfect example. These were not the actions of a group of authors who were legitimately concerned about their incomes. These were the actions of authors who are so frightened of the digital age, that the very mention of the p-word turned them into a lynch mob.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.digitalmediamachine.com/2012/08/what-happened-to-lendink-owner-explains.html
Get the story straight from the horse's mouth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Arthurs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Arthurs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heavy Metal Thunder
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Heavy Metal Thunder
My favorite pop group however, has to be England's www.kuntandthegang.co.uk
The lyrics to their greatest minor internet hit, "Men With Beards", I feel are particularly poignant here.
Men with beards, what are they hiding?
Could I handle the truth if they chose me to confide in?
Or would my dead body be found down a railway siding
Where I'd been murdered by a man with a beard
Murdered by a man with a beard
You can't work out what they're thinking in their face
Because they've got hair growing all over the place
You can't tell what they're up to, maybe it's best not to know
Perhaps they're full of hair up here
But they've got none down below?
Do they put porno mags in the bushes in the woods?
Do they interfere with kids
And make them say 'Thank you' afterwards?
Do they hang around in parks and wait till after dark
Jump out of the bushes and then f*ck you for a lark?
Men with beards, what are they concealing?
That facial fuzz gives me an uneasy feeling
But they'll hide my dismembered corpse up in the ceiling
When I've been butchered by a man with a beard
Butchered by a man with a beard
Shipman, Bin Laden, Stilgoe, Haystacks
They were all hiding something and that's an actual fact
'Whispering' Bob Harris - why was his voice so soft?
Had he murdered a prositute up in his loft?
Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper
He avoided the use of a razor or clipper,
They've all got a secret, it could be anything
And they're probably part of a paedophile ring
Men with beards, what are they obscuring?
They all seem so confident and so assuring
But to some waste ground you they will be luring
Where you'll be bludgeoned by a man with a beard
Bludgeoned by a man with a beard
Watch out for men with beards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great way to kill off a fan base
Even more annoying, the people who are complaining are probably the same ones who give away thousands of copies of their books a month for free under Kindle select.
As far as I'm concerned, its not piracy. Its free advertising and I'll take it. Hope you get your site back up somewhere Dale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great way to kill off a fan base
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LendInk Fundraiser
http://fundrazr.com/campaigns/9LiId
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: List of authors who
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/9LiId?psid=d12f4021fc0a4da39359aedbd1576f26
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]